Politics & War Lounge - Printable Version
+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Everything Else (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-7.html)
+---- Forum: Politics (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-8.html)
+---- Thread: Politics & War Lounge (/thread-54551.html)
+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Everything Else (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-7.html)
+---- Forum: Politics (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-8.html)
+---- Thread: Politics & War Lounge (/thread-54551.html)
Politics & War Lounge - Leonard D Neubache - 05-11-2018
If he's got AIDS then it's obviously as laid back and lazy as he is.
Maybe the AIDS got infected with Snoop.
Politics & War Lounge - Once Was Not - 05-16-2018
Qatar paid 100 grand for the DC metro to stay open last night so capitals fans could get home. Oh and it's definitely because of the Qatar women's hockey team (hahaha) visiting the caps a couple times or something.
Completely normal, nothing weird about that at all, don't let this distract you from Russia being the only country you should be paying attention to. Russia: Bad. Qatar slave owners: good. Mmmkay?
Politics & War Lounge - Once Was Not - 05-17-2018
Quote: (05-11-2018 10:18 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:
I never understood the whole Snoop phenomenon in the first place. The prick has always looked like he has AIDS since first got on TV. You see clips of ghetto-bunnies draped over his skeletal figure and from another continent you can clearly sense the revulsion they must feel.
I don't know man, I don't really understand how any of today's modern trends came to be. All this pop culture and gangster rap shit doesn't make sense to me. It all has people looking, talking, and acting like fools and behaving like sheep. It's like pure undistilled degeneracy. How any of it ever registered with anyone is beyond me. Being a respectful human being with decency is just lame as fuck now. All our values and priorities and standards are ass backwards. And I just can no longer envision a reversal scenario where we right the ship before smashing head on into the iceberg. I really hope you're right and gen Z saves us.
Politics & War Lounge - Simeon_Strangelight - 05-22-2018
I came upon a good talk by AlternativeHypothesis who compares the Cargo Cults of the pacific to the modern cult of Racism which permeates academia fully.
Also interesting is the article here by Paul Craig Roberts who worked in the Reagan administration. I don't fully agree with him, but he raises some interesting points about the real history:
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/04...g-roberts/
Quote:Quote:
We often hear that we need a conversation on race. Considering that Americans are a brainwashed people living in a false history, such a conversation would resemble the one the Russians were expected to have with the British in regard to the Skripal poisoning: “Yes, we are guilty. We will pay reparations. Where would you like us to send Putin for trial?” In other words, the only acceptable race conversation in the US is one in which white people accept the accusation that they are racist and offer to make amends.
Considering that the only slavery experienced by any living black or white person is income tax slavery, race is an issue only because it has been orchestrated as an issue along with gender and sexual preference. These divisive issues are the products of Identity Politics spawned by cultural Marxism.
In real Marxism, conflict is class conflict. Workers and capitalists have different interests, and history is a struggle between material interests. The capitalist is the villain and the workers are the victims.
In the pseudo Marxism of Identity Politics, the white race is the villain, especially the white heterosexual male, and racial minorities, women, and homosexuals are the victims.
There is, of course, no such thing as a white or black race. There are many different nationalities of whites, and they have done a good job throughout history of killing each other. Similarly, there are many different black tribes and Asian ethnicities who also have fought more among themselves than with others. But all of this goes by the wayside, along with the fact that in the world the “racial minorities” are actually majorities and the “white majority” is actually a minority. There are more Chinese or Indians alone than there are white people.
But orchestrated histories are not fact-based.
The working class, designated by Hillary Clinton as “the Trump deplorables,” is now the victimizer, not the victim. Marxism has been stood on its head.
The American ruling class loves Identity Politics, because Identity Politics divides the people into hostile groups and prevents any resistance to the ruling elite. With blacks screaming at whites, women screaming at men, and homosexuals screaming at heterosexuals, there is no one left to scream at the rulers.
The ruling elite favors a “conversation on race,” because the ruling elite know it can only result in accusations that will further divide society. Consequently, the ruling elite have funded “black history,” “women’s studies,” and “transgender dialogues,” in universities as a way to institutionalize the divisiveness that protects them. These “studies” have replaced real history with fake history.
For example, it was once universally known that black slavery originated in slave wars between black African tribes. Slaves were a status symbol, but they accumulated beyond the capacity of tribes to sustain. The surplus was exported first to Arabs and then to English, Spanish, and French who founded colonies in the new world that had resources but no work force. The socialist scholar Karl Polanyi, brother of my Oxford professor Michael Polanyi, told the story of the origin of the African slave trade in his famous book, Dahomey and the Slave Trade.
The first slaves in the new world were white. When real history was taught, this was widely understood. Movies were even made that showed that in King George III’s England, the alternative to criminal punishment was to be sold as a slave in the colonies. See, for example:
Minute 5 where the redhead is to be sold as a slave in the colonies in the 17th century.
Minute 12 where the men are to be sold into slavery - all white - and no - it's not indentured servants.
Among the first New World lands to be exploited by the Europeans were the Carribean Islands, which were suitable for sugar and rice production. The problem was that the white slaves died like flies from malaria and yellow fever. The Spanish lack of success with a work force of natives of the lands they conquered led those in search of a work force to the slave export business of the black Kingdom of Dahomey. The demand for black workers rose considerably when it was discovered that many had immunity to malaria and resistance to yellow fever. This meant that a plantation’s investment in a work force was not wiped out by disease.
