rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid
#1

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Very interesting thread on money and game, although it turned into more of a debate on how money affects your ability to pull women. As far as that debate goes, it seems that we've come to the collective conclusion that the opinion of honorable men may differ. We could debate that forever.

That aside, a question I get asked a lot by my buddies, regardless of their wealth is, "When is it okay for me to pickup the tab or spend money on a girl?"

My general rules of thumb seems to have served me pretty well. To answer the question, like all things, it depends on the nature of the relationship.

I'll take a crack at it...

Scenario 1 - You have money and she doesn't: If she's a student or makes $30k a year, and you're making $230k a year, expect to pay for stuff if you want her to keep up with your lifestyle. If you live a lifestyle of relative luxury and want to keep her around, she has to be able to afford it. In this scenario, it's okay to pay for things, IMO. Otherwise, you're going to be ordering steak and she's going to be getting a side of mashed potatoes and a water while watching you eat it.

However, there is a fine line between being a sugar daddy and being a masculine man she respects who just happens to make more money than she does. If she's not working to please you in other ways - blowjobs, not creating drama, small tokens of her affection even if they don't have a lot of monetary value, cleaning your house, doing your laundry, etc. - she is probably milking you. She has to be chasing your affection, and contributing to the relationship in other ways.

If you're in the mood for a steak or a trip to the Bahamas and want her company, by all means feel free to pay for it. Otherwise, you're either going to be dating nothing except "career women" who can match your lifestyle, or not be doing the things that you want to do with her.

Don't do fancy things to impress her or risk putting yourself into bankruptcy. If she starts demanding you do fancy things when you don't feel like it or your cash flow is tied up, be firm about saying no - and you owe her no explanation. Boundaries must be established.

At the end of the day I prefer this type traditional of relationship, and I've found that so do the women I date. Your mileage may vary.

Warning:This also assumes you're trying to keep the girl around and you're open to an LTR. If not, see Scenario 5 on "FWBs."

Scenario 2 - You both have similar incomes: If she's on your level of income, relatively (or at least not poor), she'll pay for stuff on her own without asking - IF she's into you. My last LTR made good money, and she was good about picking up the tab and buying me nice stuff. This goes into our basic concept of frame - women want to please a strong, masculine male.

She should still be chasing after your affection and doing feminine things, even though she's contributing to the relationship financially. If she makes similar money to you but doesn't offer to contribute, she's probably not that into you. If you're very good looking, fit, interesting, or charming, she's going to want to do whatever it takes to keep you around.

Warning - this can quickly lead to a "roommate" situation. I've seen it way too many times - "Wow, if we both didn't have separate apartments we'd be saving so much money. It would be like cutting our expenses in half, and doubling our income!" Except then the attraction dies off, and suddenly you're just two people who live together and bang once in awhile. And your finances and living arrangements are tied together, as she lusts for the days of fucking the guitarist, not the dentist.

Sometimes, and often, people mistake "attraction" for "someone who is my financial and social equal." However, women don't want to date their equal, they actually want to date their better. Hypergamy is very, very real. As a man, you always have to have the upper hand in the relationship one way or another.

You can be a hypergamous male making equal money to her, but you need to maintain the upper hand in other ways - such as by being very good looking, having status (DJ on YouTube!!!), a very strong alpha frame, or by being a very interesting / charming person, etc.

Scenario 3 - You're poor. When a woman dates a bartender, grad student, or guitarist, she usually knows what she's in for - and it's not a lifestyle of luxury. You can occasionally offer to pay, but don't break the bank trying to keep up with a woman who likes you even though you're poor, or feeling like you have to. If she knows you're poor yet expects you to pay for everything, bail.

Believe it or not, she probably likes other qualities about you. This means she is attracted to something else about you, even knowing that you're poor. Bartenders, guitarists, artists, hipsters, DJs... these guys often have no money and really hot girlfriends. Capitalize on whatever she likes about you instead, and don't much worry about money.

Scenario 4 - She wants to be your sugar momma. No clue. I have never tried this. I'd be interested to hear the RVF's thoughts, but this type of relationship wouldn't work for me personally. I've only dated women whose income is lower than mine, or relatively close to mine.

I am an admitted chauvinist pig and prefer not to date career women. Go make me a sammy, clean my room, and head to the gym. I'll worry about everything else.

All I can picture is Jefferson Darcey from Married with Children or Kato Kaelin.

Scenario 5 - She's just a fuck buddy: If she's just a random bang then it doesn't matter, because you won't be going out to dinner or on vacation anyway.

