Posts: 3,067
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
56
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 07:25 PM
Yeah, sounds totally legit and righteous. That's why they removed the monument in the middle of the night, wearing body armor, with armed guards including snipers.
Up next they're removing monuments to:
Robert E. Lee
Jefferson Davis
P.G.T. Beauregard
It is as I said. They are attempting to destroy the cultural heritage of the south.
Posts: 2,467
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
254
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 08:15 PM
If you're black and approve of this statue being removed because you believe the "legacy of slavery" is so toxic that it must be erased from public consciousness, it would behoove you to remember that the most prominent legacy of slavery is the very presence of millions of African-descended people (that would be you) in this country to begin with. Therefore, all African-Americans who truly want to erase the legacy of slavery should immediately self-deport to Sub-Saharan Africa. Any takers? No? Didn't think so.
Also, I can't believe that anyone is so fucking stupid as to believe that this monument was simply removed because it was particularly offensive. You've got to be intentionally obtuse or incredibly naive if you don't understand how the left wages its battles in the culture war. This monument was the low-hanging fruit. With the precedent set, they will continue to press for removal of more prominent Confederate monuments.
Eventually this insanity will reach its logical conclusion when the Washington monument is dynamited to the raucous cheers of "American" useful idiots of all colors, driving the final nail in the coffin of the historic American nation by engaging in the figurative patricide of the father of their country. Just a lovely picture of the future brought to you by George Soros and friends.
[size=8pt]"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”[/size] [size=7pt] - Romans 8:18[/size]
Posts: 4,257
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2014
Reputation:
104
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 08:55 PM
"Self-deport out to Africa to erase the legacy of slavery?"
I'll only agree to this if I get to take all the wealth accumulated by those descended from the slave-owners. Kona gets some too.
Send the people and the wealth accumulated in the wake of slavery back to Africa.
#MAGA (make africa great again)
I will be checking my PMs weekly, so you can catch me there. I will not be posting.
Posts: 3,024
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation:
22
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 08:58 PM
If Mayor Hairplugs removes the monuments that upset minorities, will they stop complaining or move on to the next thing that upsets them? Is it even minorities who are upset or white liberals who've run out of things to control?
The cycle doesn't end, you can't give liberals an inch. EVERYTHING is about politics to a liberal. Everything is another attempt to exercise control. I don't even care much about the monuments themselves but their removal symbolizes another attempt to control how people think.
Posts: 1,363
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
17
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 09:04 PM
This is ridiculous, you think blacks are entitled to any wealth because they were slaves? And Kona is polynesian, what do polynesians have to do with this. It just sounds like you just want to take from white and give to everyone who's not white. Where have I heard this before?
Posts: 2,436
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation:
14
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 09:13 PM
If the South had actually won the Civil War, slavery would have died a very quick death. Before the Civil War, an escaped slave had to get to Canada. During the Civil War, they only had to get to the North. This was the subsidy that the North gave the South, and it was why many abolitionists wanted the Northern states to leave the Union. William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution "a compact with hell."
Southerners also had a very legitimate fear that they could have been subject to a mass slave revolt like the one which had happened in Haiti. This was one reason why the US Government didn't recognize the second independent nation in the Western Hemisphere until about 50 years later.
Most slaves were owned by probably the top 1% of the population. It was an immoral institution that was subsidized by everyone, including poor and middle-class Southern Whites. If the poor southern Whites had any brains, they would have risen up and killed the slaveowners themselves. This was why the South implemented a draft, but provided an exemption for large slaveowners. The old cliche "rich man's war, poor man's fight" applied to this war as much as any of the others.
Posts: 473
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation:
11
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 09:15 PM
This whole issue is very sorrowful.
This issue mirrors the problems that split the US so many years ago.
The Civil War was a very complicated matter, and it takes great emotional patience to look at it beyond a simple us versus them, north vs south issue.
There were many issues that drove the fracturing of the USA, and tied into them were economic, political, and cultural. Slavery was the predominant of them all, or at least the manifestation of all of those factors.
Abraham Lincoln and Jefferson Davis both were from Kentucky, only 8 months apart, and less than 100 miles from each other. What would lead two similar men to such different fates?
