[nomadbrah]

(08-12-2018 05:38 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 02:32 AM)Mage Wrote:  

(Socialists own public transportation I my country so in the rare cases I use it, I usually ride without ticket).

Glad to see your ethics are above board and beyond reproach. I'll be reading your future forum posts accordingly.

Starving the beast is a perfectly fine ethical position to take.

You might not agree with it, but that doesn't mean it is unethical.

[Akwesi]

From the comment section:
WORD AROUND HE ATE THE CHEESE FROM HER CHEESEBURGERS

[MaxMillion]

(08-11-2018 08:39 PM)Penta Sahi Wrote:  



If you were the guy getting ragdolled in this pic, do you think you would have fared better against the hambeast?

How about 1 v 1 in a pitched street fight? (no weapons)

I'm not ashamed to say that I think I would lose to that thing in most scenarios. There's just too much mass and force to overcome, and I'm not trained in hand to hand combat so there's no way for me to deal damage through the natural fatty armor. Also surprisingly nimble.

If I had some sort of bladed weapon with at least a foot of penetration capability, I think I would stand a chance. Despite the surprising agility of the single-shoe creature, I could at least match it in that regard. I would basically stab the thing and evade until it bled out. Other than that I dunno.

*bonus scenario*

How would our ham planet fare against the ham planet featured in this video? When worlds collide!

His mistake is that he keeps getting up in its line of advance so he has no time to setup, and all it has to do is push down. Key is to get around it, and then sweep that thunderous hock. Mind you, you have a good chance of breaking your shin.

[CynicalContrarian]

The video probably ends where it does cause the beast was probably gassed from all that effort.

Reminds me of "TrigglyPuff".

[kuqezi]

First of all I think this is not the first time she has done this.
She looks like the one girl that other girls also keep around in these "situations" and she is the bull to put in front to deal with the "situation".
Then...if you find yourself in a situation where a girl, that has at least 50kg more than you is trying to confront you, in 99.99% of cases you will end up in jail, marked for life and seen as a monster, since (even if your life was in danger) you raised your hand on a girl.

In the hypothetical situation that you are facing a much bigger opponent who is very fat but also (keyword) slower than you then definitely use your arms and legs to keep them distant from grabbing you and focus on their knees/ankles and direct hits on the eyes/nose (causing loss of sight or balance, or bleeding which puts fear in them).

And since it was brought up in some posts...absolutely not in no way will even think of banging...
Cheers!

[TravelerKai]

(08-12-2018 04:10 PM)DaveR Wrote:  

15-second video: https://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/v...j4Lo1C7El4

That behemoth threw him across the room like a rag doll, although it's mostly down to her colossal mass. She probably isn't able to reach the ground without risking her balance. I would stay low and try to latch onto her ankles.

Looks like she either knew or spontaneously on accident used a Judo lapel grab throw. A sloppy one, but still good enough to execute.

BJJ, Wrestlers, and Judo guys know just how dangerous very short people with very low centers of gravity are on the mat, unlike untrained people. If you do not pay close enough attention to the distance between your chest/body is to theirs, they can easily roll you over before you have a chance to brace yourself and use a foot to stop getting thrown/rolled.

[JohnKreese]

It all makes sense now. That fight out in Vegas the other week was the first Semi-final; this fight was the other.

Never thought I'd see the day where Burger-Zangief would be taking on Burger-E-Honda in the McDonald's World Warrior Championship.



Admittedly, I'm more excited about the third-place matchup between Burger-Chun Li and Burger-Guile.

[Foolsgo1d]

You can see this all the time in Judo if you dont know how to handle it or get caught off-guard.

The problem with Judo is if your opponent then squares up and starts playing your game and it isn't a roll around on the mat but a real fights means someone is getting hurt on a hard surface.

[TravelerKai]

(08-13-2018 01:09 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

You can see this all the time in Judo if you dont know how to handle it or get caught off-guard.

The problem with Judo is if your opponent then squares up and starts playing your game and it isn't a roll around on the mat but a real fights means someone is getting hurt on a hard surface.

