[scotian]

(12-15-2015 03:31 PM)Nemausus Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 03:01 PM)Vronsky Wrote:  

Canada taking in Syrian refugees doesn't bother me as much as what I see happening in Europe. \n
- Canada has a long tradition of taking in refugees
- The refugees were picked from camps in Jordan and Lebanon (aka they're real refugees) instead of trekking in willy nilly like they're doing in Europe
- A lot of these refugees are being sponsored by friends, family and private businesses
- After the Paris attacks the Liberals wisely stated that they're only accepting women, children and families. No marauding hordes of thirsty single men.

Canada letting in 10,000 refugees in a selective and controlled manner is a far different beast than what's happening in Europe.

I have to give credit to our immigration minister John McCallum and by extension, Canadian politicians at large.

I live in downtown Ottawa close to Parliament Hill so I see many Federal politicians walking around on the streets. One night before the election I saw John McCallum returning to what I assume is his Ottawa apartment, not far from where I live. I walk by his building all the time. The apartment complex next door is home to a Muslim community association and there is a mosque/prayer room on the ground floor.

Many of our politicians make it a point to stay more grounded and closer to main street. Contrast that with the cucks in the US and Europe who implement immigration policies and preach diversity only to then go home to the most affluent, often gated communities, where they will never have to deal with the consequences of their decisions.

Our politicians are much closer to the general population than many of the power wielding people in Europe and America.

The reason John McCallum lives downtown is so the old pisstank can stumble home drunk as fuck at night. How boozed up must he have been to not be allowed on a plane? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/airline-in...g-1.334088

[DjembaDjemba]

(12-15-2015 03:55 PM)scotian Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 03:31 PM)Nemausus Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 03:01 PM)Vronsky Wrote:  

Canada taking in Syrian refugees doesn't bother me as much as what I see happening in Europe. \n
- Canada has a long tradition of taking in refugees
- The refugees were picked from camps in Jordan and Lebanon (aka they're real refugees) instead of trekking in willy nilly like they're doing in Europe
- A lot of these refugees are being sponsored by friends, family and private businesses
- After the Paris attacks the Liberals wisely stated that they're only accepting women, children and families. No marauding hordes of thirsty single men.

Canada letting in 10,000 refugees in a selective and controlled manner is a far different beast than what's happening in Europe.

I have to give credit to our immigration minister John McCallum and by extension, Canadian politicians at large.

I live in downtown Ottawa close to Parliament Hill so I see many Federal politicians walking around on the streets. One night before the election I saw John McCallum returning to what I assume is his Ottawa apartment, not far from where I live. I walk by his building all the time. The apartment complex next door is home to a Muslim community association and there is a mosque/prayer room on the ground floor.

Many of our politicians make it a point to stay more grounded and closer to main street. Contrast that with the cucks in the US and Europe who implement immigration policies and preach diversity only to then go home to the most affluent, often gated communities, where they will never have to deal with the consequences of their decisions.

Our politicians are much closer to the general population than many of the power wielding people in Europe and America.

The reason John McCallum lives downtown is so the old pisstank can stumble home drunk as fuck at night. How boozed up must he have been to not be allowed on a plane? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/airline-in...g-1.334088

Then there's Jack Layton's affinity to live in government subsidized housing* and his preference for the Chinatown masseuses' handy skills.

And not to forget former Toronto mayor Rob Ford's lively group of buds. I'd like to see an American politician slum it up in the hood like our guys.

Ford's answer to the million dollar question about his crack use was:

"...only when I'm drunk"



*Canadian version of section 8 for our American members

[TonySandos]

How the hell did the majority of Canada manage to put a man who's almost a teenager at the steering wheel of the country? Can we get some in depth background on the political process there like others did on the French elections?

[Suits]

(12-15-2015 05:31 PM)TonySandos Wrote:  

How the hell did the majority of Canada manage to put a man who's almost a teenager at the steering wheel of the country? Can we get some in depth background on the political process there like others did on the French elections?

