[Simeon_Strangelight]

Incel mass shooters only need to survive their amok run.

Afterwards they are going to get laid like gangbusters:

Of course the media will ignore all shooters that are more diverse and non-White - most of them being stopped short by their militarized schools.

We all know here what to do about it - it's not rocket science. But I guess this will continue and I would bet that the FBI is not even interested in prevention. They rather use those incidences to push their agenda - gun grabbing, Orwellian police state etc.

[Kish]

(05-19-2018 12:47 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

Incel mass shooters only need to survive their amok run.

Afterwards they are going to get laid like gangbusters:

Wow. Funny how these guys get women wet. Charles manson had a hot girlfriend in his later years.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

(05-19-2018 05:50 AM)Psygnosis89 Wrote:  

(05-18-2018 04:24 PM)Donfitz007 Wrote:  

3. Boys have NO outlet, gaming was the last bastion of hope, now with the influx of women "gamers" men have nowhere besides sports

Even something as purely masculine as lifting has been infiltrated by bitches after they realized they can post their workouts, gainz, etc for likes. Blame social media. Speaking as someone who started lifting in the mid 90s there was very few attractive women in serious gyms back then, and if so they were major butterfaces.

Alcohol too. I was never much of a drinker, but now I refused to drink at all, ever. My impressions of alcohol these days are of younger women with their stupid "sangria" in bed or those annoying moms and their idiotic "wine."

If you really wanna piss people off, refuse alcohol and say: "I don't drink. Drinking is for women. Men built civilization and need to stay sober to maintain it. Women do paper-pushing jobs and can afford to be drunks."

I would recommend never saying this to a woman, ever, unless you definitely don't want sex. We need a thread on this stuff. I used to behave like this when I was into punk rock and straight edge. It's come full circle.

[debeguiled]

(05-18-2018 04:53 PM)Dragan Wrote:  

Sorry, what the hell is this, "Mass Shooting Lounge"?. The name of this is not palatable, I don't endorse violence man, at all, please change the name of this shit.

It is the reality that is the problem, not the name of the thread. I admit I have become desensitized to mass shootings, and unfortunately the name of this thread makes sense.

Maybe desensitization is just a psychological coping mechanism, and is some way healthy.

How can people pour their own emotions into almost daily tragedies? You would go nuts if you did that.

Yeah, it is pretty sad that we take mass shootings as meh.

But it will get worse, and as usual, that girl in the video is ahead of the curve.

She is all, been there, done that, fell in love, got the tee shirt.

The time to worry is when forum members start trying to make money selling spree killer tee shirts.

Till then, just a sign of the times.

[AceP]

(05-19-2018 02:28 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

(05-18-2018 04:53 PM)Dragan Wrote:  

Sorry, what the hell is this, "Mass Shooting Lounge"?. The name of this is not palatable, I don't endorse violence man, at all, please change the name of this shit.

It is the reality that is the problem, not the name of the thread. I admit I have become desensitized to mass shootings, and unfortunately the name of this thread makes sense.

Maybe desensitization is just a psychological coping mechanism, and is some way healthy.

How can people pour their own emotions into almost daily tragedies? You would go nuts if you did that.

Yeah, it is pretty sad that we take mass shootings as meh.

But it will get worse, and as usual, that girl in the video is ahead of the curve.

She is all, been there, done that, fell in love, got the tee shirt.

The time to worry is when forum members start trying to make money selling spree killer tee shirts.

Till then, just a sign of the times.

My god. I hope she's not in school or college anymore.

I wonder how she's taking in all those death-threats like that other chick is, I think Alexandra Wallace was her name. Or even the Hitler girl.

She's really trying hard to follow in their footsteps and hope that the media will interview her.

[Dulceácido]

(05-19-2018 02:28 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

(05-18-2018 04:53 PM)Dragan Wrote:  

Sorry, what the hell is this, "Mass Shooting Lounge"?. The name of this is not palatable, I don't endorse violence man, at all, please change the name of this shit.

It is the reality that is the problem, not the name of the thread. I admit I have become desensitized to mass shootings, and unfortunately the name of this thread makes sense.

Maybe desensitization is just a psychological coping mechanism, and is some way healthy.

How can people pour their own emotions into almost daily tragedies? You would go nuts if you did that.

Yeah, it is pretty sad that we take mass shootings as meh.

But it will get worse, and as usual, that girl in the video is ahead of the curve.

