rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


Jeff Bezos’ guide to life
#1

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Here are Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ tips about inspiration, work-life balance, and how to be an inventor. Oh, and how it felt getting doused with champagne at his rocket landing. The world’s richest person displayed an unprecedented level of candor during an interview at invite-only getaway Summit Series in Los Angeles this weekend.

Why did Jeff get so vulnerable? Because his little brother Mark Bezos was the interviewer. Set against a backdrop of old Bezos family photos at the opulent Orpheum Theater, Jeff revealed his personal philosophy.

The final line of Jeff’s high school Valedictorian speech: “Space, the final frontier. Meet me there” he said, turning Star Trek’s motto into a call to action.

How he learned resourcefulness: Jeff spent summer from age four to sixteen on an isolated farm owned by his grandfather he called “Pop”. Without access to outside help, Pop had to rely on himself. Jeff said. Pop went as far as making his own needles and doing his own veterinary work like suturing cattle. Jeff spent a summer repairing an old piece of Caterpillar construction equipment Pop had bought for $5000 — a huge discount because it was entirely broken. When the giant mail-order gears for the repair arrived, they were too heavy to move…so Pop built his own miniature crane to lift them. “He would take on major projects he didn’t know how to do, and then he did them” says Jeff.

On practicing resilience: Jeff’s Pop once tore the top of his thumb off. He had tried to jump out of his moving truck and unlatch the farm’s gate before the car slid through, but the car slammed into the gate that nearly took off Pop’s finger, which was hanging on by a thread. He was so mad that he tore the top of the thumb off and threw it in the brush, then drove himself to the hospital. Rather than have his thumb stitched to his side to regrow, Pop just had the docs do a quicker skin graft from his butt. Jeff distinctly remembers how from then on “his thumb grew butt hair”. But rather than complain, Pop would just shave his thumb along with his face. “Each time you have a set back, you’re using resilience and resourcefulness, and inventing your way out of a box” says Jeff.

On raising kids: Jeff and his wife let their kids use sharp knives since they were four and soon had them wielding power tools, because if they hurt themselves, they’d learn. Jeff says his wife’s perspective is “I’d much rather have a kid with nine fingers than a resourceless kid.”

On choosing a romantic partner: When Jeff decided he was ready to settle down, his friends set him up on tons of blind dates. He eventually knew he’d found his wife when he met someone truly resourceful. “I wanted a woman who could get me out of a third-world prison” Jeff said.

How he knew to leave his job and start Amazon: Jeff had a been working in finance software engineering on Wall Street. But in 1994, he told his boss he wanted to start an Internet book store. His boss told him it was a pretty good idea but that it was “a better idea for someone who didn’t have a good job.” Jeff took a few days, and decided “the best way to think about it was to project my life forward to age 80” and make the decision that “minimized my regrets. You don’t want to be cataloguing your regrets.” And while you might feel remorse for things you did wrong, he said more often regrets stem from the “path not taken” like loving someone but never telling them. “Then it was immediately obvious” that he should leave to start Amazon. “If it failed, I would be very proud when I was 80 that I tried.”

What he’d be doing if he wasn’t ‘Jeff Bezos’: “My best guess is I’d be a very happy software engineer” following his interest in machine learning and AI. But he admits “I have this fantasy of being a bartender. I pride myself on my craft cocktails.” But be warned, he says he’s extremely slow. His fantasy bar would have a sign saying “do you want it good or do you want it fast?”

On his personal connection to the news and owning the Washington Post: Jeff says “Pop obsessively watched the Watergate hearings” in 1973. That might have subconsciously influenced how high he values investigative journalism, which he expressed by acquiring the Washington Post in 2013.

On the need for space travel and his rocket company Blue Origin: “We have to go to space to save earth” Jeff says, noting “we kind of have to hurry.” Still, he believes Plan A and Plan B both need to be protecting the environment of Earth to keep it livable. “We’ve sent robotic probes to every planet in our solar system. This one is the best. It’s not even close.”