Short answer: they didn't.

The PM is simple the leader of the party which has the most seats. The only people who vote for the eventual PM are the people who vote in his riding. In theory, it's possible for a party to win a majority and at the same time, for the leader to not getting the majority of votes in his riding, thus failing to gain a seat.

The leader of the party is selected by the party. Not a voters decision.

[TonySandos]

Thanks and wow.

I feel for you guys. It's like a less intelligent and moral Richy Rich has taken control of your country.

[LeeEnfield303]

Well, his wife is pretty hot, so there's that.

[Chewbacon]

Take a snapshot of Canada's most pressing problems. Take a snapshot of America's. Sorry, from neither the left nor the right do I 'feel sorry' for Canada.

[TonySandos]

(12-15-2015 06:55 PM)SHANbangs Wrote:  

Take a snapshot of Canada's most pressing problems. Take a snapshot of America's. Sorry, from neither the left nor the right do I 'feel sorry' for Canada.

I do. The only thing saving Canada from similar meltdown like the US is its size and climate. America's size is one of the biggest reasons why revolts have yet to materialize. Canada is simply lucky to not have a slavery narrative for the minorities to latch onto. Depending on how the political winds blow, Canada can literally be as weak as Sweden in a few short years.

[robreke]

(12-15-2015 09:05 AM)72 and sunny Wrote:  

Looks like Canada is going by way of Sweden, Germany, etc.:



Unsurprising, considering the clown at the helm:

"Justin Trudeau's lack of qualifications to be prime minister were obvious... despite his pedigree and inherited wealth, when he reached adulthood his life was remarkably unremarkable. He traveled the world and smoked marijuana and snowboarded and worked as a bouncer at bars, eventually ending up teaching high school in Vancouver."

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/13/magazi....html?_r=0

Now, where have we seen this before?



Hmm...



And his mother, wow, just wow!

Hypergamous gold digger, raging slut, attention whore, celeb eater and a drug fiend rolled into one:

"Justin Trudeau’s mother, Margaret, was 22 in 1971 when she married Pierre. He was the prime minister and a famous eligible bachelor; the beauty dubbed ‘‘Maggie T.’’ by the press smoked marijuana while under the watch of Mounties, ate peyote before giving a speech in Venezuela and left her husband to party at Studio 54 in New York. The Trudeaus eventually divorced. According to Margaret’s own account, she had affairs with Teddy Kennedy, Ryan O’Neal and at least one Rolling Stone."

The end result is this:

And this:

Typical propaganda in that top add of 'helping syrians'

It shows smiling women and children when in reality most of the refugees coming in are probably somber faced, discontented looking men between 18 and 35.

[scotian]

(12-15-2015 06:59 PM)TonySandos Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 06:55 PM)SHANbangs Wrote:  

Take a snapshot of Canada's most pressing problems. Take a snapshot of America's. Sorry, from neither the left nor the right do I 'feel sorry' for Canada.

I do. The only thing saving Canada from similar meltdown like the US is its size and climate. America's size is one of the biggest reasons why revolts have yet to materialize. Canada is simply lucky to not have a slavery narrative for the minorities to latch onto. Depending on how the political winds blow, Canada can literally be as weak as Sweden in a few short years.

We have Quebec, The White Niggers of America., they have a lot of pull up here and almost destroyed our country in separatist referendums.

Q: Why does the US have blacks and Canada has French
A: The Yanks got first pick

[72 and sunny]

(12-15-2015 05:31 PM)TonySandos Wrote:  

How the hell did the majority of Canada manage to put a man who's almost a teenager at the steering wheel of the country? Can we get some in depth background on the political process there like others did on the French elections?

Don't forget, that certain Community Organizer was only four years older when he took on the country 10x the population/became leader of the "free world".

