rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.
#1

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

In the wake of the "not a blue wave" 2018 midterm elections (how is that for mixing metaphors appropriately) a new villain emerges. Actually, they were on the radar for a few years now but it is "white women" who are blocking the leftists from taking over, if you listen to leftists now.

And they are correct.

More to the point, it is white married women.

The exit polls confirmed one thing, an "educated" white woman will vite stupid. . er.. I mean Democrat.

Married women favour Trump but I have not seen a breakdown to the fine grain by race, education AND marital status.

To get back to my point, women who are strong, in control, make money, are routinely insulted if they are not leftists. Ann Coulter is not my cup of tea but she is smart and decent looking, not a land whale, and bitchus non gratis in any "feminist" circle.
Reply
#2

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

you mean Marxism.

two scoops
two genders
two terms
Reply
#3

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

One element of cultural subterfuge is the classification of feminism: i.e. first wave, second wave, third wave, fourth wave, etc. By labeling it as such, it encourages women to "choose their favorite wave". The result is that some end up describing themselves as feminist, because they don't want to discuss the specifics of the various classifications. So the end result has been accomplished - she just called herself a feminist and, subsequently, associated herself with a leftist, non-traditional faction.

It's the same as saying "I'm a third-wave communist" or "I'm a fourth-wave homosexual". Either way, you're still a communist or homosexual.

Thus, language is one of the principal arenas in which empires rise and fall. And something as mundane as nomenclature becomes a contributing factory in the demise of a people.

"Action still preserves for us a hope that we may stand erect." - Thucydides (from History of the Peloponnesian War)
Reply
#4

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

Suffragettes were terrorists






Quote:Quote:

Suffragettes plotted to assassinate Herbert Asquith, the Liberal prime minister, as part of their campaign to achieve votes for women, according to a file released yesterday at the National Archives.

Scotland Yard was warned that two members of the movement were perfecting their pistol shooting in the hope of killing Asquith as he arrived at the House of Commons. They were never caught.

The plot was disclosed by a Mrs Moore, a member of the Women's Freedom League who believed in peaceful protest and feared more militant campaigners were about to resort to extreme measures. She may have been the actress Eva Moore, a suffragist campaigner and friend of Asquith's sister-in-law.


In September 1909 she showed Det Insp Patrick Quinn a letter she had received outlining the plan, but refused to identify the author, even though she knew the woman had been attending a shooting range. The Home Office noted that the same range had been used by the Indian assassin Madar Lal Dhingra, who a few months earlier shot Sir William Curzon-Wylie, aide to the secretary of state for India.

Det Insp Quinn reported that the plotters were among women picketing the Palace of Westminster, adding: "Mrs Moore says she has been making efforts to restrain these women for some time past and has used her power to have them removed from the carriage entrance to the House of Commons, fearing that something would happen to Mr Asquith.

"But now she finds they are getting out of hand, and therefore she thought it best to inform the authorities."

The authorities discussed removing the suffragist picket camped outside the Palace of Westminster, but decided not to because they would have had to justify the act by making the plot public.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/...quith.html

Quote:Quote:

An early suffragette strategy focused on putting businesses, large and small, under financial pressure. This is why they smashed shop windows. As their reign of terror progressed, this extended to burning or bombing a total of 17 industrial premises, including a lino factory, a laundry, woodyards and freight yards. Imagine the livelihoods lost and the impact on families at a time when there was no welfare state.

More seriously, Portsmouth Dockyard was burned to the ground, killing two. While the suffragettes didn’t claim it, there was sufficient evidence for the New York Times to suggest that it was probably a suffragette attack.

They had a penchant for attacking sporting premises, believing this would particularly upset men. A ticking bomb was found at Oxted Badminton and Lawn Tennis Club in Surrey. The grandstand at Ayr racecourse was destroyed by fire – one of 17 sports grandstands which were targeted. Cricket pavilions and golf courses, changing rooms and refreshment stands, bowling greens and boathouses were damaged, set on fire or bombed.

Churches were another favourite because they represented the ‘patriarchy’.
St Paul’s Cathedral and Westminster Abbey were attacked as well as beloved parish churches. In all 32 churches were bombed or burned down, including one in Scotland dating back to 1100.

The suffragettes focused specifically on the ordinary citizen: ‘That private citizens should be affected is inevitable, for this is war, and in all wars it is the private citizen who suffers most,’ explained Emmeline Pankhurst.

To make ordinary people’s lives difficult, they targeted the railway network and communications via telegraph wires.

Underlying their tactics was a contempt for ordinary women and men. For example after suffragettes burnt down the tea-rooms at Kew Gardens the proprietor went to the Women’s Social and Political Union headquarters to complain on behalf of her employees who had lost their jobs. She was told that she was taking ‘too personal a view of the matter’ and that the staff would no doubt be glad that they had lent support to the women’s cause.

