[anonymous123]

I think the debate of Game vs. Lifestyle has a direct analogy to the Skills vs. Size in MMA or other martial arts. Game is analogous to having skills, and Lifestyle/Money is analogous to having Size. All too often we hear "size doesn't matter."

I'm no MMA expert but did make a brief go (I was an excellent wrestler and later a powerlifter). The coach was impressed by my strength. And he said this (paraphrase): "anyone that says size and strength doesn't matter is full of shit. The fact is, if you had two guys that were exactly EQUAL in Skill, the bigger and stronger guy will destroy the smaller one. All too often people compare two completely different skill levels and determine size doesn't matter. Like, comparing Bruce Lee to some big roid guy that has mediocre skills, then you conclude that Size doesn't matter. You never hear about people comparing two people of the exact same skill level, and one guy is 150 and the other is 220, and concluding the guy at 150 has a chance."

And yes, I got thrown around like a rag doll by Olympic hopefuls that weighed 165 while I was strong as an Ape and had 50lbs on them. But, even these guys had the same view...size/strength does matter (a lot), but it can't overcome someone with a much higher skill level. That said, these guys all wanted to obtain BOTH the highest skill level and reach an optimum level of strength given their genetic makeup.

- If you have Game like Bruce Lee has skill, I'm sure you can get tons of chicks while being broke and without building up a solid lifestyle
- If you have Lifestyle/Money like Arnold Schwarzanegger has Size/Strength, I'm sure you can get plenty of chicks without having much game

These are the extremes. The best solution is to try and be your best at both.

And, just like that guy that was 165 that threw me around like a rag doll, when skill is matched up against size, skill wins. I'd also bet on smooth game over lifestyle. But, at no point did any of these guys say to me "you know, if you weren't so strong you would be much better". Rather, it was "dude, if you can increase your skill level and keep that strength, you are going to be a monster."

[CaP7]

(04-01-2014 08:17 AM)anonymous123 Wrote:  

I think the debate of Game vs. Lifestyle has a direct analogy to the Skills vs. Size in MMA or other martial arts. Game is analogous to having skills, and Lifestyle/Money is analogous to having Size. All too often we hear "size doesn't matter."

I'm no MMA expert but did make a brief go (I was an excellent wrestler and later a powerlifter). The coach was impressed by my strength. And he said this (paraphrase): "anyone that says size and strength doesn't matter is full of shit. The fact is, if you had two guys that were exactly EQUAL in Skill, the bigger and stronger guy will destroy the smaller one. All too often people compare two completely different skill levels and determine size doesn't matter. Like, comparing Bruce Lee to some big roid guy that has mediocre skills, then you conclude that Size doesn't matter. You never hear about people comparing two people of the exact same skill level, and one guy is 150 and the other is 220, and concluding the guy at 150 has a chance."

And yes, I got thrown around like a rag doll by Olympic hopefuls that weighed 165 while I was strong as an Ape and had 50lbs on them. But, even these guys had the same view...size/strength does matter (a lot), but it can't overcome someone with a much higher skill level. That said, these guys all wanted to obtain BOTH the highest skill level and reach an optimum level of strength given their genetic makeup.

- If you have Game like Bruce Lee has skill, I'm sure you can get tons of chicks while being broke and without building up a solid lifestyle
- If you have Lifestyle/Money like Arnold Schwarzanegger has Size/Strength, I'm sure you can get plenty of chicks without having much game

These are the extremes. The best solution is to try and be your best at both.

And, just like that guy that was 165 that threw me around like a rag doll, when skill is matched up against size, skill wins. I'd also bet on smooth game over lifestyle. But, at no point did any of these guys say to me "you know, if you weren't so strong you would be much better". Rather, it was "dude, if you can increase your skill level and keep that strength, you are going to be a monster."

After this post, I would close this thread. Impressive summary...

[Samseau]

(04-01-2014 07:17 AM)bacan Wrote:  

(04-01-2014 04:17 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

The chick on the far right with the black hair looks like a tranny, and now I can't stop thinking that some of the other girls in this photo may be trannys as well.

Haha, he goes out on a limb to back up what he's saying with pictures of himself and his lifestyle, and you post this hater comment?

Nothing hateful about it. DL's life sounds damn good. But that tyranny is scary.