Fucking hell, back in the day nation's leaders were wisest/strongest/ruthless (take your pick) today, in the age of "progress" the only qualification needed is to be willing to be a man-whore clown, to give up your masculine identity/essence for a few scraps from the System (that is designed to fuck you over). These (and the rest of like-them that are in public eye) foul, vile careerist "men-whores" are literally dragging the entire men-kind down the drain with them, because the System, and all women in it, will now except, indeed demand all men to look/behave/be accepting to open their assholes to all sorts of anti-masculine things... just as these faggots did.

Fuck this ghey earth, and fuck all men who are traitors to their own nature!

The day you spit back into the face of your own nature, is the day you abdicated your title/honor as a man.

You are not a man, anymore, you are a thing.

[ManAbout]

(12-15-2015 05:35 PM)Suits Wrote:  

Short answer: they didn't.

The PM is simple the leader of the party which has the most seats. The only people who vote for the eventual PM are the people who vote in his riding. In theory, it's possible for a party to win a majority and at the same time, for the leader to not getting the majority of votes in his riding, thus failing to gain a seat.

The leader of the party is selected by the party. Not a voters decision.

True, but this time around the vote was very much for Trudeau, i.e people voted for the Liberal candidate in their riding in order to elect him PM.

Also, he has been in parliament, as an elected MP from his Montreal riding, since 2006.

[MdWanderer]

(12-15-2015 09:05 AM)72 and sunny Wrote:  

Now, where have we seen this before?



Hmm...

Maybe both Trudeau and Merkel found their soulmates?

[SigmundSauer]

[Dr. Howard]

(12-15-2015 06:59 PM)TonySandos Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 06:55 PM)SHANbangs Wrote:  

Take a snapshot of Canada's most pressing problems. Take a snapshot of America's. Sorry, from neither the left nor the right do I 'feel sorry' for Canada.

I do. The only thing saving Canada from similar meltdown like the US is its size and climate. America's size is one of the biggest reasons why revolts have yet to materialize. Canada is simply lucky to not have a slavery narrative for the minorities to latch onto. Depending on how the political winds blow, Canada can literally be as weak as Sweden in a few short years.

Oh they do, its with the indigenous canadians and its called "residential schools"

They were these schools in the 1800s aimed at integrating indians with the rest of the population. They beat them etc but I don't think it was any worse than catholic orphanages at the time. In the early 2000s the indians won the guilt trip on this.

Imagine if blacks in america actually won slave reparations from the government, that is what the residential school fallout is. The federal government paid out 1.9 billion dollars to descendents of survivors and offered official apologies. That is $1350 dollars for every indian in canada.

Even better, in the sentencing and prosecution of crimes now. Judges and juries must consider the 'impact of residential schools' on the motivation of the drunken indians that wander around like zombies and stab people. This was over 100 years ago that this occurred. Can you imagine if a jury had to take plantation slavery into consideration when sentencing every.

Bringing it back to the thread topic. One of trudeau's first moves was to start the inquest into missing aboriginal women in canada. Squaws go missing from the reservation all the time, and though I support the inquest I can only imagine what kind of national holidays and reparations will be paid out when it is concluded. I also fully expect a #firstnationlivesmatter hashtag.

[TonySandos]

Canada confirmed just as cucked as the USA. Well damn

[la bodhisattva]

(12-16-2015 12:27 PM)MdWanderer Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 09:05 AM)72 and sunny Wrote:  

Now, where have we seen this before?



Hmm...

Maybe both Trudeau and Merkel found their soulmates?

The man's face in background says it all, "My country went from Bismarck to this."

[RexImperator]

"Scheiße."

[DjembaDjemba]

(12-16-2015 08:58 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 06:59 PM)TonySandos Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 06:55 PM)SHANbangs Wrote:  

Take a snapshot of Canada's most pressing problems. Take a snapshot of America's. Sorry, from neither the left nor the right do I 'feel sorry' for Canada.

I do. The only thing saving Canada from similar meltdown like the US is its size and climate. America's size is one of the biggest reasons why revolts have yet to materialize. Canada is simply lucky to not have a slavery narrative for the minorities to latch onto. Depending on how the political winds blow, Canada can literally be as weak as Sweden in a few short years.