She is all, been there, done that, fell in love, got the tee shirt.

The time to worry is when forum members start trying to make money selling spree killer tee shirts.

Till then, just a sign of the times.

Wait. Is this the same chick you've been posting other videos about in other threads? I didn't even realize who this clown was until I looked him up just now. Now I see the insanity.

Thought it was just a silly crush because I didn't recognize the name initially. Now I see she's a sociopath.

Can't decide if I'm more repulsed by her behavior or because I didn't get the joke...

[Northern]

Turns out he was creepy

http://www.news.com.au/world/north-ameri...ed9d30d1c9

Quote:

Spurned advances provoked Texas shooting

THE mother of one of the Santa Fe school shooting victims has revealed her daughter repeatedly turned down creepy advances from the alleged shooter.

A TEENAGED boy who shot and killed eight students and two teachers in Texas had been spurned by one of his victims after making aggressive advances, her mother has told the Los Angeles Times.

Sadie Rodriguez, the mother of Shana Fisher, 16, told the newspaper her daughter rejected four months of aggressive advances from accused shooter Dimitrios Pagourtzis, 17, at the Santa Fe high school.

Fisher finally stood up to him and embarrassed him in class, the newspaper quoted her mother as writing in a private message to the Times.

“A week later he opens fire on everyone he didn’t like,” she said.

“Shana being the first one.” Rodriguez could not independently be reached for comment.

If true, it would be the second school shooting in recent months driven by such rejection.
...

[debeguiled]

Nothing excuses shooting up a school, but we will never get the real story behind it from this girl's friends or her family.

We will just never know.

There will probably be a tv movie where he threatened her for months and she sweetly said no, and when he put the gun in her face, she asked him if he knew Jesus.

[Johnnyvee]

(05-19-2018 02:16 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

(05-19-2018 05:50 AM)Psygnosis89 Wrote:  

(05-18-2018 04:24 PM)Donfitz007 Wrote:  

3. Boys have NO outlet, gaming was the last bastion of hope, now with the influx of women "gamers" men have nowhere besides sports

Even something as purely masculine as lifting has been infiltrated by bitches after they realized they can post their workouts, gainz, etc for likes. Blame social media. Speaking as someone who started lifting in the mid 90s there was very few attractive women in serious gyms back then, and if so they were major butterfaces.

Alcohol too. I was never much of a drinker, but now I refused to drink at all, ever. My impressions of alcohol these days are of younger women with their stupid "sangria" in bed or those annoying moms and their idiotic "wine."

If you really wanna piss people off, refuse alcohol and say: "I don't drink. Drinking is for women. Men built civilization and need to stay sober to maintain it. Women do paper-pushing jobs and can afford to be drunks."

I would recommend never saying this to a woman, ever, unless you definitely don't want sex. We need a thread on this stuff. I used to behave like this when I was into punk rock and straight edge. It's come full circle.

Best thing I`ve read in a long time. Drinking is for women and boomers. At least heavy drinking.
(What`s up with boomers and their insatiable wine thirst?)

[Seth_Rose]

There's something truly soulless and depraved about having "Mass shooting" and "lounge" in the same sentence.

Such is life in America...

[rpg]

I just have to say something. This kid in Texas pulverized the girl who dissed him with a sawed off shotgun. She was unrecognizable.
Schools need to observe, intervene and put these potential homicidal maniacs in alternative programs. This kid was raising red flags all over before the incident. The school was negligent AGAIN. The parents were negligent AGAIN. This "every kid is a snowflake" liberal mumbo jumbo needs to stop, yesterday. Kids need to understand that this shit is not going to go on.

[PapayaTapper]

There have always been cool kids, shunned kids, bullies, and the bullied. The thing is that these things are easy to spot in hindsight. But should his "red flags' have been that noticeable in order to stand out above normal high school social dynamics? Im not saying this couldn't have been prevented but I just think its harder to identify who's going top snap and who's not in advance. It may seem obvious after the fact but not so easily diagnosed and prevented

[Johnnyvee]

(05-21-2018 11:28 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

There have always been cool kids, shunned kids, bullies, and the bullied. The thing is that these things are easy to spot in hindsight. But should his "red flags' have been that noticeable in order to stand out above normal high school social dynamics? Im not saying this couldn't have been prevented but I just think its harder to identify who's going top snap and who's not in advance. It may seem obvious after the fact but not so easily diagnosed and prevented

And what happens when they are "diagnosed." They are given the very pharmaceuticals that will take them over the egde.

