Quote: (11-26-2012 04:02 PM)Craig Wrote:
Athlone,
The only thing outdated is your constant use of the term.
No, that term clearly applies here.
Quote:Quote:
Writing lengthy responses doesn't add weight to your argument.
Nobody claimed they did, but good on you dealing with that strawman. Fight the good fight, bro.
Quote:Quote:
You're assuming the guy is weak when he might just be more committed to his principles than you.
No, he's a weakling. That's pretty obvious, both to myself and to the women he aimed to pursue. He has no spine, is easily manipulated by female action (they can toy with him with no effort because he doesn't have the emotional fortitude to stand absent their validation) and whines like a supercharger.
This is not a conclusion based upon an assumption. It is a conclusion based upon easily verifiable facts stated by the man in question. Having exhibited said weaknesses myself in the past, I don't find them difficult to spot.
He can either accept their existence and grow or continue to bitch and remain what he is. That the weaknesses are present, however, is not debatable.
Quote:Quote:
He stuck to them til 32 believing that goodness would pay off.
That it has taken him this long to adapt is worth noting, as it shows a remarkable degree of naivete.
Adaptation shouldn't take 12+ years to take off. If reality can punch you in the face for so long and you still fail to recognize its presence, then that says something (and that "something" isn't good).
Quote:Quote:
Now he's realizing that in a society full of people that think like you, it just isn't worth it. Let the savagery begin.
This brings me to another point about self-righteousness and arrogance. This guy, like yourself, is convinced that he's somehow morally better than everyone else around him. This is why, in spite of the continued administration of cold doses of reality over the course of a decade, the dude has stayed the course and refused to adapt or even address
his own faults.
If he could hop off of his moral high horse for just a second and look over his own conduct with a critical eye, he could potentially find a way to deal with his own critical faults (ex: excessive pedestalization of women) and perhaps improve his results/experience, maybe learning from others in the process. Society may have still its faults, but he would at least be better capable of dealing with them.
This does not happen because he is too busy looking down on everyone else to consider his own insecurities and failings. Instead of considering what he himself is doing wrong and could do better, he chooses to criticize society, the girls, and the men they prefer to fuck instead of him.
It isn't that he's unattractive-the girls are just "impure".
It isn't that those guys they prefer to fuck are more attractive-they're actually "losers".
It isn't that his persona is too dull or unappealing-it is that society has it all wrong.
"There's nothing wrong with me, but everything else is just fucked up!"
That's the mentality you and this guy are advocating for in a nutshell. There can be no true self improvement with the continued maintenance of this mindset, and without true self improvement there can be no romantic improvement either.
Quote:Quote:
You see that? I was rude just now b/c I abandoned the principle of politeness. It doesn't make for a very civilized discussion does it?
Quote:Quote:
Abandoning ideals might be practical for you, but that doesn't mean it's right.
Sounds fine so long as you're willing to cease bitching and moaning about the consequences.
Quote:Quote:
Now, perhaps you're willing to say "there's no right or wrong in society."
...or perhaps I'm not?
Quote:Quote:
Well, at least you're striving for consistency.
Am I?
Quote:Quote:
But you can't live as though there is no right or wrong.
Ok...
Quote:Quote:
And if you can't live it, it's not practical.
If you say so, I guess...
Quote:Quote:
Therefore your argument collapses in on itself.
...except it isn't my argument?
Strawmen need battling too, I guess. Keep fighting the good fight.
Quote:Quote:
Update: In short, my argument is that women should strive to be more than chimps.
What you think they should do is irrelevant. You must accept female nature for what it
is, not for your own personal opinion of what it
ought to be.
Women do not find weak, spineless, easily manipulated men attractive. Bitching and moaning about how they ought to be more attracted to these men for reasons you have determined yourself is a waste of time and will not change anyone's mind.
The world has no obligation to adapt to you and your feelings. You either adapt to it or pay the price.