Oh they do, its with the indigenous canadians and its called "residential schools"

They were these schools in the 1800s aimed at integrating indians with the rest of the population. They beat them etc but I don't think it was any worse than catholic orphanages at the time. In the early 2000s the indians won the guilt trip on this.

Imagine if blacks in america actually won slave reparations from the government, that is what the residential school fallout is. The federal government paid out 1.9 billion dollars to descendents of survivors and offered official apologies. That is $1350 dollars for every indian in canada.

Even better, in the sentencing and prosecution of crimes now. Judges and juries must consider the 'impact of residential schools' on the motivation of the drunken indians that wander around like zombies and stab people. This was over 100 years ago that this occurred. Can you imagine if a jury had to take plantation slavery into consideration when sentencing every.

Bringing it back to the thread topic. One of trudeau's first moves was to start the inquest into missing aboriginal women in canada. Squaws go missing from the reservation all the time, and though I support the inquest I can only imagine what kind of national holidays and reparations will be paid out when it is concluded. I also fully expect a #firstnationlivesmatter hashtag.

Multiple governments in the past few decades were blindsided by the recent demographic resurgence of the aboriginal population.

Aboriginals shifted from almost demographically insignificant to 7-8% of the current population and rapidly growing. Aboriginal women are at developing world fertility levels. Talk to a resident of Hobbema or Wetaskiwin (reserves), women have 4-8 kids throughout their lifetime.

The party that ignores the Aboroginals is the party that will never govern again. This past election, a historic number of Aboriginals voted (for the liberals).

Excerpt from StatsCanada (when our census was still mandatory, keep in mind Aboriginals actually underreport the children they have on the reserves)

Quote:

Based on the data collected from the census question on ethnic origin (or ancestry) that has been asked in censuses since the late 19th century, the number of people reporting an Aboriginal ancestry, estimated at scarcely more than 100,000 at the turn of the 20th century, rose to more than 160,000 in 1951 and exceeded one million in 1991 (Guimond, Robitaille and Senécal, 2009).Note 1 In more recent years, Aboriginal peoples, whether they are defined on the basis of ancestry or self-reported Aboriginal identityNote 2, have seen their numbers grow faster than the rest of the Canadian population, and accordingly their weight within the Canadian population is currently increasing. Persons with Aboriginal ancestry—that is with at least one Aboriginal ancestor—represented 5.4% of the population in 2006, compared to 3.8% 10 years earlier. Persons who reported an Aboriginal identity (basically a subset of the population with Aboriginal ancestry) in turn made up 3.8% of the population in 2006, compared to 2.8% in 1996 (Statistics Canada, 2008-1; Statistics Canada, 2008-2; Statistics Canada, 2003).

Source: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-552-x/91...01-eng.htm

Back on topic, still waiting for that legal weed.

[syrianguy]

I had some acquaintances sponsor some of the refugees that came over to Canada. The paperwork involved to get them here was arduous and Harper ensured that mostly christian families arrived. Muslims have to go through much more hurdles and checks. If you look at this batch of refugees you will see proper ratio i.e women, babies and families. A lot of them are Armenian syrians from Aleppo. I think only a small number of them are muslims and they are families and they all came through the church. Even if Trudeau ups the number of Muslims- Canada has only taken about 1,000 total out of the 25,000 quota- I don't think it will cause anywhere near the problem we see in Europe. What I worry about in Europe is the fake refugees: Pakistanis, Afghanis, Algerians, Egyptians and others. Those tend to be more islamized and tribal.

I wouldn't put it past liberal Trudeau to ruin all of Harper's work on tightening immigration, fighting terror and restricting Islam in Canada. After the 2006 terror plot to "behead" Harper, I think he started looking at Islam more closely and took all the appropriate measures. The Canadian media is laughably leftist and criticized his every move. Trudeau, like Obama, believes that laxer immigration policy and winning the approval of Muslims will keep the country safe, he is about to find out that it is only a green light for more attacks and ultimately conquest.

