[meetjoeblack]

I love these types of threads with absolutely TONS of pics. Because nothing says game like imaginary pics.

YEAH OK BUD!

[xxx]

(12-09-2017 07:43 PM)XXL Wrote:  

Men and women are not equal therefore we cannot compare ourselves on the same terms.

Women do not need any game. They just need to pssos certain traits that men find attractive.

I personally do not need my woman to be highly intelligent well read soulmate thay I can connect intellectually with. She needs to be good woman to me and have good potential to be a good mother.

What about the way a woman seduces and tricks? The way she plays dumb to make you do things for her? The female game arsenal is huge...


The way she traps a man into committing? God some of you are clueless... Men have to learn game, women are natural masters at it. Mark my words when a feminine woman wants a man, she games him like a Jedi master.

Female game is less about sex (although it can be used for that too, mostly by uglier women), and more about getting the man to do things for her, to fall in love with her, and to get him to ignore all other women; even to control and manipulate his actions. You think all the wealthy beta providers out there are just stupid? Many are very smart and talented businessmen -- they just get gamed by feminine, talented women.

Beauty alone isn't enough to get a powerful man, a smart woman knows this, and has a full biological bag of tricks at her disposal -- 100,000 years of evolutionary understanding of male psychology ingrained in her head, that comes out lighting fast as pure instinct.

You guys just haven't been chased. I had to learn game and study female nature to protect myself against women, not to bed them.

[meetjoeblack]

(12-09-2017 07:43 PM)XXL Wrote:  

Men and women are not equal therefore we cannot compare ourselves on the same terms.

Women do not need any game. They just need to pssos certain traits that men find attractive.

I personally do not need my woman to be highly intelligent well read soulmate thay I can connect intellectually with. She needs to be good woman to me and have good potential to be a good mother.

I agree with the part on 'sameness' despite the contradiction in society which pushes neutrality and equality. Sure, in terms in base essence but, with respect to one's talent and abilities, this is simply not the case. Gender is not fluid no matter what a SJW may try to say. Women are prevalent at playing into victimhood. Men cannot do the same thing as nobody cares.

I agreed with most of this except for the point on a woman's intelligence. Its been my experience, if a woman is not a free thinker, she is following social conditioning, social engineering, is a feminist, SJWs, and is 'sloot gonna sloot' until of course SMV craters. Now, its time to play the victimhood game.

With respect to fertility, biology, aesthetics, and even top form SMV, men are women are not the same. Also, in which one reaches top form differ significantly. one of the probems now a days is that presumption of value for having a pussy pertaining to but not limited to the west. There is virtually no fallout for women skiing down cawk mountain as some cuck will raise the alpha's babies, will marry her, and be an atm until she fucks off before divorcing him while extracting resources through the dogs of the state.

[PapayaTapper]

(12-09-2017 08:30 PM)xxx Wrote:  

(12-09-2017 07:43 PM)XXL Wrote:  

Men and women are not equal therefore we cannot compare ourselves on the same terms.

Women do not need any game. They just need to pssos certain traits that men find attractive.

I personally do not need my woman to be highly intelligent well read soulmate thay I can connect intellectually with. She needs to be good woman to me and have good potential to be a good mother.

What about the way a woman seduces and tricks? The way she plays dumb to make you do things for her? The female game arsenal is huge...

The way she traps a man into committing? God some of you are clueless... Men have to learn game, women are natural masters at it. Mark my words when a feminine woman wants a man, she games him like a Jedi master.

Female game is less about sex (although it can be used for that too, mostly by uglier women), and more about getting the man to do things for her, to fall in love with her, and to get him to ignore all other women; even to control and manipulate his actions. You think all the wealthy beta providers out there are just stupid? Many are very smart and talented businessmen -- they just get gamed by feminine, talented women.

Beauty alone isn't enough to get a powerful man, a smart woman knows this, and has a full biological bag of tricks at her disposal -- 100,000 years of evolutionary understanding of male psychology ingrained in her head, that comes out lighting fast as pure instinct.

You guys just haven't been chased. I had to learn game and study female nature to protect myself against women, not to bed them.

Men "game" for sex and women "game" for resources?....Huh...never heard that before

[Laska]

Oh really, how have they seduced you? There have been a few times I've been hit on, and it's always been painfully awkward. The reason why they pursued me was mainly because they had little access to men, and they were desperate.