The resistance of blacks to malaria is due to the protective feature of the sickle cell trait that, apparently, only blacks have. See: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/biolog..._cell.html
Slavery existed in the New World long before the United States came into existence. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are today written off by Identity Politics as racists simply because they were born when slavery was a pre-existing institution.
Slavery had existed for many centuries prior to the Confederacy. Yet, in some accounts today one comes away with the impression that the South invented slavery. As the tale sometimes goes, Southern racists so hated blacks that they went to Africa, captured blacks at great expense, only to return them to the South where they whipped and abused their investments to the point of death and demoralized their work force by breaking up black families, selling children in one direction and wives and husbands in the other. This tale is not told as an occasional abuse but as the general practice. Economically, of course, it makes no sense whatsoever. But facts are no longer part of American history.
Northern states held slaves as well. However, the predominance of slaves were in the South. This was not because Southerners hated blacks. It was because the land in the South supported large agricultural cultivation, and there was no other work force. The South, like the United States, inherited slavery from the work force that European colonists purchased from the black Kingdom of Dahomey.
Why wasn’t there an alternative work force to slaves? The reason is that new immigrants by moving West could take land from the native Americans and be independent as opposed to being wage earners working on someone else’s land. The Western frontier did not close until about 1900. At the time of the War of Northern Aggression the Plains Indians still ruled west of the Mississippi River. It was Lincoln’s Northern war criminals, Sherman and Sheridan, who were sent to exterminate the Plains Indians. Ask the American natives, or what is left of them, who the racists are: the Northerners or the Southerners.
Black studies has even corrupted other aspects of history. Consider the so-called “civil war.” The name itself is an orchestration. There was no civil war. There was a War of Northern Aggression. A civil war is when two sides fight for control of the government. The South had left the union and had no interest whatsoever in controlling the government in Washington. The only reason the South fought was that the South was invaded by the North.
Why did the North invade the South? As was once understood by every historian and every student, Abraham Lincoln invaded the South in order, in Lincoln’s own words, expressed time and time again, “to preserve the Union.”
Why did the South leave the Union? Because it was being economically exploited by the North, which, once the North gained the ability to outvote the Southern states, imposed tariffs that benefited the North at the expense of the South. The North needed protection from British manufactures in order for the economic rise of the North. In contrast, the South’s economy was based on cotton exports to England and on cheap manufactures imported from England. Tariffs would bring the South higher cost of manufactured goods and retaliation against their cotton exports. The economic interests of the North and South did not coincide.
Slavery had nothing whatsoever to do with the war. Lincoln himself said so over and over. Prior to his invasion of the South, Lincoln and the Northern Congress promised the South Constitutional protection of slavery for all time if the Southern states would stay in the Union. Historians who have read and recorded the war correspondence of both Union and Confederacy soldiers to relatives and friends at home can find no one fighting for or against slavery. The Northern troops are fighting to preserve the union. The Southern ones are fighting because they are invaded.
Nothing could be clearer. Yet, the myth has been established that Abraham Lincoln went to war in order to free the slaves. In fact, Lincoln said that blacks were not capable of living with whites, who he said were superior, and that his intention was to send the blacks back to Africa. If America ever had a “white supremacist,” it was Abraham Lincoln.
What about the Emancipation Proclamation? Didn’t this order by Lincoln free the blacks? No. It was a war measure on which hopes were placed that, as almost every able-bodied Southern male was in the front lines, the slaves would revolt and rape the Southern soldiers’ wives and daughters, forcing the soldiers to desert the army and return home to protect their families. As Lincoln’s own Secretary of State said, the president has freed the slaves in the territories that the Union does not control and left them in slavery in the territory that the Union does control.
Why did Lincoln resort to such a dishonorable strategy? The reason is that Lincoln had run through all the Union generals and could not find one that could defeat Robert E. Lee’s vastly outnumbered Army of Northern Virginia.
The character and generalship of Robert E. Lee, who is dismissed by Identity Politics as a white racist, is so highly admired by the United States Army that the Barracks at West Point are named in Lee’s honor. Not even “America’s first black president” was able to change that. Black history also covers up the fact that Robert E. Lee was offered command of the Union Army. In those days Americans still saw themselves as citizens of their state, not as citizens of the US. Lee refused the offer on the grounds that he could not go to war against his native country of Virginia and resigned his US Army commission.
If Lee had been in command of the Confederacy at the First Battle of Bull Run when the Union Army broke and ran all the way back to Washington, Lee would have followed and the war would have ended with the South’s victory.
But Lee wasn’t there. Instead, the Southern generals concluded, watching the fleeing Union Army, that the Northerns could neither fight, retreat in order, or ride horses, and were no threat whatsoever. This conclusion overlooked the superior manpower of the North, the constant inflow of Irish immigrants who became the Union’s cannon fodder, the Northern manufacturing capability, and the navy that could block Southern ports and starve the South of resources.
