Posts: 1,001
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2015
Reputation:
26
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-17-2015, 07:28 PM
Quote: (09-17-2015 07:26 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:
" hejafred
September 17, 2015 at 10:12 am
Thank you for taking this on. The whole thing about sexbots was driving me nuts. And how it was all women’s faults for being nagging feminists. The nerve of us. (Of course, then I asked my husband if he wanted to replace me with a robot, and his first answer was, “What kind?” I hit him.) "
https://frasersherman.wordpress.com/2015...ens-fault/
Ha! Give that man a beer.
![[Image: thumb.gif]](https://rooshvforum.network/images/smilies/new/thumb.gif)
Game recognized.
Maine and Canadian lobsters are the same animal. Prove me wrong.
Posts: 1,131
Threads: 0
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation:
6
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-17-2015, 07:38 PM
I forget where I saw this, I think it was the comments on an RoK article.
Feminism is a trade union for ugly women.
Posts: 635
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation:
17
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-17-2015, 11:44 PM
This may have been mentioned in another post, I saw a few comments in a similar vein but haven't read all of them.
The last time this came up on the forum I said, what I have said many times before...especially on my old blog...on this subject, that I don't think it will happen in the way we discuss.
For one, women in general already shame men for using sex toys of any kind. I don't know any guy who would admit to owning a fleshlight much less a Real Doll.
I am sure guys use them, but women have us at a disadvantage in the sex realm when it comes to 'toys' or sex aids.
So, for that reason I don't see any robots really being sold as sex bots. Some may try it, but I doubt it will really take off due to the fact that women don't need to ban them. They simply need to ridicule any guy who owns one or even jokes about owning one. Now, that could change but I doubt it.
Second, think about the cost. Even at the low end, it would probably cost as much as a new car. So, say 30k if not more? With the way things are going, your average omega/gamma/lower beta won't be able to afford that.
One thing I have thought about is some enterprising guy, especially if they passed the uncanny valley in features, opening up a sex bot escort service or cat house. As this would allow them to get passed prostitution laws.
Then again, would any of you guys want to pay to rent a more advanced version of a fleshlight? Eeeewwww.
Not to mention the CDC and health department cracking down on it. But I could see it happening to some degree.
What I think will actually happen is what happened with computers. At first it will be humanoid robots sold for businesses and then will make it into the normal consumer market.
Some wealthy tech guys may buy them as maids/servants and also use them as an occasional sexbot but more than likely they will simply replace large sections of the work force.
I think this is what really terrifies women.
Women know that they only have so much value to society with most of it being sexual. For all their 'career' talk about being empowered and independent, the fact is that most women are far from independent or empowered and only a very small few work in any capacity in a occupation that could reasonably called a "career".
Most women work in low skill areas, retail or basically as clerks/secretaries as examples, and even those with careers are far more replaceable than their comparative men in their social strata. Look at female lawyers, for example. Most simply do legal research instead of running the law firm or arguing the case.
Or doctors. Most female doctors work as GP's or similar types of fields. They aren't neurosurgeons. Those types of jobs will easily be replaced by human-esque robots. Japan is already working towards this with robot to care for the elderly and sick.
One of the more amusing things to me is that, besides sex, most jobs women do are the same types of jobs that they used to do within the home. They wait tables, do laundry, serve food (though usually it is men who cook it), and clean bedrooms.
Human robots could do that on a commercial level and eventually at the household level.
Imagine you are at work, you get a message on your smart phone that your "personal household robot assistant" is done cleaning and effecting minor repairs and is on the way to drop off your dry cleaning in the back of an automated Uber or Google car. It wants to know what you want for dinner so it can stop by the grocery store and buy the ingredients. It sends you some recipes based on your past usage or designed to help you build gains.
You come home a few hours later to a clean house, a hot meal in the stove, your errands completed, and are greeted by a smoking hot robot gladly will to rub your shoulders or suck your dick before or after dinner.
No woman could compete with that. Even if sex with a real woman is better, assuming their bitchiness doesn't reach astronomical levels, then I still see the benefit.
I don't know about you guys but even when I do have pussy on tap, I still jerk it once a day on average. Imagine how much easier a "Robotic personal assistant" would make your life even when out gaming.
