You're mixing up wealth and social class as a real demarcation between people.
A Suze Orman type chick making multi-millions vs a girl who comes from a family that has done things for the city for generations.
The girl with a good name will go to Vassar or Bryn Mawr or Brown, will take part in charities, might even attend a debutante ball. But she's not necessarily living it up like Kim Kardashian.
The society girl, the one with class, probably doesn't have millions.
The middle class girl who makes a killing selling a book or has a TV show doesn't have class.
Same thing with a middle class girl, whose parents are professionals or small business people, versus a working class girl whose parents are laborers.
It's often the case that the working class girl dad owns a plumbing business and is rich in economic terms - but they are working with their hands - and there are values that extend from that. The rich plumber girl in all of the latest is of a lower social class than the daughter of 2 college professors.
Throw in a chick from the underclass, who may come from a broken home, who very much understands the reality of growing up in a dangerous neighborhood. You know the difference between a trailer trash chick and one from the burbs. (hell throw in country and we've got a real interesting discussion.
Where the girl with class knows how proper society works
The middle class learns those things in college
The working class girl sees those things on tv and aspires
The underclass girl openly rejects that shit.
Money is intertwined with social class- but social class has always been more about power, about name, about connections to the right kind of people.
You might go to a political fundraiser. The social class is invited.
And what America has in terms of class is levels below what you see in other countries. England for instance, most of Asia where the Chinese business class sits above the darker skinned native class, Latin America - where the descendants of the colonialists largely control everything, Africa - where certain connected families are the only ones able to get things done. Places where there are no illusions of class mobility. (we have the illusion here in the states)
But in America, in terms of game? Average white dude can pound some blue blood pussy if he's able to find it, and basically fits the part.
That's what Feminism has done to the US.
Every pussy is available for the right look and the right words.
WIA
Quote: (09-04-2013 04:18 AM)PaybackTime Wrote:
Game attempts to circumvent one of the most powerful social phenomenon there is which is the reproduction of priviledge. The hypergamous nature of women on top of low social mobility makes it difficult to date somebody higher up the social ladder. I remember once dressed to the nines, I managed to pull a preppy girl from the Hamptons from a Manhattan club, I had a great leased car back then but when I parked in front of a derelict building in South Bronx, you should've seen the look on her face. I don't think she was particularly a gold-digger but she realizes my external appearance was incongruent with my real social standing, which she would never have given a chance otherwise. I eventually got the bang but I never heard from the girl again. I think it's a concept that's overlooked here, class, perceived or real does play a role, otherwise 30k millionnaires wouldn't go to the lengths they go to get laid (overdrawn accounts to shop designer labels, maxed credit cards to lease expensive cars, splurging all their money on jewelry) although they live in basements. If you've been to Miami you know the guys I'm talking about. So question is, should I limit myself to working-class girls? I've got way better success with hoodrats but then I suspect who doesn't? The poorer the easier it seems.