[Leonard D Neubache]

Women are about the least threatening adversaries you can provide, so when fans of Pettibone and Southern see that the powers that be are unwilling to let their precious, harmless waifus even enter nations like England then they are going to get a nice big dose of reality telling them that the left is never going to allow these issues to be decided by rational debate.

The Britgov doing dumb shit like banning Pettibone and Southern is going to push the soy-right further in our direction, which is a win. At some stage I envision some retarded progressive either seriously assaulting one of these dames or worse, killing them, and that will trigger off a here-to-fore unseen stampede to the far right.

[Teedub]

^ Exactly. Talking of violence, at least this lefty knows what's up:

[url=https://twitter.com/macstephens9/status/972809864627064832][/url]

[redpillage]

(03-18-2018 08:57 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(03-15-2018 09:18 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

snip

I don't know what you expect from a 22 year old (Lauren). Married with 5 kids? Brittany is older and engaged to Martin, that's pretty good I reckon.

No offence to you personally, but this punching right is the reason we don't get anywhere. Does Lauren Southern love the attention she gets? Yeah. But is she helping our cause, overall? Yeah. Her, and others like her, act as a gateway and blasting them off the internet does more harm than good. Moreover, the girl is speaking in the bloody European parliament, more than any of us commenting are. Female privilege? Again, yeah. But good overall. Just my two cents.

I completely agree. Some of you chaps need to get your priorities in order. Why spend time and effort demonizing Lauren who is clearly fighting for our cause, repeatedly putting her rather bangable ass on the line? She is two years into her twens and is extremely awake given her age. I remember when I was 22, for fuck's sake, I would punch my younger self given a chance.

So settle down everyone; I suggest you pick your battles more wisely. Quite frankly we have much bigger fish to fry than Lauren or Brittany.

[CynicalContrarian]

(03-18-2018 09:57 AM)redpillage Wrote:  

(03-18-2018 08:57 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(03-15-2018 09:18 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

snip

I don't know what you expect from a 22 year old (Lauren). Married with 5 kids? Brittany is older and engaged to Martin, that's pretty good I reckon.

No offence to you personally, but this punching right is the reason we don't get anywhere. Does Lauren Southern love the attention she gets? Yeah. But is she helping our cause, overall? Yeah. Her, and others like her, act as a gateway and blasting them off the internet does more harm than good. Moreover, the girl is speaking in the bloody European parliament, more than any of us commenting are. Female privilege? Again, yeah. But good overall. Just my two cents.

I completely agree. Some of you chaps need to get your priorities in order. Why spend time and effort demonizing Lauren who is clearly fighting for our cause, repeatedly putting her rather bangable ass on the line? She is two years into her twens and is extremely awake given her age. I remember when I was 22, for fuck's sake, I would punch my younger self given a chance.

So settle down everyone; I suggest you pick your battles more wisely. Quite frankly we have much bigger fish to fry than Lauren or Brittany.

Although, if Brittany & Martin do not make it.
Don't be surprised.
Not the worst example of body language (not even as bad as the one of Don Trump Jr.), yet far from the greatest example of masculine body language.

[url=https://twitter.com/thelaplayboy/status/974755716853649408][/url]

[Teedub]

I have mutual friends with Martin, their relationship is fine.

[Gmac]

The peanut gallery always thinks they know best!

[Easy_C]

That was my first impression, but look a bit closer.

He's leaning down onto her for the picture and as a result the height difference creates that look. She's facing firmly towards him (feet, hips, etc) so her feelings are obvious.

[Rush87]

(03-18-2018 08:57 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(03-15-2018 09:18 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  

snip

I don't know what you expect from a 22 year old (Lauren). Married with 5 kids? Brittany is older and engaged to Martin, that's pretty good I reckon.

No offence to you personally, but this punching right is the reason we don't get anywhere. Does Lauren Southern love the attention she gets? Yeah. But is she helping our cause, overall? Yeah. Her, and others like her, act as a gateway and blasting them off the internet does more harm than good. Moreover, the girl is speaking in the bloody European parliament, more than any of us commenting are. Female privilege? Again, yeah. But good overall. Just my two cents.

