I was struck by the following passage in a brief post on the amusing recent "Atlantic invasion" thread:
I believe that this post is reaching, instinctively and inchoately, towards one of the most important and explanatory facts about our time, which should be articulated and stated more clearly:
We are in the late stage of an extended peacetime that has become stale and overripe. A major war is craved, necessary, and inevitable. This will not be a "civil war" of any kind but a major global conflict. In its wake and as its direct consequence, the cultural and societal trends associated with decline and decadence will be obliterated as if they never existed, and mankind will be able to make decisive and game-changing advances on a number of fronts.
Let me now address some of these points in more detail:
1. The nature and point of wars is largely misunderstood
Wars are generally viewed as purposeless and purely destructive phenomena that result from human irrationality or miscalculation. Alternatively, they are seen as the result of cynical calculation by the "ruling classes" that exploit the slaughter of "subservient classes" for their nefarious purposes.
Both of these ideas miss the real point of wars. Major wars are necessary as a device that the human being uses to put itself in a state of combat pressure. This state allows men to decisively mobilize their resources to make revolutionary and otherwise often impossible to achieve technological progress.
The male human animal knows that it needs to make progress against materials; and it senses that the state that enables it to make such progress is a state of combat pressure in which the least action has consequences that are a matter of life and death. This state of unquestioned and totalized shared real-time purposefulness is what makes experiences of war so memorable and significant to men; it is what makes friendships forged in war the deepest that men are capable of.
There has never been a major war that did not bring in its wake game-changing and lasting advances in technology. The knowledge that enables these advances is brewed during the lulls of peacetime -- a state of constant war is an idea just as absurd as a state of constant peace. But major wars supply the concentrated mobilization which enables these advances to be implemented in a revolutionary way, unconstrained by the excessive caution and risk aversion that characterizes periods of peacetime, and especially their late, stale stages. It also sweeps away old structures and infrastructure and forces rebuilding from the ground up with novel and more advanced technologies.
2. The late stages of an extended peacetime are experienced as periods of decadence and decline -- but these trends are utterly obliterated by a major war
Just as periodic wars are needed to put men in intensely purposeful situations of totalized combat pressure, the extended peacetime renders men dull, confused and purposeless when it goes on for long enough. Generations of men who have not experienced the mobilization of combat pressure, or even the relief and purposefulness of rebuilding during the early postwar period, become progressively weaker and unfocused. This diffuseness renders men effeminate. Conversely, women become crazed and aggressive when men do not make war. The best and strongest men drift into fields such as finance which attempt to recreate a simulacrum of the real thing -- situations resembling combat pressure (the making of money being its closest analog), where men can test their mettle in real time. The power of women in society rises, and in the late, stale stages of the extended peacetime, the culture appears to be decaying and decadent.
All the phenomena of cultural decline that are so frequently documented on this forum and elsewhere are nothing more than a direct consequence of the idiocy, distraction, and concentration on trivia, that characterize the late, stale peace. The stale peace is what brings about "transgender pastors" and "trigger warnings". As men and women lose their natural roles and sense of proper place and purpose, the family crumbles and fertility rates decline. Men wander as if in a daze of idiocy and purposelessness, and women, who need men to be men, become dumb and belligerent attention whores trying to incite and provoke them.
Yet these trends, which seem so inexorable, have far less real strength than they appear to -- they are like a horror movie zombie, seemingly unstoppable in its ambling gait, but crumbling into a pile of old cardboard and junk from a direct head shot. Similarly, once the long stale peace is brought to an end by a major war, all these phenomena will be routed as if they never existed -- as the slow disgusting dreams of a drunken stupor are routed by a cold shower and a pot of strong black coffee. Men will become men as they rediscover their purpose and concentration, and women will remain women but will be brought to their proper station in life as men become men. Fertility rates will skyrocket (as they did in the baby boom after the last world war) when human beings see the reality of carnage and violent death. And idiotic worries about "controlling risk" at every turn will yield to a wave of frantic innovation and restructuring, a revolutionary period of applying, extending and implementing the knowledge that was brewed during the long peacetime.
3. There will be no "civil war" but a major world conflict, most likely in the Pacific theater.
The fantasies of a "civil war" in the US are just that -- idle fantasies. While some of the animosities between right and left are real and acute, there is not sufficient point or interest in such a war. No one can get excited about a war that would be fought with the weapons of yesterday and will never enable the concentration on advances in technology that mankind needs and craves. Even the minor skirmishes that we fought in the recent past, such as our tentative and limited engagements in the Middle East, enabled, on a small scale, the testing and refinement of certain important technologies such as drones, remote control and sensing, and coordination of these technologies with the human eye and hand in both combat and military field surgery. The next major war will be a savage conflict between major world powers that will enable an exponentially greater scale of advance in these as well as completely different and novel fields.
The most natural place for such a conflict to occur is the Pacific, and the most likely enemy is China, whose governing elite is increasingly militarized and ambitious, and which is pressurized by an excess of young men and other severe internal problems. At some point, when the Chinese come to believe -- incorrectly -- that they are ready, they will directly challenge US military supremacy in the Pacific. This will light the fuse on the fire of a major global conflict.
Such a war will be savage; limited nuclear exchanges possibly including successful delivery of nuclear bombs to the US mainland are entirely plausible, maybe even likely. The US will prevail because of the decisive and different-in-kind superiority of our military that will not be bridged on any foreseeable time horizon, though it is possible that we will suffer early setbacks as we did in World War 2. The cost will be extremely high, and many lives will come to a bad and tragic end. But in its course, and in its wake, the stale peace will be obliterated, and many things, some of them undreamed of in today's science fiction, will become reality seemingly overnight.
Finally. There is much that is shameful and distasteful about the stale peace; but as with an overripe fruit in its late stages of decay, there is something to be said for savoring its taste and enjoying its disgusting sweetness while it lasts. But know that while it won't end tomorrow, it most certainly will not last forever. It has entered its very late stage, which can still be surprisingly long and seem even longer. But we are indeed all waiting for something to happen -- and so it will.
Quote: (06-12-2014 11:10 PM)nek Wrote:
Quote: (06-12-2014 10:25 PM)la_mode Wrote:Not to sound too tin foil hat, and I understand that there are certain pockets of conflict going on around the world, but it does seem that western society is collectively in a lull right now, as if we're waiting for something to happen, or something perhaps needs to happen. And maybe that's where this fascination is stemming from.
Too much fascination with wars lately on the board. It's getting strange.
I believe that this post is reaching, instinctively and inchoately, towards one of the most important and explanatory facts about our time, which should be articulated and stated more clearly:
We are in the late stage of an extended peacetime that has become stale and overripe. A major war is craved, necessary, and inevitable. This will not be a "civil war" of any kind but a major global conflict. In its wake and as its direct consequence, the cultural and societal trends associated with decline and decadence will be obliterated as if they never existed, and mankind will be able to make decisive and game-changing advances on a number of fronts.
Let me now address some of these points in more detail:
1. The nature and point of wars is largely misunderstood
Wars are generally viewed as purposeless and purely destructive phenomena that result from human irrationality or miscalculation. Alternatively, they are seen as the result of cynical calculation by the "ruling classes" that exploit the slaughter of "subservient classes" for their nefarious purposes.
Both of these ideas miss the real point of wars. Major wars are necessary as a device that the human being uses to put itself in a state of combat pressure. This state allows men to decisively mobilize their resources to make revolutionary and otherwise often impossible to achieve technological progress.
The male human animal knows that it needs to make progress against materials; and it senses that the state that enables it to make such progress is a state of combat pressure in which the least action has consequences that are a matter of life and death. This state of unquestioned and totalized shared real-time purposefulness is what makes experiences of war so memorable and significant to men; it is what makes friendships forged in war the deepest that men are capable of.
There has never been a major war that did not bring in its wake game-changing and lasting advances in technology. The knowledge that enables these advances is brewed during the lulls of peacetime -- a state of constant war is an idea just as absurd as a state of constant peace. But major wars supply the concentrated mobilization which enables these advances to be implemented in a revolutionary way, unconstrained by the excessive caution and risk aversion that characterizes periods of peacetime, and especially their late, stale stages. It also sweeps away old structures and infrastructure and forces rebuilding from the ground up with novel and more advanced technologies.