During the first two years of the War of Northern Aggression the Union Army never won a battle against Lee’s vastly outgunned army. The North had everything. All the South had was valor. Lincoln was desperate. Opposition to his war was rising in the North. He had to imprison 300 Northern newspaper editors, exile a US Congressman, and was faced with the North’s most famous general running against him on a peace platform in the next election. Thus, Lincoln’s vain attempt to provoke a slave rebellion in the South. Why didn’t such allegedly horribly treated and oppressed slaves revolt when there was no one to prevent it but women and children?
Everything I have written in this column was once understood by everyone. But it has all been erased and replaced with a false history that serves the ruling elite. It is not only the ruling elite that has a vested interest in the false history of “white racism,” but also the universities and history departments in which the false history is institutionalized and the foundations that have financed black history, women’s studies, and transgender dialogues.
It was Reconstruction that ruined relations between blacks and whites in the South. The North stuffed blacks down the throats of the defeated South. Blacks were placed in charge of Southern governments in order to protect the Northern carpet baggers who looted and stole from the South. The occupying Union Army encouraged the blacks to abuse the Southern people, especially the women, as did the Union soldiers. The Klu Klux Klan arose as a guerrilla force to stop the predations. Robert E. Lee himself said that if he had realized how rapacious the North would prove to be, he would have led a guerrilla resistance.
The generations of Americans who have been propagandized instead of educated need to understand that Reconstruction did not mean rebuilding southern infrastructure, cities, and towns destroyed by the Union armies. It did not mean reconstructing southern food production. It meant reconstructing southern society and governance. Blacks, who were unprepared for the task, were put in control of governments so that carpetbaggers could loot and steal. Whites lost the franchise and protection of law as their property was stolen. Some areas suffered more than others from the Reconstruction practices, which often differed from, and were worse than, the policies themselves.
Reconstruction was a contentious issue even within the Republican Party. Neither president Lincoln nor Johnson would go along with the more extreme Republican elements. The extremism of the Reconstruction policies lost support among the northern people. When the Democrats regained control of the House of Representatives in the 1870s, Reconstruction was brought to an end.
In the South, and most certainly in Atlanta, where I grew up, schools were neighborhood schools. We were segregated by economic class. I went to school with middle class kids from my middle class neighborhood. I did not go to school with rich kids or with poor kids. This segregation was not racial.
When the North again got on its high moral horse and imposed school integration on the South, it disrupted the neighborhood school system. Now kids spent hours riding in school busses to distant locations. This destroyed the parent-teacher associations that had kept parental involvement and displinine in the schools. The South, being a commonsense people, saw all of this coming. The South also saw Reconstruction all over again. That, and not hatred of blacks, is the reason for the South’s resistance to school integration.
All of America, indeed of the entire West, lives in The Matrix, a concocted reality, except for my readers and the readers of a handful of others who cannot be compromised. Western peoples are so propagandized, so brainwashed, that they have no understanding that their disunity was created in order to make them impotent in the face of a rapacious ruling class, a class whose arrogance and hubris has the world on the brink of nuclear Armageddon.
History as it actually happened is disappearing as those who tell the truth are dismissed as misogynists, racists, homophobes, Putin agents, terrorist sympathizers, anti-semites, and conspiracy theorists. Liberals who complained mightily of McCarthyism now practice it ten-fold.
Politics & War Lounge - Simeon_Strangelight - 05-22-2018
Just saw this on my youtube feed.
Absolutely insane verdict.
6 and 14 years behind bars for a couple who drove up to a black children's party and called them names. Allegedly they threatened them with murder. And sure the cavalcade of cars is ominous, but still - there are no actions!
Seriously - I am not even disputing that threatening kids with murder should not be prosecuted, but 14 years and 6 years behind bars for the woman???????
This is exactly what I talked about in the post above - THE CARGO CULT OF RACISM.
What about the 3 kids who tortured that retarded white boy? What did they get for calling him racially motivated names and ACTUALLY TORTURING HIM?
![[Image: https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com...t&fit=crop]](https://imageproxy.themaven.net/https%3A%2F%2Fs3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com%2Fmaven-user-photos%2Fbluelivesmatter%2Fnews%2FCY07WDk2cUWMvF982dxlwQ%2FpkOrW3h9-0-xzl-VWQzJiw?w=684&q=75&h=359.1&auto=format&fit=crop)
IF you applied the same measure then this would merit 40 years behind bars or 60, because it followed actual actions and real torture!
By now one of the women is out free on probation. One of them got 3 years for actually not only kidnapping, threatening, filming and transmitting, but also stabbing and torturing an 18yo man.
OK - so if that gets you 3 years, then calling slurs and threatening should get you 1-2 months behind bars for both of them as a warning to not do stupid shit. Plus pay the disturbed kids 10.000$ so that they can have a good birthday party. Even the black mother publicly says that she forgives them - the shitheads did not realize in what country they were living. As Whites - they are the underclass now.
But instead they got 6 and 14 years for words while the other shitheads got 3 years for 50 times worse activities.
Sounds legit. Cargo Cult of Anti-White Anti-Western Racism confirmed. And by 2050 Whites will be a minority while the Racism Cargo Cult will be active. Shit - you better not live in the US in 30 years, when you get a reparations tax and get executed for looking at a noble non-White with a scowl.
Politics & War Lounge - Gray Beard - 05-22-2018
Quote: (05-22-2018 07:57 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
I came upon a good talk by AlternativeHypothesis who compares the Cargo Cults of the pacific to the modern cult of Racism which permeates academia fully.