On space entrepreneurship: The key to opening the opportunities of space is reducing the price of getting objects out of Earth’s gravity. “We have to lower the cost of admission so thousands of entrepreneurs can have startups in space, like we saw with the Internet”, noting how web companies exploded in popularity as infrastructure costs came down.

On phone addiction and multi-tasking: Mark says his brother Jeff is surprisingly present, and rarely distracted by his phone. Jeff explains that “When I have dinner with friends or family, I like to be doing whatever I’m doing. I don’t like to multi-task. If I’m reading my email I want to be reading my email” with his full attention and energy. Jeff exhibited this resistance to multi-tasking early in life. At Montessori school, he’d refuse to move on to the next task as the day progressed, so the teacher would literally pick up him and his chair and move him to the next project. Instead of constantly switching back and forth, Jeff says he sequentially focuses. “I multi-task serially.”

On how to establish work-life balance: “I like the phrase ‘work-life harmony'”, Jeff says. “Balance implies there’s a strict trade-off.” If he feels like he’s adding value and is a productive member of a team at work, “it makes me better at home. If I’m happy at home, it makes me a better employee, a better boss.” Don’t be someone who drains energy out of their co-workers or family. He believes it’s not just about how you allocate hours in the day, but whether you have enough energy to participate with enthusiasm.

On how to be an inventor: Because the world is so complicated, you have to be a “domain expert” to find solutions to problems. “But the danger is that once you’re a domain expert, you can be trapped by that knowledge.” You have to approach things with childlike curiosity. Inventors are the experts with beginners minds, he says.

On what defines you: “We all get to choose our life stories. It’s our choices that define us, not our gifts. You can only be proud of your choices” Jeff says. You either choose a life of “ease and comfort”, or of “service and adventure”, and when you’re 80, you’ll be more proud of the latter.

And finally, his most ridiculous quote of the talk: When discussing the tarmac celebration pictured up top after the successful landing of his Blue Origin New Shepard reusable rocket, Jeff said “My cowboy hat still has champagne stains. The best kind of stains.”

https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/05/jeff-b...de-to-life
Reply
#2

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Quote:Quote:

On his personal connection to the news and owning the Washington Post: Jeff says “Pop obsessively watched the Watergate hearings” in 1973. That might have subconsciously influenced how high he values investigative journalism, which he expressed by acquiring the Washington Post in 2013.

So producing shameless propaganda aimed at installing nepotists who will maintain your tax evasion is now "investigative journalism"?

[Image: laugh7.gif]

"Imagine" by HCE | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for squid that has never crossed your mind before
Reply
#3

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Quote: (11-12-2017 02:15 PM)lookslikeit Wrote:  

How he learned resourcefulness: Jeff spent summer from age four to sixteen on an isolated farm owned by his grandfather he called “Pop”. Without access to outside help, Pop had to rely on himself. Jeff said. Pop went as far as making his own needles and doing his own veterinary work like suturing cattle. Jeff spent a summer repairing an old piece of Caterpillar construction equipment Pop had bought for $5000 — a huge discount because it was entirely broken. When the giant mail-order gears for the repair arrived, they were too heavy to move…so Pop built his own miniature crane to lift them. “He would take on major projects he didn’t know how to do, and then he did them” says Jeff.

On practicing resilience: Jeff’s Pop once tore the top of his thumb off. He had tried to jump out of his moving truck and unlatch the farm’s gate before the car slid through, but the car slammed into the gate that nearly took off Pop’s finger,

So pop couldnt fix brakes, but he can sew up a cow?

Or is this some type of life lesson? When you come to a gate in the road of life, don't stop, jump out and open and close it and jump back in.

Aloha!
Reply
#4

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Here's 10 more reasons Jeff Bezos is a Great Guy To Emulate In Business And In Life:

http://blog.seattlepi.com/trevorgriffey/...mazon-com/

Quote:Quote:

Reason #10: Amazon Undermined Canadian Laws to Protect Booksellers
According to the Guardian newspaper, from 2002-10, Amazon.ca “has been doing business through a loophole – by not employing anybody in Canada and using a contractor to ship orders across the border, it has avoided oversight under the 1985 Investment Canada Act, which allows ministerial scrutiny of foreign companies’ presence in the country.”

