rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

https://historyinlivingcolor.files.wordp....jpg?w=670


Here's Annie in color.
Change things for you?
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

^^ I do not think it is a good idea to cheat on this woman.

Only three ways to do something: "The right way. The wrong way. Or my way. Obviously my way is best."
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

^^^Cool, is that a Mossberg Shcokwave?!

"Intellectuals are naturally attracted by the idea of a planned society, in the belief that they will be in charge of it" -Roger Scruton
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

A Mexican tribe chick:
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Too much makeup.

That's not how we do things in Russia, comrade.

http://inspiredentrepreneur.weebly.com/
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

[Image: hot-race-girls.jpg]
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Does not belong in the "would you hit it thread". Much better for the "pick one thread". They are all highly bangable. Just love the green suits.

#1 has a great smile and lovely eyes. I pick her.
#5 looks nice too.

Only three ways to do something: "The right way. The wrong way. Or my way. Obviously my way is best."
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

All of them can get it.

I pick the banging blonde 4th from the left.

Perfect tits with no bra, she's wants something and I'm happy to oblige.

Middle has a really nice hourglass figure though & probably overall the best body, with #1 to the left close second.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

If my combinatorics math is right there are 5×4 = 20 possible combinations of threesomes with these five hotties in green. :-)
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Quote: (12-14-2018 11:50 AM)Long Haired Samson Wrote:  

If my combinatorics math is right there are 5×4 = 20 possible combinations of threesomes with these five hotties in green. :-)

There are 10 possible combinations for a threesome. It would be 20 if the order in which they appeared in the threesome mattered.

Edit: whilst I would bang all of them, number 5 would be my first choice.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Quote: (11-24-2018 11:35 PM)BlackFriar Wrote:  

Thunder hips?

Who is this woman?

Id would take her to a nice dinner at TGI Fridays, where I would insist that only the first round of the cheapest alcoholic choice will be on me. Then I would take her back to her place, ask to use her bathroom, suggest another beer, make out for about one Journey song, unzip her pants and then fuck her doggy with a semi-limp dick because "I am not into cellulite".
Then I would come on her face and be all weirded out and not kiss her even though she took a shower.

I would call her a couple of times after that then ghost on her and place the blame on her telling her that "she always seemed to be busy" when I bump into her at the supermarket 2 years after.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

bloody hell, how are those women in those green suits!
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Reptile girl?
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

No.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

The one on the right (some random brit chicks from dailymail)
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Would bang thickie, on left.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

[Image: attachment.jpg40931]   

Not a trap I swear
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

^Thin, no visible tatoo, no cunt attitude, feminine pose and clothes...what's the catch then?
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Quote: (12-27-2018 03:42 AM)Latan Wrote:  

^Thin, no visible tatoo, no cunt attitude, feminine pose and clothes...what's the catch then?

Well I thought short hair might be a big red flag for some. Combined with the flat chest she almost has effeminate man vibes (also why I put the "not a trap" statement since I know those aren't allowed).

Anyway she'd get the WB from me.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Quote: (12-27-2018 03:42 AM)Latan Wrote:  

^Thin, no visible tatoo, no cunt attitude, feminine pose and clothes...what's the catch then?
Looks like a man in a wig.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Quote: (12-20-2018 03:07 AM)Filbert Wrote:  

The one on the right (some random brit chicks from dailymail)

Um... here is my rule on fat chicks. If you are not entirely sure you can find her pussy on the first attempt... hard pass. If you have to move her gut out of the way to access her pussy... you shouldn't even be considering it.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Quote: (12-20-2018 03:07 AM)Filbert Wrote:  

The one on the right (some random brit chicks from dailymail)
[Image: attachment.jpg40880]
attachment.php?aid=40880

I would definitely bang the girl on the left. Love thick girls.
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

There is no "thick", there is no voluptuous, rubenesque, healthy, etcetera. There is only fat, coupled with thirst and societal brainwashing that this sloppiness is somehow acceptable and a "preference."
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

Quote: (12-27-2018 12:44 PM)MMM Wrote:  

There is no "thick", there is no voluptuous, rubenesque, healthy, etcetera. There is only fat, coupled with thirst and societal brainwashing that this sloppiness is somehow acceptable and a "preference."

Fat is well...fat. Basically an amorphous blob of excessive fatty tissue everywhere on the body. I make the distinction between fat and "thick" by defining thick as a girl with big thighs/ass but a relatively normal sized waste/torso. Most larger women simply have an incredibly unflattering amount of fat with no muscle whatsoever... but the ones that manage to have relatively tiny waists/torsos and big asses/thighs are the sexiest things to walk the planet. Usually it's because they have actual muscle in that region as opposed to incredibly lucky fat distribution.



[Image: ee3Wcam.jpg]

To me that's a 10/10 body and the epitome of "thick".
Reply

The Would you Hit It thread [Contains NSFW Material]

^ That's a whole lot of baby fat right there. That one's built for heavy work. Hook up a plow to that bitch. Would I hit it? Hell yes, and hate myself afterwards.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)