[kaotic]

Sad and disappointed in this thread title and posters.

A lot of nasty things came out in this thread, gives me more insight into how some men think on this forum.



As for the woman - she got played by a slick dude.

Now she tries hamstering it away, while the poor bastard dodged a bullet with this woman.

You made your bed, now sleep in it.

[Rhyme or Reason]

(08-27-2016 01:50 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Now she tries hamstering it away, while the poor bastard dodged a bullet with this woman.

You made your bed, now sleep in it.

I love how she doesn't really show any remorse or regret for fucking over her fiance, only that she is now left with nobody. It's true that the fiance dodged a bullet. In effect, she did him a favor and ended up fucking herself over...and now we're supposed to feel pity for this tatted hamplanet?


FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK that.

[Pride male]

Race baiting on forum has expected outcome

[Tim in real life]

(08-26-2016 06:45 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

Here is the beauty in question:



What a piece of shit. Good. Her ex needs a red pill, and this thread needs a less race baiting title.

WNB, because butterface.

Seriously, I'mma spell out "jungle fever" is Anglo SWF code for "Hey, the closest thing to Vikings, in terms of physique".

And hot damn, looks like Anglo women have hereditary trauma about dickriding the Vikings since pre-Crusades Europe.

[eradicator]

WNB even on vacation.

I had to look up coal burning as well.

[Jackreacher]

Lucky guy, almost got cinched.

Jamaica +1

[Atlanta Man]

Good call Roosh. Moderators are what make this forum great.

[Aurini]

(08-27-2016 01:42 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

(08-27-2016 01:03 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(08-27-2016 12:53 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  

(08-27-2016 12:28 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(08-27-2016 10:00 AM)Sumanguru Wrote:  

"Coal burning" is a term up there with "mud sharking" that is used exclusively by racists/white nationalists on places like Stormfront and 4chan's /pol/. "Yellow fever," for better or worse, has a much wider penetration into the general society and isn't used exclusively by hard core racists, therefore isn't comparable.

Hmm... I wonder why that is?

This is just speculation - feel free to disagree with me - but it fits the pattern of modern doublethink: "Big Brother is Ungood." Anything white and/or male can be criticized, but anything going in the opposite direction is verboten. In this case, Blacks and women are near the top of the privilege hierarchy, so "coal burning" is crime think because it criticizes both groups. Yellow fever, on the other hand, ridicules White men and Asian women, who are acceptable targets for ridicule.

So, are you telling the black members of the forum to check their privilege?

I was explicitly criticizing the whole concept of privilege hierarchy. Your comment is in bad faith.

Absolutely not. The issue here is race baiting in this forum.
Using a discussion between members about what is or is not appropriate on this forum as a jumping off point for discussing race in general is a better example of bad faith than my comment.

I was merely trying to point out, in a succinct way, that I thought you were picking an inappropriate time to paint white men as the ultimate victims.

If you are going to characterize a fair criticism of your position as bad faith, basically a veiled ad hominem, then discussion of the issue is pointless, and I am happy to move on to the What are You Listening to? thread.

I was doing nothing of the sort. I do not think that White men are the ultimate victims - I merely note that, according to the SJW Victim Hierarchy, they're the group that's utterly safe to criticize, and the vehemence of the reaction against OP caused me to raise an eyebrow.

If OP had posted an unflattering stereotype about Whites - EG: Betas who get played by semi-pros in Asia - would that have received such a visceral reaction? Would that have been decried as race baiting? I doubt it. But as soon as he points out an unflattering stereotype about one of the SJW protected groups, the response was - at least in my eyes - immediate, excessive, and knee-jerk.

Now that said, I do think OP could have been far less inflammatory. I try and do my best to walk the fine line between stating blunt truths, while avoiding language that does more to alienate than elucidate, but it's one heck of a balancing act. Clearly OP tipped over into one side, but that really merit such levels of vitriol?

The reason I pointed it out wasn't due to some sense of ethnic grievance mongering. I pointed it out because I think the men of this forum are better than this.

