Roosh V Forum
Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Printable Version

+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Everything Else (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW (/thread-42125.html)

Pages: 1 2 3


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - MVH - 11-07-2014

I did not know Keira Knightly had a double mastectomy. She is so brave.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Paracelsus - 11-07-2014

Quote: (11-07-2014 03:07 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  

Is that Keira Knightly or Michael Jackson?

How dare you.



Michael Jackson tried to solve his problems with his appearance.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Menace - 11-07-2014

Am I really the only one who thinks that body type is sexy? You guys are full of t&a privilege!


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - AnonymousBosch - 11-07-2014

Quote: (11-07-2014 01:24 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

Quote: (11-07-2014 01:22 PM)Sonsowey Wrote:  

I am posing naked today to prove that blah blah blah

"I'm hitting the wall soon, so I'd like to attention whore as much as I can"

First thing I noticed, despite the black and white photography and hair trying to obscure her skin and face, was that her beauty has clearly peaked.

Looked up her age: 29. This is my reliable age for when they start to notice it.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - The Father - 11-07-2014

Quote: (11-07-2014 01:22 PM)SteveMcMahon Wrote:  

Variety is the spice of tits.

LOL!


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Sombro - 11-07-2014

Keira Knightly: Dead Man's Chest


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - aphelion - 11-07-2014

We saw her tits ten years ago. They were great then. Still great. But she's not exactly covering uncharted territory here.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Sourcecode - 11-07-2014

Put your hand over her face in the picture and she literally had all the features of a 12 year old boy.
Straight shoulders, Bird chest , straight hips


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - kazz - 11-08-2014

what an anticlimax


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Mekorig - 11-08-2014

[Image: boobs-that-awkward-moment-when-you-reali...o-you1.jpg]


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - aphelion - 11-08-2014

I would smash the ever loving bajeezus out of that girl on the right. Hold me back.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Aliblahba - 11-08-2014

I'd get Keira Knightly preggers just to have living genetic proof I was up in that manky. True story.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Kabal - 11-08-2014

Quote: (11-07-2014 08:02 PM)Sombro Wrote:  

Keira Knightly: Dead Man's Chest

"Keira Knightley is a pirate's nightmare, a sunken chest and no booty"


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - DrewP - 11-08-2014

So what's the point here, that photoshopped models cause society to have 'unrealistic expectations' of women's bodies? Horse shit.

Try putting a chick half as attractive as Keira Knightley on OKCupid. She'll receive roughly 49572390478503948 messages in week 1, and probably conclude none of those guys are good enough for her. Yet it's women who supposedly have to live up to an unrealistic ideal?


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Helmutnl - 11-08-2014

Quote: (11-08-2014 10:19 AM)Mekorig Wrote:  

[Image: boobs-that-awkward-moment-when-you-reali...o-you1.jpg]

Aren't those Russian girls?
Keira is atrociously skinny!


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Veloce - 11-08-2014

Goddamn, Page 1 of this thread is hammer after hammer of gold comments. It's like watching Germany pummel Brasil all over again.

Edit: Looked at the photo some more. And some more. I stared at it.

I might actually have a hard time getting it up for her. I'm not sure how our chemistry would be in person but she exudes zero sexuality whatsoever.

She's too..."model"-y, like how professional models are held up as this pinnacle of beauty but most of them are about as sexual as a rock.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - StrikeBack - 11-08-2014

They're already photoshopping that pic: black & white, clear skin, etc. why don't they add some booty and boobs while they're at it?


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - eradicator - 05-19-2015

In her prime, she was extremely hot, but that was over a decade ago(of course in pirates of the caribean she was all made up).

The wall hit her at full speed, sadly.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Easy_C - 05-19-2015

A more accurate title would be:

Keira Knightly Poses Nude and then claims itts to "prove" women don't need photoshop because otherwise nobody would care that she posed nude


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - The Father - 05-19-2015

"Knightley told The Times she demanded the (not safe for work) photos be unedited so people could see what she really looked like."

I would like to see more of what she really looks like. Her labia, for example. Purplish? Pink? Droopy or neat? Clit protrudes?

Hey she put it out there...


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Parlay44 - 05-19-2015

I see some vagina yogurt recipes in her future.
[Image: catlady.gif]


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - philosophical_recovery - 05-19-2015

Hmm.

I've banged a few gals with tits that small. They were all 10 years younger than her with better bottoms (and hairy pussies!), except one my age with an athletic build and shapely ass. Small tits are forgivable, and I love it when pretty young things with small ones go braless because they don't need support, giving you that wonderful glimpse down their neckline and onto their pert nipples. I'll take a small titted girl over a big titted girl 7 out of 10 times, depending on my need to squeeze and titfuck at the moment. Small titties typically can take a lot more roughhousing than big ones, the big tittied girls always complain when I bite them too hard or give them too firm a squeeze. The less busty gals just squeal and take it like champs.

Her narrow waist, though, that's unforgiveable and can be improved. Narrow and muscular is fine, but no plump in the rump is a grave disappointment.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Gmac - 05-19-2015

Makes me wonder if some of you dudes have actually dated women and seen them without makeup. Welcome to Earth.

And that Keira Knightly photo makes me wonder what the hell she was thinking... it's like she's modeling the part of the outfit she isn't wearing... No thanks.


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - Tengen - 05-19-2015

[Image: 337ddc2b2655219ee77ec4c8d5b288d5.jpg]


Keira Knightly Poses Nude To "Prove" Women Don't Need Photoshop NSFW - eljeffster - 05-20-2015

Quote: (11-07-2014 12:52 PM)MantisToboggan Wrote:  

In another act of first-world deluded fem-bravery Keira Knightly, who probably weighs 100 lbs. on a fat day and has a super model face poses nude to show "the man" that she (and women in general) don't need no photo shop.

I may be wrong but if I remember correctly I think Bruce Willis' daughter was walking around topless in NYC to show the world how "strong" she was, a few months back, and promptly ended up in rehab a few weeks later.

http://time.com/3559286/keira-knightley-...photoshop/

Nude pic here: http://capitalismisfreedom.com/wp-conten...ess-01.jpg



It ain't nude if you don't see the {(.)}