Also interesting is the article here by Paul Craig Roberts who worked in the Reagan administration. I don't fully agree with him, but he raises some interesting points about the real history:
https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2018/04...g-roberts/
Quote:Quote:
We often hear that we need a conversation on race. Considering that Americans are a brainwashed people living in a false history, such a conversation would resemble the one the Russians were expected to have with the British in regard to the Skripal poisoning: “Yes, we are guilty. We will pay reparations. Where would you like us to send Putin for trial?” In other words, the only acceptable race conversation in the US is one in which white people accept the accusation that they are racist and offer to make amends.
Considering that the only slavery experienced by any living black or white person is income tax slavery, race is an issue only because it has been orchestrated as an issue along with gender and sexual preference. These divisive issues are the products of Identity Politics spawned by cultural Marxism.
In real Marxism, conflict is class conflict. Workers and capitalists have different interests, and history is a struggle between material interests. The capitalist is the villain and the workers are the victims.
In the pseudo Marxism of Identity Politics, the white race is the villain, especially the white heterosexual male, and racial minorities, women, and homosexuals are the victims.
There is, of course, no such thing as a white or black race. There are many different nationalities of whites, and they have done a good job throughout history of killing each other. Similarly, there are many different black tribes and Asian ethnicities who also have fought more among themselves than with others. But all of this goes by the wayside, along with the fact that in the world the “racial minorities” are actually majorities and the “white majority” is actually a minority. There are more Chinese or Indians alone than there are white people.
But orchestrated histories are not fact-based.
The working class, designated by Hillary Clinton as “the Trump deplorables,” is now the victimizer, not the victim. Marxism has been stood on its head.
The American ruling class loves Identity Politics, because Identity Politics divides the people into hostile groups and prevents any resistance to the ruling elite. With blacks screaming at whites, women screaming at men, and homosexuals screaming at heterosexuals, there is no one left to scream at the rulers.
The ruling elite favors a “conversation on race,” because the ruling elite know it can only result in accusations that will further divide society. Consequently, the ruling elite have funded “black history,” “women’s studies,” and “transgender dialogues,” in universities as a way to institutionalize the divisiveness that protects them. These “studies” have replaced real history with fake history.
For example, it was once universally known that black slavery originated in slave wars between black African tribes. Slaves were a status symbol, but they accumulated beyond the capacity of tribes to sustain. The surplus was exported first to Arabs and then to English, Spanish, and French who founded colonies in the new world that had resources but no work force. The socialist scholar Karl Polanyi, brother of my Oxford professor Michael Polanyi, told the story of the origin of the African slave trade in his famous book, Dahomey and the Slave Trade.
The first slaves in the new world were white. When real history was taught, this was widely understood. Movies were even made that showed that in King George III’s England, the alternative to criminal punishment was to be sold as a slave in the colonies. See, for example:
Minute 5 where the redhead is to be sold as a slave in the colonies in the 17th century.
Minute 12 where the men are to be sold into slavery - all white - and no - it's not indentured servants.
Among the first New World lands to be exploited by the Europeans were the Carribean Islands, which were suitable for sugar and rice production. The problem was that the white slaves died like flies from malaria and yellow fever. The Spanish lack of success with a work force of natives of the lands they conquered led those in search of a work force to the slave export business of the black Kingdom of Dahomey. The demand for black workers rose considerably when it was discovered that many had immunity to malaria and resistance to yellow fever. This meant that a plantation’s investment in a work force was not wiped out by disease.
The resistance of blacks to malaria is due to the protective feature of the sickle cell trait that, apparently, only blacks have. See: https://www.cdc.gov/malaria/about/biolog..._cell.html
Slavery existed in the New World long before the United States came into existence. George Washington and Thomas Jefferson are today written off by Identity Politics as racists simply because they were born when slavery was a pre-existing institution.
Slavery had existed for many centuries prior to the Confederacy. Yet, in some accounts today one comes away with the impression that the South invented slavery. As the tale sometimes goes, Southern racists so hated blacks that they went to Africa, captured blacks at great expense, only to return them to the South where they whipped and abused their investments to the point of death and demoralized their work force by breaking up black families, selling children in one direction and wives and husbands in the other. This tale is not told as an occasional abuse but as the general practice. Economically, of course, it makes no sense whatsoever. But facts are no longer part of American history.
Northern states held slaves as well. However, the predominance of slaves were in the South. This was not because Southerners hated blacks. It was because the land in the South supported large agricultural cultivation, and there was no other work force. The South, like the United States, inherited slavery from the work force that European colonists purchased from the black Kingdom of Dahomey.
Why wasn’t there an alternative work force to slaves? The reason is that new immigrants by moving West could take land from the native Americans and be independent as opposed to being wage earners working on someone else’s land. The Western frontier did not close until about 1900. At the time of the War of Northern Aggression the Plains Indians still ruled west of the Mississippi River. It was Lincoln’s Northern war criminals, Sherman and Sheridan, who were sent to exterminate the Plains Indians. Ask the American natives, or what is left of them, who the racists are: the Northerners or the Southerners.
Black studies has even corrupted other aspects of history. Consider the so-called “civil war.” The name itself is an orchestration. There was no civil war. There was a War of Northern Aggression. A civil war is when two sides fight for control of the government. The South had left the union and had no interest whatsoever in controlling the government in Washington. The only reason the South fought was that the South was invaded by the North.
