[Aurini]

(08-16-2014 09:53 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-16-2014 09:00 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(08-13-2014 06:21 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What I want to know is what girls get from BJ suckfests. We just had a thread on a girl sucking off 20+ guys in Spain.

Have you ever heard of a guy eating out 6 girls at once, even in porn? What satisfaction could she possibly be getting from this? Are women that stupid that they would ruin a relationship for zero gain? Is my male brain preventing me from seeing the benefit in such behavior???

You might as well ask "What do guys get out of pounding a woman till she squirts? Of holding up all ~120lbs of her? It's like a mixture between a marathon and a boxing match - why go to that much effort?"

Women just like to be used as the receptacle, it's where the cathartic value lies for them, it's why a vibrator can never replace a man...

...that said, *healthy* women also want to enjoy the experience. Le petite morte is supposed to be a grand experience that's over-and-above the merely human, so powerful that it annihilates the self. This girl's not healthy though; she seeks the self-elimination of the nihilist. Her reason for having sex is either A)to prop up an egoistic image for the world of who she is (ergo the boyfriend), or B)to sublimate and eliminate her soul, to crush and befoul that thing in her which is sacred. The inner self whom she loathes.

Or maybe she just really loves the taste of cum.

Female ejac is usually accompanied by rolling orgasms (multiple orgasms) from over-stimulation from strokes that put pressure on their gspots (a gspot orgasm. Women have 3 different types of orgasms). Many women that could squirt and blow out that fluid pressure that builds in that gland but most are too shy and prudent to just let it out during sex and will quickly run to the toilet to pee it out after the man is done busting his nut. Ever hear a girl say she needs to pee while you are pounding away? That's usually why. If she drank too much alcohol and you are not hitting that spot right, then it is probably just regular urine. Some guys have a girth, shape, or hook that can cause this to happen without needing to pound hard at all.

If you have the stamina and athleticism to pound some pussy into submission to give them this effect, it will also give the man an ego boost as well. That's not counting the benefit that can help you bust your nut if her pussy is looser than the grand canyon as well. A woman with a super tight pussy makes it harder to do stuff like this and often your girth alone is usually enough to produce that effect of rolling orgasms in the woman. Her extra pleasure can help you get more and can compensate for any flat board syndrome. One could say women of this kind are the preferred type, but some dudes love to beat up the gooch as hard as they can and a looser broad will allow this. Only an asshole will forcibly break in a woman too hard which can cause bleeding. Something which that activity has it's own risks.

Pounding and squirts still will not cause a woman to necessarily emotionally bond with you if that is what you are pointing at. If so, I agree.

I make a point of never discussing the ill-repute of my sex life publicly, so all I'll say is that what you wrote agrees with all of the professional literature I've seen on the subject.

Hmmm, what I was getting at is similar to Lewis' essay "Men without chests" - where he writes about the new Liberal intelligentsia with their big brains, and their over-developed genitalia, but utterly lacking in the chest - the soul - which is the union between thought and instinct, the seat of courage and love.

Sex done perfectly should be utterly depraved and animalistic, as well as purely mental/emotional, a celebration of life. The roles that each partner plays are complimentary, and embrace the two-fold nature of each sex's sexuality.

The first part is the 'animal' portion; each sex has the drive to achieve basic pleasure - to orgasm - but we orgasm in different manners, and if that's all that you include in the sexual act, you might as well be masturbating. When men ignore the higher realms of sex, they become the 15 second hero. Our pleasure involves a terminus point, and for us it can easily be reached within minutes; bringing another person into that is rather pointless. When women pursue the merely physical, they become insatiable lovers; the multi-orgasmic nature of women means that they can take one cock after another, but if that's all that sex is, then they might as well buy one of those dildo machines (fewer STDs that way, plus - just like the 15 second man - they're wasting other peoples' time).

Note: "insatiable" is not a compliment, or even a fun thing to be - can you imagine if your hunger for food were insatiable? It involves a loss of the self.

The second part of our sexuality is the mental portion. For men it's about discipline and achievement; demonstrating our willpower and mastery of life. When you take this without the animalistic urge to pleasure, you get egoism - the desperate attempt to build up a portfolio of notch counts, not for yourself, but to impress society at large. For women, the mental portion is about giving themselves away; about letting the man use her, about allowing her body to be 'used' by the pregnancy which results. When this is all she has - no urge for own enjoyment and orgasm - she winds up getting throat-fucked by a dozen guys in a similar egoistic practice, while also pretending to be a Good Girl with a boyfriend.

