I read something the other day on a manosphere blog (I think it was Dalrock, can't remember).
The kind of women your grandfather married and stayed with was the kind of woman your grandmother was.
So yeah, you raise a good point. It's not necessarily easier to fuck these emancipated women (Roosh touched on this several times), but they have much fewer qualms about no-strings-attached sex. They put a lower priority on their notch count. Spit some good game and get a couple drinks in her and you're good to go. That's good if you want to get laid.
If you actually want to marry them, remember, they have higher standards for men and they usually aren't worth the investment of these better men. Obviously, I'm not referring to Provider McBetason the factory worker when I bring this up. As H. L. Mencken says, a woman would much rather be the fifth woman in a first rate man's harem than be the first wife of a fifth rate man's marriage. Women feel like genetic failures if they raise Homer Simpson's kids and they will fuck around on him given the opportunity to do so in order to give some of her offspring a better chance for success. The female mind is actually very rational in this respect.
It's just that women nowadays do not weigh these opportunity costs. What do they value? Marriage with a provider, or sex with a capable man who will (very likely) not commit to them? These women can provide for themselves economically, so which do they pick? The answer is obvious.
What they can't do (and what they ultimately would want after they hit about 28) is get a man who will stick around to raise the children that they want to have. Once that tipping point happens where the majority of these provider males do not want to marry these sluts, then the game changes. Even betas have standards for marriage because it's a very, very large investment on the man's part. It takes longer for the men to wise up to that shit, but once they do, women will (very quickly) change their behavior.
So to answer your question, what's wrong with emancipated women, I'll say "nothing". It simply depends on your priorities. Do you want to live the life of the eternal bachelor, or would you like to have a family at some point? Some men would really rather not invest decades of their time to figure out how to give a girl the 'gina tingles. Some men think that marriage would suffocate them. This day and age, the eternal bachelor option is much more attractive than it used to be.
A system where the women are more marriage oriented (and more marriage committed) makes for a happier society. Cads will be cads (and by virtue of their own skill, rarely have problems getting laid), but ultimately, this form of "sexual socialism" ensures that the majority of men get laid. Most men are better off not knowing what their wives are capable of and would do given the option. Most women are better off cashing in their chips and marrying than they are spending the rest of their lives as spinsters. Children are always better off living in intact families where they learn how men and women are supposed to act in order to keep a family together.
The kind of women your grandfather married and stayed with was the kind of woman your grandmother was.
So yeah, you raise a good point. It's not necessarily easier to fuck these emancipated women (Roosh touched on this several times), but they have much fewer qualms about no-strings-attached sex. They put a lower priority on their notch count. Spit some good game and get a couple drinks in her and you're good to go. That's good if you want to get laid.
If you actually want to marry them, remember, they have higher standards for men and they usually aren't worth the investment of these better men. Obviously, I'm not referring to Provider McBetason the factory worker when I bring this up. As H. L. Mencken says, a woman would much rather be the fifth woman in a first rate man's harem than be the first wife of a fifth rate man's marriage. Women feel like genetic failures if they raise Homer Simpson's kids and they will fuck around on him given the opportunity to do so in order to give some of her offspring a better chance for success. The female mind is actually very rational in this respect.
It's just that women nowadays do not weigh these opportunity costs. What do they value? Marriage with a provider, or sex with a capable man who will (very likely) not commit to them? These women can provide for themselves economically, so which do they pick? The answer is obvious.
What they can't do (and what they ultimately would want after they hit about 28) is get a man who will stick around to raise the children that they want to have. Once that tipping point happens where the majority of these provider males do not want to marry these sluts, then the game changes. Even betas have standards for marriage because it's a very, very large investment on the man's part. It takes longer for the men to wise up to that shit, but once they do, women will (very quickly) change their behavior.
So to answer your question, what's wrong with emancipated women, I'll say "nothing". It simply depends on your priorities. Do you want to live the life of the eternal bachelor, or would you like to have a family at some point? Some men would really rather not invest decades of their time to figure out how to give a girl the 'gina tingles. Some men think that marriage would suffocate them. This day and age, the eternal bachelor option is much more attractive than it used to be.
A system where the women are more marriage oriented (and more marriage committed) makes for a happier society. Cads will be cads (and by virtue of their own skill, rarely have problems getting laid), but ultimately, this form of "sexual socialism" ensures that the majority of men get laid. Most men are better off not knowing what their wives are capable of and would do given the option. Most women are better off cashing in their chips and marrying than they are spending the rest of their lives as spinsters. Children are always better off living in intact families where they learn how men and women are supposed to act in order to keep a family together.
“I have a very simple rule when it comes to management: hire the best people from your competitors, pay them more than they were earning, and give them bonuses and incentives based on their performance. That’s how you build a first-class operation.”
― Donald J. Trump
If you want some PDF's on bodyweight exercise with little to no equipment, send me a PM and I'll get back to you as soon as possible.
