^
Not a unicorn. Not even close.
You won't miss her. You weren't attached for a reason. Good call on cutting her loose.
Not a unicorn. Not even close.
You won't miss her. You weren't attached for a reason. Good call on cutting her loose.
Quote: (12-02-2016 10:09 AM)Rob Banks Wrote:
↑ ↑ So at what point do you draw the line? How many partners would you consider "more than a few?"
Is 3 partners OK but not 4? Is 4 partners OK but not 5?
In my opinion, there is obviously a difference between a girl who has had 2 partners and a whore who has had more than 10. That being said, I think there is a bigger difference between 0 partners and 1 than there is between 1 and 10.
If you look at those graphs that show the probability of divorce as a function of how many previous partners the girl had, you notice that the biggest drop-off is between 0 (virgin bride) and 1. Between 1 and 2, there is a much smaller drop-off.
Quote: (05-19-2016 12:01 PM)Giovonny Wrote:
If I talk to 100 19 year old girls, at least one of them is getting fucked!
Quote:WestIndianArchie Wrote:
Am I reacting to her? No pussy, all problems
Or
Is she reacting to me? All pussy, no problems
Quote: (12-02-2016 11:55 AM)VincentVinturi Wrote:
If you love somebody and you get married that's a great way to take things out of the province of free choice into the province of obligation which can have a suffocating effect on a relationship.
Quote: (12-02-2016 01:40 PM)VincentVinturi Wrote:
My girl is perfectly fine with having kids out of wedlock.
We both agreed before we ever got serious that we didn't think much of marriage.
I don't view that particular item as a poor reflection on her character.
She thinks marriage is whack and so do I.
Quote: (12-02-2016 01:40 PM)VincentVinturi Wrote:
Yes it would have repercussions with her family, who are more traditionally minded.
But it speaks all the more to me that she would be willing to displease them immensely and go against such a strong cultural pull by not doing something she doesn't believe in because she decided, via using her own brain, that it's a lot of hogwash.
I see no reason to marry in Thailand, or in any land for that matter.
It's an antiquated tradition that offers little benefit to you and in Thailand, not much benefit to the woman either since you can walk away pretty much scot free if shit goes south.
Quote: (12-02-2016 01:40 PM)VincentVinturi Wrote:
If marriage is what keeps you together with a woman then it's weak glue indeed.
Quote: (12-02-2016 06:28 PM)Travesty Wrote:
Quote: (12-02-2016 10:09 AM)Rob Banks Wrote:
↑ ↑ So at what point do you draw the line? How many partners would you consider "more than a few?"
Is 3 partners OK but not 4? Is 4 partners OK but not 5?
In my opinion, there is obviously a difference between a girl who has had 2 partners and a whore who has had more than 10. That being said, I think there is a bigger difference between 0 partners and 1 than there is between 1 and 10.
If you look at those graphs that show the probability of divorce as a function of how many previous partners the girl had, you notice that the biggest drop-off is between 0 (virgin bride) and 1. Between 1 and 2, there is a much smaller drop-off.
I think the Age Old 3 is there for good wisdom. I also think if she isn't a virgin those other 1, 2, 3 should have been boyfriends, not one night stands or flings if you go down that road.
Quote: (12-02-2016 06:28 PM)Travesty Wrote:
My outlook is hey if you aren't going for a girl as a partner for life why not do this.
Quote: (12-02-2016 06:28 PM)Travesty Wrote:
I still believe the future will be two people will get together only to have kids and be parents and live near or with each other and have no romance. Dating and sex is outside the relationship completely.
Honestly I do not think at all that that trying to match up for both long term sexual attraction and parenting traits makes any sense and is going against odds.
Why not keep these separate altogether from the beginning and everyone is happy?
Quote: (12-02-2016 09:04 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:
Quote: (12-02-2016 06:28 PM)Travesty Wrote:
I think the Age Old 3 is there for good wisdom. I also think if she isn't a virgin those other 1, 2, 3 should have been boyfriends, not one night stands or flings if you go down that road.
I know some of you guys may disagree with me on this, but I don't necessarily think a girl who had 3 long-term boyfriends is better than a girl who had 3 drunken one-night stands. If anything, a girl who had a few one-night stands -- and immediately regretted it and felt disgusted with herself -- is more desirable than a girl who is a "serial monogamist" and had 3 long-term boyfriends. At least the former girl regretted what she did right away, whereas the latter did not. Just because a girl was "in love" with the men she slept with doesn't make her any better than a girl who was not in love with her sex partners.
