[bmn200]

IMO obvious tats reduce a woman's attractiveness by at least one probably more like two points. Not feminine.

[assman]

(08-23-2011 09:00 AM)bmn200 Wrote:  

IMO obvious tats reduce a woman's attractiveness by at least one probably more like two points. Not feminine.

Fully agree. But since guys looking for just a bang don't care, and in fact, might seek out tatted girls, and these girls fail to make the distinction between ST interest and LT interest, they don't realize the tats are killing their LT prospects.

Either that or young lizards just don't think that far ahead, and are only thinking about how much fun it will be to rock new ink at the party next week.

[Parlay44]

(08-24-2011 11:30 AM)assman Wrote:  

(08-23-2011 09:00 AM)bmn200 Wrote:  

IMO obvious tats reduce a woman's attractiveness by at least one probably more like two points. Not feminine.

Fully agree. But since guys looking for just a bang don't care, and in fact, might seek out tatted girls, and these girls fail to make the distinction between ST interest and LT interest, they don't realize the tats are killing their LT prospects.

Either that or young lizards just don't think that far ahead, and are only thinking about how much fun it will be to rock new ink at the party next week.

It's funny when they get to ~30ish and are shopping for husbands and they realize how trashy guys think they are.