[Cattle Rustler]

@Aurini:

Beta is a group of men, men of all races are and can be beta. If someone has said "Weak Cracker" or "White Trash Beta who got played by semi-pros in Asia" then yeah, that would be race baiting against white people and should be called out equally. It has in the past. There's a difference between pointing out the facts and name calling in hopes of getting a reaction. What does the adjective "coal burning" add of value to the story?

In other news, I'm just waiting for someone to say "No!!! You're the real racist!!!"

[Travesty]

I am white and black chicks bang me every so often.

Should I be calling them "snowblowers"?

[Requiem]

This thread just shows again that the forum has lost a valuable member with the banning of A2D.

Still miss the dude, he would've been the only one able to bring reason into this debate without risking a ban for it while not being so damn defensive about everything. Unfortunately (as I'm sure you'll bemoan), I can't chime in since my warning-level is already too damn high.


Thread still made my day. I was sitting here in my alt-right cellar at my alt-right laptop, laughing my alt-right ass off at the massive amount of butthurt and triggering that went on here.

10/10 accurate original thread title. 10/10 story. 10/10 reactions.
Thanks for this, OP. Never change. Well worth the suspension.

[ivansirko]

i am not even sure a bancannon is good for this thread.

[Matsufubu]

I'm British and even I think that chick is a 4. A 9 is basically perfection; no diet or good decision making would make her more than a 5.5.

This story is played out time and time again, and still people do the same shit. Whether it's middle aged hambeasts marrying 21 year old Africans after a residency, or cracker-ass, honky, white trash, peckerwood men getting played by Russian brides...there will always be stupid people.

I feel sorry for the fiancée, not because he got ditched, but because he seems to have oneitis for her and that makes me think that she'll click her fingers and he'll come running. Grrr!

[Snowplow]

(08-27-2016 03:08 PM)Travesty Wrote:  

I am white and black chicks bang me every so often.

Should I be calling them "snowblowers"?

I legitimately laughed out loud to that!

[Comte De St. Germain]

On the real hottest chick I've ever been with was black. Variety is the spice of life. Now excuse me while I bang every color of the rainbow.


Love you guys.

[debeguiled]

[Chowder Head]

(08-27-2016 04:49 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  

(08-27-2016 03:08 PM)Travesty Wrote:  

I am white and black chicks bang me every so often.

Should I be calling them "snowblowers"?

I legitimately laughed out loud to that!

Now that was funny!

I can't to tell my girl she's a coal burner. I hope she doesn't know what it means.

[kaotic]

Shit I've banged all sorts of girls and always will - this dick don't discriminate with hot pussy.

Boner test never lies.

[WalterBlack]

I think this anxiety about black-white pairings is mainly an American thing. The woman in the story is British - in UK black men with white women is so common nobody gives a fuck. Black women with white men is pretty common too.

I used to work with a black American who resented the fact that she got stared at a lot in the US when she was out with her white husband. She said that she only felt comfortable in western Europe because nobody batted an eyelid.

From my perspective I see a dumb woman getting played by a conman and his race is irrelevant. If she was really that devoted to her fiance, she shouldn't have gone anywhere near any other men.

There's plenty of white British women who get fucked over by Turkish, Arab, African and Caribbean men whilst on holiday.

In any poor country, where wealthier lonely, old, trashy or ugly female tourists turn up, there will be always be poor local men looking to play the women. This kind of shit also happens to black American women on holiday in the Caribbean and to Japanese women in Bali.

I think banging women of all colours is great - I have had fantasies of banging women from every country since I was a teenager..and I'm sure I'm not the only here...

Mixing is the way of the world now, this is makeup of my Los Angeles coworker's relationships:

Sri Lankan M, Jewish F
Chinese F, Korean M
Vietnamese F, Chinese M
Mexican F, Chinese M
Puerto Rican F, Black M
Filipino/White M Chinese F
Russian F French Canadian M
Black M White F
Korean F White M

I'm Indian and I haven't been near an Indian woman in over 3 years...

[General Stalin]

(08-27-2016 05:26 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

I think this anxiety about black-white pairings is mainly an American thing.

It's really anywhere you see strong homogenization within a people. You see this a lot in some Asian cultures especially. Speaking of, that is a paring you just about never see - black and asian.

