Quote: (05-03-2015 04:20 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Foundations are where most of the world's wealth is parked. For example the Rockefellers - just as the Gates family intends to do - did not "give away" their wealth. They just transferred the ownership of their companies to thousands of foundations - their family still controlling the family business while doing various pet causes to their liking - in addition to that keeping the corporate profits far away from taxation. A foundation does not even have to be very effective to be called that way. They can spend 90% on operating costs and still be called tax-exempt.
In any case - I would not advise it - a Red Pill foundation while having a worthwhile cause would run counter to the entire plutocratic power structure. Even if you become somewhat successful it would be a huge pain in the ass to lead. Taking away the foundation status is actually easy enough if the organization opposes the true movers and shakers. We don't live in a free country - nowhere in the world.
The most powerful relatively risk free thing you could do is to run major promotion for books like the Rational Male. Rollo Tomassi is very hard to attack both for the mainstream as well as feminists. He stays clear of religion, politics and economics presenting a pure Red Pill message that all men can stay behind - MRAs, MGTOWs, PUAs, Game advocates as well as even sometimes Game haters and PUA-haters. If that book was available and promoted all around the world, then the Red Pill might stand a chance to become something more.
That could prove to be a major pain in the ass for the global social engineers. But alas - that is just an idea. There are multiple ways to even stop a self-published global bestseller from reaching the majority of the population. Major chains could boycott a book, total media-blackout etc. - this is their game on their turf.
The rationale of thinking that by starting charitable foundation one instantly is raised to a Clinton Foundation level of scrutiny is jumping the gun. Its like assuming that one will be subject to SEC regulations the day they open their corporation.
In terms of economics RVF and associated sites are keeping Roosh alive but he's not going to Bildeberg group meetings. A thousand-aire charity is not going to attract the eye of sauron.
Not starting something because when it becomes stupendously successful you might be attacked by the corrupt is ridiculous. If that was the case, my local flag football association should never have opened its doors because George Soros may fund its infiltration some day after finding out its comprised of only men.
Examples of small, male charities exist
http://www.sdniceguys.com/
http://www.careergear.org/about/mission-history/
https://www.thecalmzone.net/about-calm/what-is-calm/
As for it being a 'pain in the ass to lead' everything is a pain in the ass to lead...its also a pain in the ass to lift weights or be self employed.
Last. I don't see a charity primarily 'spreading the red pill message' as that already has commercially effective avenues like books as you have mentioned. Books don't always help though, a free copy of a book isn't going to help a guy looking for resources to battle a false rape claim, or find non biased divorce help, or a guy who is struggling with poverty while being cut off from any social assistance (free medicare and food stamps are easy to get if you are a single mom but virtually impossible for a single male)
I think it could be a viable, though challenging, project for someone that wanted something a bit more positive and rewarding in terms of 'fighting the system' instead of soul draining work like twitter warfare, fat shaming and hamster nuking...which grinds you down after a while.