If you have no real desire for an LTR with a girl, don't lead her on. Don't be seen in public with her. Don't meet her family. And don't spend money on her. All that jazz sends the wrong signal, which just creates drama down the road. When you start taking a girl out and being seen in public with her, she's going to expect a relationship. A few beers or some coffee at most is fine.

However, you can maintain casual fuck buddies with relative low investment. Just be clear about it, or at the very least don't send the wrong signals.

Scenario 6 - She's not even a fuck buddy but she wants money: We touched on this in the other thread, but if you're not fucking her, do not give her money expecting sex down the road. Paying her cell phone bill and keeping her electric from getting shut off is a nice thing to do, I guess, but it won't get you laid. Sorry.

Women are merely friends until you've banged. Treat a request for a "loan" or a "gift" as though one of your male friends asked you to borrow a few bucks and act accordingly.

Personally, I never ever lend or give money to the women I'm dating.

Scenario 7 - She's in the "industry": If she's an "Instagram model", escort, stripper, waitress / bartender (there are exceptions), "camgirl", works in a nightclub, has ever worked at Hooters, or she travels to Dubai constantly even though she's unemployed, there is a good chance that she's going to expect you to pay for everything, and compare you to other guys who are willing to throw around some loot. Some women simply understand and have no problem taking advantage of the connection between a man's desire for sex, and willingness to lead with money to potentially get it. It's almost always reflected in their occupation.

The good news is that there are plenty of regular, attractive single girls out there. So, my personal opinion is simply to avoid industry girls unless it's an FWB relationship. Do not get Oneitis over one of these girls. This is the type of thing where I've seen otherwise bright and career alpha dudes throw away so much cash it makes my head spin. These girls can literally create a black vortex of cash.

Industry girls do make great friends, which sometimes turns into bangs. They'll also open doors for you, and being seen with them raises your social status. Some of my favorite friends are industry girls, and it's helped me socially and professionally. I'll buy them a round of drinks here and there just like I would my other buddies or clients, but that's about it. Just don't take them too seriously or start to believe that you're any different than the 20 other guys who bought them drinks this week, along with tickets to Vegas and a swank hotel room. No matter how much money or status you have, someone else will eventually have more, and they'll find him. You can't turn a hoe into a housewife.

Scenario 8 - The First Date: You met a girl on Cupid or Tinder, and you've agreed to get together. Or maybe you just cold approached this girl in a bar, and the conversation is going well.

Do you pay, split the tab, or demand that she pays?

My two cents. Whether or not I'm into a girl on a first date, I have no problem picking up a tab of $20 - $30 for drinks, or $7 for coffee. A little bit of chauvinism is perfectly respectable, and this is a relatively low investment even if nothing comes from it. (Of course, relative to your income. If you make $30k a year, do not be wasting $30 on drinks - go out for ice cream, go one a bike ride, and then get a nightcap at your place or something. Drinking out is expensive, even if it's just your own tab.)

Where I've seen guys get blown out is making the first few dates way too expensive or formal. I've heard that described by women as "too intense" or "a little weird." Throwing down a few dollars for drinks is one thing, throwing down $500 is another. It's even worse when it's clear the guy doesn't really have money like that. Now, I'm sure Dan Bilzerian has no problem flying a gal out to his penthouse in Cabo and she'll proceed to fuck his brains out. But you are not Dan Bilzerian, and nor do you need to be.

My rule is first and second dates should never involve dinner, and always involve drinks somewhere casual. It should never cost you over $40. When you pick up a reasonable first date, you don't look like a chump, nor do you look cheap. And I know, you read on the internet never to pay for anything ever for any reason until she's banged you. But most girls actually prefer a chauvinist pig. I've simply made it a habit to pick up the first date, and it hasn't impeded my bangs one bit.

Of course, use some judgment here. If she seems bored or spends the entire night texting, have one drink and bounce. If you've fed her a couple cosmos and she's still not trying to leave the bar, you're DOA. If you haven't kissed her by like the second date, and banged by the third, there is like a 90% chance you're DOA. Women have no problem hanging out with "their gay best friend" who always picks up the tab. I've seen guys go on 10 dates and pick up the tab every time with zero physical reciprocation. Stupid, stupid, stupid. She's either attracted to you or she's not. And if she's not attracted to you, buying her more free drinks or steak dinners isn't going to fix that. Ever.

So to answer the question, until you've banged, don't put in any significant investment, but don't be afraid to put in a minor one for fear of being seen as a chump because you read that on the internet. Cut her loose after two or three dates if there's no physical interaction and move on. Just like anything, there is a cost of doing business. That rule applies to dating.