When the Canadian government, seeking to overcome the loophole (which was a result of the law being written before the creation of the internet), gave permission to Amazon.ca in 2010 to build a distribution center in Canada, it also created a legal precedent for allowing other non-Canadian firms to make deep inroads into parts of the culture and economy that Canadians had sought to protect from foreign competition in order to sustain local culture and jobs.

Reason #9: Amazon.com Won’t Commit to Protecting Your Privacy
Amazon.com collects personal information about you—what goods you like, what you purchase, what goods you look at, what you review, etc—that is very valuable to corporations and their marketing firms. Its current privacy policy says that it won’t sell this information to other companies— for now. But it reserves the right to change its mind without notice, and you can’t opt out, even by canceling your account. For that reason, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a watchdog of digital privacy, is effectively boycotting Amazon.com and sells its books through its own web site.

Reason #8: Amazon.com Dropped Wikileaks
At the slightest whiff of controversy, Amazon.com immediately dropped Wikileaks from its servers last year, even though Wikileaks has not been charged with a crime. Regardless of what you think of Wikileaks, Amazon.com showed that it was more interested in currying favor with politicians than supporting free speech.

The precedent it set with its treatment of Wikileaks has made Amazon.com a potential tool of political witch-hunts to control content of the public sphere. Other controversies about how it has labeled gay and lesbian books as “adult” material and “accidentally” stripped them of their sales rankings, then restored them, show how sensitive Amazon.com is to shifting political winds.

Reason #7: Amazon.com Is Being Sued for Installing Cookies on Its Customers’ Computers and Selling Their Information Without Their Consent
Amazon.com is currently being sued as part of a class-action lawsuit for deliberately circumventing its customers’ privacy preferences. According to the lawsuit, Del Vechio v. Amazon.com, Amazon.com’s web site has been engineered to bypass Internet Explorer (IE) privacy settings by installing both regular and flash cookies on users’ computers even when those IE settings are supposed to block cookies. If the allegations are true, it means that Amazon.com shares its customers’ personal information with third parties without their consent and against their wishes—violating not only the law but its own privacy policy.

Reason #6: Amazon.com Has Charged Different Customers Different Prices for the Same Product
It’s difficult to know to what degree Amazon.com continues to experiment with what it calls “price tests”— or the use of your personal information to determine the price it will offer you for a specific good. What we do know is that, according to Consumer Reports, “Amazon.com pioneered dynamic pricing” in the late 1990s, and many other online businesses followed its lead.

Amazon.com claims that it no longer engages in this practice, but a Los Angeles Times reporter caught the company engaging in the practice as recently as 2007. It’s difficult to be certain if Amazon.com stopped, or to prevent it from restarting the practice at any time. According to readability consultant Mark Hochhauser, PhD, Amazon.com’s “Conditions of Use” are so complicated that it is impossible even for him to discern for certain if Amazon.com policy allows dynamic pricing.

Reason #5: Shopping at Amazon.com Puts Independent Bookstores Out of Business
This is an obvious point, and one that pretty much everyone knows. It’s cheaper to operate a book warehouse than to operate a book showroom. Buying in bulk at discount rates, storing books in warehouses, selling books without sales taxes, may produce lower prices for customers, but these low prices undermine booksellers who have to pay rent and salaries to maintain an actual store.

What you may not know, but what the Boston Review documented so well in its story “Books After Amazon,” is that 75 percent of all online book sales through Amazon.com because, like Wal-Mart, Amazon.com uses “punitive tactics” with publishers to receive unique discounts. This includes refusing to list a publisher’s books if they do not accede to Amazon.com’s terms. With so much control over the online book market, it is now abusing its bargaining power in a way that makes it harder for both bookstores and publishers to make ends meet. In this way, Amazon.com has taken a monopolistic practices pioneered by large booksellers before it and used it against the whole industry– undercutting not just independent bookstores, but also chains and online competitors both big and small.

