[RatInTheWoods]

At least it was just the ritual one where "no permanent damage was inflicted" according to the article.

Hopefully they would have done 20 years if it was the full slice and dice.

And string me up, but I agree with another poster here, it should be 20 years for mutilating little boy babys dicks as well....
Let him decide when he is 18 if he wants to cut up his own dick.

These barbaric religious mutilations have no place in our enlightened society.

[Teep]

(12-11-2017 05:18 PM)mikado Wrote:  

(12-11-2017 09:13 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(12-11-2017 07:28 AM)Roardog Wrote:  

Imagine if it had been their FATHER who had been the instigator of the procedure and taken them to the midwife? Do you think he would have gotten off with 15 months home detention?

Listen, you bigoted idiot! Not having a mother in the home is totally horrible for young children! But not having a father around is cool! Fathers are, like, abusive and stuff.

Take that!

Post something ridiculous again and I will destroy you all over again!

Actually it might be counterintuitive, but most of the time those who enforce the female circumcision are women. Like, old aunts and grandmas who had it and will heavily bully traditionnal women into perpetuating it.

Fathers are mostly interested in their daughter's virginity when she gets married, whatever she does in her marriage (cumming or not cumming) is not really a concern for them.

Funny it's women that tend to push baby boy circumcision too. "Because it's like...cleaner, and like...it looks better".

My mom was good enough to leave my dick alone as a baby. Though she did encourage me to get cut as a teen. Her rationale? It reduces your chance of penile cancer. (probably the rarest fucking form of cancer there is).

I've come to accept and embrace women as my intellectual inferiors and not get upset about these things anymore.

[captndonk]

Cultural relativism and marxism at work.