Quote: (05-18-2019 05:05 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:
Can someone explain Queensland politics.
Seems Labor would have won but for Queensland. Is it the regional % of population distribution. What’s their views on franking credits, housing and climate change etc
I used to live in Melbourne and I don’t think people even knew who Hanson & Palmer were
Queensland's politics on this one came down to this:
They're not intellectuals and they're not baristas. They're a mostly rural and mining state with a thin veneer on the Gold Coast made up of prostitutes servicing the rich wankers who come up from Sydney and Melbourne after school finishes. They have been bleeding for a long time now because they're basically West Australians who are stuck with being too close to the New South Wales and Victorian scum.
When faggot Bob Brown, patron saint of the Greens from (sorry Leonard) Tasmania, rolled into town, his main thrust was that the Adani coal mine deal needed to be stopped and shut down. If that had happened a shitload of Queensland jobs would have disappeared. People rightly identified the Greens with Labor, because the State Labor government has been pissing on the project as well under Greens pressure and Greens votes would have flowed directly to Labor.
In addition, Queenslanders more than most other states elect based on personality. In that respect Scott Morrison ran the perfect campaign against Bill, because he relentlessly made it a popularity contest.
Unlike Bill who can't fucking read a speech without it going through three union PR teams first -- Morrison always gave the impression he was on his own. His speeches were on his own, he told John Howard to stay the fuck home and watch the cricket, and he kept his mostly-useless Cabinet colleagues away so they didn't take up any air around him. Bill by contrast would always scream about Liberal disunity any chance he got, which was one hell of an own goal because it kept people remembering the fact Labor's disunity was caused by the man now standing for the office of PM. Bill tried to overcompensate for that by having the usual conga line of suckholes standing around nodding at his words. It left the ground open for Morrison to come across as fighting a one-man battle against a gaggle of union thugs.
I remember pretty vividly the morning before the election, just after Bob Hawke died: they had Bill on for an interview, and then Morrison. Even on the death of someone he said was a mentor, Bill just couldn't summon up an original word or a real emotion to save his life. Every word he said sounded like a boring media statement, he looked like a wooden horse in a cavalry charge. Then Morrison came on after, and bang, he had energy, he batted away any tricky question they threw at him, and for bonus points he stuck one into Bob by mentioning Hazel Hawke, who stuck with Bob all through his career until Hawke left her, Charles-and-Camilla style, for the silly bint who was wearing Bob's fucking bathrobe a day after he was dead. That was the set of interviews that convinced me Morrison was the better campaigner.
Point being, Morrison would have appealed a hell of a lot more than Backstabbing Bill to a bunch of Queenslanders.
Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm