[Parlay44]

Man I couldn't stop laughing watching this. The female judge tried very hard to be rational. You could tell she wants to side with the females very badly but they're very openly and blatantly whores. So funny

Basically the verdict was ...Well you have a good case sir but since you're a dirty old man I rule that it's ok for these 2 ADULTS to destroy your property.

[Timoteo]

Yep. So typical. She exhibits disgust with him and the arrangements (she tries to make him into a dirty old man), but she also chastized the girls, and tries to hold them accountable. Out of fairness, in court the plaintiff has the burden of proving the case, and the defense will try to expose the plaintiff in any way they can. However, the judge oversteps by attacking the founder of the site. The site isn't on trial. The "lifestyle" isn't on trial either. And how are they minors at 19 and 20? This case was about the judge's personal morality, and not about the law at all. She even forgave that one of them was going to use a false rape accusation to avoid responsibility for her actions. She gives them a bullshit admonishment about being responsible at the end, but let them get away with what they did. Yep. The Hamster was strong in this judge.

[Parlay44]

I like how the guy holds strong while the 2 whores giggle away.

[porscheguy]

This is about ratings. It's also what happens when a beta tries to manage his own harem and his harem revolts. But in the end, it's about ratings. They have to rule in a way that keeps the viewers happy.

[Parlay44]

(05-31-2012 12:31 PM)porscheguy Wrote:  

This is about ratings. It's also what happens when a beta tries to manage his own harem and his harem revolts. But in the end, it's about ratings. They have to rule in a way that keeps the viewers happy.

Well I found this on Youtube but it airs on public TV during the day. So the target audience is housewives, young girls and welfare moms. This is what women are being spoon fed during the day. This is what a man walks into after a hard day of supporting his family.

It's ok to be a whore.
Do whatever you want.
There are no consequences.
Men are always wrong.
A man will pay for everything.

Funny thing is if you repeat something enough times people will start to believe it.

[teh_skeeze]

Let me start off by saying that these type of shows went downhill after Judge Wapner on the People's Court. Judge Joe Brown gets a close second because he has an amazing bullshit detector. These female judges, and Judge Alex, are snarky as fuck (Alex is more of a smartass than snarky). I understand it's for entertainment purposes, but the least they can do is show some sort of courtroom manners. With that said here is my longwinded breakdown for those that don't want to watch.

Dude is beta to the max. You can tell right off the bat after the question of "was the sex involved?" The girls look disgusted and shake their heads no. The guy almost seems to be a bit embarrassed about it as well and says "I'd be lying if I said no" instead of an emphatic "you're damn right I fucked them". In his heart he knows he's a "creepy old man" and is ashamed to be talking about it. He's been at it for 12 years and the "Sugar Baby" is nothing more than a hooker that provides G.F.E.

The girls are sluts, they know it and they don't care, until it is their turn to be shamed. The first one starts off "I'm not a sugar baby I want to get that out there", which the judge immediately calls her out on. The second one doesn't even try to hide the fact that she's a slut. Instead her hamster goes for atonement: "I'm trying to stop going on the website. I'm trying to get a real job."

I thought it was funny when the judge starts to stroke their egos with "You are two articulate young women." I guess I could give the judge the benefit of the doubt, but I won't. These sluts said all of 5 sentences between the two of them, and not one intelligent thing came out of their mouths. I've had bowel movements more articulate than them combined.

After the first commercial break, it turns out that not only is he giving alcohol to underage drinkers, he's also having the 19yo (the taller one) take ecstasy. Now, I'm sure most of us have no moral qualms about the move (in fact if you go to the threesome thread you'll see my story), but he retorts with "they are the drug users, not me!" He's just moved from creepy p4p guy to guy that has no game so he uses drugs and alcohol to loosen young women up for sex (i.e. date rape).

A short word on ecstasy: Yes it can lower the inhibitions of women, but it is an amphetamine which will increase concentration. You have to be able to create a vibe that will make a girl feel more comfortable and make it more likely that you will get some quality naked time in. This guy clearly doesn't have that ability. I'd be willing to bet that it had the opposite effect, making her ask herself "What the hell am I doing?", and making her legs close tighter than a set of vice grips

So we get to the part of the story where our beta anti-hero takes his hookers to IHOP. He gives them $24 to split and tells them to make up the difference (this man really knows how to treat a hooker!). At this point it's obvious to even the most celibate of viewers that his intent was to slam two young pussies that night and it wasn't going to happen. So he starts with the passive aggressive silent treatment. When they confront him in the parking lot, he drives off and the 20 year old (the shorter one) starts screaming how she's going to tell everyone that he raped them. You can also see the low class attitude of these two whores start to come out. They are more agitated in their movement and aggressive in their speech pattern.

