[LeBeau]

(09-03-2013 11:48 AM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

I have many things gay in this world, but having a funeral service for your PUA personality takes the cake. I wonder what else she will have him do to prove his lack of manhood?

Funnier typo buried inside already funny comment.


Regarding Strauss, yeah, I mean you hope a guy turns out happy, but this whole funeral business is pretty cheesy form of getting attention.

[bojangles]

(09-02-2013 02:38 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(09-02-2013 01:26 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

Back in the days of The Game, Style used to run around Las Vegas. And as soon as he saw a bachelorette party, he knew he was in. He made out with countless bachelorettes--and slept with a few.

and guys wonder why I call him a fraud?

In Vegas, the last group of girls to approach is a bachelorette party.

Anyone who actually goes out and meets women and parties in Vegas knows to avoid those groups of girls like the plague.

All thirsty betas think that is the easiest group to pull. Such false logic, its the only group you should not even approach.

[Cattle Rustler]

(09-11-2013 08:15 AM)bojangles Wrote:  

(09-02-2013 02:38 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

(09-02-2013 01:26 PM)Nomad77 Wrote:  

Back in the days of The Game, Style used to run around Las Vegas. And as soon as he saw a bachelorette party, he knew he was in. He made out with countless bachelorettes--and slept with a few.

and guys wonder why I call him a fraud?

In Vegas, the last group of girls to approach is a bachelorette party.

Anyone who actually goes out and meets women and parties in Vegas knows to avoid those groups of girls like the plague.

All thirsty betas think that is the easiest group to pull. Such false logic, its the only group you should not even approach.

Being a guy that's never been to vegas...may I ask, why?

It seems like good info to know for future reference. Thanks

[Christian McQueen]

@Cattle Rustler:

Because Bachelorette groups are pack mentality and essentially if you have a target then odds are you'll be dealing with multiple cockblocks from other members of the pack.

Excuses they'll use:

-It's OUR party and we stick together!
-It's about the bride; no running off with boys!
-She's with us tonight etc etc

Best targets in clubs is ALWAYS 2 girls out to play, eyes roaming around, who are clearly interested in meeting guys.

That being said, it's not impossible to pull from bachelorette groups and I've done it a few times, but it's generally not worth the hoops to jump through.

[MikeCF]

Women in bachelorette parties walk through the club in a train like formation, HOLDING HANDS.

Style = fraud.

Anyone who can't see that Style is a fraud = fraud. (Because if you actually went out, you'd know this shit and guys like me and McQueen wouldn't have to tell you.)

[Aliblahba]

(09-11-2013 03:50 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

Style = fraud.

Soup in 3...2...1...

[Samseau]

(09-11-2013 03:50 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

Women in bachelorette parties walk through the club in a train like formation, HOLDING HANDS.

Style = fraud.

Anyone who can't see that Style is a fraud = fraud. (Because if you actually went out, you'd know this shit and guys like me and McQueen wouldn't have to tell you.)

In what way is he a fraud? He may not have the tightest game, in fact his game may be (most likely) pretty weak, but when did he claim to be the ultimate mack daddy?

[Samseau]

(09-11-2013 03:50 PM)MikeCF Wrote:  

Women in bachelorette parties walk through the club in a train like formation, HOLDING HANDS.

Style = fraud.

Anyone who can't see that Style is a fraud = fraud. (Because if you actually went out, you'd know this shit and guys like me and McQueen wouldn't have to tell you.)

EDIT: Style is a fraud, claiming to sleep with Bacherlorettes?

Unless shit was drastically different back in 2003, then yeah, that's a bunch of BS

[scorpion]

Great looking girl. Money, fame, game...who cares? If he's hitting pussy of that caliber, he's doing something right. Hopefully for him he can keep her locked down. I wouldn't bet on it, though. I agree with MikeCF about never marrying a girl over an 8. Girls who've lived their entire lives as 9s and 10s aren't exactly in tune with reality like everyone else. Maybe super rare exceptions from small towns and traditional families. But this chick is a model living in L.A. It will be a miracle if she's still with him in 10 years.

I really don't like to judge guys though, especially when I don't know the whole story, or in this case, basically any of the story at all beyond the basic facts. So I can just see that the chick is hot as fuck, so I wish him well.

[Bricks]

The whole thing makes my skin crawl. What a chief.

Danger and plays last blog post sums up imo the only way to view game.

http://dangerandplay.com/2013/09/11/ask-...e-musings/

Becomes less about woman and more about you.

[ImmoralPsychology]

I'm not a fan of how game is being redefined to include all the age-old, obvious attractants. "Game" was originally, at least how I understood it, all about your behavior and words. The whole POINT of game was that you do not need superior looks (face and/or body), money, power or status to pull. These four qualities have never been in question. Before game, every (average) man on the planet would find himself wishing that he had more money to get the hot girls. Be better looking to get the hot girls. Etc. The entire premise of game was to let guys know that, hey, you know what? You don't need any of that to do very well with women! Sure, don't dress like a homeless dude, but you don't need Armani suits. You don't have to look like Brad Pitt. You don't need to drive a nice car or have a beautiful house.