Also, in your opinion, what is better about a girl with 3 previous partners than a girl with 4? To me, there really wouldn't be that much of a difference.
Quote: (12-03-2016 06:12 PM)John_Galt Wrote:
...Once the seal is broken it's gone.
Most of you wouldn't buy a jar of pickles from Wal-Mart if the lid seal was broken, but you'd wife-up a chick without a hymen. That's a really fucking strong steroid hamster right there.
Quote: (12-03-2016 07:58 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:Uh, no they can't, actually. They can only tell whether her hymen is intact or not, and a girl can lose her hymen for reasons other than sex.
Quote: (12-03-2016 06:12 PM)John_Galt Wrote:
...Once the seal is broken it's gone.
Most of you wouldn't buy a jar of pickles from Wal-Mart if the lid seal was broken, but you'd wife-up a chick without a hymen. That's a really fucking strong steroid hamster right there.
I couldn't have put it any better.
When a girl has sex for the first time, her body physically changes in a way that is very similar to a seal being broken. It cannot be undone. Doctors can tell if a girl is a virgin or not just by examining her.
There is something physically different (literally broken) about women who aren't virgins. Anyone claiming that a man who wants a virgin bride is "insecure" or "worried about the past" is sorely mistaken.
Quote: (12-03-2016 08:16 PM)John_Galt Wrote:Oh for sure. I was just pointing out to Rob Banks that even if a girl's hymen is broken, a doctor wouldn't be able to know with 100% certainty if she's a virgin or not, because they can easily lie.
lol @TJ.
Sure she CAN, but it typically is a result of VERY stressful activity or she's shoving shit up her vagina.
I've yet to meet a girl who claims her hymen was busted from something other than a penis.
Sure, it happens, but I wouldn't take a girl at her word. If she fucked up and busted her hymen without a cock, that's her fault.
Taking a girl at her word, especially on something like that, is a fools gamble.
Quote: (12-03-2016 08:03 PM)T.J. Wrote:
Uh, no they can't, actually. They can only tell whether her hymen is intact or not, and a girl can lose her hymen for reasons other than sex.
Quote: (12-03-2016 07:58 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:
Quote: (12-03-2016 06:12 PM)John_Galt Wrote:
...Once the seal is broken it's gone.
Most of you wouldn't buy a jar of pickles from Wal-Mart if the lid seal was broken, but you'd wife-up a chick without a hymen. That's a really fucking strong steroid hamster right there.
I couldn't have put it any better.
When a girl has sex for the first time, her body physically changes in a way that is very similar to a seal being broken. It cannot be undone. Doctors can tell if a girl is a virgin or not just by examining her.
There is something physically different (literally broken) about women who aren't virgins. Anyone claiming that a man who wants a virgin bride is "insecure" or "worried about the past" is sorely mistaken.
Quote: (12-03-2016 11:41 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:That's because most of the time there's still residual sperm or lubrication, or both. What girl goes to her gynecologist immediately after having sex? You can't compare those two cases because they're vastly different.
I know, for example, that when coroners examine a dead female body, they can tell if there was "recent sexual activity." They can also tell if a girl was raped (i.e. if she had forced intercourse).
Quote:Quote:Nope.
I could be wrong, but I would think that even if a girl has had time to heal, there would still be scar tissue, and a doctor would still be able to tell if she had sex before.
Quote:Quote:https://www.askthedoctor.com/can-doctors...-not-60698
Q: Hi, my name is Ivette and I have a question....is there any way to know if a woman is a virgin by going to the doctor and making tests. My mom is taking me to the doctor to check if i'm a virgin or not.
A: Virginity testing is a very controversial practice, because of its implications and inaccuracy. Virginity tests is based on the identification or presence of an intact hymen and the laxity of vaginal muscles. The hymen is a thin membrane that covers the opening of a girl’s vagina. However, the usefulness and validity of these criteria has been widely questioned because the membrane may break due to other causes too and vaginal laxity is entirely based on subjective observation. Masturbation, intensive exercise or physical activities like horse-riding can all cause the hymen to rupture. Thus a girl who has a broken hymen may be labeled sexually experienced when in fact she may never have had been touched by a man.