When I was 13, maybe 14, a super tall black girl picked some little white flowers, then presented them out to me in a mini bouquet. A guy a few years older saw it, and laughed his head off; it was pretty embarrassing. Is this the "games him like a Jedi master" that you were referring to?

[HankMoody]

Ha, random...

I was at the bar the other night. This reasonably attractive chick walked up to me and was like "I like your yellow tie. Don't go anywhere. I'll be back in 10." (side note: any suit looks good with a nice tie).

I ended up going home with another chick a few minutes later.

[xxx]

(12-09-2017 08:55 PM)Laska Wrote:  

Oh really, how have they seduced you? There have been a few times I've been hit on, and it's always been painfully awkward. The reason why they pursued me was mainly because they had little access to men, and they were desperate.

When I was 13, maybe 14, a super tall black girl picked some little white flowers, then presented them out to me in a mini bouquet. A guy a few years older saw it, and laughed his head off; it was pretty embarrassing. Is this the "games him like a Jedi master" that you were referring to?

It's not upfront. Nothing a woman does is upfront, they can't risk that for the obvious fear of being ostracized. The example you gave is you projecting the way you approach getting a woman, into the way you think a woman gets a man.

The way a feminine woman does it (all subconsciously btw) is by first pulling you in with her beauty, then getting you to approach her, then she sizes you up and figures out your weak points (naturally charms you), then slowly but surely gets you to fall in love with her. If she gets pregnant it's over; she can use the baby as leverage to get anything.

A man in love is fully at the mercy of 'his' woman.

The most masculine of men have the ability to abandon their children and partners, even while in love, but these men are rare.

[UnW]

Have you ever noticed if you're an attractive guy on apps like Tinder and so on, you get a lot of matches and girls who will write things like "don't be boring" etc in their profiles will have the most mundane, boring openers like "how are you?" It's just not required for most girls to be interesting or good at conversation since most won't ever really need these attributes to attract men.

[xxx]

(12-09-2017 09:03 PM)HankMoody Wrote:  

Ha, random...

I was at the bar the other night. This reasonably attractive chick walked up to me and was like "I like your yellow tie. Don't go anywhere. I'll be back in 10." (side note: any suit looks good with a nice tie).

I ended up going home with another chick a few minutes later.

You guys are giving as examples the lowest of the lowest of the female hierarchy... Sluts and club rats are such. They're weak, damaged women that couldn't get a high value man to commit if it was the end of the world and they were the only women left alive.

They're the equivalent of the buzzfeed beta guys; they're evolutionary dead ends who only survive because our society is so comfortable. They can always get guys to fuck them though, even the relatively ugly ones if they have some charm.

[PapayaTapper]

(12-09-2017 09:19 PM)xxx Wrote:  

The most masculine of men have the ability to abandon their children and partners, even while in love, but these men are rare.

If "masculine" ="deadbeat" :

Youre doing it wrong

[Putin Closes]

I cant think of a interesting online opener from a chick. It's just a ton of hellos or that stupid emoji smile. Lol once in a blue moon will say something else. Chicks don't need game when they have hundreds of guys on tap on tinder.

[xxx]

(12-09-2017 09:26 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

(12-09-2017 09:19 PM)xxx Wrote:  

The most masculine of men have the ability to abandon their children and partners, even while in love, but these men are rare.

If "masculine" ="deadbeat" :

Youre doing it wrong

A 'deadbeat' is a bad boy who doesn't care what society thinks of him, and yes he oozes masculinity.

Most of the time though, these 'deadbeats' are men who impregnated sluts they didn't even come close to loving, so the abandonment was relatively easy.

They're still very masculine though -- a beta could never dream of doing what they do.


*Putin Closes, game doesn't mean approaching and it doesn't mean getting sex - it means getting what you want, whatever that is. A feminine woman never approaches and yet has the best game.

[Laska]

(12-09-2017 09:19 PM)xxx Wrote:  

(12-09-2017 08:55 PM)Laska Wrote:  

Oh really, how have they seduced you? There have been a few times I've been hit on, and it's always been painfully awkward. The reason why they pursued me was mainly because they had little access to men, and they were desperate.