Why did the North invade the South? As was once understood by every historian and every student, Abraham Lincoln invaded the South in order, in Lincoln’s own words, expressed time and time again, “to preserve the Union.”
Why did the South leave the Union? Because it was being economically exploited by the North, which, once the North gained the ability to outvote the Southern states, imposed tariffs that benefited the North at the expense of the South. The North needed protection from British manufactures in order for the economic rise of the North. In contrast, the South’s economy was based on cotton exports to England and on cheap manufactures imported from England. Tariffs would bring the South higher cost of manufactured goods and retaliation against their cotton exports. The economic interests of the North and South did not coincide.
Slavery had nothing whatsoever to do with the war. Lincoln himself said so over and over. Prior to his invasion of the South, Lincoln and the Northern Congress promised the South Constitutional protection of slavery for all time if the Southern states would stay in the Union. Historians who have read and recorded the war correspondence of both Union and Confederacy soldiers to relatives and friends at home can find no one fighting for or against slavery. The Northern troops are fighting to preserve the union. The Southern ones are fighting because they are invaded.
Nothing could be clearer. Yet, the myth has been established that Abraham Lincoln went to war in order to free the slaves. In fact, Lincoln said that blacks were not capable of living with whites, who he said were superior, and that his intention was to send the blacks back to Africa. If America ever had a “white supremacist,” it was Abraham Lincoln.
What about the Emancipation Proclamation? Didn’t this order by Lincoln free the blacks? No. It was a war measure on which hopes were placed that, as almost every able-bodied Southern male was in the front lines, the slaves would revolt and rape the Southern soldiers’ wives and daughters, forcing the soldiers to desert the army and return home to protect their families. As Lincoln’s own Secretary of State said, the president has freed the slaves in the territories that the Union does not control and left them in slavery in the territory that the Union does control.
Why did Lincoln resort to such a dishonorable strategy? The reason is that Lincoln had run through all the Union generals and could not find one that could defeat Robert E. Lee’s vastly outnumbered Army of Northern Virginia.
The character and generalship of Robert E. Lee, who is dismissed by Identity Politics as a white racist, is so highly admired by the United States Army that the Barracks at West Point are named in Lee’s honor. Not even “America’s first black president” was able to change that. Black history also covers up the fact that Robert E. Lee was offered command of the Union Army. In those days Americans still saw themselves as citizens of their state, not as citizens of the US. Lee refused the offer on the grounds that he could not go to war against his native country of Virginia and resigned his US Army commission.
If Lee had been in command of the Confederacy at the First Battle of Bull Run when the Union Army broke and ran all the way back to Washington, Lee would have followed and the war would have ended with the South’s victory.
But Lee wasn’t there. Instead, the Southern generals concluded, watching the fleeing Union Army, that the Northerns could neither fight, retreat in order, or ride horses, and were no threat whatsoever. This conclusion overlooked the superior manpower of the North, the constant inflow of Irish immigrants who became the Union’s cannon fodder, the Northern manufacturing capability, and the navy that could block Southern ports and starve the South of resources.
During the first two years of the War of Northern Aggression the Union Army never won a battle against Lee’s vastly outgunned army. The North had everything. All the South had was valor. Lincoln was desperate. Opposition to his war was rising in the North. He had to imprison 300 Northern newspaper editors, exile a US Congressman, and was faced with the North’s most famous general running against him on a peace platform in the next election. Thus, Lincoln’s vain attempt to provoke a slave rebellion in the South. Why didn’t such allegedly horribly treated and oppressed slaves revolt when there was no one to prevent it but women and children?
Everything I have written in this column was once understood by everyone. But it has all been erased and replaced with a false history that serves the ruling elite. It is not only the ruling elite that has a vested interest in the false history of “white racism,” but also the universities and history departments in which the false history is institutionalized and the foundations that have financed black history, women’s studies, and transgender dialogues.
It was Reconstruction that ruined relations between blacks and whites in the South. The North stuffed blacks down the throats of the defeated South. Blacks were placed in charge of Southern governments in order to protect the Northern carpet baggers who looted and stole from the South. The occupying Union Army encouraged the blacks to abuse the Southern people, especially the women, as did the Union soldiers. The Klu Klux Klan arose as a guerrilla force to stop the predations. Robert E. Lee himself said that if he had realized how rapacious the North would prove to be, he would have led a guerrilla resistance.
The generations of Americans who have been propagandized instead of educated need to understand that Reconstruction did not mean rebuilding southern infrastructure, cities, and towns destroyed by the Union armies. It did not mean reconstructing southern food production. It meant reconstructing southern society and governance. Blacks, who were unprepared for the task, were put in control of governments so that carpetbaggers could loot and steal. Whites lost the franchise and protection of law as their property was stolen. Some areas suffered more than others from the Reconstruction practices, which often differed from, and were worse than, the policies themselves.
Reconstruction was a contentious issue even within the Republican Party. Neither president Lincoln nor Johnson would go along with the more extreme Republican elements. The extremism of the Reconstruction policies lost support among the northern people. When the Democrats regained control of the House of Representatives in the 1870s, Reconstruction was brought to an end.