The first is people losing themselves in the animal world. The second is people losing themselves in the ego-world. Good sex should involve both.

When sex is done properly, the woman derives physical satisfaction from giving herself over completely to the man. She's not trying to orgasm, which is what allows her to have multiple orgasms; this combination of physical and mental creates the spiritual centre of love for her partner. She's subsuming herself into her ancestry, an unbroken chain of women birthed from women, while also enjoying ever moment of it.

For us men, we need to break from women and enter the realm of men. Women suffer their pain during childbirth; we suffer ours through initiation. When a man approaches his lover, he does it with discipline and self control. His terminus-point - his orgasm - becomes the whole purpose of the enterprise, but he regulates and controls when it happens. He shows off egoistically how strong he is, and how much self-control he has to delay his own orgasm, while she has multiple in his stead. She, likewise, pursues his orgasm rather than her own.

The end result is a generative act; the nature of love.

To summarize:

The degenerate male is the one who's ever desperate to increase his notch-count so that his peers will respect him, but who cannot make a woman cum while he fucks her, nor can he hold down a relationship with a woman.

The degenerate female is the one who plays the alpha fux/beta bux strategy; with the fux, she switches from being purely animal to purely ego. Sometimes it's about hogging all the orgasms, other times it's about being a used-up whore, but at their core these are both the same thing.

The heroically masculine (Vir) and the sacred feminine (Virago) is the married couple who fuck like bunny rabbits, where the husband takes charge gently, and the wife eagerly submits

***

Note: Just to be perfectly clear, I'm not trying to criticize anybody, nor am I trying to be a moralizing faggot (I have more respect for pornstars than moralizers); quite frankly, the only thing I know for certain is that I'm a giant shit head and that my house is 99% glass. I'm just sharing my thoughts on all of this.

[TravelerKai]

Very interesting. People aren't kidding when they say you are super deep whenever you decide to post. I had to read that post three times just understand it all. Well done.

[kaotic]

(08-16-2014 10:41 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(08-16-2014 09:53 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:  

(08-16-2014 09:00 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(08-13-2014 06:21 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

What I want to know is what girls get from BJ suckfests. We just had a thread on a girl sucking off 20+ guys in Spain.

Have you ever heard of a guy eating out 6 girls at once, even in porn? What satisfaction could she possibly be getting from this? Are women that stupid that they would ruin a relationship for zero gain? Is my male brain preventing me from seeing the benefit in such behavior???

You might as well ask "What do guys get out of pounding a woman till she squirts? Of holding up all ~120lbs of her? It's like a mixture between a marathon and a boxing match - why go to that much effort?"

Women just like to be used as the receptacle, it's where the cathartic value lies for them, it's why a vibrator can never replace a man...

...that said, *healthy* women also want to enjoy the experience. Le petite morte is supposed to be a grand experience that's over-and-above the merely human, so powerful that it annihilates the self. This girl's not healthy though; she seeks the self-elimination of the nihilist. Her reason for having sex is either A)to prop up an egoistic image for the world of who she is (ergo the boyfriend), or B)to sublimate and eliminate her soul, to crush and befoul that thing in her which is sacred. The inner self whom she loathes.

Or maybe she just really loves the taste of cum.

Female ejac is usually accompanied by rolling orgasms (multiple orgasms) from over-stimulation from strokes that put pressure on their gspots (a gspot orgasm. Women have 3 different types of orgasms). Many women that could squirt and blow out that fluid pressure that builds in that gland but most are too shy and prudent to just let it out during sex and will quickly run to the toilet to pee it out after the man is done busting his nut. Ever hear a girl say she needs to pee while you are pounding away? That's usually why. If she drank too much alcohol and you are not hitting that spot right, then it is probably just regular urine. Some guys have a girth, shape, or hook that can cause this to happen without needing to pound hard at all.