Also, I will say when selecting a mate, I think women are far more racially discriminant than men are. They are more physically discriminant in general. Then again, I believe this is more a natural primal instinct sort of thing than anything else. Men will fuck just about anything, women are more selective.

[Comte De St. Germain]

(08-27-2016 06:05 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  

(08-27-2016 05:26 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

I think this anxiety about black-white pairings is mainly an American thing.

It's really anywhere you see strong homogenization within a people. You see this a lot in some Asian cultures especially. Speaking of, that is a paring you just about never see - black and asian.

Also, I will say when selecting a mate, I think women are far more racially discriminant than men are. They are more physically discriminant in general. Then again, I believe this is more a natural primal instinct sort of thing than anything else. Men will fuck just about anything, women are more selective.

Gonna have to whole heartedly disagree here. I've seen a lot of them in the South and in Cali(generally though they're Cambodian, Viet, or Fillipino girls with a Chinese or Japanese one sprinkled in with black guys) not to mention a certain high repped forum member is married to one also a lot of the black forum members running through Asia.

Granted the forum is as always an exceptional place, but Blasian girls are eye opening in general(though I've seen one bad case where she just looked like a busted Indian chick).

It's also a weird trend with a lot of Blasian girls dyeing their hair an off colour blonde. Still gets the dick up so it is what it is.

[Samseau]

(08-27-2016 03:08 PM)Travesty Wrote:  

I am white and black chicks bang me every so often.

Should I be calling them "snowblowers"?

Stealing that one. Yellow fever, night riders, snow blowers... all slurs I will use in the future. These are funny and not mean.

[General Stalin]

@Comte I dunno man I feel like maybe your observations are a special case, and picking out a few dark skinned members who hook up with Asian girls isn't exactly proving the generalization wrong. I thought it was a pretty understood thing that Asian girls generally are not attracted to black men. I can't speak for Asian men and black women though.

The more dark skinned asians a la Cambodian and Philipina certainly but Chinese, Japanese, Korean etc. Rare to say the least.

[kaotic]

Reading back on this thread has raised many questions and reminded of a few threads we already have going on here.

It's very clear there will always be divides on racial relations especially when it comes to women.

It's obvious with some of the anger, and snark talk that were on this thread. An emotional outpouring indeed.


Some topics that I started thinking about were:

Interracial marriage - not banging or dating - totally different story. I was reminded of a thread of how the children of interracial offspring can somewhat have issues with national identity.

One non white poster spoke of having children within his own race to maintain it's bloodline.

Then comes the vocabulary used to label women and men, coal burner, jungle fever, yellow fever, brown fever, etc.

I personally thing coal burner being used showed possible insecurity and lashing out also with jungle fever (when it comes to men chasing black women). Yellow fever typically is a positive term on this forum.

It is true the term people are up in arms about are typically used to shame a white female dating outside her race.

It's pretty obvious what isn't accepted and what is, but then comes - what context was it in ? are the terms truly equal and fair is fair ?

I have a feeling that we'd be split on that view alone.


What's confusing is some guys talk about staying in their lane when it comes to culture, ideals, but not women.

For example, talking about black/white relations here, but then dating asians.

Hell down here, you'll have conservative white dudes dating Mexican girls, just now 2 white dudes came in here with some cutie mexicanas.


I'm trying to grab the concept of racial hegemony - yes I see why it can productive and ensure a societies survival.

Thing is the world isn't as big as it used to be and many blood lines have crossed paths.

I tend to think most of us here aren't white nationalist or hold most their ideals, I'm not white, but I can understand a few things about what they do indeed say.

Maybe I can't grasp the concept since I've been surrounded mostly by people/cultures of other races and not mine. I definitely lost my racial identity growing up here.

Who knows, but I'm trying to keep an open mind.

Just a ramble.

[Marmite]

(08-27-2016 03:08 PM)Travesty Wrote:  

I am white and black chicks bang me every so often.

Should I be calling them "snowblowers"?

So long as they don't get the idea to start snowballing you.

I've always wondered if jungle fever was an acceptable term similar to yellow fever. By the general gist of this thread I'm guessing not.