Quote: (10-05-2018 10:24 PM)Garuda Wrote:
A place in Himachal Pradesh has become a hippie killing zone.
https://roadsandkingdoms.com/2017/death-...pie-trail/
See guys? It's not all bad.
Quote: (10-05-2018 10:24 PM)Garuda Wrote:
A place in Himachal Pradesh has become a hippie killing zone.
https://roadsandkingdoms.com/2017/death-...pie-trail/
Quote: (10-05-2018 04:58 PM)iop890 Wrote:
Another one of these fucking India threads? Why is it always India that starts the racial arguments these days?
Quote:Quote:
What is the chronological order of foreign invasion of India?
(1500 BC) Aryan invasion of a Sanskrit-speaking people who laid the foundations of Vedic culture in North India. (The historical validity of this hypothesis is disputed. So, take this with a pinch of salt.)
(518 BC) Achaemenid (Persian/Iranian) invasion of the Indus Valley under King Darius I.
(326 BC) Greek invasion led by Alexander of Macedonia.
(200 BC to 300 AD) Incursions of Indo-Greeks, Scythians, Parthians, Kushanas from Central Asia and establishment of their kingdoms in North and Northwestern India after the fall of the Mauryan Empire. Many of them, however, integrated into the Indian society, so although the initial invasions can be called ‘foreign,’ they gradually became Indian.
(Late 5th and early 6th century AD) - Huna Invasion during the later phases of the Guptas. They were also a nomadic tribe from the Central Asian steppe.
Arab conquest of Sindh (712 AD) under Mohammad Bin Qasim. However, there was no Arab incursion into the mainland of India.
(Circa 1000 AD) Ghaznavid raids under Mahmud of Ghazni - main motive was plunder.
(1194 AD) Ghurid invasion led by Mu'izz ad-Din Muhammad Ghori and the subsequent establishment of the Delhi Sultanate - main motive was not plunder, but empire building. This period saw a confluence of cultures and the emergence of an Indo-Islamic culture that would later become the crown-jewel of Indian pluralism and multiculturalism under the Mughals.
(1398) Invasion of Tamerlane (Timur) that broke the back of the Tughluq rule.
(1526) Mughal invasion led by Babur - a Timurid prince, against the Delhi Sultanate under Ibrahim Lodi. The Mughals too adopted Indian culture and added their own contribution to it, taking Indo-Islamic culture to its climax. Babur may have been from Central Asia, but his descendants were born and bred in India. In fact, the Later Mughals undisputedly considered themselves as Indian. So, the use of the term ‘foreign’ with Mughals other than Babur or maybe Humayun, is factually wrong.
(16th century) Portugese conflicts with Bijapuri Sultans etc over select coastal regions of Peninsular India e.g the capture of Goa in 1510 by Alfonso de Albuquerque. Other European powers like the French, the Dutch and the Danes followed after this, but their primary motive was trade and monopoly rather than an all-India conquest.
1739 Invasions of Nadir Shah of Persia and subsequent invasions from 1748 to 1767 by Ahmed Shah Abdali.
(1757–1857) British conquest of India. This wasn’t an overnight invasion but a protracted contest for power between the British East India Company and Indian rulers like the Bengal Sultans, the Mysore State under Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan, the Marathas, the Sikhs, the Awadh Nawabs and the Later Mughals as well as with European rivals in India such as the French, the Danes, the Dutch etc.
Quote: (10-07-2018 11:20 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:
They will get there one day, but first world systems for example require an avg. IQ of 97 to work - which explains why despite the constant government campaigns of creating at least latrines, the field shitting continues. Every European settler created an outhouse as one of the first things - and that was centuries ago. This kind of awareness is not difficult for some, but obviously currently are beneath them.
Quote: (10-07-2018 12:36 PM)Garuda Wrote:
Quote: (10-07-2018 11:20 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:
They will get there one day, but first world systems for example require an avg. IQ of 97 to work - which explains why despite the constant government campaigns of creating at least latrines, the field shitting continues. Every European settler created an outhouse as one of the first things - and that was centuries ago. This kind of awareness is not difficult for some, but obviously currently are beneath them.