In the South, and most certainly in Atlanta, where I grew up, schools were neighborhood schools. We were segregated by economic class. I went to school with middle class kids from my middle class neighborhood. I did not go to school with rich kids or with poor kids. This segregation was not racial.
When the North again got on its high moral horse and imposed school integration on the South, it disrupted the neighborhood school system. Now kids spent hours riding in school busses to distant locations. This destroyed the parent-teacher associations that had kept parental involvement and displinine in the schools. The South, being a commonsense people, saw all of this coming. The South also saw Reconstruction all over again. That, and not hatred of blacks, is the reason for the South’s resistance to school integration.
All of America, indeed of the entire West, lives in The Matrix, a concocted reality, except for my readers and the readers of a handful of others who cannot be compromised. Western peoples are so propagandized, so brainwashed, that they have no understanding that their disunity was created in order to make them impotent in the face of a rapacious ruling class, a class whose arrogance and hubris has the world on the brink of nuclear Armageddon.
History as it actually happened is disappearing as those who tell the truth are dismissed as misogynists, racists, homophobes, Putin agents, terrorist sympathizers, anti-semites, and conspiracy theorists. Liberals who complained mightily of McCarthyism now practice it ten-fold.
A very interesting post. As a matter of principle, however, remember: 1. History is always written by the victors (Churchill); or, equivalently, history is always written by the ruling class. 2. As a result history, at least the version you learn in school, should be regarded as propaganda. 3. All of us are biased, no exception; some of us realize we are biased, some of us don't, but we all are. In other words, as long as we are human, such wars will persist.
Politics & War Lounge - RoastBeefCurtains4Me - 05-22-2018
All this racism and sexist bullshit is a shit test upon society on a grand scale. Unfortunately, the worse white knight pedestalizing beta is a natural PUA compared to the way western society has handled these shit tests.
The cargo cultists don't deserve to be sullied with a comparison with these pathetic excuses for humanity. The typical cargo cultist would consider your your typical SJW not even worthy of cooking and eating.
Politics & War Lounge - tawm - 05-23-2018
Semi-long time lurker, relative newcomer to this particular thread.
I'm glad to see more of Ryan Faulk and Sean Last's videos and articles on this board. I think they're both possessed of a sort of earnest intelligence and prime examples of how one should counter leftist idiocy. Faulk (Alt-Hype) is especially adept at hammering down the holistic connections to everything. The race videos were a shock to my initially Liberterian sensibilities, but frankly, I have found their work to be bulletproof and I think the "smarter" opposition members see this and do not engage or they attempt to deplatform him. It's brutal, salient truth backed up by scientific data and mature, thoughtful analysis (with just the right amount of humor and panache) that's in critically short supply.
Politics & War Lounge - Samseau - 05-23-2018
Quote: (05-22-2018 04:26 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
Just saw this on my youtube feed.
Absolutely insane verdict.
6 and 14 years behind bars for a couple who drove up to a black children's party and called them names. Allegedly they threatened them with murder. And sure the cavalcade of cars is ominous, but still - there are no actions!
Seriously - I am not even disputing that threatening kids with murder should not be prosecuted, but 14 years and 6 years behind bars for the woman???????
This is exactly what I talked about in the post above - THE CARGO CULT OF RACISM.
What about the 3 kids who tortured that retarded white boy? What did they get for calling him racially motivated names and ACTUALLY TORTURING HIM?
IF you applied the same measure then this would merit 40 years behind bars or 60, because it followed actual actions and real torture!
By now one of the women is out free on probation. One of them got 3 years for actually not only kidnapping, threatening, filming and transmitting, but also stabbing and torturing an 18yo man.
OK - so if that gets you 3 years, then calling slurs and threatening should get you 1-2 months behind bars for both of them as a warning to not do stupid shit. Plus pay the disturbed kids 10.000$ so that they can have a good birthday party. Even the black mother publicly says that she forgives them - the shitheads did not realize in what country they were living. As Whites - they are the underclass now.
But instead they got 6 and 14 years for words while the other shitheads got 3 years for 50 times worse activities.
Sounds legit. Cargo Cult of Anti-White Anti-Western Racism confirmed. And by 2050 Whites will be a minority while the Racism Cargo Cult will be active. Shit - you better not live in the US in 30 years, when you get a reparations tax and get executed for looking at a noble non-White with a scowl.
Beyond insane - but the laws in Georgia are probably 3-10 years for intending to murder someone, plus anti-discrimination laws, and the jury probably decided they were guilty of intent to murder. Must have been an all black jury or something, but the problem here is a combination of bad laws (way too much time for mere intent without any action) and a shit jury system - no one wants to do jury duty for criminal cases because it pays too little and takes away your life for 3-6 weeks.
The judicial system as a whole is shit, and the laws passed are shit.
Then on top of it, you have anti-White laws, police, and judges, carrying out full sentences against Whites but not Blacks who are given slaps on the wrist over and over until they finally kill someone.
Politics & War Lounge - Simeon_Strangelight - 05-23-2018
< I would like to add that I am not blaming blacks for the legal situation. They have their own cross to bear in that respect when Clinton penalized drug users heavily knowing that many blacks would be affected by that.
It's an ideology created by the globalists set to target White Western civilization and people - and the funny part is that they know that White Nationalism/Black Nationalism/Japanese Nationalism - any tribal nationalism - is the default state. So the only way to destroy that long-term is to make the people you want to destroy a minority among them.