On a side note, Syrians hate life outside of Syria and complain constantly about everything from the weather to the big roads. Syrian immigration was not common and I doubt many will adapt to the work-home lifestyle of the West. Most of them will want to return home once the war is over. A safe zone in Syria as suggested by Trump would have been much better than all of this insanity.

[Kamaki4]

(12-16-2015 08:55 AM)ManAbout Wrote:  

(12-15-2015 05:35 PM)Suits Wrote:  

Short answer: they didn't.

The PM is simple the leader of the party which has the most seats. The only people who vote for the eventual PM are the people who vote in his riding. In theory, it's possible for a party to win a majority and at the same time, for the leader to not getting the majority of votes in his riding, thus failing to gain a seat.

The leader of the party is selected by the party. Not a voters decision.

True, but this time around the vote was very much for Trudeau, i.e people voted for the Liberal candidate in their riding in order to elect him PM.

Also, he has been in parliament, as an elected MP from his Montreal riding, since 2006.

I disagree even though the Canadian media likes to portray it as a vote for Trudeau. The election boiled down to a vote against Harper with the leftists banding together to support the party, Liberal or NDP, that they thought had the best chance to defeat Harper. Stephen Harper also needs to bare a huge brunt of the blame for this, alienating many conservatives including senior cabinet ministers who retired or chose not to run in the recent election. His autocratic style never really resonated well with his own MP's and cabinet and frankly many are glad that he is gone.

[Akula]

(12-15-2015 09:05 AM)72 and sunny Wrote:  

Looks like Canada is going by way of Sweden, Germany, etc.:

It really is amazing the propaganda that the media and Western governments put out there to sway popular opinion. Upwards of 70+% of these "migrants" are men between 18-40 yet every single video on CNN or the BBC or photo like this has women and children all over the place.

[72 and sunny]

(12-18-2015 12:10 AM)Akula Wrote:  

It really is amazing the propaganda that the media and Western governments put out there to sway popular opinion. Upwards of 70+% of these "migrants" are men between 18-40 yet every single video on CNN or the BBC or photo like this has women and children all over the place.

Which obviously means that this "stubborn pattern" is not by accident, but by someone's very specific and meticulous design. And this is not only the case in stories about migrants, but in every important public story outthere there's an explicit angle/frame beneficial to the masters' (long term) goals.

Asking yourself whose design and why is it as such, will be the first step in your journey into the rabbit hole.









Meanwhile, the unenlightened white man of Canada is only concerned about the weed being legalized. That and Hockey Night in Canada being back on CBC.

And so some years down the road, when Canada enacts Sharia law as the supreme law of the land, those some unenlightened white men while congregate on internet forums asking each other:

"How did this happen, eh?"

[Nemausus]

I mentioned earlier in this thread how Canadian politicians tend to be more connected to main street than those in other Western nations. Well, today Justin Trudeau conducted his year end French media interview from a Metro station in downtown Montreal. The full interview will air Monday.




Haters will call this a gimmick and maybe it is, but damn, talk about a change in tone. I didn't hate Harper with the level of intensity that was widespread across the country but seeing this new level of accessibility and autonomy from our PM and his ministers makes me think I didn't realize just how bad things had become. Under the old government we only saw Harper and his ministers in highly choreographed events. It was a cold, corporate, top-down kind of business. Nothing came close to this level of candidness.

Frankly, as a Canadian, I like the way this new regime is bringing back that "big small town" feel of our country. This isn't America, where there is a President, a White House, hundreds of secret service guys and billions of dollars between the common man and the Commander-in-Chief. This is Canada, where he's "just the Prime Minister" and things are much more relaxed. It's a stark contrast between our two countries and it's one I like.

The Conservatives are going to have a very hard time getting back into power. They will have to choose their new leader very wisely or they'll be stuck in the wilderness for the next decade.