And that's all I have to say about that.
Reply
#2

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 04:05 AM)HankMoody Wrote:  

Scenario 1 - You have money and she doesn't: If she's a student or makes $30k a year, and you're making $250k a year expect to pay for stuff if you want her to keep up with your lifestyle. If you live a lifestyle of relative luxury and want to keep her around, she has to be able to afford it.

Great Post Hank!

I usually operate in Scenario 1, and completely agree with your view.

I don't want to stoop down to low income lifestyle just for a PUA principle.
I really enjoy the company of a suitable woman during my adventures in life, and have no problem picking up the extra funds to make that happen.

IF, as you say she is chipping in via other ways... this is critical. Nothing will get you binned quicker from the good stuff in my life if you are not actively looking to show gratitude and reciprocation in non financial ways.

You have to be hyper alert for gold diggers doing this scenario. Take it slow and watch for the clues, signs that she is taking the piss. Set tests and bin her if she fails them.

The advantage of this scenario is that you can usually bat 1-2 SMVs above your market value, as you bring the magic into her life.

I also agree about picking up the tab on the first date, this always goes down well, and never comes across as low value, quite the opposite.
Reply
#3

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Yeah, here we go again, this is going to lead to another debate like the infamous "Happy Hour" thread with Team Appetizers vs. Team No Appetizers.

First off, doing anything social, whether you're doing it alone or with someone is going to cost money. In the course of going out and pursuing women, you're going to have all kinds of expenses: cover charges, parking, drinks, food, etc.

If you're uncomfortable about that level of the game, then focus on getting your money up, and instead of frequenting social events and inviting women out to them, look for other ways that you can interact in which you don't have to put money on the table.

Part of the problem with this "To Spend or Not To Spend" dynamic stems from the fact that guys are asking out girls who they barely know and they don't know if the girls are genuinely into them. You meet a girl, talk to her for 5-10 minutes, get her phone number, do some light bantering via text, then all of a sudden she's meeting up with you at a high-end lounge, and you're worried about whether or not she's going to order an appetizer which will add $10-$15 to the bill, and it makes me think:

1. In the back of your mind, you're not sure how much the girl likes you, so for all you know, she was just bored and didn't have any plans that particular evening, so tonight she's going to use you for a free meal, drinks, and fun, but she knows going into it that she's never going to let you hit it. That's an L for you.

2. How hot is this girl? Look, with men, the hotter the girl, the more men are willing to let the girl get away with. Most guys if a solid 7-8 were to be willing to meet up with them somewhere, and she's like, "I just got off work and haven't eaten, do you mind if I get the chicken nachos?" I have a hard time believing that most guys are going to look at her and say, "No, I'm only willing to buy you drinks because I want you to get tipsy so we can get back to my place and seal this deal."

Personally, I'm not offering anything to a girl who hasn't invested anything in me. If I've talked to a girl for 30 seconds and she's trying to get me to buy her a drink, fuck all of that. If I've danced six bachatas with a chick, and I need to hit the bar, I don't mind buying her a round as well.

Definitely don't let women take advantage of you and your generosity, but our interactions with them are not so formulaic that we need to over-assess situations, and then use preprogrammed rules for how we should behave depending on said situations.

Do what you feel comfortable doing.

I imagine that most of us work and we understand that when you're going out to meet women, going out with women, you're going to spend money.

If you're enjoying the moment doing something that you want to do and you're enjoying that moment with someone who you wanted to share it with, there's no real reason to over-think it. If you've actually vetted the girl, then you're only in the moment with her to begin with because you've actually arrived at the conclusion that she likes you and wants to spend the time with you, not that she wants to spend the time because she has nothing else better to do.

Ultimately, I guess this all depends on your perspective. If you're serial dating strangers, then this money thing and watching your expenses depending on the circumstances, is likely an issue. However, if you're only dating chicks who you have a legit interest in and they have reciprocated their interest, then this is not an issue, a girl who actually wants to spend time with you can find the fun in doing virtually anything with you, because it's not about what you two are doing, it's just the fact that you're doing it together.

