[bojangles]

There was a man in the UK who had unwittingly had sex with a minor, she looked older than she was and he was actually acquitted as she'd duped him by lying about her age. That he was acquitted was what surprised me the most. Not that the girl would lie *cough* #metoo

[Cal Meacham]

Long ago I did a job for the state university genetics department as part of a twins study. It was my job to do physical exams on twins, and fill out a series of info sheets. During that I was struck by how similar the exams were between the twins, down to the same variations in pupillary reflexes, muscle stretch reflexes, etc.

There were other similarities that were irrelevant to the study, including modes of dress, choice of spouse, even in twins that didn't grow up together.

We are not a tabula rasa. Equality goals should be limited to equal treatment in the court system. Water will find its level otherwise.

[Phazlenut]

The Deep State reveals itself again. Hope this redpills a good fraction of the voting NRA membership.

side note: $500 for half-and-half.....p4p is a sucker's game

[Buck Wild]

One helluva pussy pass

Quote:

A mother who twice had sex with a 14-year-old boy has been cleared of abuse after claiming she believed the boy was over 18.

Kimberly Abell, 33, of Longford, Coventry, seduced the teenager after getting drunk at a teenager's birthday party.

A court heard she drank half a bottle of vodka, half a bottle of Disaronno liqueur and shots before asking the schoolboy: 'Aren't you going to f*** me?'

When the boy's mother reported the incident to police months later she was arrested and charged with two counts of sexual activity with a child.

After a trial at Warwick Crown Court she was found not guilty of both charges.

TLDR: "Strict liability" no longer applies to women.

[DannyAlberta]

(05-03-2019 10:12 AM)Buck Wild Wrote:  

TLDR: "Strict liability" no longer applies to women.

Did it ever?

The pussy pass is historically entrenched. It was only revoked in the most extreme cases. It used to be a balance or a trade off for lack of voting rights and financial power. Funny thing though, women got voting rights and financial power without having to give up their pussy passes.

They're still totally oppressed though...

[balybary]

I was wondering why you didn't include a pic of the women who has "seduced the teenager"

I click on the link and then understand why

[AOC's Missing Boyfriend]

Cody Wilson set himself up for a confrontation with the deep state years ago, when he came up with the Liberator. I was running in the same circles as him at the time, so I quickly found out about the effort... we had a lot of mutual friends. This is also the time that bitcoin took off, and perhaps unsurprisingly, it was a huge niche for libertarian/anarchist communities at the time. We were all marveling at the applications of both bitcoin and 3d printing of weapons components. Much less what was possible with new advances in cryptography... Anyway.

I always got the sense the guy was intelligent. But I saw hubris there too. I could see it in his face. Believe me, the guy is smart, but we are slaves to our baser instincts. He was doing some next level shit.



He had a target on his back for a long time, and with his law training (UT law I believe), he was a fearsome adversary to the pro-gun control crowd. At the end of the day, he falls victim to entrapment, yet another case where they don't follow the law. Tremendously unethical for something like that to happen USING A MINOR. Which reminds me, I think it was in Hawaii, they decriminalized police having sex with prostitutes in the name of having a better chance at stomping out prostitution. Whatever that means...

The honeypot is long-used trap. And given laws in the US, at the state level, you can do everything possible to make sure you're keeping it legal, and even if she deceives you, you're the guilty party--even if you've made got faith efforts to ascertain it's all good,:

Quote:

Ignorance Is Not a Defense
Statutory rape is considered a “strict liability crime,” meaning that a defendant can be found guilty of this type of offense even if he/she was genuinely unaware that the alleged victim was under the age of consent. In other words, it is irrelevant whether or not the defendant had knowledge of the victim’s age, nor whether the minor agreed to the act. As impractical as it may be, adults have a legal responsibility to verify the age of all sexual partners.

Defendants can still be found guilty of statutory rape even under the following circumstances:

The minor lied about their age
The minor had a fake ID
The minor expressed their consent
The minor initiated the activity

I just pulled this from a law office website for a random state, but from my understanding, a lot of states share similar laws.