Quote: (10-13-2015 02:58 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:
Quote: (10-13-2015 02:50 AM)porscheguy Wrote:
You ought to start a thread on this subject matter.
He already has: thread-50531.html
Well predicted and spoken, Bosch!
That was a more recent thread collecting my accelerating observations.
It goes much further back, with my initial suspicions of a Cult Of Sensibility, which now I'd subsume into a wider 'Neo-Victorian' Framework. I generally observe, formulate theories and gradually refine them, but I think my initial thought here holds true, and everything else I've noticed (sexual repression, dismissive-avoidance, a transition out of hook up culture, male and female incels, deliberate moral retardation of university women) comes out of this:
thread-38167...#pid780336
Quote:Quote:
After 125 years of 'progress', all it takes is the same combination of factors to exist in society: social class stratification; a privileged female upbringing; sexual discomfort and repression; a dominant religion * ; and a belief in one's own superior morality, and the end result is the same as then. We're simply seeing the return of The Cult of Sensibility.
* the religion would be both Progressive Utopianism and Militant Atheism, both of which have transitioned into full-blown Religious Cults.
Here's my suspicion of the Dismissive-Avoidant Attachment style of Millennial Girls, (with bonus unfortunate-prediction of Dylann Roof, Vester Lee Flanagan and Christopher Harper-Mercer).
thread-36406...#pid735368
My suspicions refining further that the Sensible's love of high emotion coupled with technology could make them disinterested in relationships with a man:
thread-45247...#pid963608
I can't find the thread, but there's a later discussion about the decay of nightclub game and my suspicion girl's going out to nightclubs in groups not to meet men or to hook up but to take selfies, to strengthen their Social Media Narcissistic Constructs. I linked to a News.Com story about an Aussie woman mentioning going out with no interest in having sex - too creepy and awkward for her - then further predicted this attitude, not slootdom will be the coming wave.
Add the increased rape culture and false rape accusation hysteria, then couple that with my observations of deliberate moral retardation by Academia to keep graduates in an adolescent mindset, (specifically the 95-120 IQ set who possess a malleable-gullibility about reality):
thread-49633...pid1085419
And it's easy to see which way the wind is blowing: Victorian Style sexual prudery. Sex is bad. It is something that only bad people do. It will be that black and white to them.
This is why I've spoken before that I believe Evo Psych has had its day as a reliable Player Tactic. Culture is moving on. Evo Psych will work on prole girls - they'll always be sluts - but any girl with a education requiring moderate to little intellectual challenge will be infected with Moral Retardation, including the belief there are no Objective Moral Truths; and will find the emotional hysteria they crave in Progressive Social Justice. These midwitted girls - not as smart as they think they are, but smarter than their audience - control the media.
As such, you'll increasingly-notice Moral Purity Signalling. The recent rise of Women in Hollywood suddenly speaking out about sexism is part of this. This kind of narrative:
"I was asked to a private audition with [Famous Producer] and, so sweet and innocent, my queefs smelling of rosewater, I went along. As I approached his house, the little birds I sing with every morning tried to pull my drawstrings away, and the field mice tried to scamper in front of me to block my path, but I didn't listen. I went inside... and then he tried to sexually-proposition me!"
Meanwhile, I was watching old movies on TV as an eight-year-old knowing that actresses were sleeping with the money men to get the parts. Ashley Judd either apparently knows less about the reality of the business than a film made during the silent era, or she's simply Virtue-Signalling she's Morally Pure, and that transactional sex for fame is
bad.
Expect more of this. We need another War.
---
I know, you're thinking "Wait, Slut Walks are a thing!" and "Girls are still sloots around me".
- Slut walks are a holdover of sex-positive third-wave feminism, which is in its dying days, being replaced with sex-negative fourth wave feminism.
I'd venture most of the in Slut Walks aren't actually having any sex. They're not going along to show solidarity with sluts and sex-positivity. I guarantee you their mental framing for attendance is simply:
no-one tells me what to do!. As a bonus, they get to indulge in emotional hysteria like a good Sensible, and can generate pictures to attention whore for validation of their moral purity on social media.
- As for Sloots, dumber than 95 or so, smarter than 120, a player is getting laid. That middle ground is Flake / False Rape Accusation land.