Currently it's an ideology heavily penalizing anything that breaches the most important Western myths - RACISM/COLONIALISM/SLAVERY/HOLOCOUST. Those are currently the defining foundation myths of the West.
Politics & War Lounge - Dulceácido - 05-24-2018
...meanwhile, investigators have determined that there is now irrefutable information that concludes that Malaysia flight 17 shot down over eastern Ukraine was undoubtedly done by the Russians--right down to the unit who did it.
And then Rocha wept.
Politics & War Lounge - Fortis - 05-27-2018
Dudes are certainly waking up. One of closest friends just told me that he realized he is not a feminist recently. I'm SHOCKED since he's the poster boy for a liberal.
Politics & War Lounge - C-Note - 06-04-2018
SCOTUS just ruled, 7-2, in favor of the Christian baker in Colorado who was sanctioned for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple.
Politics & War Lounge - Simeon_Strangelight - 06-04-2018
Quote: (06-04-2018 11:46 AM)C-Note Wrote:
SCOTUS just ruled, 7-2, in favor of the Christian baker in Colorado who was sanctioned for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple.
Wise choice - any Christian organization could start 100 lawsuits of similar sort against Muslim bakers, because most of them are not making any gay cakes either.
Politics & War Lounge - Gray Beard - 06-04-2018
Quote: (06-04-2018 11:46 AM)C-Note Wrote:
SCOTUS just ruled, 7-2, in favor of the Christian baker in Colorado who was sanctioned for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple.
However, the ruling is very narrow because it hinges on the observation that the state did not treat the baker's religious beliefs fairly. Instead, there was evidence that the religious beliefs of the baker and their sincerity were treated disparagingly. In other words, there was a serious flaw in the process by which it was originally determined within Colorado that the baker was obligated to bake such a cake. If the Colorado decisions would have been based on careful weighing of the right of the public for access to an open market versus the right of the baker to live a life according to his religion, then SCOTUS might have made a different decision. The two supporting liberal justices would likely change sides and nobody knows what Justice Kennedy--who was originally expected by observers to be the tie-breaker--might have decided.
Politics & War Lounge - godfather dust - 06-05-2018
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-monsa...J00IZ?il=0
Bayer buys Monsanto - sell you fucked up food and the "medicine" to treat the resulting issues.
Politics & War Lounge - Easy_C - 06-05-2018
Quote: (06-05-2018 01:46 AM)godfather dust Wrote:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-monsa...J00IZ?il=0
Bayer buys Monsanto - sell you fucked up food and the "medicine" to treat the resulting issues.
That's called a "revenue synergy".
Politics & War Lounge - Enoch - 06-05-2018
Quote: (06-05-2018 01:46 AM)godfather dust Wrote:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-monsa...J00IZ?il=0
Bayer buys Monsanto - sell you fucked up food and the "medicine" to treat the resulting issues.
Why invent the cure for cancer when you can treat it for years?
Politics & War Lounge - Simeon_Strangelight - 06-07-2018
Evergreen state college admission numbers are dropping by as much as 30%.
The "no-whites-allowed" controversy surely backfired. This is a little micro-view into the future of what the US will look like with Whites being a minority, but a despised and blamed-for-everything minority.
You can count yourself lucky if it looks like Brazil - it probably will, because of the weapons collected by Whites, so a mass-genocide is unlikely. But the country should descend nicely into an assortment of shithole areas interrupted by segregated city-states.
Politics & War Lounge - Samseau - 06-07-2018
Quote: (06-07-2018 08:35 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
You can count yourself lucky if it looks like Brazil - it probably will, because of the weapons collected by Whites, so a mass-genocide is unlikely. But the country should descend nicely into an assortment of shithole areas interrupted by segregated city-states.
Still going to be 100x more livable than future Western Europe Islamic police states.
Politics & War Lounge - Simeon_Strangelight - 06-07-2018
Quote: (06-07-2018 01:00 PM)Samseau Wrote:
Quote: (06-07-2018 08:35 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:
You can count yourself lucky if it looks like Brazil - it probably will, because of the weapons collected by Whites, so a mass-genocide is unlikely. But the country should descend nicely into an assortment of shithole areas interrupted by segregated city-states.
Still going to be 100x more livable than future Western Europe Islamic police states.
Yeah - I expect war for sure in Europe, but it does not seem as if the European countries are taking this lying down. Muslim and African numbers are all well below 10% in Austria and Italy and Italy already elected a rather more right than Trump party into office.
The problem is of course the ageing demographics. In 20 years the numbers of Muslim and African males will be on the same level as the locals. Still - to the East there are 200 mio. Whites and a generally younger population. They are not going to go down easily. And their military led by grumpy gnarled men is not going to take marching orders from the EU forever.
Frankly I don't know which area will turn out worse - both are under tremendous attack with guys like Trump only slowing it down.
Politics & War Lounge - Suits - 06-08-2018
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/aus...spartanntp
Austria to close 7 mosques, expel imams in crackdown
Quote:Quote:
BERLIN — Austria's government said Friday that it is closing seven mosques and plans to expel imams in a crackdown on "political Islam" and foreign financing of religious groups.
