[The Lizard of Oz]

Yeah, man, I know all about black bulls, LOL.

First of all, the cuck world and the "BDSM" world are not the same, even though they have some overlap. I find the cuck world extremely amusing but I don't particularly hate it.

In both cases, they are essentially white worlds -- its ideas, rules, rigors, and jargon are as white as can be. I think a lot of the "bulls" just get a kick out of it and barely try to understand the lunacy that the white freaks and their cucks get up to.

[Kwisatz]

Check out this thread, it's called the "Dead Inside Eyes". Its exactly what he described -> http://forum.jerkoffzone.net/ubbthreads/...376&page=1

(01-28-2015 05:22 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  

"Archie, the only reason I go to these nights is that there's always one girl there that is like lamb thrown to the wolves. At some point she realizes what she is doing, how low she has sunk, and a crack appears across her face"
.....

The chick wants to please you not because she's in
In love, or in lust, but she wants some kind of approval.

What you guys got?

WIA

[WestIndianArchie]

That's not exactly what he was talking about, this is the aftermath.

But great thread. I can't believe it's 30+ pages

NOT WORK SAFE

WIA

(02-04-2015 05:55 AM)Kwisatz Wrote:  

Check out this thread, it's called the "Dead Inside Eyes". Its exactly what he described -> http://forum.jerkoffzone.net/ubbthreads/...376&page=1

(01-28-2015 05:22 PM)WestIndianArchie Wrote:  

"Archie, the only reason I go to these nights is that there's always one girl there that is like lamb thrown to the wolves. At some point she realizes what she is doing, how low she has sunk, and a crack appears across her face"
.....

The chick wants to please you not because she's in
In love, or in lust, but she wants some kind of approval.

What you guys got?

WIA

[Aliblahba]

   



Which one of y'all is this?

[Amsterdamned]

when a girl is on top of me,i put my finger in her butthole and after 3 minutes when she forget about the finger i put it in her mouth and then I say to myself. .... nasty nasty girl

[simondice]

The walk of shame the next day.
At my school, come Sunday morning (especially after game day) you see the girls with their hair rustled up, wounded knees, wrinkled clothes and that exhausted look on their face.
It's just good fun.

The look in a girl's face when she is sucking your dick, and she's REALLY into it. You pull it away for a second and that look of lust, drool, submissiveness and hunger…

[Giovonny]

Why was "stack-on" banned?

He was describing CONSENSUAL sex between CONSENTING adults.

(I guess Roosh just doesn't want that stuff described in detail on his site)


***

The "red pill" only goes so far. Some realities are much, much further down the "rabbit hole".

It's ironic to me because...

We discuss lying to girls, influencing their emotions, manipulating their behavior, etc.

But, if we talk about spanking them on the ass, it's a problem?!?!?

The irony is that physical pain doesn't last as long as emotional pain.

Smacking a girl on the ass will hurt her for a few minutes. Hurting her emotionally will last much longer.

Just sayin..

***

Also,

I've heard a theory that some women like to be dominated because they were so often dominated back in caveman times, that they learned to accept it. They didn't fight back since fighting back would often lead to worse injury or death. It sort of got wired into them.

It is an evolutionary psychology thing.

Could some women be genetically predisposed to enjoy being dominated???

Could some men be genetically predisposed to enjoy dominating women???

Just a theory..

A "red pill" theory

[TravelerKai]

(02-05-2015 03:06 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

Why was "stack-on" banned?

He was describing CONSENSUAL sex between CONSENTING adults.

(I guess Roosh just doesn't want that stuff described in detail on his site)


***

The "red pill" only goes so far. Some realities are much, much further down the "rabbit hole".

It's ironic to me because...

We discuss lying to girls, influencing their emotions, manipulating their behavior, etc.

But, if we talk about spanking them on the ass, it's a problem?!?!?

The irony is that physical pain doesn't last as long as emotional pain.

Smacking a girl on the ass will hurt her for a few minutes. Hurting her emotionally will last much longer.

Just sayin..

***

Also,

I've heard a theory that some women like to be dominated because they were so often dominated back in caveman times, that they learned to accept it. They didn't fight back since fighting back would often lead to worse injury.

It is an evolutionary psychology thing.

