Sluts are like porn, you know it when you see it, but some of you guys look at the world as black and white, as if women can only be either virginal and pure or filthy whore sluts. I think the real world is a lot more nuanced than that.
For me a slut is a girl that has had many sex partners and who treats sex as casual and as not important and would sleep with just about any guy that crosses her path. While I feel that internal gut disgust that someone mentioned before when I see a woman like this I wouldn't consider a girl that has had serious relationships that may have lasted 6 months or 2, 3 years or whatever time period and then moved on to another relationship with another guy for another 3 years or whatever, and ends up having had 6 or 7 sexual partners a slut.
Hell, I've slept with girls that just wanted to be in a serious relationship with a good guy and I was the one who dumped them after being with them for a little while, forcing them to go on "the market" again to look for another guy. These weren't sluts, just normal girls that wanted a relationship.
Quote: (02-12-2015 02:25 PM)Travesty444 Wrote:
Quote: (02-12-2015 11:37 AM)Pride male Wrote:
Would you guys really prefer a world where most women are chaste and sex is really difficult to get except for prostitutes? Like Ancient Greece or Saudi Arabia.
Sure if it meant girls 18-20 were virgins and were motivated to help start families and stay attractive for their husbands.
If someone gave me an attractive 18yo today that wanted to start a family and was devoted to me I'd be fine with not getting side pussy and putting all my efforts into that family.
Maybe for you, but I know for sure that even with the greatest woman ever by my side I'd soon start craving another woman and I'm sure most guys are like me. Ha, I can't even think how many times I finished having sex with a girl I really liked and I was already thinking about some other girl.
Quote: (02-12-2015 03:13 PM)atlant Wrote:
Quote: (02-12-2015 09:06 AM)SteveMcMahon Wrote:
I always failed to see the logic in how a lot of one night stands would somehow would make a vagina more loose than X years of regular sex with the same guy.
I have to agree with this, it sounds more like frat/bro science then real life experience. If you compare a woman who has had regular sex with two or three boyfriends in a ten year period with a whore who has had 100 guys one night stands, even though the second is obviously the slut, does it really make a big difference on their size?
Quote: (02-12-2015 07:32 PM)Orion Wrote:
I would trade all the pleasure of all of these friendships, mini-relationships, wolfpacks and everything i made in this world in a split second for a life in a true family, where husband is a king. You know, the one that will love and respect you unconditionally when everybody else pisses you off. And no matter how much we build our own self-control, frame and confidence, we will always be struggling with external world whose only goal is to devour us, for it's own purpose.
Are these the only two choices? Why not have both the friendships, mini-relationships, and all that
and the family?
Quote: (02-12-2015 08:04 PM)Samseau Wrote:
1. When men have lots of sex with girls, that doesn't mean they can't be monogamous. If anything, it means they'll appreciate a good woman more.
Completely disagree with you, no man is monogamous by nature, even the lowest of the low betas would still have sex with different women if they could, even if they had a good woman. I do agree that having sex and getting to know many different types of women makes you appreciate a good woman a lot more, it does for me, but to say that a man would be monogamous is so silly. It doesn't matter how great a woman is, any man will always want another, and another, and another.
Quote: (02-12-2015 08:04 PM)Samseau Wrote:
2. People forget that men are promiscuous for two reasons. The first reason men are promiscuous, and this is the main reason, is because women today are huge sluts and dump men for the next cock once they get bored. 2/3's of divorces are initiated by women, and I'm sure the ratio climbs when it comes to casual relationships. Fact is, women are the ones who chew through their partners, it's not men being the evil awful players. Most men are players become women make them that way. These men are probably not going to be unfaithful since their natural inclination isn't to be unfaithful in the first place.
Such bullshit, men have been promiscuous since the beginning of time, it's our nature, we don't become promiscuous because we meet a couple of sluts along the way, actually we don't
become promiscuous because of some life event, we
are promiscuous. The only reason you have men that are not promiscuous is because they can't get different women, because they're bad with women, because they're betas and socially awkward, because they're too ugly or lack confidence, or whatever the reason, but even all these men in monogamous relationships would turn promiscuous if you put a different woman naked in front of them.
Quote: (02-12-2015 08:04 PM)Samseau Wrote:
The second reason men are promiscuous is because some men are just horn dogs. These guys are obvious yet they are also the kinds of men women tend to flock to, which in turn makes men more likely to become players in the future just to compete. But regardless, the naturally occurring man who needs huge sexual variety over a faithful woman is probably less than 20% of men. The vast majority of men are happy just to have a single girlfriend.
I simply can't agree with you, it is true that some men need much more variety then others but no men is happy with a single girlfriend unless they have really low test levels. They may think they're happy and that they don't need any other woman but that's just the way they rationalize the fact that they can't get more women. Again, put a naked woman in front of them and we'll see how monogamous they are.
Quote: (02-12-2015 08:04 PM)Samseau Wrote:
3. In order for a man to be promiscuous, he needs game. Since a man must learn good game in order to be a stud, it follows that being promiscuous increases the chance for marriage since studs are better at attracting women, virgin and whore alike.
Being promiscuous increases the chance of marriage for men? You can argue for the exact opposite, yes, you can attract more girls, but you know a lot more about their true nature and therefore you will more likely turn away from marriage.
Anyway, while young and inexperienced is vastly superior, sluts do exist, so why not enjoy both and everything else in between in the spectrum? Obviously sluts are to fuck and dump, and good girls are to be enjoyed, but it doesn't mean you can't have both.
Quote: (02-14-2015 12:56 AM)MrEndorphine Wrote:
I am reading this big long thread and I get really confused. Isn't game, no matter if Neil Strauss-style or RooshV-style about picking up and banging as many girls as possible? Isn't having sex - no-strings-attached - seen as a good thing? Something US guys (and many others) are not getting enough of? Isn't getting into a relationship, being domiciled into a Beta, and living a family live with a fat ugly chick not portrayed as one of the worst things to happen? (This is actually not my opinion.) Aren't you complaining that girls are not loose enough and giving you the sex you need?
Instead, I have the impression I am on a forum of neo-reactionaries. Dont get me wrong. Some of the arguments have some merit, for example "Orions" polygamy argument is in line with some of the claims of a very controversial but also very insightful freethinker
(https://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/PLSRR1.PDF) Did you get it from him? (Sorry, "LionOfJuda", but you will not like the author).
Oh, some other remark: This graph is clear bullshit. There is no straight line or anything, probably there is not even a weak correlation. And who are these girls who marry as virgins? Guys, be serious, these are either some girls from Muslim families or some extremely unattractive girls, or super religious-fundamentalist , or all of the above ...
You are exactly right about the bolded part regarding some guys on this forum and yes, that graph is complete bullshit.