When I used to teach guys a few Judo throws (with gi jackets on) in my self defense classes, that included knives, etc. My MMA students would ask me why bother wearing the gi and using lapel collars in the demonstrations. To them they always wanted to just grab people with BJJ type grips for self defense purposes.

Well on the street, nobody is butt naked and wet with sweat. Soooo...

That usually ended that complaint.

Women on the other hand, unless they are wearing thicker clothing, you are not going to grab their clothes the way the girl grabbed his shirt. Her outfit would have likely ripped in your hand. That's why you see in those catfights those skimpy outfits are destroyed very quickly.

Street defense would be many times harder if everyone was naked. Grabbing a shirt can create all kinds of fulcrum and leverage, making the amount of effort to throw a lot less. Self Defense instructors from the East Coast/Up North in the US, will tell you that winter time is the best time to get attacked by a bad guy if it just had to happen. Coats and winter jackets will betray the attacker dearly. Can you imagine choking someone out with their own jacket, from merely grabbing it and spinning them around to get their back on the street? If you let go, I'd bet most would run away quickly. It freaks out brand new white belts in a class and they volunteered for it.

Then in the concealed handgun carry world, dudes up north that wear jackets in the winter love it because they can now carry that full sized .357 magnum, a big 1911, etc. and no one will see the print/outline of the pistol. Doing that in summer clothes usually isn't worth it. Even though I can only wear a big coat a handful of times a year, I don't see the point in carry such large pistols like those anyway, but that's just me.

[Rocha]

Guy does not seem that weak, or soyboy, but he has zero agression in him, at least in this situation. The first throw could have get someone off guard. But an upkick or at least try to get a hold of her head when he got up the first time was mandatory.

She looks definitely a legit black belt in eating fast food.

Nonetheless she invented a new style of fight along the lines of:

Kimbo Slice - Backyard brawler
Tank Abbot - Bar brawler
Hambeast - Fast food brawler

I would put her on WWE against Ronda Rousey.

[Johnnyvee]

I think "she" would punch herself out quite soon. Stamina is definitely the way to go in that fight.

[Soyouz]

To answer your question, more than 90% of men would win against this beast.

This is nothing more than a short video (5 seconds) of a guy being caught off-balance. This guy was in a lose/lose situation. He decided not to retaliate, which was probably the smartest thing to do. What could he win by fighting a drunk woman in a McDonald in Canada? Not much... Put this fat female beast against an average guy in the octagon, and she would lose (she would gas out after 30 seconds).

There's a reason why they would never let Ronda Rousey fight Khabib Nurmagomedov in the octagon, just like there's a reason why they would never let Ann Wolfe get into the ring against Andre Ward. It wouldn't be fair, it wouldn't make any sense. Men have larger skeletal size and bone mass than women, and fighting is part of our DNA.

There might be a day where Feminazis change the rules, and convince fighting organizations to let women fight men. Until then, common sense prevails : men are better fighting machines than women, period.

[Suits]

(08-12-2018 05:26 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 05:38 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 02:32 AM)Mage Wrote:  

(Socialists own public transportation I my country so in the rare cases I use it, I usually ride without ticket).

Glad to see your ethics are above board and beyond reproach. I'll be reading your future forum posts accordingly.

Starving the beast is a perfectly fine ethical position to take.

You might not agree with it, but that doesn't mean it is unethical.

The honourable approach would be to simply choose other transportation options.

Mage is just looking for a justification for being a cheap-ass who cheats the system.

That makes him the biggest socialist of all.

[Celestial]

What'd this guy do, steal her french fries?

No surprise this is in Canada.

[Kona]

(08-12-2018 05:26 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 05:38 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 02:32 AM)Mage Wrote:  

(Socialists own public transportation I my country so in the rare cases I use it, I usually ride without ticket).

Glad to see your ethics are above board and beyond reproach. I'll be reading your future forum posts accordingly.

Starving the beast is a perfectly fine ethical position to take.

You might not agree with it, but that doesn't mean it is unethical.

A few years in the gulag will make you see things theirvway...

Besides, I thought my man Mussolini got the trains running right on time.