You are completely right that there has always been cool kids and losers. And in the US there was also plenty of guns available in previous decades. (Prior to the late 90s) So what has changed. Not to be arrogant, but he answer should be obvious;
Diet and drugs.

[Brother Abdul Majeed]

(05-21-2018 03:30 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(05-21-2018 11:28 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

There have always been cool kids, shunned kids, bullies, and the bullied. The thing is that these things are easy to spot in hindsight. But should his "red flags' have been that noticeable in order to stand out above normal high school social dynamics? Im not saying this couldn't have been prevented but I just think its harder to identify who's going top snap and who's not in advance. It may seem obvious after the fact but not so easily diagnosed and prevented

And what happens when they are "diagnosed." They are given the very pharmaceuticals that will take them over the egde.

You are completely right that there has always been cool kids and losers. And in the US there was also plenty of guns available in previous decades. (Prior to the late 90s) So what has changed. Not to be arrogant, but he answer should be obvious;
Diet and drugs.

Not just diet and drugs. Access to the internet has played a big part in this. Weird kids like that van attacker in Toronto can read all kinds of crap and fill his head up with nonsense. Improper use of social media can also create a sense of extreme isolation in some kids as well.

[nola]

(05-21-2018 03:30 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(05-21-2018 11:28 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

There have always been cool kids, shunned kids, bullies, and the bullied. The thing is that these things are easy to spot in hindsight. But should his "red flags' have been that noticeable in order to stand out above normal high school social dynamics? Im not saying this couldn't have been prevented but I just think its harder to identify who's going top snap and who's not in advance. It may seem obvious after the fact but not so easily diagnosed and prevented

And what happens when they are "diagnosed." They are given the very pharmaceuticals that will take them over the egde.

You are completely right that there has always been cool kids and losers. And in the US there was also plenty of guns available in previous decades. (Prior to the late 90s) So what has changed. Not to be arrogant, but he answer should be obvious;
Diet and drugs.

Firstly: the kid was fucking autistic.

Also diagnosed with what other than ASD? depression ect... he was a narcissistic, entitled child. That made an impulsive decision and knew after he killed the first person he was fucking finished so he followed through until the end.

Diet and Drugs were not the problem here. That's a ridiculous statement. Ted Kazanski was a PhD that lived off his own land in his later years and did not do drugs or even drink. He spent 30+ years as the Uni-bomber.

Eliot Rodgers was a mentally ill child. No examination needed.

I'd assume if his beta male hollywood father whipped his ass for being a fucking pussy and made him get a job in highschool he could have likely turned out okay.

If anything this is a case of bad parenting. Not Diet and drugs.

[Johnnyvee]

(05-21-2018 03:50 PM)nola Wrote:  

(05-21-2018 03:30 PM)Johnnyvee Wrote:  

(05-21-2018 11:28 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

There have always been cool kids, shunned kids, bullies, and the bullied. The thing is that these things are easy to spot in hindsight. But should his "red flags' have been that noticeable in order to stand out above normal high school social dynamics? Im not saying this couldn't have been prevented but I just think its harder to identify who's going top snap and who's not in advance. It may seem obvious after the fact but not so easily diagnosed and prevented

And what happens when they are "diagnosed." They are given the very pharmaceuticals that will take them over the egde.

You are completely right that there has always been cool kids and losers. And in the US there was also plenty of guns available in previous decades. (Prior to the late 90s) So what has changed. Not to be arrogant, but he answer should be obvious;
Diet and drugs.

Firstly: the kid was fucking autistic.

Also diagnosed with what other than ASD? depression ect... he was a narcissistic, entitled child. That made an impulsive decision and knew after he killed the first person he was fucking finished so he followed through until the end.

Diet and Drugs were not the problem here. That's a ridiculous statement. Ted Kazanski was a PhD that lived off his own land in his later years and did not do drugs or even drink. He spent 30+ years as the Uni-bomber.

Eliot Rodgers was a mentally ill child. No examination needed.

