Vatican Treasurer Cardinal Pell Charged With Sex Offences, No Real Evidence Required
06-28-2017, 08:04 PM
A Cardinal from Australia, he's number three in the entire Catholic Church hierarchy. He's also a conservative clergyman on steroids. I'm a young man, but I reckon I've heard this guy being trashed by the media and SJWs for at least fifteen years now. And I probably heard it before that as well, but just don't remember.
After the charges, he is obviously the most senior clergyman ever to be facing court for sexual offences.
He's constantly railed against "smorgasbord Catholics" who pick up certain aspects of the faith while ignoring others (i.e. by supporting the ordination of female priests, gay marriage, or abortion).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-29/ca...es/8547668
In short, absolutely zero evidence to suggest he did anything wrong. If something super duper real pointing to his absolute guilt comes out, wake me up when it does.
I recall that the Catholic Bishop for the Australian military was also charged a few years ago and was found not guilty, but I'd say the knives will certainly come out for Pell in the courts.
We are only reaching the start of this historic sexual abuse madness and the idea that, because some bonafide molesters will get away sometimes, we need to lower the standard of proof to nothing but a game of he-said, he/she-said.
After the charges, he is obviously the most senior clergyman ever to be facing court for sexual offences.
He's constantly railed against "smorgasbord Catholics" who pick up certain aspects of the faith while ignoring others (i.e. by supporting the ordination of female priests, gay marriage, or abortion).
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-29/ca...es/8547668
Quote:Quote:
Cardinal George Pell has been charged with multiple counts of historical sexual assault offences and ordered to appear in a Melbourne court next month.
Victoria Police Deputy Commissioner Shane Patton said the Vatican-based cardinal was required to appear at the Melbourne Magistrates' Court on July 18.
He said the charges were served on Cardinal Pell's legal representatives in Melbourne, and that they involved multiple complainants.
Last July, police confirmed they were formally investigating complaints about offences alleged to have occurred in Ballarat in the 1970s. [What evidence?]
Cardinal Pell has always maintained his innocence and strenuously denied any wrongdoing.
Deputy Commissioner Patton said the "process and procedures" being followed had been the same as those applied "in a whole range of historical sex offences, whenever we investigate them". [Bet they didn't involve DNA analysis, video recordings or anything else we could call concrete.]
"The fact that he has been charged on summons — we have used advice from the Office of Public Prosecutions and also we have engaged with his legal representatives, which is common and standard practice."
As head of the Vatican's finances, Cardinal Pell is considered number three in the Catholic hierarchy behind the Pope.
In July, Cardinal Pell said the allegations were part of a smear campaign by the media.
"The allegations are untrue, I deny them absolutely," Cardinal Pell said.
In short, absolutely zero evidence to suggest he did anything wrong. If something super duper real pointing to his absolute guilt comes out, wake me up when it does.
I recall that the Catholic Bishop for the Australian military was also charged a few years ago and was found not guilty, but I'd say the knives will certainly come out for Pell in the courts.
We are only reaching the start of this historic sexual abuse madness and the idea that, because some bonafide molesters will get away sometimes, we need to lower the standard of proof to nothing but a game of he-said, he/she-said.
Born Down Under, but I enjoy Slovakian Thunder: http://slovakia.travel/en/nove-zamky