If you have the stamina and athleticism to pound some pussy into submission to give them this effect, it will also give the man an ego boost as well. That's not counting the benefit that can help you bust your nut if her pussy is looser than the grand canyon as well. A woman with a super tight pussy makes it harder to do stuff like this and often your girth alone is usually enough to produce that effect of rolling orgasms in the woman. Her extra pleasure can help you get more and can compensate for any flat board syndrome. One could say women of this kind are the preferred type, but some dudes love to beat up the gooch as hard as they can and a looser broad will allow this. Only an asshole will forcibly break in a woman too hard which can cause bleeding. Something which that activity has it's own risks.

Pounding and squirts still will not cause a woman to necessarily emotionally bond with you if that is what you are pointing at. If so, I agree.

I make a point of never discussing the ill-repute of my sex life publicly, so all I'll say is that what you wrote agrees with all of the professional literature I've seen on the subject.

Hmmm, what I was getting at is similar to Lewis' essay "Men without chests" - where he writes about the new Liberal intelligentsia with their big brains, and their over-developed genitalia, but utterly lacking in the chest - the soul - which is the union between thought and instinct, the seat of courage and love.

Sex done perfectly should be utterly depraved and animalistic, as well as purely mental/emotional, a celebration of life. The roles that each partner plays are complimentary, and embrace the two-fold nature of each sex's sexuality.

The first part is the 'animal' portion; each sex has the drive to achieve basic pleasure - to orgasm - but we orgasm in different manners, and if that's all that you include in the sexual act, you might as well be masturbating. When men ignore the higher realms of sex, they become the 15 second hero. Our pleasure involves a terminus point, and for us it can easily be reached within minutes; bringing another person into that is rather pointless. When women pursue the merely physical, they become insatiable lovers; the multi-orgasmic nature of women means that they can take one cock after another, but if that's all that sex is, then they might as well buy one of those dildo machines (fewer STDs that way, plus - just like the 15 second man - they're wasting other peoples' time).

Note: "insatiable" is not a compliment, or even a fun thing to be - can you imagine if your hunger for food were insatiable? It involves a loss of the self.

The second part of our sexuality is the mental portion. For men it's about discipline and achievement; demonstrating our willpower and mastery of life. When you take this without the animalistic urge to pleasure, you get egoism - the desperate attempt to build up a portfolio of notch counts, not for yourself, but to impress society at large. For women, the mental portion is about giving themselves away; about letting the man use her, about allowing her body to be 'used' by the pregnancy which results. When this is all she has - no urge for own enjoyment and orgasm - she winds up getting throat-fucked by a dozen guys in a similar egoistic practice, while also pretending to be a Good Girl with a boyfriend.

The first is people losing themselves in the animal world. The second is people losing themselves in the ego-world. Good sex should involve both.

When sex is done properly, the woman derives physical satisfaction from giving herself over completely to the man. She's not trying to orgasm, which is what allows her to have multiple orgasms; this combination of physical and mental creates the spiritual centre of love for her partner. She's subsuming herself into her ancestry, an unbroken chain of women birthed from women, while also enjoying ever moment of it.

For us men, we need to break from women and enter the realm of men. Women suffer their pain during childbirth; we suffer ours through initiation. When a man approaches his lover, he does it with discipline and self control. His terminus-point - his orgasm - becomes the whole purpose of the enterprise, but he regulates and controls when it happens. He shows off egoistically how strong he is, and how much self-control he has to delay his own orgasm, while she has multiple in his stead. She, likewise, pursues his orgasm rather than her own.

The end result is a generative act; the nature of love.

To summarize:

The degenerate male is the one who's ever desperate to increase his notch-count so that his peers will respect him, but who cannot make a woman cum while he fucks her, nor can he hold down a relationship with a woman.

The degenerate female is the one who plays the alpha fux/beta bux strategy; with the fux, she switches from being purely animal to purely ego. Sometimes it's about hogging all the orgasms, other times it's about being a used-up whore, but at their core these are both the same thing.

The heroically masculine (Vir) and the sacred feminine (Virago) is the married couple who fuck like bunny rabbits, where the husband takes charge gently, and the wife eagerly submits

***

Note: Just to be perfectly clear, I'm not trying to criticize anybody, nor am I trying to be a moralizing faggot (I have more respect for pornstars than moralizers); quite frankly, the only thing I know for certain is that I'm a giant shit head and that my house is 99% glass. I'm just sharing my thoughts on all of this.

Nailed it.

[HonantheBarbarian]

She's from New Jersey, a certified guidette.


This all makes much more sense now.