[ddjembe mutombo]

I saw this in my news feed and had to take a look. I find it hilarious that she is outraged by them telling the girls to wear non-white t-shirts, but not by the banning of speedos for males.

Quotes from an interview with the mother:

Quote:

"Being a feminist and seeing things through that filter, I was just kind of enraged by that," Smith told The Huffington Post. "They're saying little girls need to be ashamed of their bodies and cover themselves up."

Quote:

"I have a little boy, I'm teaching him to think correctly, and this is contrary to what I'm teaching him," she said.

Quote:

"Setting one standard for half of the student body only promotes the idea that girls bodies are naturally shameful," she wrote.

Yup... telling little girls not to cover up is body shaming, but telling boys not to wear speedos is a-ok.

[TheWastelander]

They're sixth graders. Why does she want to sexualize 11 or 12-year-old girls? The non-fat ones have barely entered puberty.

And yeah, her hypocrisy is retarded. I feel sorry for her son. His psycho lesbian mother who's potentially a pedophile is going to mess him up.

[DannyAlberta]

Quote:

"I have a little boy, I'm teaching him to think correctly, and this is contrary to what I'm teaching him," she said.

That comment it literally bone-chilling.



Behold the birth of another mangina who, through no fault of his own, had a feminist for a mother who thought it was her right and duty to treat her son like some kind of social experiment.

[kmhour]

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

If the coin that she had flipped had landed on another side, she would have blasted the school for sexualizing and objectifying girls by throwing a pool party.

[Dr. Howard]

Though I think the mom is nuts, I am somewhat perplexed by the t-shirt rule. Back in my day all school related pool events were just 'no bikinis' I mean, does the swim team have to wear t-shirts?

[eljeffster]

(05-21-2015 09:52 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

Though I think the mom is nuts, I am somewhat perplexed by the t-shirt rule. Back in my day all school related pool events were just 'no bikinis' I mean, does the swim team have to wear t-shirts?

I agree. Yes there are certain basic standards. Perhaps no bikinis for girls and no speedos for boys, or whatever. I see this more as a part of the assault on parent's rights. Look at all the "Diktats" from the school, including the drop off pick up rules that would exclude a couple of ten year olds from the neighborhood biking over to the school pool party.

[Handsome Creepy Eel]

eljefster, I think the dropoff and pickup rules are to protect themselves from lawsuits when a kid decides to stop at a videogame store for a few hours after the party and the parent calls the search & rescue...

[Cr33pin]

[General Stalin]

Who the fuck wants to wear a T-shirt over a swimsuit? I'm not saying the wording or delivery the woman used was proper or tactful, but "girls must wear T-shirts over their bathing suits" is pretty fucking retarded. Another instance of the public thinking the need to protect and coddle women. If I were a father of a 11-12 year old girl I would think thats a stupid rule too, though I wouldn't frame it how this woman did.

[TheWastelander]

(05-21-2015 10:25 AM)General Stalin Wrote:  

Who the fuck wants to wear a T-shirt over a swimsuit? I'm not saying the wording or delivery the woman used was proper or tactful, but "girls must wear T-shirts over their bathing suits" is pretty fucking retarded. Another instance of the public thinking the need to protect and coddle women. If I were a father of a 11-12 year old girl I would think thats a stupid rule too, though I wouldn't frame it how this woman did.

Agreed, but look at how she frames it. She thinks this is "policing their sexuality."

That's fucking weird and reminds me of what AnonymousBosch has been writing about these nuts as of late.

[ddjembe mutombo]

(05-21-2015 09:52 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

Though I think the mom is nuts, I am somewhat perplexed by the t-shirt rule. Back in my day all school related pool events were just 'no bikinis' I mean, does the swim team have to wear t-shirts?

Apparently they didn't want to make the poor kids buy a new swimsuit just to attend one pool party. It was the easiest and cheapest way to make a one-piece. Honestly, I think the logic is stupid. Just say, One-piece swimsuits OR a non-white t-shirt over a bikini. Either way, the response from the mom is hilarious. Even better is the comment section on the Huffington Post article. There are plenty of sane comments, but there are a handful of "MAKE THE BOYS WEAR SHIRTS TOO!" comments. I mean, guys and girls are totally the same...

[Sonsowey]

It is weird that at a pool party they force girls to wear a t-shirt over their swimsuit, I had one of these when I was in 5th grade and people just wore normal swimsuits.

[Menace]

Has she ever considered this is so that girls who have developed/not developed their breasts don't feel bad? That this actually makes things more equal and protects girls' feelings? Nope.

[AnonymousBosch]

(05-21-2015 11:51 AM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

It is weird that at a pool party they force girls to wear a t-shirt over their swimsuit, I had one of these when I was in 5th grade and people just wore normal swimsuits.

Female comfort and privilege generates female hysteria and a culture of sensibility where they flit between pearl-clutching reactions to whatever the mass media tells them the current, trendy thing to worry about is.