Could women be genetically predisposed to enjoy being dominated???

Could men be genetically predisposed to enjoy dominating women???

Just a theory..

I think he was a little bit rude to senior members as a low count poster more than what he was talking about exactly. Maybe a combination of both. Just a guess. Sometimes shit happens over PMs too.

Humans are dimorphic (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism) so to a great degree by default we are configured to dominate them in many ways. Culture and ideology are the only things that undo alot of that.

[The Lizard of Oz]

“Stack-on” deserved to be banned because he had the too-relaxed for his first posts sound of a former banned poster and he had an asshole’s attitude to boot. I doubt he was banned for talking about his uninteresting fetishes.

What a lot of guys posting here don’t know about “bdsm” is that it’s a world saturated by feminist scumbags and manginas pretending to be “tops” and “doms,” but who are in fact total pussies who need a bunch of bullshit words to put between them and their fear of fucking.

The so-called “subs” are almost always cunts who “top from the bottom” – see how shitty their jargon is? – and these feminist cunts take great pleasure in allowing their cubicle dom to serve their uninspired fantasy needs. So-called “bdsm” is bluer pill than the bluest SoCal sky: it’s full of mangina weasel talk about “safety” and “consent” and all the rest of that laughable lingo.

Do guys actually think spanking some bitch or making her suck down some piss is a big f’ing deal? Dude, there’s no need to be a cubicle bdsm mangina servicing a feminist cunt to feed some slut your dirty cock fresh from her ass. No safe words – just “suck it clean bitch.”

Fuck that “bdsm” noise and the idea that it’s “redpill.” It’s jackshit is what it is.

[TravelerKai]

[vinman]

(02-05-2015 03:49 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

“Stack-on” deserved to be banned because he had the too-relaxed for his first posts sound of a former banned poster and he had an asshole’s attitude to boot. I doubt he was banned for talking about his uninteresting fetishes.

What a lot of guys posting here don’t know about “bdsm” is that it’s a world saturated by feminist scumbags and manginas pretending to be “tops” and “doms,” but who are in fact total pussies who need a bunch of bullshit words to put between them and their fear of fucking.

The so-called “subs” are almost always cunts who “top from the bottom” – see how shitty their jargon is? – and these feminist cunts take great pleasure in allowing their cubicle dom to serve their uninspired fantasy needs. So-called “bdsm” is bluer pill than the bluest SoCal sky: it’s full of mangina weasel talk about “safety” and “consent” and all the rest of that laughable lingo.

Do guys actually think spanking some bitch or making her suck down some piss is a big f’ing deal? Dude, there’s no need to be a cubicle bdsm mangina servicing a feminist cunt to feed some slut your dirty cock fresh from her ass. No safe words – just “suck it clean bitch.”

Fuck that “bdsm” noise and the idea that it’s “redpill.” It’s jackshit is what it is.

[samsamsam]

(02-05-2015 03:49 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

“Stack-on” deserved to be banned because he had the too-relaxed for his first posts sound of a former banned poster and he had an asshole’s attitude to boot. I doubt he was banned for talking about his uninteresting fetishes.

What a lot of guys posting here don’t know about “bdsm” is that it’s a world saturated by feminist scumbags and manginas pretending to be “tops” and “doms,” but who are in fact total pussies who need a bunch of bullshit words to put between them and their fear of fucking.

The so-called “subs” are almost always cunts who “top from the bottom” – see how shitty their jargon is? – and these feminist cunts take great pleasure in allowing their cubicle dom to serve their uninspired fantasy needs. So-called “bdsm” is bluer pill than the bluest SoCal sky: it’s full of mangina weasel talk about “safety” and “consent” and all the rest of that laughable lingo.

Do guys actually think spanking some bitch or making her suck down some piss is a big f’ing deal? Dude, there’s no need to be a cubicle bdsm mangina servicing a feminist cunt to feed some slut your dirty cock fresh from her ass. No safe words – just “suck it clean bitch.”

Fuck that “bdsm” noise and the idea that it’s “redpill.” It’s jackshit is what it is.

How do you really feel about bdsm Lizard of Oz?

It was pretty clear.

[runsonmagic]

(02-05-2015 03:06 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  

Why was "stack-on" banned?