I have a completely different perspective of this, because I'm not broke or poor, I don't date women off sites like Seeking Arrangement, I don't take fuck buddies out on dates, I just don't put myself in situations with women where I have to worry about who's going to out con who, and guessing what's going to be my ROI on the interaction, I already know all this shit before I step on the field. That's what players do. They know the game before it's time to play, so instead of thinking, you're just playing, and having fun doing it.
Reply
#4

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 05:03 AM)jariel Wrote:  

Personally, I'm not offering anything to a girl who hasn't invested anything in me. If I've talked to a girl for 30 seconds and she's trying to get me to buy her a drink, fuck all of that. If I've danced six bachatas with a chick, and I need to hit the bar, I don't mind buying her a round as well.

That's a great way of putting it. The more invested she is with me, the more generous I can be. If you ever get bottle service you'll see this all the time. I was in Vegas for a friends bachelor party. The table next to us had 3 guys pulling any girl walking by and giving them free drinks. These girls didn't know these guys and had no investment in them at all. As quickly as the table was full, it emptied out (we actually moved the better girls over to our table but that was using game). The three guys ended up standing there alone and left early.
Reply
#5

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Any time i'm meeting a new chick I always tell them let's go for cheap drinks or meet at starbucks. I think most guys don't want to be perceived as broke, but in my opinion this shouldn't matter. There's been times I've went on dates in the past and the girl just sits there when the check comes, I literally say "so let's split this in half." Now I use a more passive approach and just simply ask them "is this restuarant or bar within your price range?" That let's them know early I'm not expecting to pay. Has been working out well so far.

-CD
Reply
#6

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 05:03 AM)jariel Wrote:  

I have a completely different perspective of this, because I'm not broke or poor, I don't date women off sites like Seeking Arrangement, I just don't put myself in situations with women where I have to worry about who's going to out con who, and guessing what's going to be my ROI on the interaction, I already know all this shit before I step on the field. That's what players do. They know the game before it's time to play, so instead of thinking, you're just playing, and having fun doing it.

Exactly. $40 - $80 is my range, depending on how hot she is. And $0 if possible. I am always going for the $0 date. If I truly like a girl I take her to a nice dinner, but this is way after we sleep together and have started to develop a relationship. Spending money on women in general is a negative ROI. Knowing bachata would significantly decrease anything you would ever have to spend on her.
Reply
#7

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Good post Hank, and good food for thought. I think you covered about all the scenarii.

Though I must say I don't see what chauvinism has to do with paying the tab. Perhaps "traditional" or "old school" is closer to the meaning you're looking for ?
Reply
#8

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Good stuff as always Hank.

It's amazing that I've never actually seen someone write this out.
For me, this is common sense. And I'm on Team Appetizers.

I've never been juiced for my ducats © Ice Cube, but the real salary killer is when you move from just fucking to LTR.

It never seems to be a conscious decision on the player's part, "hey, I'm going to be in an LTR", but rather deliberate and seemingly unconnected decisions to hang out to the exclusion of other opportunities. Like being pushed into something by some unseen hand. But these unconscious moves actually push you into a different state of normalcy.

Where players have verbal, physical, and sexual escalation, a woman has financial escalation. The quality and frequency sex will go up...to a certain point and then it becomes regular and predictable, and then irregular and unwanted from both sides.

The money though, that never ratchets down in an unconscious LTR.

Now you're feeding this broad 4-5 nights out the week. Even if she makes the same money, even if you trade off, even when you cook at home - new pussy ends up being "cheaper" than regular pussy.

Good post.

WIA
Reply
#9

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

My take on this is pretty simple: Don't be a cheap bastard. Being cheap dries up pussy almost as fast as telling her how "lucky you were to meet her". Before some borderline autistic jumps in and accuses me of being a chump and blowing cash on chicks let me specify: I'm talking about simple meeting up for drinks dates with chicks you haven't fucked yet.
Reply
#10

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 11:57 AM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  

Good stuff as always Hank.

It's amazing that I've never actually seen someone write this out.
For me, this is common sense. And I'm on Team Appetizers.

I've never been juiced for my ducats © Ice Cube, but the real salary killer is when you move from just fucking to LTR.

It never seems to be a conscious decision on the player's part, "hey, I'm going to be in an LTR", but rather deliberate and seemingly unconnected decisions to hang out to the exclusion of other opportunities. Like being pushed into something by some unseen hand. But these unconscious moves actually push you into a different state of normalcy.

Where players have verbal, physical, and sexual escalation, a woman has financial escalation. The quality and frequency sex will go up...to a certain point and then it becomes regular and predictable, and then irregular and unwanted from both sides.

The money though, that never ratchets down in an unconscious LTR.

Now you're feeding this broad 4-5 nights out the week. Even if she makes the same money, even if you trade off, even when you cook at home - new pussy ends up being "cheaper" than regular pussy.

