[TheScientist]

(10-29-2018 01:24 AM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 11:19 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

how are you at 31 years old matching with college aged girls on tinder?

I assume most 18-22 year old girls limit their target age to 25 maybe 28.

are you lying about your age on tinder or these young girls are targeting guys your age on there?

also, what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

Because to be honest I dont believe a 31 year old guy with an ugly face who is short is fucking 6s and 7s consistently even on tinder even if your body is amazing.

I've never seen a guy with that physical profile who fucks a lot of girls in nightclubs or social circle and I doubt online is that different.

A 7 to me is legit hot and a 6 is cute meaning you are not in any way scared to be seen in public with her? what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

I put my age as 27.

This is a 6:


This is a 7:


Online is much different than nightgame and social circle. If you haven't used it you don't really understand how powerful having a nice body is. These girls are looking for cock and they will go for the strongest attraction traits they see. Number one is having a nice face, but number two is body.

...your posts truly indicate that you need to get outside more and deal with reality on reality's terms. Sounds like you're spending a little too much time on that online business.

as i suspected you are lying about your age and overrating the girls.

that first girl is below a 6 meaning I would be embarrassed to be seen in public with her. i mean she has fat arms and squirrel face.

The girl you call a 7 is a 6.

and LOL, I need to deal with reality when you admit yourself you get no success outside of online?

so online is closer to reality then social circle and nightclubs where you say yourself you get no success?

I stand 100% by what I said; ive never in my life met or seen a short ugly guy no matter how muscular who consistently fucked even 6s and 7s.

[Captain Gh]

First Girl a 6???!? This is where training a Bitch applies! By spending merely 2 weeks on a treadmill... she's a legit 9! She obviously spends a bit too much time eating perfectly cooked steaks at her country club... and the right player would easily have that Shit corrected!

[Off The Reservation]

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

[pancakemouse]

(10-29-2018 09:09 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

You know, I had faith in this thread. I thought it was an interesting concept. But some guys just can't be helped.

Denial is an extremely strong defense mechanism.

[Repo]

To me first girl is a 5 absolute max, maybe a 4, I would cringe at seeing her naked. Second girl is somewhat debatable, I could see her from a 6 to 7, depending on your tastes and if she has ass or not.

[crispytaco]

Hi,
For the record, I'm 43 y/o and 5'7 and I've banged some 9's from time to time.

If I get $40k/m I'd do the following:
-Sponsor a local model show (catwalks).
- In the show, have the promoter to introduce you to the models, get the numbers for further shows.
- Rent a yatch or something like that and invite them to a super party with DJ and alcohol. Have them to invite female friends.
- Sudenly you have social proof/status
- Don't screw it up being arrogant
- Rinse / repeat / profit

[Kish]

(10-29-2018 10:06 AM)Repo Wrote:  

To me first girl is a 5 absolute max, maybe a 4, I would cringe at seeing her naked. Second girl is somewhat debatable, I could see her from a 6 to 7, depending on your tastes and if she has ass or not.

The first girl would be hot if she lost some weight. The second girl has a old woman face. Drops her rating to a 5 or 6 to me.

[Repo]

(10-29-2018 10:29 AM)Kish Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 10:06 AM)Repo Wrote:  

To me first girl is a 5 absolute max, maybe a 4, I would cringe at seeing her naked. Second girl is somewhat debatable, I could see her from a 6 to 7, depending on your tastes and if she has ass or not.

The first girl would be hot if she lost some weight. The second girl has a old woman face. Drops her rating to a 5 or 6 to me.

Yeah, but pretty much any girl would be hotter if they lost weight, but chances are she will just get fatter and sloppier.

[quaker13]

I'd swipe right on both girls and extend an invitation to the crib, but not meeting for drinks

[pancakemouse]

Keep in mind those were just random birds I pulled off of http://www.tind3r.com swiping after spending a few minutes on it. There are many different "types" of 6s and 7s. Many guys in the community have seen the actual girls I've slept with and agreed with my ratings. I actually think I'm quite a harsh rater.

[jordypip23]

(10-29-2018 02:34 AM)TheScientist Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 01:24 AM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 11:19 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

how are you at 31 years old matching with college aged girls on tinder?