Reason #4: Amazon.com Founder Jeff Bezos and His Family Donated $150,000 to Defeat an Income Tax In Washington State in 2010
Amazon.com Founder Jeff Bezos is, according to Forbes Magazine, the 43rd wealthiest person on the planet. His estimated net worth of $12.3 billion is roughly double what it was estimated to be last year.

According to Slate magazine, Amazon.com as a company has almost no public record of charitable giving whatsoever, and the Bezos family’s charitable giving has been stingy compared to other Seattle billionaires such as Paul Allen and Bill Gates.

However there is one cause Bezos was keen to contribute to. According to the Washington State Public Disclosure Commission, Jeff Bezos and his family donated $150,000 to defeat Initiative 1098 in 2010. I-1098 would have created an income tax in Washington state on individuals who make more than $200,000 and families with incomes over $400,000 to specifically pay for health care and education. The initiative failed badly, and now the state of Washington, which faces a $5.3 billion deficit for the 2011-13 biennium, will cut $1 billion more from K-12 and higher education and health care spending than it would have if the income tax had passed.

Reason #3: Amazon.com is Anti-Union
Amazon.com actively opposed union organizing drives in both the United States and the UK.

In the Fall of 2000, a group calling itself “[email protected]/WashTech,” with later affiliated with the Communications Workers of America, began to a campaign to unionize the employees of Amazon.com, starting in Seattle. Amazon.com opposed the union organizing campaign in the U.S. in the Fall of 2000 with everything from distributing anti-union propaganda to offering “reduced phone shifts and free massages” for employees, before it simply laid off 1,300 workers, 850 of which were in Seattle, blaming the layoffs on the decline of the dot.com economy. Many though by no means all of the states that the company has since expanded to are “right to work” states where it is much more difficult for workers to join a labor union.

In the UK in 2001, Amazon.com hired a U.S.-based union-busting firm, The Burke Group, whose aggressive tactics successfully scared warehouse employees in Milton Keynes from unionizing, while four outspoken union supporters claimed they were illegally fired for their activism. According to one researcher who wrote about the “Union Avoidance Industry in the United States,” the “Graphical Print and Media Union (GPMU) [in the UK] stated that the company [Amazon] had mounted the most aggressive union avoidance campaign it had ever encountered, accusing it of sacking one union activist and committing other illegal practices.”

Those who have likely suffered most the costs of Amazon.com’s opposition to labor unions are its temporary employees in its warehouses and distribution centers. In the UK, newspapers have reported that Amazon.com has threatened to fire its 7-day-a-week employees if they call in sick, and has cut short the shifts of its nighttime employees without notice in the middle of their shifts and hours before public transportation has resumed, leaving temp workers stranded over the night. In the U.S., a former Nevada distribution center employee, Richard Austin, has filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Amazon.com skims time from its employees’ hours in order to keep from paying them legally required overtime wages.

Reason #2: Amazon.com is a World-Class Tax-Dodger
While other companies struggled with the world recession, Amazon.com has prospered. Between 2008 and 2010, Amazon’s gross annual profits increased from $4.3 billion to $7.7 billion. Because of its sophisticated and controversial practices for exploiting tax laws that were not written to account for internet commerce, it has paid only a small fraction of its corporate income in taxes. What’s more, it has increased its bottom line by deftly avoiding sales taxes that its rivals have to collect.

At least 5 countries outside the U.S. have recently investigated Amazon.com for engaging in dishonest financial practices meant to avoid paying taxes. Amazon.com has generated controversy in Japan by failing to report its income there from 2003 to 2005. In 2009, the Japanese government ordered Amazon.com to pay over $119 million it was estimated to have owed. In its 2009 annual report, Amazon stated bluntly that “We believe that these claims are without merit and are disputing the assessment.” In addition, Japan has been investigating Amazon.com for violating a U.S. tax treaty by falsifying the location of its sales to avoid Japanese corporate income taxes between 2006 and 2009.