Good post.

WIA

I've never made equal or less money than the broad I bang and the main course I feed them is tube steak. Bitches love tube steak.
Reply
#11

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

To boil down a long post, these are the biggest mistakes I've observed...

- Too much money invested into a woman a guy hasn't banged yet. If you haven't banged her yet, keep the investment relatively nominal, and don't keep throwing money at her if it's not going anywhere physical. It never will.

- Guys with money throwing it at chicks, and then getting frustrated because "it's like so unfair!!" that he took her out for 5 steak dinners and then found out she's blowing the bartender. She is either sexually attracted to your or she's not. If this happens to you, it's your fault.

- Guys who have money throwing it at girls in the industry. Seeing her three nights at the strip club because she asked, or hanging out at her bar every night and leaving big tips isn't a recipe to get laid, it's a recipe to get used. Industry girls are masters at making you think they're attracted to you while at the same time extracting cold hard cash for nothing.

- Good looking guys with a lot going for them who have no money thinking they can't get any chicks due to their lack of loot, so they don't try. Dude, go for that 9.

- Guys who up the ante way too fast with women, and basically marry the first girl they fuck. It's almost like they've put in such an investment, they feel like they can't get out. I don't care how hot she is, take it slowly.

And to address something, there are plenty of guys with money, game and looks. They usually don't need any advice and have figured all this shit out.

I write this stuff for guys like me, and because a lot of my friends are like "Hank, you're not even good looking, but man can you pull poon. What would you do in XYZ scenario?" I came to the RVF and game after being married for 12 years. I hadn't thought about "dating" at all during that time. When I got divorced and started getting out there, it was utter culture shock. I have been blown out by more ugly women I met off the internet than I like to admit. I have bought more expensive dinners, drinks, and lap dances than I ever should have, thinking it would lead to poon. I've made every fucking mistake ever, even knowing better sometimes.

Thanks to this forum, and a lot of practice, my sex life is exactly where I want it. I have an awesome social network that includes hot single chicks, industry gals, and a bunch awesome dudes that range from everything to lawyers, professional wrestlers, MMA fighters, and doctors, to that guy who bartends down the street and pulls more poon than I could ever hope for. Now it's more a matter of who I feel like letting in than going out and finding more, and my game is exclusively social circle now. But that didn't happen over night.

It's been a long but pretty awesome journey.
Reply
#12

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Great question. What do you think about intentionally dumbing down the type of place to go on a first date as a way of getting around this question. For example going somewhere on a date that is very casual or inexpensive, say where $20 total might be spent instead of $70-$100 for two. Then do you think the question of who pays changes, by the fact that you have are dealing with a lot less money?
Reply
#13

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

I default to picking up the tab on the first date but I make sure not to overdo it. I plan first and second dates to be pretty inexpensive as I plan to be paying for most/all of it. Most of the time I notice the girl will elect to go dutch or often times will pay the tab herself which I don't object to. This is 2016 after all.

The key is, unless you are looking for a sugar baby, then don't try to win her with cash. The "date" isn't how you win her over, it's you. Your charm, game, chemistry, etc. I prefer going for a walk somewhere interesting a lot of the time weather permitting. It's free and you get to spend time together walking and talking and observing/playing off of shit around you.

As was talked about, a lot of the analysis of spending comes in when you are seeing a girl for a period of time. In which case Hank's idea is the most logical. If a girl is your financial equal then there is no reason she can't pitch in and match you on shit you want to do together. If she makes a fair amount less then it only makes sense that you'll be picking up tabs for her so you can include her into your lifestyle.
Reply
#14

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 01:36 PM)offthereservation Wrote:  

Great question. What do you think about intentionally dumbing down the type of place to go on a first date as a way of getting around this question. For example going somewhere on a date that is very casual or inexpensive, say where $20 total might be spent instead of $70-$100 for two. Then do you think the question of who pays changes, by the fact that you have are dealing with a lot less money?

That's what I do. I live in a major city, though, where we have a lot of "gastropubs", many of which are in walking distance to my house.

I'll go to somewhere a little bit trendy but where a beer is $6. If I'm not feeling the conversation, "someone just got arrested and I have to go bail them out of jail" and I'll leave early.