Aloha!

[Mage]

(08-13-2018 10:13 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 05:26 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 05:38 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 02:32 AM)Mage Wrote:  

(Socialists own public transportation I my country so in the rare cases I use it, I usually ride without ticket).

Glad to see your ethics are above board and beyond reproach. I'll be reading your future forum posts accordingly.

Starving the beast is a perfectly fine ethical position to take.

You might not agree with it, but that doesn't mean it is unethical.

The honourable approach would be to simply choose other transportation options.

Mage is just looking for a justification for being a cheap-ass who cheats the system.

That makes him the biggest socialist of all.

Wishful thinking Suits.

I specifically wrote that in the rare cases I use public transportation I usually ride without ticket.

Your case against me is me mentioning that I am against socialists and not merely talking but actually taking some little action and act of civil disobedience. This is what got you angry.

So yeah I do all I can to use other means of transportation. I have past posts in this forum about my love of driving. I drive if I can or walk and only use public transportation when these options are not available. This happens like 5-10 times per year maybe. Even then I do sometimes buy a ticket.

If I wanted to be a cheap ass I wouldn't spend all that money on gas to drive around on my own car. But I believe in self reliance and freedom so I opt for a more costly yet liberating option.

Public transportation in itself is socialist. A ticket of an earning person subsidizes all the senile seniors who ride for free and vote for bigger taxes to get bigger retirement benefits. It imprisons you while you are there, it has cameras, violates privacy and has low IQ dogs working on minimum wage playing bosses on power trip checking people. I feel guilty whenever I use it. If I buy ticket I feel more guilty and not buying ticket makes me feel better. Getting around on my own is the best trough.

[Wealth of Spirit]

(08-13-2018 10:58 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 04:10 PM)DaveR Wrote:  

15-second video: https://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/v...j4Lo1C7El4

That behemoth threw him across the room like a rag doll, although it's mostly down to her colossal mass. She probably isn't able to reach the ground without risking her balance. I would stay low and try to latch onto her ankles.

Looks like she either knew or spontaneously on accident used a Judo lapel grab throw. A sloppy one, but still good enough to execute.

BJJ, Wrestlers, and Judo guys know just how dangerous very short people with very low centers of gravity are on the mat, unlike untrained people. If you do not pay close enough attention to the distance between your chest/body is to theirs, they can easily roll you over before you have a chance to brace yourself and use a foot to stop getting thrown/rolled.

Glad to see Judo getting some love here. That looked like (albeit sloppy) tsurikomi goshi. Didn't know it could be done with such a short sleeve.

Being tall and lanky, I could never pull it off on my much shorter training partners. Nice form!

[Windom Earle]

Where’s Little Dark when you need him most

[Richard Turpin]

Truly monstrous. As many have already stated, as a man you are automatically in a pickle in these situations; she's heavy with a low COG. If nobody was around a stiff jab or two to the face would take the fight out of the creature immediately. This is a bad move in public though for all sorts of reasons.

Judo is ideal here. First, it would help you to stay on your feet (unless intoxicated). Secondly, if things go to court, Judo has the advantage over other MA's in that it has the classic 'Judo uses your opponent's strength against them' disclaimer!

You could quite feasibly bullshit your way out of trouble by saying that 'with Judo you can only use what your opponent gives you' in order to beat them. I've trained Judo for years and while statements like this are overused and somewhat debateable, they are still true enough to probably get away with it;

"I'm sorry Your Honour, but if this behemoth had only restrained herself somewhat, and not used her full strength in order to smite me down, my subsequent (and instinctive) Harai Goshi would not have wounded the brute in such a permanent and grievous fashion".

It's an iffy defence admittedly, but better than nothing. I mean, you can't say this after you've just unleashed a right-hook, or a roundhouse kick! You could even draft in a Judo expert to impress the court; "He's right Your Honour, Judo is after all, 'The Gentle Way' ".