Now game is being redefined to include at least working out hard and making as much money as you can. How is this game? It's no mystery that if you're rich, you'd have to have minus game to repel women. If you look like a male model, you don't need much else as long as you don't live under a bridge. And this is borne out by the constant comparisons too. "I know a lawyer who makes $200k and he can't pick up women." Yeah, because he is a fucking moron with women. He's not normal, he has anti-game. Clearly, this is NOT the baseline. The baseline is a normal guy who has an excess of one of the above four things. Then he will be swimming in it. This is obvious and anyone over 15 with real life experience wouldn't disagree. We all know this. We always have. And it's blue pill as fuck.

Certainly making yourself as attractive as possible will help you a lot, but it's not game. Having a huge bankroll will too, and it's not game either. I'm not saying a guy shouldn't do these things. I'm saying they are, and have always been, so obvious that there is little point in mentioning them. And certainly do not call any of that 'game'. It's disingenuous at best and flat out wrong at worst.

You can say your game is good when you're either a skinny or fat dude that can go out dressed WORSE than everybody else in the venue, spend less than the average guy does, tell the women you're a manager at Staples, and still pull the best women. That's game. If you spend 10 hours a week in the gym, spend $100 on grooming products alone a month, your outfits are worth $500 or $1000+, drive a 'nice' car, and you're spending more than $100 on drinks (either for yourself or for you and the girls), then you may or may not have game in you, but you won't need it (as long as you're not a complete twat). If you have looks and money and you can't get laid, it's not because you don't have game, it's because you're a loser. If you need those things to get a girl over a 5 or 6, you do not have game. Simple as that.

Like I said, all great things to have that will enhance your life with and without women. I don't advise against getting them. Just don't call that game. It's not game.

[RXB]

(09-11-2013 08:51 PM)ImmoralPsychology Wrote:  

I'm not saying a guy shouldn't do these things. I'm saying they are, and have always been, so obvious that there is little point in mentioning them.

Going up to women you find attractive and talking to them is also obvious. Should we stop mentioning that as well?

[WestIndianArchie]

(09-11-2013 08:51 PM)ImmoralPsychology Wrote:  

I'm not a fan of how game is being redefined to include all the age-old, obvious attractants. "Game" was originally, at least how I understood it, all about your behavior and words. The whole POINT of game was that you do not need superior looks (face and/or body), money, power or status to pull.


...

Certainly making yourself as attractive as possible will help you a lot, but it's not game. Having a huge bankroll will too, and it's not game either. I'm not saying a guy shouldn't do these things. I'm saying they are, and have always been, so obvious that there is little point in mentioning them. And certainly do not call any of that 'game'. It's disingenuous at best and flat out wrong at worst.
....

Like I said, all great things to have that will enhance your life with and without women. I don't advise against getting them. Just don't call that game. It's not game.

Preach

[Samseau]

passive vs. active game

[ImmoralPsychology]

(09-11-2013 09:28 PM)RXB Wrote:  

(09-11-2013 08:51 PM)ImmoralPsychology Wrote:  

I'm not saying a guy shouldn't do these things. I'm saying they are, and have always been, so obvious that there is little point in mentioning them.

Going up to women you find attractive and talking to them is also obvious. Should we stop mentioning that as well?

Nice attempt at a troll.

If you're rich, it's all you need to get plenty, PLENTY of hot women.
If you're very good looking, it's all you need to get plenty, PLENTY of hot women.
If you're powerful, it's all you need to get plenty, PLENTY of hot women.
If you're the best at what you do, (high status), it's all you need to get plenty, PLENTY of hot women.

In many cases, they will find you and you'll barely have to do any work. This is as old as dirt. Every guy in the world knows this. You don't need 'game', you just have to avoid being a total loser in other areas of your life. If you have any one of these in excess and you can't get laid by 8's and above with regularity, you are a loser or a freak. Simple as that. It means that your personality is so bad that women who give you megapoints by default just for being one of these has taken all those points away from you for it. Women a woman finds out you're rich or powerful or good-looking, she's interested on some level before ever even meeting you. She is likely to already want to bang you based just on that alone because she has made all sorts of other assumptions (right or wrong) from that fact. The only reason you're going out on a date and not heading right over to your house for the bang is to a) reduce her ASD and b) she might want to convince herself your not a total psycho.

What world do you live in where going up to women and talking to them gives you that? Yes, talking to women is obvious, but it doesn't get you there. It's only the very first step. And if you're just average on the metrics mentioned, you're going to have to deal with a shitload of rejection. You're going to have to increase your real 'game' be learning to understand women better and knowing how to talk to them in such a way that makes them attracted to you. You're going to have to think about logistics. You're going to have to think of all sorts of subtle things that influence her decision to bang you.

Anyway, this is my last post explaining this. This is not opinion, it's a fact. Any guy that doesn't see this has lived under a rock, covered in snow, all his life.

Just don't call that game. And if you insist on calling it 'game', then fine. Give me a new fucking word that describes what I'm talking about so that I can differentiate between a guy who got his 10 pussy by being rich vs the guy that got his 10 pussy DESPITE being just average.