rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests
#26

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

always thought this was a terrible idea - putting a girl's sexual business out there is a good way to invite false rape accusations (buyer's remorse).
Reply
#27

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (08-20-2015 11:13 AM)jariel Wrote:  

I don't believe in doing that simply because I don't want it done to me. I wouldn't want some chick posting a pic of me sleeping with dick hanging out, or whatever shit she might have -- when you're asleep in the bed with a chick, you don't know what she's doing, because you're asleep, she can take pics of you, go through your things, etc.

So I discourage that behavior simply because you wouldn't want it done it to you.
The golden rule? I agree. If some chick passed around naked pics of me where they ended up online, that chick would be considered the scum of the Earth to me. Fvck that. If she was on a female version board like this - posting normal pics of me, and telling random internet strangers about our personal sex lives, I would be done with her, and she would be considered the scum of the Earth to me.

There has to be some trust - something sacred.

I never understood why guys would post naked pics of chicks online. Pics that were sent with confidence and trust. Only thing you're doing by posting them is showing that you can't be trusted, and you that you're lacking in emotional maturity.
Reply
#28

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Roosh has asked me to remind you all about a potential privacy leak which arises when uploading photos.

Photos taken with mobile devices in particular tend to embed information such as GPS coordinates (i.e. YOUR PRECISE LOCATION), time/date and the device type into the file's metadata at moment of capture. More info here:

http://www.howtogeek.com/203592/what-is-...remove-it/

Please make sure you either change your device settings or strip out the data using an app before you post it. Alternatively follow the instructions in the link provided.


Nineteen84
Reply
#29

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 10:51 AM)Kaebs Wrote:  

Quote: (08-16-2015 11:43 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

1. It's getting forum members in trouble. This is a public forum that is read by white knights. It has happened that girls who were uploaded were identified and the member was confronted. In fact, a big case just happened the other week.

2. It can be used to hurt the forum. Our enemies can claim we are "violating the privacy" of girls we are intimate with. This recently happened in Poland with traveling youtube PUAs (not part of this forum) that gave a headache to us normal guys living there.

Did I miss something? What happened?

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html

Sadly.

Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?

That's rich.
Reply
#30

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:24 PM)JohnnyR Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 10:51 AM)Kaebs Wrote:  

Quote: (08-16-2015 11:43 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

1. It's getting forum members in trouble. This is a public forum that is read by white knights. It has happened that girls who were uploaded were identified and the member was confronted. In fact, a big case just happened the other week.

2. It can be used to hurt the forum. Our enemies can claim we are "violating the privacy" of girls we are intimate with. This recently happened in Poland with traveling youtube PUAs (not part of this forum) that gave a headache to us normal guys living there.

Did I miss something? What happened?

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html

Sadly.

Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?

That's rich.

It's about as rich as a guy with eleven posts trolling the forum.
Reply
#31

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:24 PM)JohnnyR Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 10:51 AM)Kaebs Wrote:  

Quote: (08-16-2015 11:43 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

1. It's getting forum members in trouble. This is a public forum that is read by white knights. It has happened that girls who were uploaded were identified and the member was confronted. In fact, a big case just happened the other week.

2. It can be used to hurt the forum. Our enemies can claim we are "violating the privacy" of girls we are intimate with. This recently happened in Poland with traveling youtube PUAs (not part of this forum) that gave a headache to us normal guys living there.

Did I miss something? What happened?

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html

Sadly.

Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?

That's rich.

No he didn't plaster faces, they were censored.

Secondly, he didn't throw a sissy fit. He was more concerned about the girls he was still interested in another country, were hurt from it.

I think there was one he was especially interested in that got burned.

He was sharing his love of women with us and gave a world class guide on the countries he was banging in.

I'm thankful he did that, bummed he got caught.

It is what it is.
Reply
#32

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:26 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:24 PM)JohnnyR Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 10:51 AM)Kaebs Wrote:  

Quote: (08-16-2015 11:43 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

1. It's getting forum members in trouble. This is a public forum that is read by white knights. It has happened that girls who were uploaded were identified and the member was confronted. In fact, a big case just happened the other week.

2. It can be used to hurt the forum. Our enemies can claim we are "violating the privacy" of girls we are intimate with. This recently happened in Poland with traveling youtube PUAs (not part of this forum) that gave a headache to us normal guys living there.

Did I miss something? What happened?

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html

Sadly.

Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?

That's rich.

It's about as rich as a guy with eleven posts trolling the forum.

Well, the dude was asking for it.

What is it they say? Hell hath no fury like a woman's wrath.

As for me "trolling", I don't see a "moderator" badge next to your name. Though I am a tad myopic.

But I've known enough self designated "troll hunters" on other forums to know you're not worth the bother.[Image: tard.gif]
Reply
#33

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Sounds like Johnny wasn't worth the bother in the end. [Image: tard.gif]
Reply
#34

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:46 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Sounds like Johnny wasn't worth the bother in the end. [Image: tard.gif]

If he was Special Ed/Chick Magnet, he really needs to go back to Mexico so that he can go undefeated with all of the extremely sexually aggressive women there. If he wasn't those guys, he needs serious help.
Reply
#35

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:48 PM)Merenguero Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:46 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Sounds like Johnny wasn't worth the bother in the end. [Image: tard.gif]

If he was Special Ed/Chick Magnet, he really needs to go back to Mexico so that he can go undefeated with all of the extremely sexually aggressive women there. If he wasn't those guys, he needs serious help.

Haha. Still sore that I actually get laid in Mexico?