Abraham Lincoln moved in young adulthood to the more mercantile and industrious Illinois, where as Davis moved to Mississippi.
I bring this up to show how two men of an eerily similar background can have their worldviews shaped so dramatically different from one another.
Lincoln's own cousin and closest friend decided to fight for the south, despite Lincoln's desperate plea and an offer of Colonel in the Union Army. His cousin ended up dying in the war, and Lincoln was distraught like few had ever seen him.
In the border states brother fought brother, and neighbor fought neighbor. One cannot overstate overstate this fact. Particularly for the South, the near entirety of its army was poor men with no connection or even remote future personal benefit from slavery. Even the Union held a silent admiration for the professionalism and conduct of the Confederate army, whose soldiers were fighting in tattered clothing with little pay in worthless currency.
Were these men evil? Does a man suddenly wake up and decide to fight his own brother over some imaginary slaves he's never seen and will never own?
Did these men not make up the fabric of America? Do they not represent a goodness about America, even in the most tragic of ways?
There can be many similar great things said of the Union Army, whose great leadership and determination eventually broke a stale mate to crush a determined enemy on their own home territory. Every memorial to their victory is a testament to restoring a great country to its whole.
From it's inception in 1863 until around 1900, confederate widows and war orphans were not even able to lay flowers on their fathers tombs in Gettysburg National Cemetery. Such was the dark atmosphere that lingered from that war.
Fortunately the mood lightened and memorials started to rise, remembering both the dead and notable southern figures from the war. If we solely look at it from this angle, surely there is little to protest.
Yet inevitably, things become perverted. Racist and segregationist causes did co-opt confederate heritage to their own ends, and this did nothing to heal any divide, and likely this was the case with the Confederate Flag over the South Carolina capital, erected in protest of the de-segregation laws in 1962. This kind of misrepresentation was and is a deep insult to the true heritage of the confederacy.
Now, however, there is perversion on the other side. Rather than have an informed discussion on what is proper and respectful for historical remembrance, we are motivated by passion to remove any public recognition or remembrance of our forefathers who fought in that tragic war.
Surely even a rabid confederate sympathizer would not be completely distraught over the removal of just that one memorial in New Orleans commemorating white supremacists (post civil war in fact). However this removal was not part of a mutual discussion with respectful and limited aims. We are now on two sides, which cannot be bridged. One side is in power, and they want all statues gone, all memory erased.
What faith can a man keep while his past is erased?
The center cannot hold.
***** FIN *****
Post Script: In small, tiny, non-descript towns in Germany you occasionally come across German WW2 memorials. Usually they are tucked away by small church. Nobody, especially the people of these communities, has any love for Nazism, which devastated their country and took away their sons and husbands. Yet they still pay respect to the men who went off and died, and respect the sacrifice of the men who went to fight for them. Most importantly, they pray for their souls to rest in peace.
Posts: 1,363
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2013
Reputation:
17
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 09:16 PM
All Or Nothing does have a good point, apparently this specific obelisk is a monument to something that goes against what the US si supposed to stand for, freedom, equality, liberty and all that, but instead of removing it why not simply change its name, call it "Fraternity obelisk" or something.
Posts: 6,125
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation:
147
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 09:22 PM
Weambulance already touched on this, but for me what marks it as wrong -- and that the mayor knows it's wrong -- is the fact it's being removed at night. By masked workers. Night is the time of the thief and the secret policeman alike because it conceals.
"He who behaves badly hates the light."
Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
Posts: 5,822
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
72
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 11:29 PM
I am a supporter of the confederacy, but I agree completely with Atlanta man. Confederate monuments should not be in the hands of the US or state governments. The Confederate States were invaded by the United States, lost and signed terms of surrender to rejoin the Union. It wasn't like "oh hey buddy, lets put down our guns and hug it out" It was more like "surrender or be completely obliterated" its more akin to Irish occupation by the British, than line up and shake hands after a softball game. Making this separation clear to the people in the south by removing monuments and banning flags should make it more clear that they are a conquered people, not 'brothers and sisters' with California hippies or Vermont socialists.