Meanwhile, according to the Amazon.com’s 2009 annual report, it is subject to investigations for tax-dodging in “France for 2006 through 2009, Germany for 2003 through 2009, Luxembourg for 2004 through 2009, and the United Kingdom for 2003 through 2009.” These investigations have been progressing for years, and appear to be ongoing.

According to the Seattle Times, one of the reasons that Amazon.com tax policies are so controversial both in and outside the U.S. is because of the innovative legal argument that Amazon has pioneered that its “distribution centers” are separate institutions that do not constitute a “physical presence” within a state or nation. In the U.S., Amazon.com does collect sales taxes in six states. But it also avoids paying sales tax on goods that move through its facilities in “Arizona, Indiana, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia.”

Amazon.com plays hardball with those governments who disagree with its interpretation of what constitutes a “physical presence” in their states. The state of Texas is currently suing Amazon.com for what it alleges are $269 million in unpaid sales taxes. In response to this lawsuit, Amazon counter-sued and announced plans to completely close its operations in Texas. Similarly, when state governments have sought to pass legislation taxing the transactions of individuals and small firms that use Amazon.com’s web site to sell their goods, Amazon.com has completely cut off its “affiliates” in those states. According to the Seattle Times, “Amazon has ended affiliate relationships in North Carolina, Rhode Island and Colorado,” and is currently threatening to do the same in California.

In addition to Amazon.com’s argument that its “distribution centers” do not represent a legal “physical presence” where they are located, Amazon.com also tries to push governments to give it an advantage over its competitors in exchange for locating some of its operations in a state. In the case of the state of Tennessee, as described by the Seattle Times, even after its government officials offered Amazon.com “free land, job-training assistance and more than $12 million in property-tax breaks” in exchange for building a distribution hub there, Amazon.com is still reportedly insisting that the state grant the facility a sales tax exemption. In South Carolina, a right to work state that is not averse to giving tax breaks to corporations, even the politicians and populace may have reached a limit to what they are willing to give Amazon.com, and are currently debating whether it really makes sense to give it a special sales tax advantage over corporations such as Walmart and Best-Buy.

Like many large U.S. corporations in the news lately, Amazon.com uses complicated tax write-off schemes and balancing between its domestic and international divisions to pay only a fraction of the corporate income tax rate in the U.S.. So that while Amazon.com technically owed the U.S. Treasury $852 million on its profits between 2008 and 2010, it paid only $176 million after it had made all of its deductions. That left it paying well below the 35 percent corporate tax rate for U.S. corporations. (See documents on the New York Times website for more info)

Reason #1: There are Better Alternatives
Contrary to popular wisdom, there are plenty of alternatives to Amazon.com, even for those who prefer to shop online. You might not get the absolutely lowest price in every instance. But the problems listed above explain the costs of just deciding where to make your purchases.

Amazon.com sells goods of all kinds, making any description of alternatives potentially limitless. Because it dominates the book-selling industry, and because so many people tend link to Amazon.com by default when sharing links on Facebook, Twitter, on their web sites and in their emails, I am focusing my discussion on books.

First is the fact that you can purchase books online from other places. If you are a bargain shopper, you can’t do much better than Bookfinder.com, which aggregates prices not just from Amazon.com but from other sources in the U.S. and around the world. To support independent booksellers who have gone online-only, it’s worth checking out Alibris.com.

But online commerce doesn’t have to come at the expense of the physical bookstore. A bookstore is so much more than a showroom for books. It is a vital community space. Independent booksellers in particular tend to host book events for local authors that no large chain would bother with. Force all independent booksellers online, and you lose this valuable civic space for debate and discussion in your local community, while also hurting the local economy. When was the last time you went to an author reading sponsored by Amazon.com? And how many of the places where you used to go to book events have either gone out of business in the last 10 years or are on the verge of doing so?