Roosh linked to a lesbian's sub-Robert Crumb comic story of her rape a little while back. Dyke is at college in the 70's, 'feels funny', guy takes her back to her room, bathes her and 'rapes her', whilst she is unable to resist because she feels 'so strange'.

The most telling part of the story is a few panels later: it's now the 80's, she's passing a Newstand and she sees the media blaring the In-Vogue Rich White Women Hysteria of the time: Roofies! She instantly decides that yes, she was drugged and date raped.

Sigh.

That is the privileged female mindset: whatever drama is being discussed and could offer you attention, affect.

This is all rape culture is, and why Female Typists, whilst laughable, are so dangerous. They disseminate toxic ideas: the typist with the Feminist Alzheimer's suicide story the other day has now normalised the idea that Alzheimer's patients should be put down to spare their suffering, and it's spread to Reddit, and been front page news on Australian News Sites with people uploading the stories of their family for hysterical attention.

One of the horrible quotes I saw: "Sometimes she still laughs and smiles. I have no idea why."



Anyway, how it relates to this:

The Sensible Concern about 10 years ago that any picture taken at a school event obviously meant that the photographer wasn't a parent of one of the children, but a predator sexualising their children who was obviously going to upload the pictures to the internet for strangers to jerk off over. Cops would frequently be called to school events.

The reaction: cover the children up for their physical safety.

10 years later, the Trendy Sensible Concern is about Girl's Low-Self Esteem, and Everyone Is A Pervert! is fading into memory, so they want to uncover the children again, for their mental safety.

If you think it's strange that it's the opposite reaction, it's because Sensibility isn't logical, it's hysterical.

Other women see the attention the mother gets from this, realise it raises her status, want to raise their own to be as cool and progressive, so mirror the concern.

From one of the - as always - snarky, "I know everything that is to be known about every topic in existence" female typists:

Quote:

The issue of a woman's body being so sexualized that a 12-year-old can't wear a SWIMSUIT to the POOL.

To which I would ask, who originally created the mindset that children's bodies WERE sexualised? Hysterical progressives, 10 years ago.

Female Sensibility functions as a meme.

[eljeffster]

(05-21-2015 10:18 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

eljefster, I think the dropoff and pickup rules are to protect themselves from lawsuits when a kid decides to stop at a videogame store for a few hours after the party and the parent calls the search & rescue...

Another reason not to have kids in the West. My parents let us out of the house on a weekend day and we only came back for meals until dusk. As young as first grade I walked several blocks to school. My parents had a lot of free time. They are still married.

I get it that schools don't want to be sued. The problem is when the school- or nosy people start calling CPS or cops on kids and the parents get investigated for "child endangerment."

[aphelion]

(05-21-2015 04:28 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-21-2015 11:51 AM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

It is weird that at a pool party they force girls to wear a t-shirt over their swimsuit, I had one of these when I was in 5th grade and people just wore normal swimsuits.

Female comfort and privilege generates female hysteria and a culture of sensibility where they flit between pearl-clutching reactions to whatever the mass media tells them the current, trendy thing to worry about is.

Roosh linked to a lesbian's sub-Robert Crumb comic story of her rape a little while back. Dyke is at college in the 70's, 'feels funny', guy takes her back to her room, bathes her and 'rapes her', whilst she is unable to resist because she feels 'so strange'.

The most telling part of the story is a few panels later: it's now the 80's, she's passing a Newstand and she sees the media blaring the In-Vogue Rich White Women Hysteria of the time: Roofies! She instantly decides that yes, she was drugged and date raped.

Sigh.

That is the privileged female mindset: whatever drama is being discussed and could offer you attention, affect.

This is all rape culture is, and why Female Typists, whilst laughable, are so dangerous. They disseminate toxic ideas: the typist with the Feminist Alzheimer's suicide story the other day has now normalised the idea that Alzheimer's patients should be put down to spare their suffering, and it's spread to Reddit, and been front page news on Australian News Sites with people uploading the stories of their family for hysterical attention.

One of the horrible quotes I saw: "Sometimes she still laughs and smiles. I have no idea why."



Anyway, how it relates to this:

The Sensible Concern about 10 years ago that any picture taken at a school event obviously meant that the photographer wasn't a parent of one of the children, but a predator sexualising their children who was obviously going to upload the pictures to the internet for strangers to jerk off over. Cops would frequently be called to school events.

The reaction: cover the children up for their physical safety.

10 years later, the Trendy Sensible Concern is about Girl's Low-Self Esteem, and Everyone Is A Pervert! is fading into memory, so they want to uncover the children again, for their mental safety.

If you think it's strange that it's the opposite reaction, it's because Sensibility isn't logical, it's hysterical.

Other women see the attention the mother gets from this, realise it raises her status, want to raise their own to be as cool and progressive, so mirror the concern.