Chancellor Sebastian Kurz said the government is shutting a hardline Turkish nationalist mosque in Vienna and dissolving a group called the Arab Religious Community that runs six mosques.
The actions by the government are based on a 2015 law that, among other things, prevents religious communities from getting funding from abroad. Interior Minister Herbert Kickl said the residence permits of around 40 imams employed by ATIB, a group that oversees Turkish mosques in Austria, are being reviewed because of concerns about such financing.
Kickl said that, in two cases, permits have already been revoked. Five more imams were denied first-time permits.
The conservative Kurz became chancellor in December in a coalition with the anti-migration Freedom Party.
In campaigning for last year's election, both coalition parties called for tougher immigration controls, quick deportations of asylum-seekers whose requests are denied and a crackdown on radical Islam. The government recently announced plans to ban girls in elementary schools and kindergartens from wearing headscarves, adding to existing restrictions on veils.
"Parallel societies, political Islam and tendencies toward radicalization have no place in our country," Kurz told reporters in Vienna. He added that the government's powers to intervene "were not sufficiently used" in the past.
Friday's measures are "a first significant and necessary step in the right direction," said Vice Chancellor Heinz-Christian Strache, the Freedom Party's leader. "If these measures aren't enough, we will if necessary evaluate the legal situation here or there."
Good to see that the leaders of one European country don't have their collective heads up their asses.
Politics & War Lounge - Simeon_Strangelight - 06-09-2018
It's like talking to a Lysenkoist.
She is a progressive woman born to a Harvard graduate father (pre affirmative action, so smart and industrious) who went to mostly White private schools and is proud of the fact that affirmative action gave her the opportunity to study at UCLA while her dad earned his way to Harvard.
On the other side is a conservative who grew up in the South making a living picking cotton. It was then a good job and he knew neighbors who could raise 12 kids off picking cotton and having their own fields later (kids all became lawyers, doctors etc.)
Either way - he did not grow up in privilege and got to know the South as it was - not a concoction of racist White devils, just people trying to survive. She grew up in privilege raised by a Harvard graduate father and complains about White Supremacy everywhere.
Bizarro world.
Politics & War Lounge - fokker - 06-13-2018
I don't know if this merits its own thread, but Macedonia and Greece have ended the naming dispute and it's now gonna be Northern Macedonia (Северна Македониjа):
Quote:ABC.net.au Wrote:
The prime ministers of Greece and Macedonia say they have agreed on "Republic of Northern Macedonia" as the new name for the Balkan country, ending a bitter 27-year dispute that had prevented the former Yugoslav republic from joining international institutions such as NATO.
Key points:
The new name will be used both domestically and internationally
Macedonia will also amend its constitution as part of the deal
The dispute over the "Macedonia" name had been a thorn in relations between the two countries at least since 1991
Greece's Alexis Tsipras and Macedonia's Zoran Zaev made the announcements shortly after speaking by phone.
The new name — which in Macedonian is Severna Makedonija — will be used both domestically and internationally, while Macedonia will also amend its constitution as part of the deal.
Greece had long demanded that Macedonia change or modify its name to avoid any claim to the territory and ancient heritage of Greece's northern region of Macedonia — birthplace of ancient warrior king Alexander the Great.
"There is no way back," Mr Zaev told a news conference as he explained the decision.
"We have been solving a two-and-a-half decade dispute … that has been drowning the country," he said, adding that the deal "will strengthen the Macedonian identity".
Mr Tsipras said the deal dictates "a clear distinction between Greek Macedonia and our northern neighbours".
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-13/ma...ia/9862810
Politics & War Lounge - C-Note - 06-15-2018
The neighbor who attacked Rand Paul received a felony conviction and 30 days in jail. Apparently, the guy didn't like it that Paul was stacking yard debris next to their shared property line.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/06/...rison.html
Quote:Quote:
The neighbor convicted of violently attacking Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul outside the senator's Kentucky home last year was sentenced Friday to 30 days in federal prison.
Rene Boucher, 59, was also ordered Friday to one year of supervised release, a $10,000 fine and 100 hours of community service, according to WBKO. He was also ordered to have no contact with the Paul family.
"No one deserves to be violently assaulted,” Paul said in a statement Friday. “A felony conviction with jail time is appropriate and hopefully will deter the attacker from further violence. I commend the FBI and Department of Justice for treating this violent, pre-meditated assault with the seriousness it deserves."
Paul also said he thinks Boucher should face a longer sentence: "The original 21 month sentence requested would have been the appropriate punishment."
The attack left the Republican lawmaker with six broken ribs. His recovery was complicated by fluid and blood around the lungs and recurrent pneumonia.
Boucher pleaded guilty in March to a federal charge of assaulting a member of Congress. Boucher had asked for probation.
The senator told police that the incident occurred when his “neighbor came onto his property and tackled him from behind, forcing him to the ground and causing pain.”
Boucher claimed he tackled Paul over agitation about piles of brush on Paul’s property. Boucher also claims Paul used his lawnmower – on the same day as the attack – and blew some leaves onto his property, sparking his outrage.
But the senator's office pushed back against the notion the neighbors had an ongoing dispute.
“There was no ‘longstanding dispute.’ This description is untrue,” a spokesman for Paul said. “It is impossible to have a dispute when no words of disagreement were ever spoken -- neither immediately nor at any other time before the attack occurred.”