For those reasons, here are a couple bookstore web sites which reflect my Pacific Northwest-centric perspective:

First, there is Powells.com, probably one of the best independent bookstores in the U.S., located in Portland, Oregon. And if you live in Seattle, it goes almost without saying that you should support the Elliott Bay Book Company.

Second, most university bookstores, if you have a decent public university in your town, are non-profits that deserve your love and support.

Remember how myspace.com rose and fell with customer whims? Amazon.com can quake just as easily, if consumers decide they’d rather spend their money elsewhere. The key is to buy local, buy union, support non-profits, or otherwise buy from good corporate citizens. It will be worth the extra dollar or two that you might spend on your next purchase.

And from Bezos's own words?

Quote:Quote:

On how to be an inventor: Because the world is so complicated, you have to be a “domain expert” to find solutions to problems. “But the danger is that once you’re a domain expert, you can be trapped by that knowledge.” You have to approach things with childlike curiosity. Inventors are the experts with beginners minds, he says.

Well, Bezos certainly has at least one person who agrees he's a bit childlike. That would be Federal judge Margaret Mary McVeigh, who, in the course of tearing Amazon a new asshole over its practices with one of its own vendors -- Toys R Us -- had this to say about Bezos, who was called to the stand to testify about what he knew of the contract between Toys R Us and Amazon:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/11641703/ns/bu...gj1nNV96Uk

Quote:Quote:

The two retailers signed a 10-year strategic partnership in 2000 — at the height of the Internet stock bubble — that made Amazon.com the exclusive online retail outlet for Toys “R” Us toys, games and baby products.

Whether the agreement also made Toys “R” Us the exclusive provider of such products on Amazon.com was at the heart of the lawsuit, filed in 2004, and a counterclaim filed by Amazon.

The deal originally was hailed as a model for future bricks-n-clicks partnerships, and came as some industry watchers expected online retailers to overwhelm traditional bricks-and-mortar merchants. Based on testimony in a trial last year, the arrangement worked well for both sides for the first several years, improving the ability of Toys “R” Us to compete with eToys and Walmart.com while eliminating toy inventory problems that had been plaguing Amazon.

But Toys “R” Us executives grew increasingly unhappy as the prominence of their virtual store was diminished and Amazon.com signed agreements with rival retailers including Target as well as independent sellers known as zShops.

In a 131-page opinion, New Jersey Superior Court Judge Margaret Mary McVeigh ruled that Amazon had breached its agreement, although she did not award any monetary damages, saying Toys “R” Us was unable to prove it had paid a premium for exclusivity on the site.

In her opinion, McVeigh took a rather dim view of the trial testimony of some Amazon executives, including that of the company’s billionaire founder Jeff Bezos, saying she had “no doubt his knowledge and understanding (of the Toys "R" Us agreement) went much deeper than revealed.”

When pushed on the witness stand, “certain information ‘just came back to him’” she said in the ruling, while another of Bezos’ explanations was referred to as “rather childlike.”


McVeigh also rejected Amazon’s efforts to defend itself by asking her to throw out e-mail evidence that may have included hearsay. She said she found it “incomprehensible … that a corporation dealing primarily in Internet commerce finds Internet communications to lack reliability.”

And she repeatedly complained about the ambiguous use of language in memorandums, contract agreements and discussions, concluding that “the language as drafted whether intentional or inartful gave Amazon the words to play the game their way.”

Bezos is just another dotcom scumbag who has created a contradiction in terms: the Internet middleman, which can only last while it is a parasite and while people are too lazy to go direct to the maker of a good or an alternative website that isn't evil and isn't in the business of owning free speech platforms.

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
Reply
#5

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

The other thing about trying to emulate these guys is that Jeff Bezos, cuck or not, is final-boss level smart. It's very hard to appreciate the difference in IQ between the average dude reading the blog post and Jeff himself.

I will be checking my PMs weekly, so you can catch me there. I will not be posting.
Reply
#6

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Quote: (11-12-2017 08:37 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

Bezos is just another dotcom scumbag who has created a contradiction in terms: the Internet middleman, which can only last while it is a parasite and while people are too lazy to go direct to the maker of a good or an alternative website that isn't evil and isn't in the business of owning free speech platforms.