2. The late stages of an extended peacetime are experienced as periods of decadence and decline -- but these trends are utterly obliterated by a major war
Just as periodic wars are needed to put men in intensely purposeful situations of totalized combat pressure, the extended peacetime renders men dull, confused and purposeless when it goes on for long enough. Generations of men who have not experienced the mobilization of combat pressure, or even the relief and purposefulness of rebuilding during the early postwar period, become progressively weaker and unfocused. This diffuseness renders men effeminate. Conversely, women become crazed and aggressive when men do not make war. The best and strongest men drift into fields such as finance which attempt to recreate a simulacrum of the real thing -- situations resembling combat pressure (the making of money being its closest analog), where men can test their mettle in real time. The power of women in society rises, and in the late, stale stages of the extended peacetime, the culture appears to be decaying and decadent.
All the phenomena of cultural decline that are so frequently documented on this forum and elsewhere are nothing more than a direct consequence of the idiocy, distraction, and concentration on trivia, that characterize the late, stale peace. The stale peace is what brings about "transgender pastors" and "trigger warnings". As men and women lose their natural roles and sense of proper place and purpose, the family crumbles and fertility rates decline. Men wander as if in a daze of idiocy and purposelessness, and women, who need men to be men, become dumb and belligerent attention whores trying to incite and provoke them.
Yet these trends, which seem so inexorable, have far less real strength than they appear to -- they are like a horror movie zombie, seemingly unstoppable in its ambling gait, but crumbling into a pile of old cardboard and junk from a direct head shot. Similarly, once the long stale peace is brought to an end by a major war, all these phenomena will be routed as if they never existed -- as the slow disgusting dreams of a drunken stupor are routed by a cold shower and a pot of strong black coffee. Men will become men as they rediscover their purpose and concentration, and women will remain women but will be brought to their proper station in life as men become men. Fertility rates will skyrocket (as they did in the baby boom after the last world war) when human beings see the reality of carnage and violent death. And idiotic worries about "controlling risk" at every turn will yield to a wave of frantic innovation and restructuring, a revolutionary period of applying, extending and implementing the knowledge that was brewed during the long peacetime.
3. There will be no "civil war" but a major world conflict, most likely in the Pacific theater.
The fantasies of a "civil war" in the US are just that -- idle fantasies. While some of the animosities between right and left are real and acute, there is not sufficient point or interest in such a war. No one can get excited about a war that would be fought with the weapons of yesterday and will never enable the concentration on advances in technology that mankind needs and craves. Even the minor skirmishes that we fought in the recent past, such as our tentative and limited engagements in the Middle East, enabled, on a small scale, the testing and refinement of certain important technologies such as drones, remote control and sensing, and coordination of these technologies with the human eye and hand in both combat and military field surgery. The next major war will be a savage conflict between major world powers that will enable an exponentially greater scale of advance in these as well as completely different and novel fields.
The most natural place for such a conflict to occur is the Pacific, and the most likely enemy is China, whose governing elite is increasingly militarized and ambitious, and which is pressurized by an excess of young men and other severe internal problems. At some point, when the Chinese come to believe -- incorrectly -- that they are ready, they will directly challenge US military supremacy in the Pacific. This will light the fuse on the fire of a major global conflict.
Such a war will be savage; limited nuclear exchanges possibly including successful delivery of nuclear bombs to the US mainland are entirely plausible, maybe even likely. The US will prevail because of the decisive and different-in-kind superiority of our military that will not be bridged on any foreseeable time horizon, though it is possible that we will suffer early setbacks as we did in World War 2. The cost will be extremely high, and many lives will come to a bad and tragic end. But in its course, and in its wake, the stale peace will be obliterated, and many things, some of them undreamed of in today's science fiction, will become reality seemingly overnight.
Finally. There is much that is shameful and distasteful about the stale peace; but as with an overripe fruit in its late stages of decay, there is something to be said for savoring its taste and enjoying its disgusting sweetness while it lasts. But know that while it won't end tomorrow, it most certainly will not last forever. It has entered its very late stage, which can still be surprisingly long and seem even longer. But we are indeed all waiting for something to happen -- and so it will.
same old shit, sixes and sevens Shaft...