A lot of this depends on your geographic location, though. I have one buddy who lives in the boonies, and he's only got two options. Either a nice restaurant or a seedy dive bar. In which case, I'd go to the nice restaurant and sit at the bar instead of getting a table.
Reply
#15

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 01:36 PM)offthereservation Wrote:  

Great question. What do you think about intentionally dumbing down the type of place to go on a first date as a way of getting around this question. For example going somewhere on a date that is very casual or inexpensive, say where $20 total might be spent instead of $70-$100 for two. Then do you think the question of who pays changes, by the fact that you have are dealing with a lot less money?

This is another case where logistics and "groundwork" (having a local bartender or two in your corner)can make a big difference. I pretty much always fit in Hanks Scenario #1 but I never ever go out of pocket for a dinner on first date. My recipe is pretty much the same...get em back to my place My biggest investment is usually tipping the bartender well. Here's a previous post of mine:


Quote:Quote:

Papaya Tapper wrote

Well my game is pretty "niche" for lack of a better word...so I'm not sure how much of this will be helpful to you. I'm 44 so I've been "gaming" chicks since long before I even knew that I was gaming (or it was called that) . I'm only into younger women but I'm 6ft 3 keep in shape and look younger but my logistics are by far my best asset. I live in beach community is SoCal /OC (one that forum member G Manifesto is very familiar with) and my house is literally within 2 blocks of 11 different bars, restaurants, cafe, etc... My front patio faces a street where people often park when going to those venues. (I often sit outside and work on my laptop. I have one buddy that refers to my patio as "spider game" with me just waiting for "victims" to walk by. Patio/spider game is a whole other post)

Long story short on first dates I usually try to hit two or three of those venues (where bartenders and staff know me...big plus) then bounce to my house. If we're drinking and I can get them to my house it's usually a done deal. Once they are there I have tons of DHV material: pics of where I've traveled, with other hot chicks, I keep a surfboard and snowboard in the corner of my home office that's plainly visible when I give "the tour". There's even a pic of me with a well known celebrity (another story) clearly visible when someone comes out of the bathroom. You might say I'm playing "Most Interesting Man In The World Game" at my house. Girls eat that shit up.

But if I get them home and make a move but see I'm not going to close I usually wrap it up quickly with something along the lines "Hey, I've had a great time but I've got an early day tomorrow. We should hang out again...buh bye". I won't let it linger and let it get awkward. The trick is to make them know they fucked it up...even if they dont know how exactly

I'll then open it back for a 2nd date a couple days later with a text something along the lines of the "I had a dream about you" I suggested above or "You still want to learn to surf?" ...calibrated to the girl and whatever is 1st date specific. IE tailored to whatever happened (kiss, petting, finger bang) etc. Second date is just a funnel for getting her back to my house. I've gone as far as 4 dates to close but those have been rare and actually been a long time.

Like I said it's pretty niche to me but I hope some of that helps. I guess the short answer to getting 2nd date is to remain enough of an interesting mystery that the hamster wants more

_______________________________________
- Does She Have The "Happy Gene" ?
-Inversion Therapy
-Let's lead by example


"Leap, and the net will appear". John Burroughs

"The big question is whether you are going to be able to say a hearty yes to your adventure."
Joseph Campbell
Reply
#16

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 11:57 AM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  

Good stuff as always Hank.

It's amazing that I've never actually seen someone write this out.
For me, this is common sense. And I'm on Team Appetizers.

I've never been juiced for my ducats © Ice Cube, but the real salary killer is when you move from just fucking to LTR.

It never seems to be a conscious decision on the player's part, "hey, I'm going to be in an LTR", but rather deliberate and seemingly unconnected decisions to hang out to the exclusion of other opportunities. Like being pushed into something by some unseen hand. But these unconscious moves actually push you into a different state of normalcy.

Where players have verbal, physical, and sexual escalation, a woman has financial escalation. The quality and frequency sex will go up...to a certain point and then it becomes regular and predictable, and then irregular and unwanted from both sides.

The money though, that never ratchets down in an unconscious LTR.

Now you're feeding this broad 4-5 nights out the week. Even if she makes the same money, even if you trade off, even when you cook at home - new pussy ends up being "cheaper" than regular pussy.

Good post.

WIA

Agreed. Then if the LTR becomes a marriage, the financial escalation goes to defcon 5. The sex, goes defcon 5 in the other direction.
Reply
#17

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

This was the progression of my last few online dates, prior to dialing it back and simply running social circle game. (Then I've gotta go do real stuff and hit the gym. Yay for days off).

Date 1: Gastropub downtown. No food, but beers.
Date 2: Taco joint near my house. Cheap tacos and beers. Joined by friends. Bangs. Turned into an LTR.