Justin Trudeau may be too left learning, but he is changing the way politics are being done in this country, probably for the better. Ignoring this trend, dismissing him as an airhead or believing he gets by on the basis of his name or looks won't help anybody who hopes to see Canada tack back to the right in 2019.

The Conservatives will need to nominate a more friendly and approachable leader while attacking the Liberals on their poor policy decisions, instead of constantly taking shots at the image of the new PM. I don't believe that kind of attack will resonate with Canadians going forward any more than it did this past election.

[HighSpeed_LowDrag]

Talking about Canada "tacking back to the right" in 2019 is somewhat disingenuous when you consider the reality that all the mainstream Canadian political parties have been in lockstep adherence to the Globalist Progressive consensus for many years (yes, even the Conservatives.) Indeed, I would hazard to guess that Canada is the sole country on the planet that has given itself over to the Narrative 100%.

How this came about has much to deal with the eternal struggle among Canadians to define what, exactly constitutes a Canadian identity. There's a somewhat clichéd phrase that I hear that says that Canada, and Canadians, are defined more by what we're not than what we are.

We're not British.
We're not French.
We're definitely not Americans.

At least other countries affected by the globalists have recognizable ethnic-majoritarian identities they can fall back on, like the four nations of Britain, or the Swedish, or the Australians. The Americans have (at least, up until now) their "melting pot" and strong assimilationist culture. We have none of that at all.

This lack of unifying ethnic identity is in large part due to the fact that Canada's history is the history of the latent struggle between its English and French-speaking peoples. If the countries of Europe today are divided by ethnicity, and the US historically divided by race, our latent divide is by language. Multiple governments in the past have tried to weld together a unified Canadian identity, only to see each attempt fail repeatedly.

It all changed once Pierre Trudeau came into power in the 70s and decided the best way to disempower the surging Quebec nationalist movement was by a) establishing official Bilingualism and b) instituting multiculturalism as an official government policy to, in effect, render the French-speaking people of Quebec not one of the three founding peoples, but merely one amongst many others.

What this has resulted in is Canada essentially creating an identity for itself as the utopia of Globalist Progressivism, and as the base blueprint for its ideologues to impose upon all the other nations of the world. Our governments now buy into all its essential ideals; feminism, multicultural diversity, gay acceptance, and unfettered social justice warriorism combined with mass immigration, economic financialization and free-trade.

Quote:

“We know in our bones that Canada was built by people from all corners of the world who worship every faith, who belong to every culture, who speak every language. We believe in our hearts that this country’s unique diversity is a blessing.”

-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in his election victory speech, 19 October 2015

So how does this relate back to the Conservatives?

Simple - the Conservative Party of Canada is a party of neocons through and through.

-Harper actively suppressed social conservatives during his time as PM because of his obsession with making sure that the Liberals could not claim a "hidden agenda" on his part to roll back abortion rights. He undermined any and all attempts by members of the Conservative caucus to introduce or even discuss a law to limit or regulation abortion (of which Canada, unique among Western democracies, has none.) Perhaps the one scrap he did give them was a managed stage-play of allowing a free-vote on repealing gay marriage that he knew he would lose - then declaring the issue permanently settled.

-The Conservatives declared themselves all-in on mass immigration, to the point where they managed to out-do the Liberals in pandering to newcomers (the vast majority of whom are non-European.)

-Conservative foreign policy under Harper was little more than lock-step adherence to the militaristic adventurism of the United States under both Bush and Obama, with a specific blend of blind acceptance of Israeli foreign policy under Benjamin Netanyahu and a willingness to shove gay acceptance down the throats of non-Western nations. Had Harper been in power in 2003, we would have found ourselves deep in the quagmire of Iraq. As it were, he was happy to limit himself to Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria/Iraq 2.0.

I seriously considered not voting last election because, quite frankly, the power of the Narrative in this country means that there's little real difference between the two parties. Consider what interim leader Rona Ambrose has to say about Donald Trump: http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2015/...brose.html