My old instructor had the best idea. He would tell me of when he was being ejected from nightclubs by heavy-handed bouncers, he would feign drunkenness and foot sweep them down flights of stairs! Good Ashi-Waza (sweeps) are lethal on a hard surface. Until you've had it done to you, you can't appreciate how quickly you can be turned upside-down. Most foes won't even know what happened and as they are hard to see to the untrained eye you can make it look like a clumsy accident and avoid jail.

[TravelerKai]

(08-15-2018 01:12 AM)Wealth of Spirit Wrote:  

(08-13-2018 10:58 AM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-12-2018 04:10 PM)DaveR Wrote:  

15-second video: https://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/v...j4Lo1C7El4

That behemoth threw him across the room like a rag doll, although it's mostly down to her colossal mass. She probably isn't able to reach the ground without risking her balance. I would stay low and try to latch onto her ankles.

Looks like she either knew or spontaneously on accident used a Judo lapel grab throw. A sloppy one, but still good enough to execute.

BJJ, Wrestlers, and Judo guys know just how dangerous very short people with very low centers of gravity are on the mat, unlike untrained people. If you do not pay close enough attention to the distance between your chest/body is to theirs, they can easily roll you over before you have a chance to brace yourself and use a foot to stop getting thrown/rolled.

Glad to see Judo getting some love here. That looked like (albeit sloppy) tsurikomi goshi. Didn't know it could be done with such a short sleeve.

Being tall and lanky, I could never pull it off on my much shorter training partners. Nice form!

No that was a Sumi Otoshi throw, because she did not use any foot techniques, only using his lack of balance and his lapel (shirt collar). The throw you suggested is a type of hip throw, requiring the executioner to use their hips to provide the off balance or lack of kuzushi. Observe the correct throw in this old school video.

Sumi Otoshi rarely works on your classmates at the dojo. Which makes it perfect to use on the street against people who do not know anything about fighting at all.

I would bet money this girl has brothers and likely wrestled with them. Many Canadians know wrestling or wrestle in middle school and high school. Could have even been a school wrestler her own self, you never know.

American/Canadian Football is another possible thing because she finished him off with an Offensive Lineman's finishing block at the end. She actually did it perfectly too, which is the scary part. She pushed right on his back part of his shoulder at his weakest balance point like a college caliber OL player would. When you watch football and hear scouts or analysts talk about how a guy on the OL always finishes his blocks and/or has nasty finishes, they are talking about what that girl did to this guy. The good ones often knock defensive line, linebackers, and CB/Safeties from getting back on their feet to chase the ball carrier. Doggish attitude from OL football players that dominate blocks like that tend to get lots of attention from scouts and coaches watching film, because that kind of nasty demeanor cannot be taught at all. You are either nasty or not.

Here are some examples. The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th ones are the best examples that fit what she did.

[RIslander]

The moral of the story here is to walk away from all confrontations, whether with a male or female. There is absolutely nothing you can gain from fighting. 99.9% of problems can be solved by saying "OK, my bad" even it wasn't and cautiously backing off and leaving.

The only thing to be gained by escalation is either injury, legal problems or in rare situations an ego boost. And any redpilled man knows the third option will be short lived.

[jordypip23]

(08-15-2018 04:22 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

The moral of the story here is to walk away from all confrontations, whether with a male or female. There is absolutely nothing you can gain from fighting. 99.9% of problems can be solved by saying "OK, my bad" even it wasn't and cautiously backing off and leaving.

The only thing to be gained by escalation is either injury, legal problems or in rare situations an ego boost. And any redpilled man knows the third option will be short lived.

Truth. In retrospect, 90+% of my past arguments & tense situations with females were simply an utter waste of time & energy.

[Matsufubu]

Well the answer probably isn't tomoe nage, unless you're Ronnie Coleman.

The Beast has momentum + mass and some technique. From his position it doesn't matter if he's a soy boy or a manly man. He needs to use a table as an obstacle to break her momentum, then go for a single leg, mount, and then GnP - except you wouldn't, you'd just pin her arms until help arrived unless you want jail time. Fatties can't reach down, are top heavy and gas quickly.

[PapayaTapper]

[LEMONed IScream]

Gentlemen! We have found the leader for the upcoming Bovine Amphibian Corps!