When I was 13, maybe 14, a super tall black girl picked some little white flowers, then presented them out to me in a mini bouquet. A guy a few years older saw it, and laughed his head off; it was pretty embarrassing. Is this the "games him like a Jedi master" that you were referring to?

It's not upfront. Nothing a woman does is upfront, they can't risk that for the obvious fear of being ostracized. The example you gave is you projecting the way you approach getting a woman, into the way you think a woman gets a man.

The way a feminine woman does it (all subconsciously btw) is by first pulling you in with her beauty, then getting you to approach her, then she sizes you up and figures out your weak points (naturally charms you), then slowly but surely gets you to fall in love with her. If she gets pregnant it's over; she can use the baby as leverage to get anything.

A man in love is fully at the mercy of 'his' woman.

The most masculine of men have the ability to abandon their children and partners, even while in love, but these men are rare.

Some teenage girls do very weird things. How can you be so confident I made it up?

[meetjoeblack]

No. Women have no game. Men just continue to marry and swear away their resources + get cucked along the way.

There is a reason as to why Leonardo Decaprio is single, banging 18yr old models like clock work.

[Caractacus Potts]

(12-09-2017 09:41 PM)Putin Closes Wrote:  

I cant think of a interesting online opener from a chick. It's just a ton of hellos or that stupid emoji smile. Lol once in a blue moon will say something else. Chicks don't need game when they have hundreds of guys on tap on tinder.

I had one send me "Me bed is broken can I sleep in yours?"

I think it may be the best one I've ever gotten.

[scrambled]

(11-26-2017 09:24 PM)gang Wrote:  

I feel like I have reached almost a pinnacle state of being where I am more unique and offer 100x more value than any girl could ever possibly offer me.

[gang]

(12-10-2017 12:43 AM)meetjoeblack Wrote:  

No. Women have no game. Men just continue to marry and swear away their resources + get cucked along the way.

There is a reason as to why Leonardo Decaprio is single, banging 18yr old models like clock work.

Some women have game after the dumbass goes out of his way to pursue her, sure. And thats not even game its just the dumbass still buys into the idea of love (99% of men). I'm not talking about that.

I'm talking about a women recognizing a man of extreme value, knowing that theres no possible way he would magically choose her from all the other bitches who look exactly like her, and her going out of her way to pursue.

Isn't that biologically there job? To reproduce with the highest value man? How the hell do they do that when they just sit there and look stupid doing absolutely nothing.

I think there is a tiny segment of groupie bitches who do this in the entertainment industry, they pursue the rapper or the athelete and a bunch of rappers and atheletes just end up fucking the same bitch. One eventually gets took for his cash and manhood. Never heard of it outside of that though.

[Rhyme or Reason]

(12-09-2017 09:44 PM)xxx Wrote:  

A 'deadbeat' is a bad boy who doesn't care what society thinks of him, and yes he oozes masculinity.

There's plenty of deadbeats who aren't getting laid. Many more than are getting laid. By your definition this would make them beta, yet you go on to say:

(12-09-2017 09:44 PM)xxx Wrote:  

They're still very masculine though -- a beta could never dream of doing what they do.

You're equating masculinity to being a deadbeat.

If 'Getting what you want' is the metric of determining alpha / masculinity, then that would rule out most dead beats who don't get shit that they really want in life, many times that includes women.

I think the type of person you're alluding to in your description is another kind of individual altogether; the rogue type...guys that are good with chicks that seemingly have little else to offer. They tend to get hated on by beta guys with money / 'things going for them' (or so they think) and are often resentful of anyone they see as lesser or undeserving/unworthy having any success with women.

These guys do not understand the decoupling of material possessions, money, or on-paper ""status"" from the appeal of the person themselves. Women innately view these things as different altogether.

"There's just something about him"

I think the 'deadbeats' you refer to are just selling something women are wiling to buy...even if no one else is.

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Women don't need game. They have the game changer being a pussy so, men propose on a quickly depreciating asset.

[XXL]

As for girls tricks they mostly guilt men into something or bait us to do something. It's repetitive and very obvious to any guy who has had a few GFs.

If game is whatever that produces results then we call it their game.

[Matsufubu]

In other news, zebras are terrible at hunting lions. Fucking zebras! Why do they expect Simba himself to bestow his kingly attention upon their boring, two-tone asses when they look exactly the same as the next zebra to them?