[bacan]

(04-02-2014 10:43 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(04-01-2014 07:17 AM)bacan Wrote:  

(04-01-2014 04:17 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

The chick on the far right with the black hair looks like a tranny, and now I can't stop thinking that some of the other girls in this photo may be trannys as well.

Haha, he goes out on a limb to back up what he's saying with pictures of himself and his lifestyle, and you post this hater comment?

Nothing hateful about it. DL's life sounds damn good. But that tyranny is scary.

Nevermind, I just saw this quote from another thread:

(04-04-2014 05:35 PM)Drazen Wrote:  

The second guy is Justin Ross Lee. He's an internet "celebrity" that has a pocket square business. He'll be on the Millionaire Matchmaker next week. Its really weird they have him in this article as he appears to be a rich as fuck jet-setter. http://instagram.com/justinrosslee

http://www.rooshvforum.network/thread-34784.html

Those pictures are of Justin Ross Lee

Weird..

[RockHard]

I was confused at first too but I think Distant Light was saying he used to hang with JRL

[RockHard]

I found this article over at Dalrock's and it really affected me. Not about the girls, because that's old news. I felt for John, the "start-up founder", who's talking about his sex life. This hits both sides of the coin - John has money but shitty style, and he's tried making lifestyle changes (going to places where the women are, like yoga class), ends up going the path of least resistance (online) and fails there too. John is getting set up to become a John, because with all that money and no game, he'll end up buying himself a whore.

Quote:

Not that any of this necessarily translates into more sex for John, who is slight of build and certainly dorky (he wears socks with sandals and rarely makes eye contact), but who nonetheless has nice features and a pair of adorable dimples: The 25-year-old shyly reveals that he’s never had sex, never been on a date, never even kissed a woman. The Silicon Valley landscape is so dominated by men that he’s had trouble meeting women, much less women who’d want to play around with computer programming, watch sci-fi and have a date of laser tag, which is mostly what does it for John. “I tried to think about what I could do that more women do,” he says bashfully. “At one point, I did yoga for a while.” And there were women in his class he found attractive, but as he says, “It’s hard for me to go deeper than just ‘hi.’” He’s tried Internet dating and Grouper and even Down (formerly Bang With Friends), an app that allows you to tag which of your Facebook friends you’d want to sleep with, and then lets you know if they’ve tagged you, too. So far, John hasn’t received any Down pairings.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/feature/mill...z2y1bXNBGG

[Distant Light]

Another interesting article...

http://nypost.com/2014/04/02/meet-the-ol...SocialFlow

Quote:

“My friends will start the e-mail chains, ‘All right, what are we doing? Where are we going? Cancun or Miami?’

Quote:

“I could run around New York City and bang as many girls as I do on spring break, but it’s not the same feeling,” says Justin. “You’re out in the sun, the all-inclusive thing is great. It’s always a great time. I never come back wondering why I did that.

Quote:

Joaquin says when he went on his first proper spring break (while still enrolled in college), he had to ration his funds down to the last dollar.
But when he went to Miami at the age of 31, he and his three friends plopped down thousands for the “911” suite at the W Hotel.
The year before, his prowling pack of seven secured a row of pricey poolside rooms at Miami’s Shore Club.

[sand]

(03-19-2014 09:02 PM)Christian McQueen Wrote:  

If Game is not needed, then how come we all know men who check off everyone of those good attributes, but DON'T get laid consistently and even more importantly, have ZERO concept of keeping a girl's interest in a LTR or marriage?

This is so true. Two weeks ago, I was hanging out with a few friends from LA and the lead actress from the film they just finished. The first night she had a party at her apartment. Really nice place in downtown...tons of art and a 5.1 B and W sourround system that blew my mind.This girl was hot but nothing out of the ordinary, a solid 8.5+, my age (21). After 3 days of hanging out/partying alone with us, she brought her boyfriend to yacht club party we at.

The dude is 42, good looking, and extremely well educated and makes mad bank. Turns out he pays for her apartment and everything in it. The next day at lunch her bf tells one of my friends that he is planning on marrying her soon.

What he doesnt know is that she has another guy sugardaddy who pays for her partying and bangs her in the apartment he pays for. On top of that both don't know about one another or the fact that she's actually has a girlfriend who she's in an LTR with...

