[agentaika]

Twitter hashtag #YesAllWomen spawned after a lot of men started saying "not all men" as a response to the blanket statements being made about us. Are these generalizations done intentionally to rile a response, which can then be used to trend a hashtag, or post as content on their Tumblr blogs?

The #BanBossy campaign had a similar vibe. Sheryl Sandberg and company, if they did their research, likely knew how adamant most men are about free speech, so what better way to stir up controversy with men than to suggest a word be banned?

Or maybe I'm giving them too much credit? Either way, I suspect this strategy, if it is one, wouldn't be as effective if we didn't directly reply to them on social media. They wouldn't have anyone to fight against, and their arguments would be confined to their echo chamber.

[Ensam]

Here's the secret:
They want you to break the rules. Women love a guy who knows how to break the rules and get away with it.

The getting away with it is the key part. How far you can step over the line is a measure of social intelligence and women love it. If you do it in some tone deaf ham fisted manner it doesn't work. You have to be charming and witty about it.

That's why I don't understand why guys here bitch about all the 'rules' that society is making for men now. Each BS rule is another opportunity to show that you 'get it'.

[KorbenDallas]

Guys are mad about rules like 18 years of child support which is impossible to get out of if your girlfriend "accidentally" gets pregnant.

I do hear you though. Feminists fuck anti-feminists all the time. They love it and then when they get dumped they go to their jezebel site...

It's rather bizzare. They fuck the guys that break the rules and then go try and figure out how to make more rules..

[draguer]

(05-26-2014 11:26 AM)Ensam Wrote:  

That's why I don't understand why guys here bitch about all the 'rules' that society is making for men now. Each BS rule is another opportunity to show that you 'get it'.

Because there are things important to us beyond seeking the approval of women.

[Truth Teller]

I see that #BanBossy really worked. Again, this is simply the nature of Twitter. People have nothing to talk about, so they hop on whatever the cause of the day is. Next week it'll be something about Kim Kardashian's wedding.

[polymath]

Who cares. Pay attention to something else.

[Muk]

(05-26-2014 11:26 AM)Ensam Wrote:  

That's why I don't understand why guys here bitch about all the 'rules' that society is making for men now. Each BS rule is another opportunity to show that you 'get it'.

Because some of those "rules" could send you to jail for 20 years.

[agentaika]

(05-26-2014 02:22 PM)polymath Wrote:  

Who cares. Pay attention to something else.

Exactly. That's my point. If we didn't let them goad us into discussions and arguments, they couldn't get the attention they need to push their propaganda.

[Kingsley Davis]

(05-26-2014 03:45 PM)agentaika Wrote:  

(05-26-2014 02:22 PM)polymath Wrote:  

Who cares. Pay attention to something else.

Exactly. That's my point. If we didn't let them goad us into discussions and arguments, they couldn't get the attention they need to push their propaganda.

No attention from you but plenty from mangina white knighting enablers.

[void]

(05-26-2014 11:46 AM)KorbenDallas Wrote:  

Feminists fuck anti-feminists all the time. They love it and then when they get dumped they go to their jezebel site...

It's rather bizzare. They fuck the guys that break the rules and then go try and figure out how to make more rules..

Tell a Vegan you eat meat daily, look at her hungry sexual gaze in need of a piece of meat (your dick). Fuck her good.

[agentaika]

(05-26-2014 03:49 PM)Kingsley Davis Wrote:  

(05-26-2014 03:45 PM)agentaika Wrote:  

(05-26-2014 02:22 PM)polymath Wrote:  

Who cares. Pay attention to something else.

Exactly. That's my point. If we didn't let them goad us into discussions and arguments, they couldn't get the attention they need to push their propaganda.

No attention from you but plenty from mangina white knighting enablers.

True. However, their latest #YesAllWomen trend was started in response to men trying to defend men, and #BanBossy took off after men expressed outrage over Sheryl Sandberg's anti-free speech campaign.

[Andy_B]

(05-26-2014 11:26 AM)Ensam Wrote:  

Here's the secret:
They want you to break the rules. Women love a guy who knows how to break the rules and get away with it.

The getting away with it is the key part. How far you can step over the line is a measure of social intelligence and women love it. If you do it in some tone deaf ham fisted manner it doesn't work. You have to be charming and witty about it.

That's why I don't understand why guys here bitch about all the 'rules' that society is making for men now. Each BS rule is another opportunity to show that you 'get it'.

This is the most anti-democratic "law of the jungle" BS I've ever heard.

Let's make eating food illegal, after all the alphas will just break the rules and not only be well fed but also get all the hot babes.

Sheeeesh.

[Days of Broken Arrows]

Is goading men online part of feminist strategy?

Yes, excellent observation. It's because women live to create drama. Look at it this way: all the stuff you see around you was created by men. All the insanity that goes on inside it is made by women.

Usually women's drama takes place on the homefront in the form of shit-testing her man, or playing "let's you and him fight." But a lot of feminists don't have anyone at home...or if they do he's too much of a pussy to fight back.

And so we now have feminists trying to goad men at large since they can't do it in their homes. They accomplish this through their constant, screeching hysteria via hashtags. And once again, it's instructive to note that men created the Twitter "society" and women filled it with drama, just like they did in the real world.

Women aren't productive. They're reproductive.

[agentaika]

A popular Twitter feminist started a #FemaleWars hashtag with the comment "Referring to women as 'females' is degrading, dehumanizing, cissexist." A few people have been smart enough to call her out on how this was a bullshit statement. But not before she was able to get the "misogynistic" replies she had hoped for, which she'll probably use in a Tumblr post somewhere about the patriarchy.

Feminists are trolling men.

(05-27-2014 08:05 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  

Is goading men online part of feminist strategy?

Yes, excellent observation. It's because women live to create drama. Look at it this way: all the stuff you see around you was created by men. All the insanity that goes on inside it is made by women.

Usually women's drama takes place on the homefront in the form of shit-testing her man, or playing "let's you and him fight." But a lot of feminists don't have anyone at home...or if they do he's too much of a pussy to fight back.

And so we now have feminists trying to goad men at large since they can't do it in their homes. They accomplish this through their constant, screeching hysteria via hashtags. And once again, it's instructive to note that men created the Twitter "society" and women filled it with drama, just like they did in the real world.

Women aren't productive. They're reproductive.

[RockHard]

(06-06-2014 12:33 PM)agentaika Wrote:  

But not before she was able to get the "misogynistic" replies she had hoped for, which she'll probably use in a Tumblr post somewhere about the patriarchy.

Feminists are trolling men.

Exactly. The rule is, don't feed the troll, but there's always someone who will threaten violence and / or rape, which is EXACTLY what she wants him to do, because then she gets to scream misogyny and patriarchy, even though it's just some nobody who has no actual power beyond anonymously insulting people online.

Don't take the bait. If you must engage, either troll back or religiously argue for equal treatment.