A respected poster according to everyone but still probably the most underrated (in my opinion).
LDN's a few life cycles ahead of me, but his observations are relevant for men of all ages. He's an undeniable forum luminary and a pleasure to call a fellow Australian, especially as our home country is becoming a veritable shithole of feminists and white knights.
His humor is second to none and I will never forget his ill-fated attempt to timeline Jean Valjean's six-dimensional life.
This recent post was an absolute corker and will kick off our LDN-themed festivities:
thread-68749...pid1797226
LDN's a few life cycles ahead of me, but his observations are relevant for men of all ages. He's an undeniable forum luminary and a pleasure to call a fellow Australian, especially as our home country is becoming a veritable shithole of feminists and white knights.
His humor is second to none and I will never forget his ill-fated attempt to timeline Jean Valjean's six-dimensional life.
This recent post was an absolute corker and will kick off our LDN-themed festivities:
thread-68749...pid1797226
Quote: (06-06-2018 10:28 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:
I suppose it's not to anyone's benefit to simply go back and forth over why intervening in a situation like this is a bad idea. It's more helpful to explain the why in detail. This forum typically approaches the nature of women in relation to sexual manipulation one way or another, but there are other facets of their ingrained behavior where it's important to understand the nature of women so you don't get blindsided with bad outcomes for "nice" behavior.
What I'm going to go into here is stuff that a lot of guys understand on a basic level yet without having an appreciation for the nuts and bolts level of how it works.
My experience in this field is drawn mostly as a guard who had to deal routinely with issues of domestic violence and female mental health issues in health care settings. This has been complimented by the mentorship in these issues of the older guards who I foolishly dismissed as fossils until I was proven wrong often enough to accept reality.
I'll open with the big premise.
Women do not do "gratitude" except where it's a convenient entry to gain the continued patronage of someone they're sexually interested in.
This is not limited to saving them from a violent encounter. We are generally painfully aware here that an ugly man who changes a flat tire for a woman and a handsome man who does likewise will receive two vastly different responses. The handsome man will be showered with praise and offers of future rendezvous while the ugly man will have to suffer the woman standing silently and awkwardly to one side as she fidgets, desperate for the horrible ordeal to disappear in her rear view mirror.
For most women in any stage of fertility there is no such thing as gratitude. Only an opening to gain sexual access to a suitable set of genetics.
The second part of this equation is arguably more cruel.
Women are biologically driven shut out men they owe an obligation to when that man is not considered to be sexually suitable. Worse, they will actively seek to harm that man's social standing in order to "get rid of him" rather than suffer his continued proximity under the burden of a debt they don't wish to recognize.
Hear me, young pups, as I tell the tale of two guards. One as ugly as sin, the other an Adonissian vision of male charm. Several damsels found themselves under duress. A vicious, drunk cad was attacking their booth at their place of work. The ugly guard arrived first on scene and bore the lion's share of the peril in restraining the attacker. The gorgeous guard arrived second and merely provided support to finalise the matter.
Who got the credit from all these women? You guessed it. But worse. The women soon began to find agreement that the ugly guard who had long since been accepted as benign in his patrols suddenly took on an aura of creepiness, such that a request was made to management that the creepy guard should be left to patrol outside while the gorgeous guard patrol the booths.
That, gentlemen, is how female gratitude manifests itself.
Moving on.
When faced with a violent encounter a woman's first reaction is to secure her survival. "White middle class men, save me!"
What most men don't understand is that the very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.
Did that go by you too quickly? Again.
The very second survival has been secured, a woman will instantly mentally re-arrange the event to preserve her tribal alignments.
This is why police will save a woman from being stabbed by her deranged husband and she will provide a report mere minutes later that the police busted in and assaulted him for no reason. Not only will she says this but she will believe it down to her core.
You can bet on it again and again and again and you will not be disappointed. If a woman has to choose between telling the truth and protecting "her tribe" (even if that's loosely defined as progressives-plus their human pets) then she will lie until the end of time to protect her tribe. She does this effortlessly because her tribe is intrinsically linked to her ego. It's a survival mechanism that ensures she places her own children above everyone else's, even if her "child" is a 6 foot "unwell asian man".
These are not principles on female modus operandi. They are iron laws.
Respect these laws and account for them or suffer the consequences.
p.s. If you wonder now what the difference is between white-knighting in the 50's and white knighting today then the million dollar question is this.
Does the woman I'm trying to save consider me to be part of her tribe or a factional enemy?
Born Down Under, but I enjoy Slovakian Thunder: http://slovakia.travel/en/nove-zamky