Autism, like all other forms of neurological illness (so called psychological i.e. the soul) is caused by an unnatural diet for humans, and it`s downstream effect on hormones and neurotransmitters. Glutamate in particular which causes excitotoxicity is propagated by sugars, refined starches, caffeine, alcohol and artificial sweeteners. Also autoimmunity is a major factor since it supresses (in the context of a certain genetic phenotype) the GAD-67 enzyme which reduces the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate to the calming GABA. The leading cause of all autoimmune disease is grains, low fat dairy and legumes. All of which are foods homonids did not evolve with, hence we have limited capacity to handle them. I could go on about this for a long time, but that is the essence of the aetiology of mental disorders. Medication adds to the problem by the much studied effect of depersonalization, inhibition relief etc. This is well proven by now. So you have an excessively excitable and possibly psychotic person, (which is also caused by the dietary elements mentioned) which is now stripped of his natural inhibitions as well. This is a recipe for disaster, and should be understood by now. Unfortunately financial interests get in the way of the truth.

Even though we don`t know yet if this guy was medicated, (I find it very likely) the dietary causes is enough to cause the kind of volatility that could end in a tragedy like this. Had it been addressed properly with the dietary interventions necessary, this would never have happened. This goes for a huge part of the violence (including suicides) we see in Western societies today. Really, psychology as a "science" should be terminated totally. Instead it should reorganized as a part of the field of neurology, and the brain disorders in question handled by addressing the underlying, mostly dietary, causes mentioned above. It`s about time this happens.

Ted kaczynski was en extreme outlier, and has little relation to these types of spree murderers. The difference should be obvious. No offense man, but you seem to motivated more by emotions rather than rationality in your reply here. I haven`t even addressed any of the other issues with the religion on psychology, which all in all is one of the greatest crimes against humanity ever perpetrated. Psychology is also hardcore anti-male, Feminist/Marxist.

I really hope you will reconsider your stance on this my friend.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

There are multiple reasons for the school shooter phenomenon:

+ diet - thousands of percent more sugar and caffeine (there are school which treat so-called ADHD kids just by healthy diet alone)
+ drugs - the creator of ADHD admitted before his death that the illness of ADHD was made up - check it out! Boys are drugged since early on
+ autism and Aspergers - early 1980s the cases were 1 in 10.000. Now it approaches 1 in 75 in the US. And no - it's not due to better diagnosis! You can ask old school teachers and doctors - there is a ton more of them, a ton!
+ copy-cat syndrome - the more school shooters there are, the more people will do it, when they feel desperate
+ atomized sexual market - there used to be rejects and "losers" too in the past, but they got a beating and that was the end of it
+ diversity is not our strength - when there are more kids who look like you and are similar to you, then the more in common you will find with them - that is simply a fact across all cultures
+ social media exacerbates the teenage angst due to hyper-reality of the internet - for example - even sane Manosphere blokes have online beef while if they ever met, then they would never have it - the internet is a form of hyper-reality
+ video games - yes - they are fun and many countries with zero school shooters like Japan are playing even more games, but fact is - the US governments support those games because they lower the killing threshold - for a teenager who is already on drugs, has borderline Aspergers, has no hope of getting a girl in the atomized sexual market, feels alienated by the world and his country - then for a guy like him the first-person shooter is the last straw that breaks the camel's back. Then he snaps. I would not ban video games - it's easier to deal with the drugging of kids, diet and feminism.

[realologist]

(05-21-2018 04:22 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

There are multiple reasons for the school shooter phenomenon:

+ video games - yes - they are fun and many countries with zero school shooters like Japan are playing even more games, but fact is - the US governments support those games because they lower the killing threshold - for a teenager who is already on drugs, has borderline Aspergers, has no hope of getting a girl in the atomized sexual market, feels alienated by the world and his country - then for a guy like him the first-person shooter is the last straw that breaks the camel's back. Then he snaps. I would not ban video games - it's easier to deal with the drugging of kids, diet and feminism.