In olden days, Conan's guide to life was this:






Does this sound fair and just to you...or is it the law of the jungle...might makes right?

Bezos represents what power looks like in the digital age.

The only commonality between the two is an inner ruthlessness and persistence. It's just that one is expressed through brawn and the other, brain.
Reply
#7

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Quote: (11-12-2017 09:45 PM)questor70 Wrote:  

Quote: (11-12-2017 08:37 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

Bezos is just another dotcom scumbag who has created a contradiction in terms: the Internet middleman, which can only last while it is a parasite and while people are too lazy to go direct to the maker of a good or an alternative website that isn't evil and isn't in the business of owning free speech platforms.

In olden days, Conan's guide to life was this:






Does this sound fair and just to you...or is it the law of the jungle...might makes right?

Bezos represents what power looks like in the digital age.

The only commonality between the two is an inner ruthlessness and persistence. It's just that one is expressed through brawn and the other, brain.

Conan might have followed the law of the jungle, but at least he was prepared to follow a law. Bezos can't even do that, per the Toys R Us case. And at least Conan was honest about his intentions: when asked what is best in life, Conan obviously says: crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentation of the women.* He doesn't say "I believe in making a better world for refugees." Be careful who you let inside your head.





* Not to mention there's a subtext in that scene, which is that Conan at that point in his life is nothing but a slave, a whipped dog. It's right after Conan gives that speech that his owner, having looked pityingly on him in the scene, sets him free: because he recognises that Conan doesn't belong in the East mouthing their platitudes about what is best in life.

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
Reply
#8

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Well, the message of Conan is setup right in the Riddle of Steel prologue.

[Image: img_4379.jpg?w=676]

"Noone in this world can you trust.
Not men, not women, not beasts...
this (pointing at the sword) you can trust."




The world of Conan is the rugged individualist. Conan is no different from Clint Eastwood as the Man with No Name, an icon I see many here hold up as the epitome of alpha.

There really is no "honor" in the world of Conan because everyone is basically out for himself. Likewise, it's the same way with modern life, romantic or otherwise.

Call me jaded but show me a very successful man and I'll show you someone who, somewhere along the line, needed to break some eggs to make his omelette.

Playing life purely according to the rules only gets you so far.

---

I mean, I don't want to get too autobiographical but I do very well for myself, and I have not done so by cheating the system directly, but I have worked for companies that did some fishy things. So I have benefitted indirectly from my colleagues gaming the system. Most of it, I hope, within the legal side of the gray zone, but I'm not a lawyer so I don't know. I'm not proud of any of this, but at the same time it's not keeping me up late at night.

Even Ben & Jerry's, poster-children for responsible capitalism, cashed out to a big soulless conglomerate (Uniliver). They claim their mission hasn't compromised, but I'm sure it has if you follow the house that Jack built far enough.
Reply
#9

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Jeff Bezos also holds considerable stake in the Washington Post and is very active in politics. Throughout the election he used the Post as a propaganda tool against Trump. It was the Kochs, Bezos, Soros, and Carlos Slim all using their various bought and paid for media outlets to try and tear down Trump.

He's your basic elite globalist power monger who does not have any real loyalties to the country which made him rich or the citizens who use his services.
Reply
#10

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

So people are surprised that a billionaire is a ruthless businessman, self absorbed, and will use any trick, any loophole, any vague law, rule, or misunderstanding to step over everyone? Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Carlos Slim, Bill Gates, Richard Branson, Steve Jobs, etc. are no different than John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, George Westinghouse, Henry Ford, Cornelius Vanderbilt, etc. They make fascinating character studies. I'm reading a huge Rockefeller biography right now. But I have no desire to emulate them or apply their "secrets" of life.
Reply
#11

Jeff Bezos’ guide to life

Do the likes of Jeff Bezo and Richard Branson who write "work-life balance" books for the liberal bourgeoisie afford their own employees in their keep with such enlightened ideals?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)