When Emily Davison found that fires in post boxes were going out too quickly, she turned to sulphuric acid and phosphorus. A number of postmen suffered severe lung damage or burns.

Emmeline is alleged to have said ‘no cat or canary should be killed’. She appears not to have had the same scrupulous concern for human life.

The earliest terrorist attack was at the Theatre Royal in Dublin. Petrol was scattered, fires lit and three bombs went off, all while the theatre was full. No one died but it suggests a serious willingness to risk human life. This attack was carried out by fully paid-up central organisers of the WSPU.
Many of the bombs were aimed at causing maximum destruction and it was only through sheer luck and incompetence that deaths did not result. A bomb planted outside the Bank of England would, if it had not been defused by a policeman, gone off in a busy commercial area mid-afternoon. A bomb at Lime Street station, Liverpool, was packed with nuts and bolts to maximise harm. A bomb containing 24 cartridges of gunpowder was placed in the toilets of a theatre to go off during a matinee performance. The congregation at St John’s, Smith Square, had to put out a bomb containing 5½lb of gunpowder. Another bomb was lobbed into a full Territorial Army barracks.

Suffragettes burned down a great many houses and mansions (96 if you include the hotels). If you were a prominent member of society who had spoken out against the suffragettes your house was particularly liable to be attacked. The fact that such houses often had domestic staff living in them, who were on occasion nearly trapped by the fires, did not cause the perpetrators concern.

There were assassination attempts. Prime Minister Herbert Asquith had a hatchet thrown at him when he was visiting Dublin. It missed but sliced the cheek and ear of John Redmond, leader of the Irish Nationalists. Potentially lethal letter bombs were sent to Lloyd George and Henry Curtis Bennett, the chief magistrate at Bow Street. When this was unsuccessful two suffragettes attempted to throw Curtis Bennett off a cliff at Margate.

The suffragette projects became increasingly sophisticated. One involved planting a large bomb at Windleden reservoir near Barnsley. Had they been successful the whole valley would have been flooded with consequent loss of life and livelihood. They also planted two bombs underneath the Loch Katrine Aqueduct which supplied half of Glasgow with water. Luckily the lit fuses burned out before detonation on both bombs, perhaps due to the bad weather.

As a result of their reign of terror the suffragettes were, unsurprisingly, loathed by the general public. Their membership massively declined and they were reduced to a small rump group of much-hated hard core activists.

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/hero...nd-simple/

Here is the book that documents the campaign of terror:
https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B00OZ3HUVA/r...uage=en_GB
Reply
#5

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

When you take a look at the genuinely fucked up rhetoric bandied about at pussy-hat marches you have to wonder what kind of atrocities we'd be neck-deep in now if women had the same guts that men do.

When not properly collared by the age of 18 they quickly turn into the most psychologically vile creatures you could imagine.

Whatever dark thoughts you've had on a bad day, I guarantee it's got nothing on what goes through a clinically lonely woman's head on a regular basis.

The public will judge a man by what he lifts, but those close to him will judge him by what he carries.
Reply
#6

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

Quote: (11-08-2018 08:39 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

When you take a look at the genuinely fucked up rhetoric bandied about at pussy-hat marches you have to wonder what kind of atrocities we'd be neck-deep in now if women had the same guts that men do.

Whatever dark thoughts you've had on a bad day, I guarantee it's got nothing on what goes through a clinically lonely woman's head on a regular basis.
I don't know and we shouldn't speculate either. Although I do think that western society in the time of those suffragettes and even now let women get away with murder and terrorism far too often.

None of the suffragettes that attempted assassination on a minister or tried to kill people in a theatre full of people or who committed arson were executed.

The early 20th century was a time when such murderers if female were only executed hesitantly and far more rarely than men and with much opposition.

Text is too long so here is the link:
https://unknownmisandry.blogspot.com/201...their.html

I believe proper Justice will ensure better functioning of women as well as men. When accountability for proper behavior and virtue are equal with women as well as men.

Because dark thoughts will not become reality when Justice is properly applied. And attempted atrocities will be properly dealt with as with a cancerous tumor.
Reply
#7

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

Quote: (11-08-2018 05:19 AM)66Scorpio Wrote:  

In the wake of the "not a blue wave" 2018 midterm elections (how is that for mixing metaphors appropriately) a new villain emerges. Actually, they were on the radar for a few years now but it is "white women" who are blocking the leftists from taking over, if you listen to leftists now.

And they are correct.

More to the point, it is white married women.

The exit polls confirmed one thing, an "educated" white woman will vite stupid. . er.. I mean Democrat.