From one of the - as always - snarky, "I know everything that is to be known about every topic in existence" female typists:

Quote:

The issue of a woman's body being so sexualized that a 12-year-old can't wear a SWIMSUIT to the POOL.

To which I would ask, who originally created the mindset that children's bodies WERE sexualised? Hysterical progressives, 10 years ago.

Female Sensibility functions as a meme.

AnonymousBosch AGAIN with the real talk. Please let us know when your book is complete.

[WalterBlack]

(05-21-2015 04:28 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

Anyway, how it relates to this:

The Sensible Concern about 10 years ago that any picture taken at a school event obviously meant that the photographer wasn't a parent of one of the children, but a predator sexualising their children who was obviously going to upload the pictures to the internet for strangers to jerk off over. Cops would frequently be called to school events.

The reaction: cover the children up for their physical safety.

10 years later, the Trendy Sensible Concern is about Girl's Low-Self Esteem, and Everyone Is A Pervert! is fading into memory, so they want to uncover the children again, for their mental safety.

If you think it's strange that it's the opposite reaction, it's because Sensibility isn't logical, it's hysterical.

There’s a crazy amount of fear now about what will be done with kids' photos. I visited UK last year and I went to watch my 10 year niece perform in the her school’s Xmas play. My brother (her father) couldn’t make it to the event because he was at work so he asked me to film it. Unfortunately, all filming and photography of the event was banned. This is fucking ridiculous.

[AnonymousBosch]

(05-21-2015 06:43 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

There’s a crazy amount of fear now about what will be done with kids' photos. I visited UK last year and I went to watch my 10 year niece perform in the her school’s Xmas play. My brother (her father) couldn’t make it to the event because he was at work so he asked me to film it. Unfortunately, all filming and photography of the event was banned. This is fucking ridiculous.

It's fairly commonplace now for men to ignore the children of others in public, out of fear of being accused of a sexual interest in a child.

Saw it a few weeks back in a Chemist: loud-mouthed single mother complaining about her ex-husband to the Hippo Chemist whilst waiting for her prescription. The 4 year-old-boy wandering around behind her trying to catch the attention of the four older men waiting

He'd make eye contact, try talking, try shyly offering a toy. They'd all just look elsewhere, deliberately avoiding contact.

This is how Female Hysteria destroys community, trust and empathy. They've simply moved on from destroying the 'it takes a village' concept to destroying normal male-female sexual interaction.

How does this boy grow up?

- He either identifies with the feminine, who give him attention and learns to be a good little feminised clown for their coos of approval.

- Or his exclusion makes him rebel against society entirely: the children of single mothers tend towards behavioural problems.

Men create, women destroy. Always.

[WalterBlack]

I saw this last night on David Letterman’s final TV show:

You can tell that Letterman loves kids and he’s not afraid to mess with them for a laugh. He talks to them in an adult tone. I act the same as he does around kids.

The way things are going, how long will it be before something like Letterman’s skits becomes off limits?

[infowarrior1]

(05-21-2015 07:02 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

(05-21-2015 06:43 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

There’s a crazy amount of fear now about what will be done with kids' photos. I visited UK last year and I went to watch my 10 year niece perform in the her school’s Xmas play. My brother (her father) couldn’t make it to the event because he was at work so he asked me to film it. Unfortunately, all filming and photography of the event was banned. This is fucking ridiculous.

It's fairly commonplace now for men to ignore the children of others in public, out of fear of being accused of a sexual interest in a child.

Saw it a few weeks back in a Chemist: loud-mouthed single mother complaining about her ex-husband to the Hippo Chemist whilst waiting for her prescription. The 4 year-old-boy wandering around behind her trying to catch the attention of the four older men waiting

He'd make eye contact, try talking, try shyly offering a toy. They'd all just look elsewhere, deliberately avoiding contact.

This is how Female Hysteria destroys community, trust and empathy. They've simply moved on from destroying the 'it takes a village' concept to destroying normal male-female sexual interaction.

How does this boy grow up?

- He either identifies with the feminine, who give him attention and learns to be a good little feminised clown for their coos of approval.

- Or his exclusion makes him rebel against society entirely: the children of single mothers tend towards behavioural problems.

Men create, women destroy. Always.

I think someone coined the term pedohysteria to describe this. Which bears a similarity to its sister hysteria which is rape hysteria as is amply documented and demonstrated by recent events.

[aphelion]

'No Speedos? I am OUTRAGED that you would try to police my 11 year old son's sexuality in this way.'

[General Stalin]

(05-22-2015 08:06 AM)aphelion Wrote:  

'No Speedos? I am OUTRAGED that you would try to police my 11 year old son's sexuality in this way.'

Well it doesn't say "no body thongs" so you're all set there.

[joelf]

There are signs at NYC playgrounds No Adults Without Children. Makes you feel dirty just reading the fucking thing. Everyone is a suspect now.