He was describing CONSENSUAL sex between CONSENTING adults.

I suspect his low post-count made mods suspicious. If he'd been a known forum member posting the same content, we'd just assume someone was revealing a kinky side. But because this was the only thread he'd ever posted on, he didn't have the reputation to make a post that bold yet.

Lesson to newbies: post a couple general replies before busting out how you trauma farm or fought fifty white knights at the club.

[runsonmagic]

(02-05-2015 03:49 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  

“Stack-on” deserved to be banned because he had the too-relaxed for his first posts sound of a former banned poster and he had an asshole’s attitude to boot. I doubt he was banned for talking about his uninteresting fetishes.

What a lot of guys posting here don’t know about “bdsm” is that it’s a world saturated by feminist scumbags and manginas pretending to be “tops” and “doms,” but who are in fact total pussies who need a bunch of bullshit words to put between them and their fear of fucking.

The so-called “subs” are almost always cunts who “top from the bottom” – see how shitty their jargon is? – and these feminist cunts take great pleasure in allowing their cubicle dom to serve their uninspired fantasy needs. So-called “bdsm” is bluer pill than the bluest SoCal sky: it’s full of mangina weasel talk about “safety” and “consent” and all the rest of that laughable lingo.

Do guys actually think spanking some bitch or making her suck down some piss is a big f’ing deal? Dude, there’s no need to be a cubicle bdsm mangina servicing a feminist cunt to feed some slut your dirty cock fresh from her ass. No safe words – just “suck it clean bitch.”

Fuck that “bdsm” noise and the idea that it’s “redpill.” It’s jackshit is what it is.

Lizard, virtually all of your posts could be a dramatic reading. We needed to start meme-ing them with Shakespeare or Bukowski pictures.

But yes, your content is spot-on too. The BDSM is full of feminists who need extreme dominance to fulfill their suppressed desires, and the overweight and dejected who can only get laid by a level of sluttiness and attention whoring that even stripper avoid.

The irony of course is that most "vanilla" women are perfectly happy to get kinky once they're comfortable with you.

Dip your toe in the kink community, and then use what you enjoy to corrupt normal girls.

[Samseau]

Are kink women actually attractive? I enjoy some pain here and there but only with hot girls. Let's be real: anything from a "community" is going to have the nastiest sluts imaginable. Girls who have notch counts in the hundreds and go from one dom to the next looking for the next high. All relationships in the community will be based on how extreme you can make the session; this means if you can't top the last performance you gave her she'll move onto the next cock.

All in all extremely undesirable.

As for the bans in this thread, not sure why they were banned but keep in mind somewhere around 1/4 to 1/3 of bans happen because of stuff in PM's... and nothing stack-on wrote in this thread was especially troll-like, even if extreme. My guess: he was a formerly banned member.

[Deluge]

(02-06-2015 05:48 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Are kink women actually attractive? I enjoy some pain here and there but only with hot girls. Let's be real: anything from a "community" is going to have the nastiest sluts imaginable. Girls who have notch counts in the hundreds and go from one dom to the next looking for the next high. All relationships in the community will be based on how extreme you can make the session; this means if you can't top the last performance you gave her she'll move onto the next cock.

All in all extremely undesirable.

Hot kink girls do exist, though it's a given they're hyper-promiscuous. I banged one who was a 7.5, on our first date she bragged about how many guys she was banging since she'd moved here from her small town for college, and later invited me back to her place and fucked me on the first date. She works at some lounge as a corset waitress now and is in a "polyamorous" relationship, a lot of these "sex-positive" alternative types are.

(02-06-2015 05:48 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

keep in mind somewhere around 1/4 to 1/3 of bans happen because of stuff in PM's...

How do you mean?

[Moma]

Deluge, what Samseau means is that they usually get warnings via PMs and then they fire back defiantly and get clipped by the Hairy one or Tuthmosis.

[Comte De St. Germain]

(02-06-2015 10:48 AM)Moma Wrote:  

and get clipped by the Hairy one

It's like all the feminists mention Roosh kind of like Voldemort from Harry Potter. He is simply known in their circles as "The Hairy One Overlord of the Manosphere"

[RockHard]

I had to google that phrase. Now I want to make a t-shirt. Red t-shirt with a big feathery cock on the front