Married women favour Trump but I have not seen a breakdown to the fine grain by race, education AND marital status.

I agree. That chart Roosh posted on the other thread basically highlights that racial demographics and single women are the two major headwinds working against conservatives.

Building a wall will help with the former but not with the latter.

[Image: PST_2017.05.15.intermarriage-01-10.png?w=308]
Reply
#8

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

I tend to agree that there is a general leftism/progressivism/Marxism/feminism that both seeks and maintains power by co-opting and altering the talking points of each individual group. They adopt the beliefs of each group only while it is useful and will discard said idea (and their supporters) the minute they no longer add to the power of the group (see: TERF feminists or gay libertarians). This leads to eating one's own, and can, in the worst cases, lead to a French Revolution effect - execution of the impure by the pure, who are, in turn, deemed impure and executed by the new pure.

One of the biggest issues with this group (not unique to them but very obvious) is that they are led by a demographically small cabal of absolute crazies. Some of the material they produce calls for insane practices to be put in to place - things that 90%+ of people do not and would not agree with. It the the case (per Taleb) of the minority dictating terms to the majority.

Where you run in to a unique problem with "leftism", in its current iteration, is in its acceptance - both the groups acceptance in society and those the group chooses to allow in to its ranks. The larger society in the West is currently willing to accept a group (as one of the major political/philosophical movers) that espouses obvious falsehoods ("Transgender women" are men. This is indisputable, biological fact.) But this may come from who is operating the machine on a lower level. I believe it was Jordan Peterson (sorry, I know) that said he surmised that many people with pre-existing psychological and psychiatric issues were drawn to radical leftist groups like Antifa, because the behavior of those groups mask their underlying pathological behavior (like a desire to, say, scream at random people and hit them). I agree with that idea. I think many people (again, in the lower levels) who work with these groups may actually be suffering from mental illness.

How this will be dealt with is currently a matter of much speculation. But, history would tell us that the pendulum always swings back. I fear that many of these people or their ideological descendants may meet with a rather expedient end (at some time in the future).

Currently out of office.
Reply
#9

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

How about simply being an Egalitarian? Freedom and rights for everybody?

And a general FYI for when people start claiming that feminism started off as a plea for equality...this was NEVER true. Early feminist leader Caroline Norton, creator of the Tender Years doctrine and all the monstrousities that have sprung from it stated early on that she she believed in a women automatically get custody/men automatically get serfdom form the very beginning.

Contrary to public belief, the law wasn't slanted in favor of men, it was slanted in favor of ...children. The most important thing the child needed was PROVISIONING - food, shelter, a roof over their head. The courts made sure that the parent most able to provide that got custody. This was usually the man, so the man got custody. The courts were trying to get away from monstrous things like slavery, serfdom, second class citizens and debtors prisons, and the feminists were pushing to bring these things back to control their ex-husbands.

It's amazing how much of this monstrous beuracracy simply disappears when you just give custody to the parent most capable of taking care of them.
Reply
#10

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

Feminism is just a tool for the usual suspects to achieve their political ends by sowing division and pitting goy against goy. It's no different from "class struggle" and other vapid divide and conquer tactics centered around homo propaganda, "racism," abortion etc. Just an interim strategy to separate white goys into divided camps as they build up the, er...final solution..of demographic displacement.

They care as much about respecting wahmen as they cared about the struggles of the proletariat in Bolshevik Russia. I seem to remember large chunks of the "proletariat" ending up in mass graves just months after Lev Bronstein et al took over in 1917. But there is no need to use historical parallels here, just look at how happy they are to let third world invaders run sex slave rings of adolescent white girls in the UK or rape with impunity in Germany to absolutely zero outcry. Compare that to the hysteria generated by the white frat rape at UVA, which would have been completely insignificant in comparison with the depravities of Muslims and Africans in Europe, even aside from the fact it didn't actually take place!

The funny thing is that feminism will go completely out the window once whites are a powerless minority and it is no longer necessary to play divide and conquer games among them. If "they" get to their desired end game, white women will be turned into literal sex slaves for themselves and their "minority" enforcers. We're gonna go from third wave feminism straight to oriental-style concubinage. This will also be the end of "body positivity," cause ain't nobody want no fat sex slaves. So there's that, I guess.
Reply
#11

There is no such thing as "feminism", there is just leftism.

Quote: (11-09-2018 12:16 AM)Higgs Bosun Wrote:  

The funny thing is that feminism will go completely out the window once whites are a powerless minority and it is no longer necessary to play divide and conquer games among them.

[Image: potd.gif]

It's not that funny, certainly ironic.

I always wonder if people around here truly think "white people" will vanish, though. There are far too many things unseen in history to be certain that anything will happen that is an extreme or foregone conclusion.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)