Snopes on Life Support - Printable Version
+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Everything Else (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: Snopes on Life Support (/thread-63965.html)
+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Everything Else (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: Snopes on Life Support (/thread-63965.html)
Snopes on Life Support - The Beast1 - 07-24-2017
Found this deliciously ironic Gofundme page:
https://www.gofundme.com/savesnopes
Quote:Quote:
David Mikkelson
Dear Readers,
Snopes.com, which began as a small one-person effort in 1994 and has since become one of the Internet’s oldest and most popular fact-checking sites, is in danger of closing its doors. So, for the first time in our history, we are turning to you, our readership, for help.
Since our inception, we have always been a self-sustaining site that provides a free service to the online world: we've had no sponsors, no outside investors or funding, and no source of revenue other than that provided by online advertising. Unfortunately, we have been cut off from our historic source of advertising income.
We had previously contracted with an outside vendor to provide certain services for Snopes.com. That contractual relationship ended earlier this year, but the vendor will not acknowledge the change in contractual status and continues to essentially hold the Snopes.com web site hostage. Although we maintain editorial control (for now), the vendor will not relinquish the site’s hosting to our control, so we cannot modify the site, develop it, or — most crucially — place advertising on it. The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us.
Our legal team is fighting hard for us, but, having been cut off from all revenue, we are facing the prospect of having no financial means to continue operating the site and paying our staff (not to mention covering our legal fees) in the meanwhile.
As misinformation has increasingly threatened democracies around the world (including our own), Snopes.com has stood in the forefront of fighting for truth and dispelling misinformation online. It is vital that these efforts continue, so we are asking the Snopes.com community to donate what they can. (Our suggested donation is $10, but if you can give more please consider doing so — every little bit helps.)
We need our community now more than ever, as it is only through your support that Snopes.com can remain the community and resource we all know and love.
Sincerely yours,
Team Snopes.
Unfortunately, it seems to have broken the $100k mark from suckers who use the service. I wonder if Mickelson will use the money for more washed up whores.
Snopes on Life Support - YoungBlade - 07-24-2017
I hope Trump is the vendor. Then all the false articles can become fake news
Snopes on Life Support - Captainstabbin - 07-24-2017
Quote: (07-24-2017 03:20 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:
Found this deliciously ironic Gofundme page:
https://www.gofundme.com/savesnopes
Quote:Quote:
The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us.
Our legal team is fighting hard for us,
They can afford a "legal team" but can't pay their hosting fee? I'm guessing the real problem is that they were spending like crazy when traffic was up during the election and, now that it's tanked, they can't pay the bills coming in.
Looks like shilling for the Democrats doesn't pay as well as they hoped.
Snopes on Life Support - SamuelBRoberts - 07-24-2017
"We had previously contracted with an outside vendor to provide certain services for Snopes.com. That contractual relationship ended earlier this year, but the vendor will not acknowledge the change in contractual status and continues to essentially hold the Snopes.com web site hostage. Although we maintain editorial control (for now), the vendor will not relinquish the site’s hosting to our control, so we cannot modify the site, develop it, or — most crucially — place advertising on it. The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us. "
Sounds like there's a lot more to this story than this GoFundMe page is letting on.
Snopes on Life Support - zoom - 07-24-2017
They gave an outside source complete control of its hosting? Wow, what a dumb move.
Snopes on Life Support - eradicator - 07-24-2017
Quote: (07-24-2017 03:20 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:
Found this deliciously ironic Gofundme page:
https://www.gofundme.com/savesnopes
Quote:Quote:
David Mikkelson
Dear Readers,
Snopes.com, which began as a small one-person effort in 1994 and has since become one of the Internet’s oldest and most popular fact-checking sites, is in danger of closing its doors. So, for the first time in our history, we are turning to you, our readership, for help.
Since our inception, we have always been a self-sustaining site that provides a free service to the online world: we've had no sponsors, no outside investors or funding, and no source of revenue other than that provided by online advertising. Unfortunately, we have been cut off from our historic source of advertising income.
