Quote: (10-24-2018 09:17 AM)questor70 Wrote:
Quote: (10-23-2018 11:55 PM)Professor When Wrote:
...chatting during mandatory student events for a few hours
One thing I don't often see discussed in relation to young inexperienced guys being thrown into the friendzone is how the young view time. Time is not a precious commodity to the young because the rest of your life feels infinitely vast. While it's true young guys are naive and misguided (I definitely was) you also have to value your own time enough in order to be ruthless enough to get what you want.
Point being that "a few hours" may seem inconsequential to you but feels like a collossal waste to an older man. The older you get the more you'll feel compelled to make shrewder decisions about how you spend your time.
Just remember that any time you spend orbiting a girl who won't put out is time you could have spent elsewhere, not necessarily chasing other girls, but doing something else that's meaningful or adds value.
I'm not saying you're as bad as I was, but I wasted my entire college stay orbiting one chick I wanted to bang. Frankly, I don't recall anything interesting from all those hours hanging out with her. I barely remember anything other than the fact she was addicted to coffee and thought Keanu Reeves was hot in Point Break. The only value that time had was me staring at her and fantacizing about what I wanted to do to her. So it was hardly a friendship, really.
Well said, Questor70!
Let's not forget Horstman's corollary to Parkinson's law:
Work expands to fit in the time we give it.
Female behaviour corollary to Parkinson's law:
Female's attention seeking behaviour will occupy all the available time a man gives her.
Prof. When, Mystery advocates around, on average, 7 hours rule, cumulatively, for a woman to get her from attraction through comfort/rapport to seduction to bed. This is for the interaction in person, add some time (ideally, as little as possible) for messaging. You need to mentally tally up how much time it takes to get from beginning to an end. And above a set amount of time, you need to cut it off - the opportunity cost becomes too high. And if you yourself don't value your time, a girl won't either. Paradoxically, a busy man, with limited time is perceived as more interesting than the other way round. Sometimes the medium is the message. It's not semantic content and analysing the interaction won't bring resolution. If you're over 10 hours (this is 3 dates each 3 hours!) and no bang (not to mention no kissing), you'll be better off expecting Santa will get you a money making machine for Christmas. Even if you banged, it's a misery to spend 50+ hours to court a woman and you won't feel good about it regardless of the outcome.
Some cases are hopeless - it did happen to me a couple times to get numbers from girls who were absolutely socially inept, that is they didn't realise I tried to pick them up - you should always indicate why you to talk them, that's why you have non-verbals (touch) and verbals ('I think you look cute'). If a girl doesn't get that, she'll bring your more misery than fun. The hilarious thing is, this girls will keep in touch until the end of time. You need to get them of the fence on the first date at the latest - even a virgin will not decline kissing if she's interested. If a girl is difficult, you need to give them the talk - explain you're a man, she's a woman, and THIS IS A DATE. If she fucks around, doesn't give a straight answer, just down your drink, pay, leave the venue, block her number. In other words, next. THAT'S IT.
And remember, as Questor70 wrote it above - life is short. Certainly shorter than you think.
____________________
My
Adventures in Game updates on the go:
twits by Max Detrick
Unbowed. Unbent. Unbroken.
I don’t ever give up. I mean, I’d have to be dead or completely incapacitated.
-- Elon Musk