[Johnnyvee]

(05-21-2018 04:22 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  

There are multiple reasons for the school shooter phenomenon:

+ diet - thousands of percent more sugar and caffeine (there are school which treat so-called ADHD kids just by healthy diet alone)
+ drugs - the creator of ADHD admitted before his death that the illness of ADHD was made up - check it out! Boys are drugged since early on
+ autism and Aspergers - early 1980s the cases were 1 in 10.000. Now it approaches 1 in 75 in the US. And no - it's not due to better diagnosis! You can ask old school teachers and doctors - there is a ton more of them, a ton!
+ copy-cat syndrome - the more school shooters there are, the more people will do it, when they feel desperate
+ atomized sexual market - there used to be rejects and "losers" too in the past, but they got a beating and that was the end of it
+ diversity is not our strength - when there are more kids who look like you and are similar to you, then the more in common you will find with them - that is simply a fact across all cultures
+ social media exacerbates the teenage angst due to hyper-reality of the internet - for example - even sane Manosphere blokes have online beef while if they ever met, then they would never have it - the internet is a form of hyper-reality
+ video games - yes - they are fun and many countries with zero school shooters like Japan are playing even more games, but fact is - the US governments support those games because they lower the killing threshold - for a teenager who is already on drugs, has borderline Aspergers, has no hope of getting a girl in the atomized sexual market, feels alienated by the world and his country - then for a guy like him the first-person shooter is the last straw that breaks the camel's back. Then he snaps. I would not ban video games - it's easier to deal with the drugging of kids, diet and feminism.

I agree with that list Zel, even though I would probably weigh the diet and pharmaceuticals part a bit more. I also think that the difference between say ADHD, ADD, autism and Asperger`s is like the difference between regular coke, vanilla coke, cherry coke and so on. It`s mostly a marketing ploy to sell more drugs.
You see the same thing in medicine in general with all these unnecessary subdivisions that miss the point, or fail to address the real cause. It`s different symptoms caused by the same (mostly dietary) problem. People have different genetics after all, but it`s not really the genetics that is the problem, it`s the diet and stimulants.

PS; It`s interesting that Japan has zero school shootings, but tons of Incel men. Japanese also have a pretty healthy diet. Men in Japan sadly kill themselves to often, but after careful consideration it seems. They are not "mentally" ill when they do this. It`s of a very different character than what you see in the US.

[Leonard D Neubache]

(05-21-2018 11:28 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

There have always been cool kids, shunned kids, bullies, and the bullied. The thing is that these things are easy to spot in hindsight. But should his "red flags' have been that noticeable in order to stand out above normal high school social dynamics? Im not saying this couldn't have been prevented but I just think its harder to identify who's going top snap and who's not in advance. It may seem obvious after the fact but not so easily diagnosed and prevented

I think one of the things that exacerbates the pain of being bullied is the shameless perpetual masturbatory talk from school authorities about "ending bullying" while they blatantly turn a blind eye to it in practice.

Thankfully my sons are not subject to it but I've seen other kids lives wrecked by teachers that endlessly bleat about ending bullying and when witnessing it in the schoolyard merely shrug and go back to their phones.

This is absolutely a side-effect of the extreme gynocentrism that has overtaken academia. As we know, women equate talking about a problem with that problem actually being solved. A sad holdover from their primitive biology which drives them to complain about shit so that men will fix it, except without men (or at least only cucks who are forbidden to act) the problems continue to exist despite pleas of "didn't we talk about this already!?"

As someone who existed in the lower rungs of the high school power structures during my entry years I can say that 20+ years ago there was at least a sense of reality in dealing with bullies. It was a shit life, but at least you could quantify it. None of the teachers gave a shit but that was life. You learned to accept it or fight back.

Currently kids are suffering under the anti-reality effect of enforced delusion where teachers will not simply ignore bullying, they will bleat endlessly about how it's not tolerated even while it's happening directly under their noses.

It's one thing to suffer it, but it's another entirely for the cult of authority to signal great virtue regarding their protectorship over you while simultaneously ignoring your suffering. Kids more than adults (and teenagers more than kids) need to make sense of the world, and "we will protect you">"you're not protecting me">"we, the sainted, have protected you, you're welcome" is the kind of thing that will snap a teen's wiring.

Long story short. It's rarely the tough reality that sends you off the deep end. It's having to incorporate everyone else's delusions into that reality that does your head in, particularly when the lunatics are in all the positions of authority.

[puckerman]

(05-21-2018 09:08 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

I think one of the things that exacerbates the pain of being bullied is the shameless perpetual masturbatory talk from school authorities about "ending bullying" while they blatantly turn a blind eye to it in practice.

Thankfully my sons are not subject to it but I've seen other kids lives wrecked by teachers that endlessly bleat about ending bullying and when witnessing it in the schoolyard merely shrug and go back to their phones.