Date 1: Pho. No alcohol.
Date 2: Seedy dive bar near my house that has a really fun karaoke. Bangs. Turned into an LTR.

Date 1: Taco joint near her house. She actually asked me out, and then picked up the check.
Date 2: Shooting range, followed by Applebees near my house (for irony). Bangs. Turned into an LTR.

Date 1: Jazz bar downtown. These places are awesome and cheaper than you think if you go on a weeknight. Part of me would consider doing all my first dates at a jazz bar, because if it sucks, at least I got to listen to some jazz.
Date 2: Large party at an acquaintance's house. Bangs. Turned into a STR that I broke off.

Date 1: Drinks at a gastropub downtown.
Date 2: Ice skating at place where some of my friends were at. Would have resulted in bangs, but girl wouldn't shut up about her dog.

Rule - first date, in my opinion, should always be in a place where no one recognizes you. You do not want to be seen around town with ugly women. If you know she's hot and there is a reasonable likelihood of a bang, break this rule. But if it's with a girl you've never actually seen in person, wait until the second date to be seen with her.
Reply
#18

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

You almost need to develop an "identity" with how you spend your money
so that it's congruent with your personality and your lifestyle.

That way you don't ever have to be conflicted about how much money
you're spending in any situation.

That is to say, how you spend your money is a direct reflection of the
quality of your game. The more skill and confidence you have in your game
the more comfortable you'll be when it comes to spending money...and that
in turn will help women see you as a strong and confident guy.

So it's not how much money you have that boosts attraction,
it's the spirit and style in the way that you use it. Treat it as
an extension of your game that's well integrated.
Reply
#19

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Much of it is a cultural thing. The British girls tend to be more willing to pay for a first date than the Americans or at least the bitchy New York girls I've dated. Asians also generally expect you to pay on a date.

Generally I use the first date bang recipe here telling the girl the first round is on me. If we get on well enough she'll pay for the second round. Sometimes if meeting later I just have one round and then take them straight back to my place. If I can see it isn't going no where I suggest we split the bill and I get out of there. There's no true black or white to it, it can be rather nuanced.

I've dated wealthier girls and by wealthier girls I mean very wealthy girls (from their parents i.e. dad) and we generally split the bills, sometimes they'd pay for things themselves such as hotels (I had a girl who paid for 5 nights in Paris) and I'd pay for dinners. It's a fine line though - they have to offer it themselves - they will know if you're being cheap and tell you straight away. Usually best to split it.
Reply
#20

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 09:22 AM)coverdoc Wrote:  

Any time i'm meeting a new chick I always tell them let's go for cheap drinks or meet at starbucks. I think most guys don't want to be perceived as broke, but in my opinion this shouldn't matter. There's been times I've went on dates in the past and the girl just sits there when the check comes, I literally say "so let's split this in half." Now I use a more passive approach and just simply ask them "is this restuarant or bar within your price range?" That let's them know early I'm not expecting to pay. Has been working out well so far.

-CD

Are you a native German and/or have experience in North American dating? Curious how the expectations line up between the two places, I heard German women were more down for a "split costs" dating model but that might be a nonsense trend piece. What's the truth?
Reply
#21

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Quote: (01-02-2016 03:52 PM)Vincent Chase Wrote:  

Much of it is a cultural thing. The British girls tend to be more willing to pay for a first date than the Americans or at least the bitchy New York girls I've dated. Asians also generally expect you to pay on a date.

Generally I use the first date bang recipe here telling the girl the first round is on me. If we get on well enough she'll pay for the second round. Sometimes if meeting later I just have one round and then take them straight back to my place. If I can see it isn't going no where I suggest we split the bill and I get out of there. There's no true black or white to it, it can be rather nuanced.

I've dated wealthier girls and by wealthier girls I mean very wealthy girls (from their parents i.e. dad) and we generally split the bills, sometimes they'd pay for things themselves such as hotels (I had a girl who paid for 5 nights in Paris) and I'd pay for dinners. It's a fine line though - they have to offer it themselves - they will know if you're being cheap and tell you straight away. Usually best to split it.

Yes, "first round's on me" is a great power-of-suggestion statement that frames you as a generous guy who's not a cash cow.
Reply
#22

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

Some real wisdom in the summary posts. Specially liked the "spider game" from PapayaTapper, ha-ha.

Upon reading the thread title, I expected it to be about: "When it is okay to pay a little more money to save you from headaches or excessive waiting."

