Quote: (01-13-2018 08:56 PM)Blancpain Wrote:
Quote: (01-13-2018 05:19 PM)LeBeau Wrote:
Quote: (01-13-2018 12:19 PM)Blancpain Wrote:
Even in the 1970s a woman fleeing from an abusive husband could be arrested and imprisoned for "abandoning the home" (abandono del hogar). Until the 1970s a woman could not have a bank account without a co-sign by her father or husband.[77] In the 1960s and 1970s these restrictions were somewhat relaxed, but it was not until after Franco's death that a more egalitarian view of the sexes was adopted.''
40 years after his death, his beliefs are adopted by the manosphere.
It seems suspect that you're trying to tie men on this forum to these views as an opening post.
So if you believe that, you would force your sister, daughter, or female relative to stay with an abusive husband?
I've never seen a thread here where people have advocated that. And I'm certainly not going to give you the validation you're looking for.
I'm not trying to tie anyone to anything. I certainly would not allow my sister to stay with an abusive husband. Just because the fact that I admire this man does not mean I agree with all his views.
But looking at the big picture, aside from minor points, he is the leader I brace the most ideologically.
You also have to take context into account, he said these things in 1960s, back then the world was different, he probably wouldn't hold some of those values today..
He is certainly spot on though about banning women from judicial positions, because its a scientific fact that women act on emotion and not rationally.
As well, the thinking that probably went behind rules such as not allowing women to bail on their husbands is that many women would falsely accuse their husband, and even more would bolt on a whim, due to their naturally volatile temperament. Nearly every divorcing broad lies about their husband being abusive in order to better divorce-rape him.
Franco was a very good leader overall. Spanish women were much better off under him than they are today in the cultural marxist dystopia their country is fast becoming. That is true of nearly every other western Catholic country. I would have
loved to live in early 1970s Spain.
There is a lot of bullshit written about Franco in the history books and popular culture, with degenerates like Luis Buñel perpetrating that commie narrative. The Nationalists are constantly portrayed as savage fascist troglodytes fighting righteous progressive freedom-loving "Republicans", who were in fact nun-raping clergy-murdering killers aligned with the worst, most criminal regime to ever rule in Europe, the Bolsheviks', and they were funded by the same globalist crowd.
Those "Republicans" murdered 7,000 defenseless Spanish clergy members during the Terror Rojo, carrying the great tradition of terror campaigns from the French and Bolshevik revolutions. The heroic efforts of Franco and Spanish patriots ended up saving the lives of hundreds of thousands of their countrymen, starting with the 65,000 clergy members the Reds didn't manage to get ahold of.
From William Carr's "Pawns in the Game" chapter on Spain:
Quote:Quote:
...It must be remembered that the leaders of a revolution don’t consider the effort entirely wasted if it doesn’t end in a proletarian dictatorship. Every revolt against constituted government and lawful authority is considered by those who plot and plan revolutionary efforts as a step in the right direction. If the effort falls short of success that is bad, but not hopeless. It doesn’t matter how many people are killed. They are just pawns in the game. They are expendable. It is extraordinary how few of the top-level revolutionary leaders get killed during a rebellion.[2] It is accepted as good revolutionary technique, to sacrifice the masses and preserve the members of the Illuminati, for they are to govern the new order. Even in ordinary strikes the Reds usually stir up the trouble, and then sneak away. They leave the other workers to do the actual fighting with the police or militia.
The following facts are given to prove that during a revolution everyone who is not a party member or a fellow traveller, may expect no mercy of any kind. Even Fellow Travellers are liquidated after they have been used to advantage.
Prior to July, 1936, the directors of the World Revolutionary Movement had literally flooded Madrid with agents. Moses Rosenberg arrived as Moscow’s ambassador to Madrid. Anteneff Avseenko arrived in Barcelona. Dimitrov arrived to personally conduct the religious persecutions planned to follow the Communist Coup. During the Civil War Rosenberg ruled as tzar of Madrid. Avseenko assumed command of the Catalan Red Army. Rosenberg organized the Chekas in Spain and saw that they carried out their work of spying out more and more victims.
Moscow’s agents organized “Purification Squads”. Officially their duty was to seek out Fascists but secretly they liquidated all those who had been previously listed as reactionaries to the Illuminati’s plan for subjugation of Spain. These lists had been compiled by Communist spies who had been worked into the Union of Concierges; (house and apartment janitors) the tax departments, the Postal Services, and other public offices. The lists of those to be liquidated were very complete because Moscow’s spies, some disguised as scissors and knife grinders, had covered every district, street by street and house by house. All citizens were listed according to their political, labour, social, and religious standing and affiliations. When the order for the Reign of Terror to start was given, the Communists worked with the sureness, the ferocity, and the thoroughness, of starved brutes. Stalin had once stated : “It is better that a hundred innocent people die than one reactionary should escape.” They obeyed this order with devilish persistency.
So others who live in countries not yet subjugated may understand what happens during a reign of terror, some actual atrocities will be described.
On July 17th, 1936, a group of Communists wearing the uniforms of government troops called at the Dominican Convent in Barcelona. The leader informed the Mother Superior that because mob violence was feared he had orders to escort the sisters to a place of safety. The sisters gathered together their few belongings and, unsuspectingly, accompanied the soldiers who took them to the suburbs where they murdered them all. The leader callously remarked afterwards, “We needed the building. We didn’t want to muss it up before we occupied it.[3]
Senor Salvans was a known anti-Communist. Three times purification squads visited his home in Barcelona. When the third visit produced no information regarding his whereabouts, the Reds murdered the whole family of eight. That vile deed was performed in accordance with paragraphs 15 and 16 of the instructions already referred to.
One of the most senseless acts of violence ever committed in the name of “Liberty ... Equality ... Fraternity”, was the murder of sixteen lay-brothers who worked voluntarily as male nurses in the largest hospital in Barcelona. Their only crime was that they belonged to a religious order. The fact that they nursed all who were sick, regardless of class, colour, or creed, made no difference to those who ordered their “liquidation”. E.M. Godden, who published Conflict in Spain, on page 72 reported : “The slaughter of the living was accompanied by derision for the dead. During the last week of July, 1936, the bodies of nuns were exhumed from their graves and propped up outside the walls of their convents. Obscene, and offensive, placards were attached to their bodies.”
Rep point to the OP for daring to go against the grain on El Generalísimo.