Can't blame those Mexican lassies for not wanting a middle-aged geek with a small prick.

In any case, I feel bad for a guy who spends all his free time on this forum tracking down "trolls".
Reply
#36

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:36 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:24 PM)JohnnyR Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 10:51 AM)Kaebs Wrote:  

Quote: (08-16-2015 11:43 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

1. It's getting forum members in trouble. This is a public forum that is read by white knights. It has happened that girls who were uploaded were identified and the member was confronted. In fact, a big case just happened the other week.

2. It can be used to hurt the forum. Our enemies can claim we are "violating the privacy" of girls we are intimate with. This recently happened in Poland with traveling youtube PUAs (not part of this forum) that gave a headache to us normal guys living there.

Did I miss something? What happened?

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html

Sadly.

Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?

That's rich.

No he didn't plaster faces, they were censored.

Secondly, he didn't throw a sissy fit. He was more concerned about the girls he was still interested in another country, were hurt from it.

I think there was one he was especially interested in that got burned.

He was sharing his love of women with us and gave a world class guide on the countries he was banging in.

I'm thankful he did that, bummed he got caught.

It is what it is.

Oh get off his pole, will you?

The dude was bragging.

Fair enough - I do that a lot too. But I wouldn't create a little soap opera about the girl I "cared for" was hurt after I uploaded her pics to a forum of thirsty degenerates.

That IS rich.
Reply
#37

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 04:23 PM)SpecialEdward Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:36 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:24 PM)JohnnyR Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 10:51 AM)Kaebs Wrote:  

Did I miss something? What happened?

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html

Sadly.

Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?

That's rich.

No he didn't plaster faces, they were censored.

Secondly, he didn't throw a sissy fit. He was more concerned about the girls he was still interested in another country, were hurt from it.

I think there was one he was especially interested in that got burned.

He was sharing his love of women with us and gave a world class guide on the countries he was banging in.

I'm thankful he did that, bummed he got caught.

It is what it is.

Oh get off his pole, will you?

The dude was bragging.

Fair enough - I do that a lot too. But I wouldn't create a little soap opera about the girl I "cared for" was hurt after I uploaded her pics to a forum of thirsty degenerates.

That IS rich.

Yawn, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
Reply
#38

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (09-08-2015 04:34 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 04:23 PM)SpecialEdward Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:36 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (09-08-2015 03:24 PM)JohnnyR Wrote:  

Quote: (08-17-2015 11:18 AM)Blackwell Wrote:  

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-46477.html

Sadly.

Wait. The dude plastered several chicks faces/bodies all over the internet, gets burnt, and then throws a sissy fit about white knights?

That's rich.

No he didn't plaster faces, they were censored.

Secondly, he didn't throw a sissy fit. He was more concerned about the girls he was still interested in another country, were hurt from it.

I think there was one he was especially interested in that got burned.

He was sharing his love of women with us and gave a world class guide on the countries he was banging in.

I'm thankful he did that, bummed he got caught.

It is what it is.

Oh get off his pole, will you?

The dude was bragging.

Fair enough - I do that a lot too. But I wouldn't create a little soap opera about the girl I "cared for" was hurt after I uploaded her pics to a forum of thirsty degenerates.

That IS rich.

Yawn, don't let the door hit you on the way out.

He was able to give a completely accurate analysis of me in the post before. I'll give him that.
Reply
#39

New forum rule: Do not post nude or identifiable images of your sexual conquests

Quote: (08-16-2015 11:43 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

From this point, don't share images or screenshots that identify your dates or girlfriends (e.g., first names, faces, phone numbers, etc) and do not upload/share naked photos.

There are three reasons for this:

1. It's getting forum members in trouble. This is a public forum that is read by white knights. It has happened that girls who were uploaded were identified and the member was confronted. In fact, a big case just happened the other week.

2. It can be used to hurt the forum. Our enemies can claim we are "violating the privacy" of girls we are intimate with. This recently happened in Poland with traveling youtube PUAs (not part of this forum) that gave a headache to us normal guys living there. Also, stories that show men bragging about sleeping/gaming specific girls have gone viral in an attempt to shut people down (e.g. Julien Blanc).

3. The girls eventually find out. I lost count how many times a girl you guys uploaded sent me a hysterical email that their photo was on the forum, even if it wasn't housed on the physical server. It's a headache and waste of time for me.

There are more negatives than positives in uploading these types of photos. If you're going to upload photos, keep it generally clothed and not something that was obviously part of a late-night sexting session. Naked or semi-nude photos are better suited to be shared in private with your friends instead of a forum that is completely public and monitored by the enemy.

We should make the forum private. White knights, leaches, and other undesirables are also remarkably lazy. As evidenced by their retarded thinking style. Having 2-3 hurdles in order to see content would be great. IE) only members can read the forum, after one month if a user has less than 10 posts they lose access (gets rid of lurkers that don't contribute or possibly spys) and so on.

The fact that the tinder thread has 1 million views also makes me paranoid that people that work for the company read it and try to patch the things that get us success. Society hates masculine men that are not slaves to women and the system.

In addition I think should have more lax banning policy on actual players. Guys like Mars, Greek Kamaki, Satori have a place here. There aren't THAT many masculine men not being used as tools so we should value them more instead of banning them forever like SJW's want to do. IE. one month ban. two month ban. 4 month ban. 8 month ban. Every violation double ban length time. Masculine men have too much pride to try to sneak through the system and create new accounts often times in a place where they are unwanted.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)