Quote: (05-18-2016 10:57 AM)Veloce Wrote:
There's one factor that's kept me from wholeheartedly accepting chemtrails as something I need to be concerned about:
Why would global elites spray THEMSELVES or willfully affect their own environment (like engineer a drought)?
That is the million dollar question. Qui Bono? Due to the sensitivity of the matter, I don't know if the answer will be forthcoming.
However, we can speculate.
For one, I think we can establish that similar examples have occurred in the past.
There is a growing body of evidence that environmental estrogens like phthalates and such as birth control, pesticides, plastics, fertilizers have substantially negative health effects. They may be responsible for low testosterone, birth defects related to sexual and intellectual development, increased risk of cancer, and so on.
Some of the negative health effects could be mitigated. Regarding environmental estrogens, those who are aware of the problem could take steps to reduce their exposure and intake. TRT could be used to offset some of the downsides of endocrine disfunction, and in the worst cases an aramotase inhibitor could be used.
Assuming that geoengineering is occurring, the most credible allegations are that atomic metallic particles are being seeded in the stratosphere to manipulate climate. Medical literature is beginning to accumulate that suggests that high accumulation of metals lead to premature aging and cognitive disorders such as alzheimers. To mitigate these effects, those aware of it could use advanced water purifiers (reverse osmosis based, or berkeys), and rinse all their vegetables thoroughly. Giving blood occasionally would also be beneficial. Using dietary metal chelators (curcumin with piperine, baby aspirin, etc) or eating food high in turmeric and black pepper would help to clear a large volume of the harmful metals from the bloodstream and organs.
One powerful motive would be money. A prolonged drought would potentially encourage homeowners and agricultural companies to sell off some of the most prized real estate in the country for a song. Once enough people have left and most property has been consolidated, the climactic conditions could be reversed and huge profits could be generated by selling everyone back their land. Buy low, sell high. This is essentially what was done by the "Oligarchs" (such as Khodorkovsky) in Russia after the collapse of the USSR. One potential downside to this would be the temporary loss in tax revenue due to the exodus of taxpayers and lower property tax rates.
Another potential motive would be to exert control over politically and economically independent groups. Some of the more high profile separatist movements (Utah ranchers, Branch Davidians) have occurred in "flyover country" where reliance on government for their well being is minimal. More importantly than those groups, there is a large volume of people existing in the area that may be considered "homesteaders", "preppers", are very pro gun rights, religious, and live in tight knit communities. The ability to decrease the viability of arable land and force those people into regions that are more amendable to urban, centralized lifestyles would prevent them from continuing lifestyles that are incompatible to globalism.
Again, all just speculation on my part.