I assume most 18-22 year old girls limit their target age to 25 maybe 28.

are you lying about your age on tinder or these young girls are targeting guys your age on there?

also, what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

Because to be honest I dont believe a 31 year old guy with an ugly face who is short is fucking 6s and 7s consistently even on tinder even if your body is amazing.

I've never seen a guy with that physical profile who fucks a lot of girls in nightclubs or social circle and I doubt online is that different.

A 7 to me is legit hot and a 6 is cute meaning you are not in any way scared to be seen in public with her? what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

I put my age as 27.

This is a 6:


This is a 7:


Online is much different than nightgame and social circle. If you haven't used it you don't really understand how powerful having a nice body is. These girls are looking for cock and they will go for the strongest attraction traits they see. Number one is having a nice face, but number two is body.

...your posts truly indicate that you need to get outside more and deal with reality on reality's terms. Sounds like you're spending a little too much time on that online business.

as i suspected you are lying about your age and overrating the girls.

that first girl is below a 6 meaning I would be embarrassed to be seen in public with her. i mean she has fat arms and squirrel face.

The girl you call a 7 is a 6.

and LOL, I need to deal with reality when you admit yourself you get no success outside of online?

so online is closer to reality then social circle and nightclubs where you say yourself you get no success?

I stand 100% by what I said; ive never in my life met or seen a short ugly guy no matter how muscular who consistently fucked even 6s and 7s.

There are always exceptions to the rule. Danny DeVito ain't no Brad Pitt or Leonardo DiCaprio but simply due to fame he probably could lay quite a few dimes if he wanted to.

[TheScientist]

(10-29-2018 09:09 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

no.

I'm sincerely grateful to everyone who has taken the time to make suggestions especially the people who wrote long posts.

that is NOT what corsega did so why should I thank him?

his comments have had nothing to do with the subject of this thread.

[TheScientist]

(10-29-2018 10:01 AM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 09:09 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

You know, I had faith in this thread. I thought it was an interesting concept. But some guys just can't be helped.

Denial is an extremely strong defense mechanism.

what exactly do you believe I'm in denial of?

Only thing I'm denying is your theory that short ugly guys can get laid a lot with just muscle.

[pancakemouse]

(10-29-2018 01:39 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 09:09 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

no.

I'm sincerely grateful to everyone who has taken the time to make suggestions especially the people who wrote long posts.

that is NOT what corsega did so why should I thank him?

his comments have had nothing to do with the subject of this thread.

(10-29-2018 01:42 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 10:01 AM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 09:09 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

You know, I had faith in this thread. I thought it was an interesting concept. But some guys just can't be helped.

Denial is an extremely strong defense mechanism.

what exactly do you believe I'm in denial of?

Only thing I'm denying is your theory that short ugly guys can get laid a lot with just muscle.

Read the thread, I've already given you great advice. Yet all you've done so far is go to a club and get in fights with people, and then consider hiring a bodyguard.

I am living proof that a short ugly guy can get laid a lot with muscle. I've fucked hotter girls than I posted and all were purely on the basis of body game and appealing to women's natural instincts to hook up. If you haven't seen it, you aren't looking hard enough.

[AneroidOcean]

(10-29-2018 02:53 PM)corsega Wrote:  

If you haven't seen it, you aren't looking hard enough.

This is true of a lot of things in life. Great line.

[TheScientist]

(10-29-2018 02:53 PM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 01:39 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 09:09 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

no.

I'm sincerely grateful to everyone who has taken the time to make suggestions especially the people who wrote long posts.

that is NOT what corsega did so why should I thank him?

his comments have had nothing to do with the subject of this thread.

(10-29-2018 01:42 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 10:01 AM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 09:09 AM)Off The Reservation Wrote:  

And just like clockwork here comes the argumentative personality of the scientist. Long gone are the thank you so much for the detailed reply.

You know, I had faith in this thread. I thought it was an interesting concept. But some guys just can't be helped.

Denial is an extremely strong defense mechanism.

what exactly do you believe I'm in denial of?

Only thing I'm denying is your theory that short ugly guys can get laid a lot with just muscle.