We had previously contracted with an outside vendor to provide certain services for Snopes.com. That contractual relationship ended earlier this year, but the vendor will not acknowledge the change in contractual status and continues to essentially hold the Snopes.com web site hostage. Although we maintain editorial control (for now), the vendor will not relinquish the site’s hosting to our control, so we cannot modify the site, develop it, or — most crucially — place advertising on it. The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us.
Our legal team is fighting hard for us, but, having been cut off from all revenue, we are facing the prospect of having no financial means to continue operating the site and paying our staff (not to mention covering our legal fees) in the meanwhile.
As misinformation has increasingly threatened democracies around the world (including our own), Snopes.com has stood in the forefront of fighting for truth and dispelling misinformation online. It is vital that these efforts continue, so we are asking the Snopes.com community to donate what they can. (Our suggested donation is $10, but if you can give more please consider doing so — every little bit helps.)
We need our community now more than ever, as it is only through your support that Snopes.com can remain the community and resource we all know and love.
Sincerely yours,
Team Snopes.
Unfortunately, it seems to have broken the $100k mark from suckers who use the service. I wonder if Mickelson will use the money for more washed up whores.
Yeah, I saw that they are certainly getting a lot of cash, will probably hit their goal within a week.
While it makes for a funny story, I won't lose sleep if they stay afloat, it seems like there is too much traffic for popular liberal sites like snopes or jezebel to shut down.
But yeah, why would they give outside control of their site over to someone else, so that someone else could make all of the advertiser money?
Snopes on Life Support - DarkTriad - 07-24-2017
Quote: (07-24-2017 05:48 PM)eradicator Wrote:
Quote: (07-24-2017 03:20 PM)The Beast1 Wrote:
Found this deliciously ironic Gofundme page:
https://www.gofundme.com/savesnopes
Quote:Quote:
David Mikkelson
Dear Readers,
Snopes.com, which began as a small one-person effort in 1994 and has since become one of the Internet’s oldest and most popular fact-checking sites, is in danger of closing its doors. So, for the first time in our history, we are turning to you, our readership, for help.
Since our inception, we have always been a self-sustaining site that provides a free service to the online world: we've had no sponsors, no outside investors or funding, and no source of revenue other than that provided by online advertising. Unfortunately, we have been cut off from our historic source of advertising income.
We had previously contracted with an outside vendor to provide certain services for Snopes.com. That contractual relationship ended earlier this year, but the vendor will not acknowledge the change in contractual status and continues to essentially hold the Snopes.com web site hostage. Although we maintain editorial control (for now), the vendor will not relinquish the site’s hosting to our control, so we cannot modify the site, develop it, or — most crucially — place advertising on it. The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us.
Our legal team is fighting hard for us, but, having been cut off from all revenue, we are facing the prospect of having no financial means to continue operating the site and paying our staff (not to mention covering our legal fees) in the meanwhile.
As misinformation has increasingly threatened democracies around the world (including our own), Snopes.com has stood in the forefront of fighting for truth and dispelling misinformation online. It is vital that these efforts continue, so we are asking the Snopes.com community to donate what they can. (Our suggested donation is $10, but if you can give more please consider doing so — every little bit helps.)
We need our community now more than ever, as it is only through your support that Snopes.com can remain the community and resource we all know and love.
Sincerely yours,
Team Snopes.
Unfortunately, it seems to have broken the $100k mark from suckers who use the service. I wonder if Mickelson will use the money for more washed up whores.
Yeah, I saw that they are certainly getting a lot of cash, will probably hit their goal within a week.
While it makes for a funny story, I won't lose sleep if they stay afloat, it seems like there is too much traffic for popular liberal sites like snopes or jezebel to shut down.
But yeah, why would they give outside control of their site over to someone else, so that someone else could make all of the advertiser money?
Because they're idiots?
Snopes on Life Support - ElFlaco - 07-25-2017
Quote: (07-24-2017 05:37 PM)zoom Wrote:
They gave an outside source complete control of its hosting? Wow, what a dumb move.