For example:
-If you are far away from an ATM of your bank, but have one from another bank close, pay the extra fee to withdraw cash instead of having to drive, waste time going to the free ATM
-Paying a bit extra in small purchases if a little 5-10% difference would entail driving downtown or wasting time.
-Leaving good tips in venues you like or visit often, so every time you get better and faster service.

Anyway, I wonder how the forum would apply this to girls. Rather spend more money than waste time? The main thing is that broads are unpredictable, so any money spent is an investment, and as such, subject to risk.

-TD
Reply
#23

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

When I'm going on a first date with a woman (particularly from online), I have generally vetted her a bit via the phone to verify some basic chemistry and interest from her is present. It's sort like a pre-date and it only costs me 5 to 20 minutes of time.

If she passes the pre-date phase, I set-up a low/no cost meeting. Walk around somewhere or some casual place to grab a drink. If an online girl gives me the vibe that she is physical attracted to me in person (which I know in about 60 seconds of meeting; I already covered the verbal side during the pre-date), I'm not going to let 20 bucks fuck up the vibe for what is pretty much a guaranteed bang.

I also like to see what a woman's natural reaction is to any form of generosity when deciding to see them again or not even if I get the bang. Does she at least offer to cover herself? Does she even thank me? Does she make-up for it in other ways (ex: lets me drink her booze and cooks me meals at her place)? Even if she puts out, I probably won't go for the repeat bang if I get the feeling that she expects to be taken out all the time at my expense.

I have the "first round/date on me" mentality for the most part and I share that perspective with women often times so they know that I'm generous but not an ATM. Sometimes I get some blowback and a woman will say, "Well, I always expect the man to pay while dating" which I retort, "Well, I expect the woman to always be cooking if I'm always paying." -- Generally speaking, women will not only cook for me but pay for all or at least half the groceries as well. Therefore, I win.

Back in the day, I was hardcore about the going dutch/everyone pays for themselves on the first date deal. I lost a few bangs that way as a result of that attitude. Now, I just default assume I'm going spend 20 bucks (I don't often times even spend that if anything) and I might spend more if the woman goes the extra mile. However, I also have pretty sharp intuition now regarding whether a chick is legitimately attracted to me or not. So, the 20 bucks or whatever is not really about buying her affection but more about getting past the mental/social/culture block and negative gut reaction she has when a man attempts to go dutch.

The way we as men have red flags that indicate borderline personality disorder traits or other undesirable things, women have red flags for hardcore cheapskates/financial losers and even if you're not one in reality, women are emotionally driven people who don't think logically. Almost all have had a bad experience with a guy in the past who was an ultra cheapskate and they try to figure out how to avoid guys like that in the future. Of course, the ultra cheapskate guy wanted to go dutch in the beginning and therefore, they associate that action with Mr. Loser Cheapskate Dude. Basically, these women are triggered when you request they pay for their own shit on a first date. It's stupid and not logical but how many women do you know that are both smart and logical?
Reply
#24

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

End of the day, most chicks are going to be looking for a provider of some sort, to some degree.
Your choice is how much are you willing to spend on this chick?
When the next & better chick may be right around the corner.
Reply
#25

When it's okay to pay for stuff, and when it's stupid

The entire year, I've never had to worry about team appetizers debate.

It's always been a late date around 9 and 1 round of drinks, which I don't give a shit paying for. I never paid for food.

I go to dive bars and local spots where drinks are cheap or happy hour is in effect. If the girls interesting and cute, sure I'll buy the round, maybe have her buy the second, hell sometimes she'll pay the entire tab or split it without even saying anything.

If she lags, I'll jokingly say she's buying the first round - I've never had a girl not get the first round after being late or flaked on.

I always eject after first round if the date is boring, bait isn't hooking, or I'm just not feeling it.

If I'm unsure about the date, I'll meet at a Starbucks, I don't even fucking buy anything, but let them grab themselves something. I just tell them it's an easy place to meet.


I've struggled with 1 girl who wanted me to pick her up and take her dinner, she told me to the a gentleman, I told her start acting like a lady, obviously she didn't like that.

I'm currently dealing with a cute latin girl who suggested I come pick her up after I gym (30 minutes from work/45-50 from home). I scoffed at the idea in my head. We talked above about how the hotter the girl is, the more shit we're willing to let slide.

I stuck to my guns, told her first meet, halfway, if she's cool, we'll talk near her. Then I negged her, asking does she not drive or have a car to use ? So we'll see how that pans out first before making a decision to drive to her.


If it's a plate or a girl I've gone a few dates, I don't mind paying ever so often, but I make sure she knows she should be putting in work and paying ever so often also.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)