[Sonoma]

Obviously you would want a hot girl who wasn't a slut to fuck you, but how would you rank each of those in terms of importance?

For example- would you consider yourself most successful in which of the following situations? (All of which are from my own experience)

1. Unattractive girl approaches you at a bar, accuses you of raping her roommate freshman year, and stealing her laptop earlier in the semester. You tell her the truth, that you took her roommates virginity and she was butthurt. You have no clue about her laptop. You bone her that night

2. Highly attractive whore willingly puts out on first date, but potentially has STDs and no condom is available. Bang?

3. Highly attractive girl with low notch count, but still has seen a few dicks is desperate for a relationship with you

4. 7/10 with large breasts and zero hook up history wants a relationship

5. 6.5/10 gives up her virginity at the age of 23

6. Highly educated girl who has seen a few dicks (6) wants to date

What would you choose/be most proud of?

I'll post what I ended up doing in a few comments, I had all the above in the span of a couple months

[eradicator]

I would ignore the first, run out and find a condom for the second(ALL of these lizards potentially have STDs, it is part of the game, keep it covered). and turn the rest into a harem. Actually, #6 would probably not be very much fun, well educated girls are really shitty on dates, constantly trying to show they are as smart as me and I just want to joke around and have fun.

[Moma]

I want to hit as many quality lizards as possible. I never had a problem getting in relationships. So finding one who has a few c0cks and is looking for a relationship is an easy game.
I don't want the one who wants to date. I want the one who wants to do something nasty. Then once I nutt, we can both be on our ways.

My sticking point is getting consistent SNL's from city to city.

I think in 3,4,5,6,2,1 would be my order of choice.

[Pride male]

The quantity of quality girls. Quality is both appearance and personality.

[BlurredSevens]

I'm not sure I understand this thread.

Are you hung up on which girl to bang? Why didn't you just bang all 6 girls? Who cares?

I guess I've never understood the significance of a girls sexual history as it relates to her attractiveness. Seems like a silly thing to think about. Are you also worried about her diet? Or what kind of toothpaste she uses? Why do you know so much about these girls histories?

Personally, I also don't care what she wants (relationship, etc.) and don't see how that affects my attraction to her. If she passes the boner test and is in close proximity to me, I'm going to bang her. The rest is irrelevant in my mind.

So again, what are you hung up on here?

[RealityCheck]

The highly attractive girl with low notch count, but still has seen a few dick and is desperate for a relationship with you seems like the bang I'd be most proud of from the six options, whether it was just a one time bang, or a relationship.

I think the question being asked here comes down to a simple quantity vs. quality debate. Obviously Sonoma is including sexual history as an attribute of quality. I agree, but only if you want to date a girl, because I also agree with BlurredSevens in that if you're just going for the bang, then who gives a fuck?

As far as quantity vs. quality, I look at it like this: When you're on the hunt for notches, quantity is quality. I'm not banging hotties on the regular right now, but I believe that as I get older, travel more, make more money, improve my lifestyle, etc, then that will come. I'm not worried. Bang the hottest girls that your game gets you, and keep improving yourself and your game until you can get hotter girls than you used to get. That's a good measure of success.

[Suits]

I have a very simple criteria.

Did I wuss out or did I give it my best shot?

There will always be another, hotter girl, but I won't get any of them if I don't try.

[Saweeep]

How you measure success with women is like asking how you measure success in life?

You'll get a million different answers.

Only you can decide where your priorities lie.

[ElJefe]

Exactly. Whatever makes you happy, bro.

Learning game is about setting yourself free. What you do with freedom is up to you.

[SouthernCasanova]

I'd fuck them all. LTR or mini-relationship the highly attractive girl with the low fucked count.

[heavy]

I actually really like this OP (tho I feel the situations could be phrased more specifically), as getting the bang isn't always the best test of "success with girls" in its entirety IMHO. I've banged chics who didn't want anything afterward, which I feel *can be* a sign of weakness in my game.

Success according to heartiste would be summarized in his measure of alphaness, which I sympathize with: "how hot are the women he can attract, how strong is that attraction for him, and how many of those women find him attractive". Probably the best most succinct summary of alpha in one little phrase.

And that's not in a vacuum, that's at any given point in time in any given situation. You could add a time element regarding how long they're attracted, but I feel that is encapsulated within the metric. If women are only attracted based on looks but you're really awkward, less women will be attracted less at any given point in time.

No success on #1 unattractive girl with rape mention, yes on all the others, more success based on hotness first.

What would you choose/be most proud of? #3 if I'm getting blowjobs or sex with her, #2 if not

(02-11-2015 05:02 AM)Suits Wrote:  

I have a very simple criteria.

Did I wuss out or did I give it my best shot?

There will always be another, hotter girl, but I won't get any of them if I don't try.

Suits, love ya, but I think you missed the question. He was looking for a metric. It's cool if you don't measure success...real men don't have big dick contests...but in this case he was looking for a "measure of success".

[Mujeriego]

I use a simple metric: Am I banging the type of girls I like on a regular basis

[Parlay44]

Bang all of them. Date the prettiest one. Marry none of them. Cheat on all of them.

[germanico]

I would stop overanalyzing and ask myself if I feel succesful with women or if im satisfied with the quality or quantity of my sexual partners.

[Suits]

(02-11-2015 10:48 AM)heavy Wrote:  

(02-11-2015 05:02 AM)Suits Wrote:  

I have a very simple criteria.

Did I wuss out or did I give it my best shot?

There will always be another, hotter girl, but I won't get any of them if I don't try.

Suits, love ya, but I think you missed the question. He was looking for a metric. It's cool if you don't measure success...real men don't have big dick contests...but in this case he was looking for a "measure of success".

Yes, I believe that establishing a metric is counter-productive to having happiness.

I just prefer to do what I want without fear. That's satisfying enough on it's own.

[Travesty]

I'm all about how many 7+'s 23yo and under I hit. That is my goal for life.

7.5+ from 24-30 are runners up.

Anything under that for me is just batting practice they aren't real scores in my head. I kind of won't savor it long and almost really forget it in a few days now otherwise which sucks because I used to really enjoy 6's. :*(

9 = two 8's
8 = three 7's

That equation is how I emotionally feel it terms of how much success I feel.

[Geomann180]

To define success with girls, you must first define what it is that you want out of (dealings with) them.

_
Success with girls to me is getting what I want out of my relationships with women.

Right now I want to get laid with girls who aren't vapid Americans who can carry on conversation, are sweet, thin, feminine, with nice asses, who can cook.

I'm doing that - ergo - I'm successful with girls.
_

G

[PittFighter]

I fuck who I want

and fuck who I don't