So the guy leaves and puts the girls' stuff behind a bush in front of her house. He knows that he's fucked up, and he's worried because he knows he can't handle it. So he parks his car two blocks away from his place. The girls at this point are on their way back to his place so the 20 year old can drop off the 19 year old. He pretends that he's not there when they bang on the windows, but leaves the door unlocked. They get scared when the door opens and they drive off. They find his car, park someplace else so that their car isn't near his, and vandalize it by scratching it with a corkscrew and slashing the tires.

The judge then asks the man if he called the cops. He said he did three times. The judge makes a snarky comment about "dangerous sugar babies" (I'm really starting to get annoyed with this, but I'm going to continue because I've already written so much). The cops were going to arrest the 20 year old, that's when she cried rape (at this point in our history, they should just have a "I'm a woman" defense like we have the Insanity Plea). My question is, where is the snarky comment from the judge? It's ok to make fun of a man who calls the police because his car was vandalized after they tried to enter his home without consent, but to call out a woman for lying to the police? That's where we have to draw the line.

The incident is over and both parties agree to not contact one another and to let bygones be bygones (the first smart move this man has made, you can tell he's a businessman). He then asks for compensation for the damage to his car. He also sends a letter to the 19 year old's mother. I'm ok with this move, I wonder where her father is because that would have been the better person to say "Hey look at how much of a slut your daughter is!"

At this point they show the invoice for the repairs and he's driving a 2009 Honda Accord. For a man that spends 50k on bitches a year, you'd think he'd splurge on a nicer car. I'm guessing this isn't the first time his car has been vandalized by a scorned hooker.

The cunt judge now scolds the man saying "these are consequences to this type of lifestyle." This is true and all, but has nothing to do with these two girls vandalizing property. If only "rape" victims were treated with the same contempt. Of course the peanut gallery starts clapping in agreement with the judge.

At this point, the judge says that one of the girls told a staff member of the program that if he was willing to walk away, they would be willing to spend time with him again. When she asks which one it was, both deny (shocker!). Once a hooker, always a hooker.

Now they bring out the founder of the website that the parties met on. I'm not going to go into it, because it has NOTHING to do with the case. Except maybe show the character of the girls and prove that they knew what they were getting into when they met this man. Actually, now that I'm watching it, the founder of the website has a solid business plan. Successful and generous men meeting with young and beautiful women in a "mutually beneficial" relationship. Of course the judge now spews her feminist bullshit at him with "I think it's important that girls go to school, get an education, and take care of themselves. Without having to rely on a man to do it." (Insert more clapping from the peanut gallery) Riiiiight, because we all see how that's been working out for society. A country full of middle management material with not enough of those jobs to go around. An education system that focuses on turning you into a parrot, instead of teaching real useful skills. Not only that, but these girls look and act as if they were destined to become waitresses or hairdressers. You go guuuurrl. The founder of the website doesn't slump or get defensive. He just smiles and says "Thank you, your honor" and walks off set. Brilliant!

The verdict: The judge now lambasts the plaintiff for seeking compensation for the damages done to his car. Which they ADMIT to doing. She calls him a sorry, pathetic, 47 year old man. She then says that she doesn't care that there were no laws broken, that the lifestyle that brought these consequences on him are not ok with her. She then says "because you are contributing to the delinquency of two MINORS (her stress not mine), I am not awarding you anything." She also threw a lot of in my book and in my world self centered, solipsistic language into her ruling. I don't feel like typing it out verbatim.

I'm sure this judge felt like she was making a ruling to "help" these girls out. All it has done is encouraged them to act like low class sluts until they hit the wall at warp speed and wonder what the fuck happened? I feel sorry for everyone that had to watch this video, to all the people who read this, and finally to myself for having taken up so much time writing this. May god have mercy on our souls.

tl;dr Preponderance of the evidence would suggest that these women should pay up. However, since we had a strong, empowered, and independent woman as the arbitrator, she ruled that the man is due nothing because he is a creepy old man. I think that if either (a) the arbitrator was a man, or (b) the plaintiff showed no remorse for his actions, the result would have been different.

[Saladin]

The dude's 47? He's aging badly. At first I thought he was late 50s.

Also, the judge seems to be harsh on the girls too to be fair.

edit- Judge is clearly biased towards the girls if you watch more of it.

[Saladin]

9:20 one of the girls said she wanted to yell rape.....

Just shows how casually women take something like false rape accusations.