This is absolutely a side-effect of the extreme gynocentrism that has overtaken academia. As we know, women equate talking about a problem with that problem actually being solved. A sad holdover from their primitive biology which drives them to complain about shit so that men will fix it, except without men (or at least only cucks who are forbidden to act) the problems continue to exist despite pleas of "didn't we talk about this already!?"

As someone who existed in the lower rungs of the high school power structures during my entry years I can say that 20+ years ago there was at least a sense of reality in dealing with bullies. It was a shit life, but at least you could quantify it. None of the teachers gave a shit but that was life. You learned to accept it or fight back.

Currently kids are suffering under the anti-reality effect of enforced delusion where teachers will not simply ignore bullying, they will bleat endlessly about how it's not tolerated even while it's happening directly under their noses.

It's one thing to suffer it, but it's another entirely for the cult of authority to signal great virtue regarding their protectorship over you while simultaneously ignoring your suffering. Kids more than adults (and teenagers more than kids) need to make sense of the world, and "we will protect you">"you're not protecting me">"we, the sainted, have protected you, you're welcome" is the kind of thing that will snap a teen's wiring.

Long story short. It's rarely the tough reality that sends you off the deep end. It's having to incorporate everyone else's delusions into that reality that does your head in, particularly when the lunatics are in all the positions of authority.

I also wonder about how things have changed since my school days. The biggest difference is that when I went home, I wasn't connected anymore. We had two phones number and one phone number in the house. There were no social media, no email, no Internet, and no cell phones. Stupid disputes would also be totally forgotten over summer vacation. Now, kids never get a break from their bullies.

[PapayaTapper]

(05-21-2018 09:08 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(05-21-2018 11:28 AM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

There have always been cool kids, shunned kids, bullies, and the bullied. The thing is that these things are easy to spot in hindsight. But should his "red flags' have been that noticeable in order to stand out above normal high school social dynamics? Im not saying this couldn't have been prevented but I just think its harder to identify who's going top snap and who's not in advance. It may seem obvious after the fact but not so easily diagnosed and prevented

I think one of the things that exacerbates the pain of being bullied is the shameless perpetual masturbatory talk from school authorities about "ending bullying" while they blatantly turn a blind eye to it in practice.


This is absolutely a side-effect of the extreme gynocentrism that has overtaken academia. As we know, women equate talking about a problem with that problem actually being solved. A sad holdover from their primitive biology which drives them to complain about shit so that men will fix it, except without men (or at least only cucks who are forbidden to act) the problems continue to exist despite pleas of "didn't we talk about this already!?"

Excellent post and this point is extraordinarily salient.

I cant tell you how many times Ive heard girls / women say "I dont need you to fix the problem. I just need you to listen".

That statement goes against every instinctual fiber of my problem solving entrepreneurial existence, life experience, and self identity. Really understanding and accepting this female "need" as innate has been hard and I still struggle with ingraining it.

You've hit a major nail on the head. At a primal level acknowledgement of the problem is in female administrators' minds a, if not the, solution to said problem.

[Leonard D Neubache]

The problem is an extremely broad one (no pun intended). I've worked directly and peripherally for the government for various periods of time (God help me) and this gynocentric "talking = solving" mentality in the public sector has become a swamp in which progress and productivity goes to die.

If they ever achieve their goal of 50% female participation rates in the military (and that will be stacked heavily in non-combat for obvious reasons) then I wish I were kidding when I say that engaging in warfare will be an issue to be discussed rather than a capacity to be built.

I would bet good money that this is being played out similarly in the public sectors of most Western nations.

[Simeon_Strangelight]

The "we talked about it" solution is being applied across the world:



Makes sense.



Essentially it's all part of gynocentric thinking. In addition you have the point that "if you don't talk about it, then it does not exist". That is broadly applied when non-PC solutions need to be taken.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

(05-18-2018 06:02 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

(05-18-2018 04:53 PM)Dragan Wrote:  

Sorry, what the hell is this, "Mass Shooting Lounge"?. The name of this is not palatable, I don't endorse violence man, at all, please change the name of this shit.

Its "Mass school shooting lounge" actually "man".

No one is "endorsing" violence.

The thread is intended as a catch- all for these incidents rather than have a new one every time they happen (since they happen almost weekly)

Nothing new comes from new threads about basically the same topic

"Lounge" is often used as "general" in the RVF vernacular

Still, we could rename this to Mass school shooting thread to get rid of that unintentional "relaxation and fun" context.

After all, we don't talk about Trump in Donald Trump lounge.