Read the thread, I've already given you great advice. Yet all you've done so far is go to a club and get in fights with people, and then consider hiring a bodyguard.

I am living proof that a short ugly guy can get laid a lot with muscle. I've fucked hotter girls than I posted and all were purely on the basis of body game and appealing to women's natural instincts to hook up. If you haven't seen it, you aren't looking hard enough.

why exactly should I listen to any advice from you?

You have said yourself you are a short , ugly guy who has no success in nightclubs or social circle.

I'm doing basically only night game so why would I listen to anything you say when you admit yourself you have 0 success outside of online?

Also, based on the pictures you posted even online you are fucking 6s and below and i'm trying to leverage my income to fuck 9s and 10s.

so you have no success outside of online and you are fucking mediocre girls by lying about your age online; again you have admitted all this yourself so why should I listen to anything you say?

And you say that you are able to get laid online using your muscles because muscle "appeal to women's natural instinct to hook up" ....if this this true then why are your big muscles not "appealing to women's natural instinct to hook up" in night clubs or social circle?

[AneroidOcean]

(10-29-2018 06:27 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

why exactly should I listen to any advice from you?

You have said yourself you are a short , ugly guy who has no success in nightclubs or social circle.

I'm doing basically only night game so why would I listen to anything you say when you admit yourself you have 0 success outside of online?

Also, based on the pictures you posted even online you are fucking 6s and below and i'm trying to leverage my income to fuck 9s and 10s.

so you have no success outside of online and you are fucking mediocre girls by lying about your age online; again you have admitted all this yourself so why should I listen to anything you say?

And you say that you are able to get laid online using your muscles because muscle "appeal to women's natural instinct to hook up" ....if this this true then why are your big muscles not "appealing to women's natural instinct to hook up" in night clubs or social circle?

With your self-reported height, looks, physique, and income you are in a very small top percentile of men.

What you need to learn from short ugly guys that get laid is the one thing you're clearly missing:

GAME

You should be in the black man game thread and reading WIA game/mindset posts instead of questioning one guy on here who clearly has more social awareness than you (or denying people claiming you are in denial...which is hilarious).

[TheScientist]

(10-29-2018 07:17 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 06:27 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

why exactly should I listen to any advice from you?

You have said yourself you are a short , ugly guy who has no success in nightclubs or social circle.

I'm doing basically only night game so why would I listen to anything you say when you admit yourself you have 0 success outside of online?

Also, based on the pictures you posted even online you are fucking 6s and below and i'm trying to leverage my income to fuck 9s and 10s.

so you have no success outside of online and you are fucking mediocre girls by lying about your age online; again you have admitted all this yourself so why should I listen to anything you say?

And you say that you are able to get laid online using your muscles because muscle "appeal to women's natural instinct to hook up" ....if this this true then why are your big muscles not "appealing to women's natural instinct to hook up" in night clubs or social circle?

With your self-reported height, looks, physique, and income you are in a very small top percentile of men.

What you need to learn from short ugly guys that get laid is the one thing you're clearly missing:

GAME

You should be in the black man game thread and reading WIA game/mindset posts instead of questioning one guy on here who clearly has more social awareness than you (or denying people claiming you are in denial...which is hilarious).

what exactly do you think I'm in denial of?

are you talking about his claim that short ugly guys are getting laid a lot with just muscle?

Please be specific and tell me what I'm in denial of.

[torridon747]

Can this troll get banned already why is anyone taking him seriously. He writes like a non-native English speaker or someone with low IQ yet claims to be making 40,000 a month and can't get girls.

Bruh, I know dudes with a fraction, A FRACTION of your wealth (less impressive stats too) and they can't walk down the street without tripping over a few gold digging hoes willing to put out for the chance of getting child support.

It's time to put up or shutup. Prove you're rich as fuck. Timestamped rolex, timestamped lambo, timestamped bank statements, give us what you got, let's see that fucking black card (obviously with the digits blurred). There's a reason nobody is taking you seriously, your story doesn't add up. If you're scared of posting on a public forum PM me or one of the many members here that know better than to dox ANYONE here with proof.

[JonVonstroke]

(10-29-2018 01:24 AM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 11:19 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

how are you at 31 years old matching with college aged girls on tinder?

