Roosh V Forum
Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Printable Version

+- Roosh V Forum (https://rooshvforum.network)
+-- Forum: Main (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Everything Else (https://rooshvforum.network/forum-7.html)
+--- Thread: Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. (/thread-21066.html)

Pages: 1 2


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Ziltoid - 02-24-2013

Just kidding.






Would it be considered rude to ask somebody their gender?
What if you legit can't tell...?


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Tuthmosis - 02-24-2013

[Image: wtf.jpg]







Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - cardguy - 02-24-2013

Here is a game I play.

Whenever I see a disgusting troll walking down the street - or am passing one in the corridor at work.

I look at their left hand. And if I see a wedding ring I always smile to myself. Knowing there is a guy out there who has that to look forward to that evening.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Wool Suit - 02-24-2013

We broke evolution.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Hades - 02-24-2013

At the least she seems friendly. I don't care if the barista is androgynous as long as he isn't an asshole.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Emancipator - 02-24-2013

The recent Proctor and Gamble commercials massadspam since the Olympics have been annoying me with their phony "WOMANS SO AWESOME, MEN SUCKS"







Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - cibo - 02-24-2013

So the marketing strategy here is to confuse me so much I don't realize I'm overpaying for shitty coffee?


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - cardguy - 02-24-2013

I had to watch this advert again to try and forget about the one above:







Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Mekorig - 02-24-2013

Wait, the barista at the OP comercial was a she? Shitze....what chemicals do to a human body...


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - void - 02-24-2013

this isnt a man?


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Bacchus - 02-24-2013

It reminds me of the Sherminator from American Pie.

[Image: 982a4d4dcb4b1780a9a4bcd7716b6271.jpg]


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Ziltoid - 02-24-2013

I've re-watched this video a couple times now, analyzing it...
I can say with absolutely zero sarcasm that if it weren't for "her" name, I would have thought this was a guy. Am I the only person who sees purely masculine body language here?


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - RandalGraves - 02-24-2013

Well played, Ziltoid.

[Image: gets-the-joke.gif]


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Hannibal - 02-24-2013

I didn't know eunuchs were back in style.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Tuthmosis - 02-24-2013

The real question is:

Would you bang, if it meant that you got free Starbucks coffee for the rest of life--for you and your "fave 5"? No patries, sandwiches, or other shit is included in the deal, though.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - agorist - 02-24-2013

Quote: (02-24-2013 11:15 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

The real question is:

Would you bang, if it meant that you got free Starbucks coffee for the rest of life--for you and your "fave 5"? No patries, sandwiches, or other shit is included in the deal, though.
Put a bag over her head and do your business.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Handsome Creepy Eel - 02-25-2013

Fuck you, Ziltoid [Image: lol.gif]

@Tuth: I love banging those feminine-looking guys in the ass.

Just kidding.

[Image: troll.gif]


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Basil Ransom - 02-25-2013

In addition to being totally sexually ambiguous, she doesn't even look human; she has a lifeless, alien, corpse-like appearance.

There are other androgynes that are at least attractive, eg the boy model who looks like a girl, Andrej Pejic [this is one of his manliest photos - he looks a lot more like a girl in his other ones]

[Image: l-FL6sZu2972T4Ews5.jpg]


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Lemmo - 02-25-2013

She could grow out her hair and put on some make-up and look like a chick. So she isn't entirely a victim of genetics (although obviously she shouldn't be on TV).


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - kosko - 02-25-2013

Quote: (02-24-2013 09:35 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

[Image: wtf.jpg]




SNL would never get away with that stuff nowadays.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - username - 02-25-2013

I watched the video without sound first and was convinced it was a man. When I un-muted it then I realize it was a woman, I think.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Double Salad - 02-25-2013

[Image: 3t4uxp.jpg]


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - thebassist - 02-25-2013

Quote: (02-24-2013 10:12 PM)Hades Wrote:  

At the least she seems friendly. I don't care if the barista is androgynous as long as he isn't an asshole.

Exactly. As long as they don't have any kind of negative personality characteristics, and as long as they don't affect me in any way, they can do, or be, any way they want to and I won't care. And that counts for everyone.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Parlay44 - 02-25-2013

I've gotten to the point where I only shop at places that have pretty women as servers or at the register.


Starbucks uses traditionally feminine, sexy woman for commercial. - Roosh - 02-25-2013

Quote: (02-24-2013 11:15 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

The real question is:

Would you bang, if it meant that you got free Starbucks coffee for the rest of life--for you and your "fave 5"? No patries, sandwiches, or other shit is included in the deal, though.

There are a lot of international Starbucks locations. $3 a day cappucino habit is $1000 a year. That's $25,000 easy in a lifetime.

Nah I wouldn't bang.

By the way, this question reminds me of the Seinfeld episode where Kramer makes a deal to get free macchiatos instead of suing the cafe that burned him with extra hot coffee.