The general problem with "game" as a whole that I've come to see is that there is a huge overabundance of different "systems", "techniques", and excessive categories like "Asian girl game", "club game", etc etc, or just specific checklists of "dos and donts" like "have money, work out, get a nice car, etc".
I'm thinking that distilling this down into a more fundamental core principle and going from there is probably better if one wants a deeper understanding of things, and broader applications than just "picking up chicks".
I spend time reading about philosophy and human nature lately; and while I don't have any perfect "system", if there's a universal principle of "attractiveness" within human nature, you could lump it under the term of "charisma".
This of course wouldn't just include a simplistic set of cliches, but would be a broader principle with more universal application, and wouldn't apply only to men with the goal of getting women, but to women as well.
While things like "looks, money, job title, possessions" can add or subtract from charisma for both sexes, there's no simplistic "list" of things which will universally work, as it's something much more fluid (e.x. the guys who get the most women usually aren't complete broke deadbeats, but they aren't always the richest guys in the world).
Likewise, charisma as a universal principle wouldn't solely be related to physical or sexual attractiveness, but would be applicable to all situations that involve influencing or leading other people's behavior, whether being a company director, a religious leader, a military commander, etc.
I think that devoting more study to charisma and its role in human history and philosophy would likely end up being more effective in the long run than just studying specific examples of "alpha males" - much like studying the actual scientific laws of physics themselves, rather than just observing certain 'instances' of it (such as gravity making an apple fall from a tree).
Since, in practice, there are many men who have charisma even if they don't always appear at a glance to be a "macho" or "alpha male" stereotype; musicians in general are a great example, since in practice, many rock stars had lots of 'groupies' like Prince or David Bowie, even though one might say they look "gay", for that matter religious leaders like Jesus and Muhammed obviously had great charisma as well even though most people wouldn't think of "Jesus" as a sex symbol.
As far as where to begin, this is hard since studying something directly from the 'source' doesn't provide easy and simple answers or 'step-by-step guides to success', but I see it as kind of like how a professional gambler thinks, versus an average Vegas better thinks; professional gamblers don't just pick a 'safe bet' that they think will work every time; they have to learn to study and analyse things and adapt to the situations around them.
So eventually if 'game' could evolve beyond just simple 'how-to' guides into more of a serious study of charisma with grounding in human history and universal applications beyond just meeting women, this might be an 'evolution' of sorts.
I'm thinking that distilling this down into a more fundamental core principle and going from there is probably better if one wants a deeper understanding of things, and broader applications than just "picking up chicks".
I spend time reading about philosophy and human nature lately; and while I don't have any perfect "system", if there's a universal principle of "attractiveness" within human nature, you could lump it under the term of "charisma".
This of course wouldn't just include a simplistic set of cliches, but would be a broader principle with more universal application, and wouldn't apply only to men with the goal of getting women, but to women as well.
While things like "looks, money, job title, possessions" can add or subtract from charisma for both sexes, there's no simplistic "list" of things which will universally work, as it's something much more fluid (e.x. the guys who get the most women usually aren't complete broke deadbeats, but they aren't always the richest guys in the world).
Likewise, charisma as a universal principle wouldn't solely be related to physical or sexual attractiveness, but would be applicable to all situations that involve influencing or leading other people's behavior, whether being a company director, a religious leader, a military commander, etc.
I think that devoting more study to charisma and its role in human history and philosophy would likely end up being more effective in the long run than just studying specific examples of "alpha males" - much like studying the actual scientific laws of physics themselves, rather than just observing certain 'instances' of it (such as gravity making an apple fall from a tree).
Since, in practice, there are many men who have charisma even if they don't always appear at a glance to be a "macho" or "alpha male" stereotype; musicians in general are a great example, since in practice, many rock stars had lots of 'groupies' like Prince or David Bowie, even though one might say they look "gay", for that matter religious leaders like Jesus and Muhammed obviously had great charisma as well even though most people wouldn't think of "Jesus" as a sex symbol.
As far as where to begin, this is hard since studying something directly from the 'source' doesn't provide easy and simple answers or 'step-by-step guides to success', but I see it as kind of like how a professional gambler thinks, versus an average Vegas better thinks; professional gamblers don't just pick a 'safe bet' that they think will work every time; they have to learn to study and analyse things and adapt to the situations around them.
So eventually if 'game' could evolve beyond just simple 'how-to' guides into more of a serious study of charisma with grounding in human history and universal applications beyond just meeting women, this might be an 'evolution' of sorts.
