Posts: 5,420
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
102
Zimmerman case
07-09-2013, 04:48 PM
I read Trayvon had to climb over a fence to get into the gated community, if so it indicates he was aware he was trespassing, and ballistics claims Trayvon was shot from below. I think it means he was trespassing and was on top of the guy when they guy shot him.
Although I don't think someone should get shot for trespassing, If I was on the jury I would not convict the guy.
If someone catches you trespassing and confronts you, you don't get in his face, you say "Sorry, leaving now." unless you really want trouble.
Zimmerman should have listened to the cops when they said leave Trayvon alone, but unless the orders of the operator are legally binding he didn't commit a crime by continuing to follow him.
Posts: 195
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2012
Reputation:
6
Zimmerman case
07-09-2013, 08:59 PM
A) This case has absolutely nothing to do with race and only race-baiters(Al Sharpton comes to mind) and SWPLs bring it up.
B) Under Florida's law code, Zimmerman should go free although in my personal opinion, he should be charged with manslaughter and given a few years just so that this doesn't become a precedent for getting away with murder.
Just my two cents.
Posts: 605
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation:
2
Zimmerman case
07-09-2013, 09:02 PM
This case seems like a pretty cut-and-dry case of self defense. I think a lot of people who hear about this case don't realize that you can easily get a concealed carry permit in Florida and that the self defense statues in Florida are pretty lenient.
Posts: 6,695
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
146
Zimmerman case
07-09-2013, 09:19 PM
Don't care.
Vice-Captain - #TeamWaitAndSee
Posts: 1,603
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
16
Zimmerman case
07-09-2013, 09:21 PM
I wonder how this is going to affect security of middle class housing in urban areas of America.
Zimm was a volunteer looking out for his community because there had been previous break ins in the neighborhood. Think of what the options are if you live in one of these communities. (1) Form a watch group and report suspicious people to the police. Result - the police get tired and stop responding. (2) Secure your doors with reinforced iron doors and put bars on the windows. Problem - it's unlikely the home owner's association would ever allow this. (3) Have a gun in your home. Problem - this is the worst solution. You never want to get to this point. It's unlikely you will have time to get your gun if you are surprised by your flimsy door being kicked in. Most people aren't physically or psychologically capable to respond in time. Once you are faced with a do or die fight situation, your chances of getting injured go up astronomically. Again, you don't want it to get this far.
Zimm was actually executing the best strategy - the only effective defense is a good offense - be visible in the community and make yourself known to intruders. But now, thanks to the liberal, leftist media, this can be the most costly option. Liberals don't like a man who stands straight and doesn't cower and hand over all his money. The criminal can now freely case any neighborhood eating skiddles to pass the time. The police don't have the resources to respond and at some point somebody won't be looking and then you take the opportunity. Zero cost for the criminal with huge potential rewards. If you are the criminal - you win.
It is clear now after seeing the detailed and overwhelming evidence of the trial, that Zimmerman is the victim of a political trial. It's also apparent that the original investigators and prosecutors were competent and made the right decision. The only reason he was tried was for political reasons - Al Sharpton - a well known liar in previous situations whipped up a mob and a libertard media made up a fictitious narrative about a rogue wannabe cop. All false.
I actually think Mexico is safer than America. Here, you can protect yourself with reinforced iron doors, bars on windows, barbed wire, gates, viscous dogs, and anything else you can think of.
Furthermore, the policia stop and search anyone they want and they pick up Trayvon thug types and throw them in the back of the pickup truck. Handcuffs aren't necessary - anyone who jumps out of the truck is shot.
The liberals who control the media love thugs and hate normal honest men. Women are sensitive to the direction the winds are blowing and know who the winners are. If you are a normal man in America - act submissive or go to jail. The liberals hate you and they have the power. In America, the thugs win. Maybe that's why you are here. Think about it.
Rico... Sauve....
Posts: 7,595
Threads: 0
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation:
79
Zimmerman case
07-10-2013, 01:59 PM
Obama Admin has been working behind the scenes fanning the flames of racial strife surrounding the Zimmerman case:
http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/07/10/new...-protests/
Take care of those titties for me.
Posts: 378
Threads: 0
Joined: Sep 2012
Zimmerman case
07-10-2013, 02:03 PM
Trayvon thug types??? If he was considered a thug then I'm Darth Vader.
Posts: 615
Threads: 0
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation:
0
Zimmerman case
07-10-2013, 05:20 PM
Tons of reasonable doubt here.
Posts: 50
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2013
Zimmerman case
07-10-2013, 06:36 PM
Quote: (07-10-2013 06:30 PM)pozdnyshev Wrote:
Quote: (07-10-2013 02:03 PM)sucio44 Wrote:
Trayvon thug types??? If he was considered a thug then I'm Darth Vader.
Trayvon was the self-styled "NO LIMITS NIGGA".
That's pretty weak yo. I had a more hardcore nickname for myself when I was a kid. nut maybe that's because I was into death metal.
Also, if Travyon Martin was really a no limits nigga, why doesn't he have a criminal record? Kids these days are all bark and no bite.
The real no limit nigga here is Zimmerman, apparently he beat the shit out of an cop in 2005 or something. Fuck da police?
Posts: 252
Threads: 0
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
15
Zimmerman case
07-10-2013, 06:44 PM
Did Zimmerman chase him after Trayvon ran (flight), once Zimmerman accosted him (unjustly) did Trayvon have Reasonable Suspicion to suspect this person is a harm to him to question him and not be an official law enforcement officer, so with reasonable suspicion of harm Trayvon does his other option (fight) in self defense claims here in Philly they go by the fight or flight rule and if there is any thread of ability to take flight (without a reasonable suspicion to expect harm from flight) and you don't take flight you're getting charged point blank period. So if you have to fight and expect that it could be fatal you have the right to preserve your life with excessive force.
Did you notice this was all from Trayvon perspective because self defense does not account for YOU chasing someone down, it does not account for YOU accosting someone.
You can NOT chase someone down in THE DARK, accost them and think they don't have a right to think of you as a threat, and if you happen to be getting your ass kicked as a result of this you cannot kill this person!
Self defense is not because you get a broken nose, it's not even if your head is getting bumped (not slammed evidence suggests that being slammed would of been much more SEVERE gashes that would of needed stitches maybe even staples not the cut that Zimmerman had)
Point being you CAN shoot someone because you was scared, you CAN shoot someone out of anger of loosing, and you CAN shoot someone because they LOOK suspicious. But in each of those instances you WILL go to jail
Posts: 4,883
Threads: 0
Joined: May 2011
Reputation:
39
Zimmerman case
07-10-2013, 07:38 PM
Well...Zimmerman didn't have the right to stop Martin and ask him anything. He isn't a peace officer, and was instructed by law enforcement to leave him alone. Martin didn't have to submit to being detained and questioned by someone that isn't a cop. I don't understand how it's so out of the realm of imagination that Martin himself felt threatened, and seeing the gun (on a guy that isn't a cop) made him all the more fearful for his life. Maybe he felt like he had to go for the gun before Zimmerman did. If you're saying that Zimmerman did nothing wrong, and basically had the right to stop anyone he wanted, then you are saying that it's cool for any black male to be confronted by anyone in anyplace other than his own neighborhood, and that it's justifiable to kill him if he objects.
"The best kind of pride is that which compels a man to do his best when no one is watching."