Now imagine it will probably be marketed towards families, the elderly, and the disabled first with a special upgrade option.
I for one welcome our new robotic overlords.
Women these days think they can shop for a man like they shop for a purse or a pair of shoes. Sorry ladies. It doesn't work that way.
Women are like sandwiches. All men love sandwiches. That's a given. But sandwiches are only good when they're fresh. Nobody wants a day old sandwich. The bread is all soggy and the meat is spoiled.
-Parlay44 @
http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-35074.html
Posts: 3,448
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation:
35
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 06:17 AM
Sorry guys but Nas beat you to it.
A man is only as faithful as his options-Chris Rock
Posts: 34
Threads: 0
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation:
0
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 11:22 AM
Wait a minute: if women are supposed to have control over their bodies, shouldn't men be able to do whatever they want with theirs? Also, if sex robots for men are outlawed, does that mean that women (sorry, wymyn) will be forced to throw out their sex toys? That will only be fair--not that feminists are interested in that.
Posts: 1,143
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
10
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 11:43 AM
@ Troll King: "where'd you get your STD?" .. " A rental cyborg sex bot of course." haha
Posts: 1,143
Threads: 0
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation:
10
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 11:47 AM
Women realize sex bots means a lower quality beta-male pool to draw from for starters, as guys start weighing the ROI of western bitches, and invest in a robot.
Along the "have your cake and eat it too" guidelines; it takes away men's emotional desire for women. What would a woman be without emotions? Who does she get her emotional tampon fix from?
Since women occidentally don't have "relationships" per se, but rather a broad spectrum "man experience" derived from multiple men simultaneiously, it anchors all the MGTOW gents into a new risk free option, and permanent exclusion. The tech of sex bots is the anti-christ of core tenants of feminism. Don't need men ladies? Not even a little? Now you're entirely replaced based on present value and ROI.
Posts: 2,467
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation:
254
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 06:06 PM
I don't understand why people think sexbots will be a big thing in the near future. It strikes me as a fundamental misunderstanding of technological trends and human psychology. Do I mean that a lot of men wouldn't be interested in sexbots if they did exist? No - I just mean that sexbots aren't necessary because there will be superior alternatives, namely VR porn ala Oculus Rift. It seems absurdly obvious to me that VR porn, combined with some sort of integrated fleshlight/pocket pussy attachment will be tremendously popular over the coming decades. VR porn is the natural outgrowth of current internet porn, which is incredibly popular (think of how many men view porn versus fuck inflatable blowup dolls - that's VR porn vs. sexbots in a nutshell). I mean, why would a rational man spend thousands of dollars on a sexbot (which he then has to carry around and maintain, and hide away somewhere in his house) when he could just utilize his existing VR platform to consume interactive porn? There's just no appeal for a sexbot once VR porn starts to take off. (And by the way, this is not any kind of endorsement of VR porn. I think it's going to be a complete disaster and will ruin the lives of tens of millions of men. Definitely avoid it when it starts to come out).
[size=8pt]"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.”[/size] [size=7pt] - Romans 8:18[/size]
Posts: 1,440
Threads: 0
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation:
8
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 07:59 PM
Quote: (09-15-2015 09:29 AM)captndonk Wrote:
I really doubt that there are robots which can compete with a real woman any time soon.
I think you might not realize how low Western women have driven the bar.....
Лучше поздно, чем никогда
...life begins at "70% Warning Level."....
Posts: 590
Threads: 0
Joined: Jan 2015
Reputation:
7
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 09:18 PM
I can see why feminists would be against sexbots - even if every adult man and woman each got one for the same price, they would help men more than women. Simply put, sexbots for men would cost a lot less than a wife, or especially an ex-wife. But even if women all got them for free, they'd still lose money vs. being in a relationship with a man, because even a free Robo-Chad isn't pay for her bills, student loans, handbags, etc.
And while sexbots kind of seem like something for losers, I think on a macro scale they would kill a lot of the thirst.
Posts: 631
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2015
Reputation:
1
Woman calls for ban of sexbots
09-18-2015, 09:19 PM
It's the next step after fapping to CGI characters.