I hear you Giovonny.
When I was younger, everyone shared the sidewalk, no problem, unconsciously.
In recent years, I have noticed it is more of a competition, and the fact that I give people ground long before they reach me is taken as a sign of weakness, and they tend to walk straight at me, even if it isn't where they're going.
I finally figured it out though. I was watching a Nat Geo doc on chimps, and opened up my gait, spreading arms out from my sides, swinging them, as well as swinging my shoulders more. Believe it or not, copy chimps seemed to work.
Now usually people give me room long before I get there, and if I look at them, they are looking away.
I also found that slowing down and walking slowly is much better than walking fast, and that a slight movement in my shoulders was enough to change perceptions, no need to change how my hips moved.
The funny thing was, because I had been walking the softer way for so long, it felt totally unnatural to walk more confidently. I also felt that everyone would know that I was putting on a fake alpha walk.
But nope, no one noticed. One time I checked out my walk in the reflection in a shop window because it felt so fake, and was surprised to see that it looked completely normal, like a dude walking. It was that I was so used to the old way that made walking more assertively feel unnatural.
Nowadays sometimes I slip back into my old way of walking without noticing it, though I figure it out pretty quick because people all start walking straight at me and expecting me to move out of their way, and I have to make adjustments.
It reminds me of a study that was done where they asked criminals separately to look at the videos of people and they all chose the same people as potential victims. Whether it is conscious or not, how you walk is very important when it comes to how people assess you.
This is a fascinating article, well worth studying because a lot of the markers of being a victim are the opposite of what you want to do to be confident.
Marked for Mayhem
Quote:Quote:
In a classic study, researchers Betty Grayson and Morris I. Stein asked convicted criminals to view a video of pedestrians walking down a busy New York City sidewalk, unaware they were being taped. The convicts had been to prison for violent offenses such as armed robbery, rape, and murder.
Within a few seconds, the convicts identified which pedestrians they would have been likely to target. What startled the researchers was that there was a clear consensus among the criminals about whom they would have picked as victims—and their choices were not based on gender, race, or age. Some petite, physically slight women were not selected as potential victims, while some large men were.
The researchers realized the criminals were assessing the ease with which they could overpower the targets based on several nonverbal signals—posture, body language, pace of walking, length of stride, and awareness of environment. Neither criminals nor victims were consciously aware of these cues. They are what psychologists call "precipitators," personal attributes that increase a person's likelihood of being criminally victimized.
It is a pain to think that just being yourself is not good enough, but if you think of this stuff as a game, and try out different things, it can be pretty fun experimenting.
For example, I have noticed that a large percentage of college students behave in a certain way, and I have figured out a strategy for dealing with the youngsters.
They used to give me fits with their bizarre sidewalk behavior, and now I just take it in stride, so to speak.
The psychology is fascinating, and it is fun to play around with.
There is a good chance my walk is more alpha than these chimps. Sometimes.