This is stupid, as you say, but surprisingly common. Tech-phobic customers think they can just delegate everything without knowing the basics, like domain registration. Actors do the same with their financial managers. Some YouTube stars don't even own their channel. Lazy!
Snopes on Life Support - Paracelsus - 07-25-2017
Be warned, some are saying the GoFundMe is a scam being used by the guy to fund a dirty divorce proceeding.
Snopes on Life Support - Leonard D Neubache - 07-25-2017
Eat.
Shit.
And.
Die.
Snopes on Life Support - Simeon_Strangelight - 07-26-2017
Those psycho propaganda workers have now raised over 600.000$
Either the leftist morons were gullible enough or the globalists stepped in to save their Pravda-workers - may the bullshit continue.
Snopes on Life Support - Atomic - 07-26-2017
Quote: (07-26-2017 12:07 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Those psycho propaganda workers have now raised over 600.000$
Either the leftist morons were gullible enough or the globalists stepped in to save their Pravda-workers - may the bullshit continue.
Let's face it, the SJW crowd is a target market that is ripe for the picking. A SJW and their virtue money are soon parted.
Snopes on Life Support - eradicator - 07-26-2017
Quote: (07-26-2017 12:07 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Those psycho propaganda workers have now raised over 600.000$
Either the leftist morons were gullible enough or the globalists stepped in to save their Pravda-workers - may the bullshit continue.
Shit, I thought it would take them a week to get that much, more like 2 days.
Snopes on Life Support - germanico - 07-26-2017
![[Image: tumblr_n2ioxxRG2B1qhhxd4o3_500.gif]](https://24.media.tumblr.com/14c5f88004efe208a40d6b96b3147e77/tumblr_n2ioxxRG2B1qhhxd4o3_500.gif)
Snopes on Life Support - TravelerKai - 07-26-2017
Those fuckers aren't going anywhere guys. This was like hoping Huffpost or Slate would go out of business. Too many idiot liberals, and clueless young people, rely and use those kinds of websites.
Snopes on Life Support - Simeon_Strangelight - 07-26-2017
Quote: (07-26-2017 02:40 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:
Those fuckers aren't going anywhere guys. This was like hoping Huffpost or Slate would go out of business. Too many idiot liberals, and clueless young people, rely and use those kinds of websites.
It's worse than that - the globalists need those kind of "independent" fact-checkers and "independent" newspapers like Huffpo to spout their nonsense and propaganda. They won't be closed even if they lose 100 mio. $ / year. It's like the former state Prawda - cost is irrelevant.
Snopes on Life Support - Aurini - 07-31-2017
Quote:Quote:
We had previously contracted with an outside vendor to provide certain services for Snopes.com. That contractual relationship ended earlier this year, but the vendor will not acknowledge the change in contractual status and continues to essentially hold the Snopes.com web site hostage. Although we maintain editorial control (for now), the vendor will not relinquish the site’s hosting to our control, so we cannot modify the site, develop it, or — most crucially — place advertising on it. The vendor continues to insert their own ads and has been withholding the advertising revenue from us.
Our legal team is fighting hard for us, but, having been cut off from all revenue, we are facing the prospect of having no financial means to continue operating the site and paying our staff (not to mention covering our legal fees) in the meanwhile.
I smell Gamma.
Snopes on Life Support - 911 - 07-31-2017
Quote: (07-26-2017 03:11 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Quote: (07-26-2017 02:40 PM)TravelerKai Wrote:
Those fuckers aren't going anywhere guys. This was like hoping Huffpost or Slate would go out of business. Too many idiot liberals, and clueless young people, rely and use those kinds of websites.
It's worse than that - the globalists need those kind of "independent" fact-checkers and "independent" newspapers like Huffpo to spout their nonsense and propaganda. They won't be closed even if they lose 100 mio. $ / year. It's like the former state Prawda - cost is irrelevant.
Exactly.
This is more or less a PR stunt, it lends Snopes an organic veneer for what is a deep state info outlet. They've built up a strong brand that normies flock to like sheep.