When I found out this guy was planning on marrying her, I was like THIS IS WHY I NEED GAME. Im smart, talented and the future is looking bright but I dont want to rely on that to get girls because ill end up like that guy. trying to marry the first girl who puts up with him for his money.


Poor guy. I feel bad for him. I mean the dude didnt do anything wrong other than be beta. But yeah, this is why I NEED GAME.

[soup]

Lead actresses are the worst type of divas. The epitome of the worst shit we talk about on here.

[Distant Light]

(04-05-2014 10:10 AM)RockHard Wrote:  

I was confused at first too but I think Distant Light was saying he used to hang with JRL

Yep hungout with him a handful of times in 2012 90% of the time with a chick coming or going...

(04-22-2014 11:26 PM)sand Wrote:  

(03-19-2014 09:02 PM)Christian McQueen Wrote:  

If Game is not needed, then how come we all know men who check off everyone of those good attributes, but DON'T get laid consistently and even more importantly, have ZERO concept of keeping a girl's interest in a LTR or marriage?

This is so true. Two weeks ago, I was hanging out with a few friends from LA and the lead actress from the film they just finished. The first night she had a party at her apartment. Really nice place in downtown...tons of art and a 5.1 B and W sourround system that blew my mind.This girl was hot but nothing out of the ordinary, a solid 8.5+, my age (21). After 3 days of hanging out/partying alone with us, she brought her boyfriend to yacht club party we at.

The dude is 42, good looking, and extremely well educated and makes mad bank. Turns out he pays for her apartment and everything in it. The next day at lunch her bf tells one of my friends that he is planning on marrying her soon.

What he doesnt know is that she has another guy sugardaddy who pays for her partying and bangs her in the apartment he pays for. On top of that both don't know about one another or the fact that she's actually has a girlfriend who she's in an LTR with...

When I found out this guy was planning on marrying her, I was like THIS IS WHY I NEED GAME. Im smart, talented and the future is looking bright but I dont want to rely on that to get girls because ill end up like that guy. trying to marry the first girl who puts up with him for his money.


Poor guy. I feel bad for him. I mean the dude didnt do anything wrong other than be beta. But yeah, this is why I NEED GAME.

IMO that isn't game or lifestyle he's just a dude providing...

Guys who view themselves as "bachelors" who have this lifestyle while they might not get the top tier chicks they will be getting their fair share of quality just due to the fact that there life puts them in favorable environments.

One of my girls fucked a guy out of BOREDOM and then texted me the next day that she met a guy who lived in a penthouse and his fridge had nothing but moet champagne. He just happened to be "decent enough" and it turned out he actually had abit of money.

The guy "providing" in such manner is simply right there with a creeper because he's only doing it as a way to win over WHEN he could just cut the BS and just get an escort. Reason I don't factor in this archtype is due to the fact that I have a friend who isn't reach and is just a normal blue collar worker. He got married to a chick who had cheated on him AND HE KNOWS SHE DID!!!!!

Not that actual cheating matters, (people can do what they want) it's the acceptance and willingness to still marry despite her distrust. (I tell all women I dislike monogamy but opened to polyamorous relationships)

P.S...I know of girls I used to hang with who would DAYGAME with the intention of milking these type of dudes, ha!

[soup]

Here's the reality for ALL girls

[Marysia]

Game is like powder a dead man. How great he will be dress and makeup he always stink. If you are looser (crooked face, low inteligence, shitty job) game doesn't help you at all. Women still won't sleep with you dude! Women love good looking (sign of health), muscle (fell safety) and money (for kids). You cannot change that, this is biology. Stop talking bullshit man!

[debeguiled]

Powder a dead man?

[aSimpNamedBrokeback]

Like powdering a dead man.
About as accurate as.
Women like money (for kids).

[Kavelli]

This is the best thing I've ever read, im gonna have to save this shit

[Marysia]

(11-08-2016 01:03 PM)aSimpNamedBrokeback Wrote:  

Like powdering a dead man.
About as accurate as.
Women like money (for kids).

Thank you. Special for powdering

[Moma]

Hahahaha@powder for a dead man! I'm weak lmaoooo!!!

[redbeard]