A few things: 1.) It's a joke but more specifically 2.) I don't believe it helps. I'm happy to discuss, but there are no instances in history where allowing women to be a vocal voice in male issues has lead to a positive change. "C'mon dude, she makes a good point. We can let one girl speak on our behalf. What's the worst that can happen?" - Feminism.

We've witnessed instances like this throughout history. They are great when they are parroting what we think, but when they are ultimately influenced in a different direction (And that's what always happens), suddenly they're 'dangerous'. [See Ivanka & how she was pedestalized in the DT thread vs now for a good example].

Women, conservative or otherwise are creatures seeking the apex of hypergamy. We know this, yet we ignore it outside of game. Girls like Lauren Southern are no different to the hot girl with daddy issues, but instead of staying away, dudes be like: "Nah man, that's not a red flag, this girls different".

What will eventually happen, is she will gain more fame, more reach and the moment she is influenced by someone with a higher social standing, she'll suddenly be softening on certain stances which will influence the following she's created. Ultimately however, it will simply lead to more women speaking on our behalf.

Essentially allowing her power is a cheap and meaningless political 'win' which does little outside of line her bank accounts and derail male focus from actively working to unnecessary white knighting (As demonstrated here).

[nomadbrah]

G O S S I P
O
S
S
I
P

[CynicalContrarian]

Tommy Robinson made sure to give Martin's speech at 'Speakers Corner' nonetheless.

[/url]

[url=https://twitter.com/MarkBraithwait7/status/975428284094795776]

[RexImperator]

If you are going to have someone treated wrongly by the authorities and drum up sympathy for your cause, it definitely helps to have them be a photogenic young girl.

[nomadbrah]

Tommy Robinson is a civ-nat though right?

Generation Identitaire are "etno-cultural" nationalists, a phrase they are very adept at skirting around.

I think commented from the beginning here that GI was the way forward for European nationalism.

Etno-cultural by Generation Identitaire means basically, that you can separate ethnicity and culture, the two go together. They skirt around when asked just what that means in practical terms. They're usually "accused" of being a modern Blut und Boden, which I don't even see what would be wrong with that.

I do like their approach in stressing culture AND ethnicity. It allows for a limiting ethnic movement, but one that recognizes that an non-ethnic individual might become part of a group through shared culture. It follows though, that when you're missing half the importance (ethnic), then you should be strong in the other (culture).

[MMX2010]

Rush87 Wrote:

Essentially allowing her power is a cheap and meaningless political 'win' which does little outside of line her bank accounts and derail male focus from actively working to unnecessary white knighting (As demonstrated here).

"Essentially allowing her power" would be a perfectly valid description if an RVF member were recommending that Lauren be allowed membership in RVF. That's because RVF is a limited, niche space, whose rules allow it to remain limited and niche.

But you're using the phrase "essentially allowing her power" to describe her posting Youtube videos - which is as unlimited and non-niche as I can imagine.

Literally no one is "essentially allowing her power". And you're echoing talking points without realizing that the infinite nature of YouTube destroys those talking points.

[CynicalContrarian]

Two is company.
Three is a crowd.

[url=https://twitter.com/StefanMolyneux/status/975179284276015105][/url]

[Rush87]

(03-18-2018 07:19 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

Rush87 Wrote:

Essentially allowing her power is a cheap and meaningless political 'win' which does little outside of line her bank accounts and derail male focus from actively working to unnecessary white knighting (As demonstrated here).

"Essentially allowing her power" would be a perfectly valid description if an RVF member were recommending that Lauren be allowed membership in RVF. That's because RVF is a limited, niche space, whose rules allow it to remain limited and niche.

But you're using the phrase "essentially allowing her power" to describe her posting Youtube videos - which is as unlimited and non-niche as I can imagine.

Literally no one is "essentially allowing her power". And you're echoing talking points without realizing that the infinite nature of YouTube destroys those talking points.

Their use of YouTube doesn't afford them power. Listening to, validating and supporting them does.

Nobodies saying they should be denied access to free speech. I'm simply rejecting the idea that they are in anyway helpful to our cause, which (In addressing the last part of my quote you quoted) was simply in response to unnecessary white knighting which absolutely validates my point. Men are affording her power by listening to and supporting her.

In any case, nothing I say will alter the fact that thousands of men will subscribe on Youtube and elevate her platform, so it's more or less an irrelevant discussion.