The cap on this is the deceit that the civil war was at all about slavery. The Confederate States of America legally declared their secession (Calexit) and formation of a sovereign government separate from the United States of America. After seceding, the USA would not remove their federal troops from confederate soil. Conflict ensued and the United States invaded the Confederates states, seizing their territory and gaining their surrender through military conflict. The Confederate States of America did not invade the USA. They were invaded by Lincoln. They resisted the invasion and lost. Its like Russia using military force to invade and retake countries that it lost in the fall of the USSR.
The US civil war was the imposition of federal military power against the democratic will of the people. All of the states voted to secede, they did not have dictatorships or military coups forcing their exit from the United States.
The slavery portion was propaganda to make people feel like the USA was 'liberating' a country from its evil masters, just like how we 'brought democracy' to Iraq, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Korea. If it was really about slavery, why did Lincoln's emancipation proclamation only free the slaves in the confederate states, while those in Kentucky (union) remained in bondage. The emancipation proclamation wasn't even 'real' or binding. The US president can't make law over other nations (The confederate states of America). Its as ludicrous as Trump writing an executive order to free all of the slaves in Libya, or banning hockey in Canada.
The more these statues come down, graves are dug up, and flags are removed the more the mask is removed. What used to be a paternal relationship of the federal govenment to the ignorant and backwards south, becomes naked spite. The leftists who ruined new york, california, minnesota etc now only have one place left to emigrate to, and that is the south, where god, family and the confederacy must be erased to make it 'safe' for gay pride parades, electric cars and bike paths.
Confederates, and Southern States need to get this idea that the rest of America needs to, or wants to make room for their culture out of their heads. They need need to make private efforts to keep it instead of assuming that the very government that has contempt for them will also be fair custodians. Foolish.
Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
Posts: 2,331
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation:
12
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 11:33 PM
Lincoln killed states rights.
Posts: 4,257
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2014
Reputation:
104
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-25-2017, 11:56 PM
Guys, you know I was joking.
C'mon, I always try to bring a bit of levity to untenable threads.
Also, Kona is forever black in my heart.
I will be checking my PMs weekly, so you can catch me there. I will not be posting.
Posts: 354
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2017
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-26-2017, 12:12 AM
@AtlantaMan
So how should the entire black population be treated in US? Because based on your logic you are all children of losers, I mean how much big of a loser can you be if someone took you from your homeland in chains, made you work for free and occasionally fucked the female ones during lunch break.
Posts: 10,543
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation:
201
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-26-2017, 12:48 AM
Considering the workers had to do this at night under the cover of police snipers, I would say that they're just freeing up space.
The next statue is going to be of a guy with an AR15. I don't suspect it will take more than 20 years for it to be in place at this rate.
And when the spark ignites there's gonna a be a lot more pain laid down than just fucking hurt feelz. The days when troubles were limited to problematic statues will seem god-damned utopian by comparison.
The public will judge a man by what he lifts, but those close to him will judge him by what he carries.
Posts: 16,771
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation:
212
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-26-2017, 02:58 AM
Mark my words - this is just the beginning.
They will go after the Founding Fathers next in the North as well as anyone anywhere.
Even Abraham Lincoln is not safe, because he is not diverse enough.
That is how the history of a nation gets wiped out. Ah well - nothing lasts forever.
Posts: 3,067
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
56
Confederate monuments removed from New Orleans in dead of night
04-26-2017, 05:41 AM
I hear the Revolutionary War was nothing but an overreaction to a small tea tax, too.
Nobody said slavery had nothing to do with it. But it sure as hell was not some righteous war waged by the north to free the slaves. The Civil War was the result of many years of simmering hostility and the slavery aspect was but a minor part of it. Up until the start of the Civil War, slaves who escaped to the free states were legally supposed to be captured and returned to their owners, per the Supreme Court. And the reason they were no longer returned after the start of the Civil War was because they were considered contraband.
But yep, those Yankees--of which I am one, by the way--were just in it to free the po' slaves.
Can you explain to me why the slaves weren't just freed by way of sending a bunch of cash to the south to buy the slaves' freedom if that's what it was all about? Or are you just going to rest comfortably on your confirmation bias?