I assume most 18-22 year old girls limit their target age to 25 maybe 28.

are you lying about your age on tinder or these young girls are targeting guys your age on there?

also, what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

Because to be honest I dont believe a 31 year old guy with an ugly face who is short is fucking 6s and 7s consistently even on tinder even if your body is amazing.

I've never seen a guy with that physical profile who fucks a lot of girls in nightclubs or social circle and I doubt online is that different.

A 7 to me is legit hot and a 6 is cute meaning you are not in any way scared to be seen in public with her? what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

I put my age as 27.

This is a 6:


This is a 7:


Online is much different than nightgame and social circle. If you haven't used it you don't really understand how powerful having a nice body is. These girls are looking for cock and they will go for the strongest attraction traits they see. Number one is having a nice face, but number two is body.

...your posts truly indicate that you need to get outside more and deal with reality on reality's terms. Sounds like you're spending a little too much time on that online business.

I hate to come across as a 'hater', but the ratings for these girls are unacceptable.

I understand that we all have some preferences which can slightly skew things but the portly ginger is 4 at best and the second girl is the epitome of a butter-face(5-5.5 if I am being generous).

Have some standards for Christ's sake; let's get it together here boys.

Also, it's obvious the OP is a troll and the claims he's made on here are false. No need to keep humoring him.

[pancakemouse]

(10-30-2018 12:09 PM)JonVonstroke Wrote:  

(10-29-2018 01:24 AM)corsega Wrote:  

(10-28-2018 11:19 PM)TheScientist Wrote:  

how are you at 31 years old matching with college aged girls on tinder?

I assume most 18-22 year old girls limit their target age to 25 maybe 28.

are you lying about your age on tinder or these young girls are targeting guys your age on there?

also, what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

Because to be honest I dont believe a 31 year old guy with an ugly face who is short is fucking 6s and 7s consistently even on tinder even if your body is amazing.

I've never seen a guy with that physical profile who fucks a lot of girls in nightclubs or social circle and I doubt online is that different.

A 7 to me is legit hot and a 6 is cute meaning you are not in any way scared to be seen in public with her? what is your definition of a 6 and 7?

I put my age as 27.

This is a 6:


This is a 7:


Online is much different than nightgame and social circle. If you haven't used it you don't really understand how powerful having a nice body is. These girls are looking for cock and they will go for the strongest attraction traits they see. Number one is having a nice face, but number two is body.

...your posts truly indicate that you need to get outside more and deal with reality on reality's terms. Sounds like you're spending a little too much time on that online business.

I hate to come across as a 'hater', but the ratings for these girls are unacceptable.

I understand that we all have some preferences which can slightly skew things but the portly ginger is 4 at best and the second girl is the epitome of a butter-face(5-5.5 if I am being generous).

Have some standards for Christ's sake; let's get it together here boys.

Also, it's obvious the OP is a troll and the claims he's made on here are false. No need to keep humoring him.

No. This is the problem with stone-casting as far as ratings go. Guys have never actually sat down and made a rubric with their actual 1-10, they just see something and then immediately call it out.

You are vastly underrating.

First of all, here's another photo of the first girl:


I have a literal scale that I keep on a spreadsheet with example photos. From the sheet, this is a 4:



This is a 5:

[DJ-Matt]

(10-30-2018 12:09 PM)JonVonstroke Wrote:  

I hate to come across as a 'hater', but the ratings for these girls are unacceptable.

I understand that we all have some preferences which can slightly skew things but the portly ginger is 4 at best and the second girl is the epitome of a butter-face(5-5.5 if I am being generous).

Have some standards for Christ's sake; let's get it together here boys.

Also, it's obvious the OP is a troll and the claims he's made on here are false. No need to keep humoring him.

Dude I would breed both of those girls all day long (especially the redhead)

[kaotic]

Guys on the forum will never agree or settle on what they think is a good rating for a chick.

At this point its just mental masturbation....or masturbation material lol.

Still can't believe dudes are buying into this trolls story.

[pft123]

The red head has the potential to get hotter. The other one, not so much, as good as it gets

[Hypno]

I can't believe no one has recommended buying a zebra yet. I remember a thread about someone who did that.