The upper castes resist using the latrines because still see emptying them as the work of the lowest. However, the lowest refuse to do it because they see it as a modern reminder of centuries of oppression. So latrines have ended up as storage rooms.
The government is better off building an army of robots just for the task.
Quote: (10-06-2018 08:23 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:
Quote: (10-05-2018 04:58 PM)iop890 Wrote:
Another one of these fucking India threads? Why is it always India that starts the racial arguments these days?
Quote:Quote:
What is the chronological order of foreign invasion of India?
(1500 BC) Aryan invasion of a Sanskrit-speaking people who laid the foundations of Vedic culture in North India. (The historical validity of this hypothesis is disputed. So, take this with a pinch of salt.)
(518 BC) Achaemenid (Persian/Iranian) invasion of the Indus Valley under King Darius I.
(326 BC) Greek invasion led by Alexander of Macedonia.
(200 BC to 300 AD) Incursions of Indo-Greeks, Scythians, Parthians, Kushanas from Central Asia and establishment of their kingdoms in North and Northwestern India after the fall of the Mauryan Empire. Many of them, however, integrated into the Indian society, so although the initial invasions can be called ‘foreign,’ they gradually became Indian.
(Late 5th and early 6th century AD) - Huna Invasion during the later phases of the Guptas. They were also a nomadic tribe from the Central Asian steppe.
Arab conquest of Sindh (712 AD) under Mohammad Bin Qasim. However, there was no Arab incursion into the mainland of India.
(Circa 1000 AD) Ghaznavid raids under Mahmud of Ghazni - main motive was plunder.
(1194 AD) Ghurid invasion led by Mu'izz ad-Din Muhammad Ghori and the subsequent establishment of the Delhi Sultanate - main motive was not plunder, but empire building. This period saw a confluence of cultures and the emergence of an Indo-Islamic culture that would later become the crown-jewel of Indian pluralism and multiculturalism under the Mughals.
(1398) Invasion of Tamerlane (Timur) that broke the back of the Tughluq rule.
(1526) Mughal invasion led by Babur - a Timurid prince, against the Delhi Sultanate under Ibrahim Lodi. The Mughals too adopted Indian culture and added their own contribution to it, taking Indo-Islamic culture to its climax. Babur may have been from Central Asia, but his descendants were born and bred in India. In fact, the Later Mughals undisputedly considered themselves as Indian. So, the use of the term ‘foreign’ with Mughals other than Babur or maybe Humayun, is factually wrong.
(16th century) Portugese conflicts with Bijapuri Sultans etc over select coastal regions of Peninsular India e.g the capture of Goa in 1510 by Alfonso de Albuquerque. Other European powers like the French, the Dutch and the Danes followed after this, but their primary motive was trade and monopoly rather than an all-India conquest.
1739 Invasions of Nadir Shah of Persia and subsequent invasions from 1748 to 1767 by Ahmed Shah Abdali.
(1757–1857) British conquest of India. This wasn’t an overnight invasion but a protracted contest for power between the British East India Company and Indian rulers like the Bengal Sultans, the Mysore State under Haider Ali and Tipu Sultan, the Marathas, the Sikhs, the Awadh Nawabs and the Later Mughals as well as with European rivals in India such as the French, the Danes, the Dutch etc.
India is a young country, barely 50 years old, as an independent nation. All new countries are fiercely nationalistic, which often seems to go a little overboard to outsiders with a longer, more secure national identity.
The historical fact of India is one of being ruled over by outsiders, just about all outsiders: Indo-Europeans, Greeks, Arabs, Turks, Persians, Mongols. Everyone had a go at India. They make France look like an impenetrable fortress.
Then there's the fact that Hindi is a language based on Sanskrit which is a European language. Mind blown once you figure out that the Arab numerals, were really Sanskrit numerals, were phonetically similar to Old Norse. I guess, this is the same as speaking spanish in Latin America, except the Indians were colonized by Europeans already 3500 years ago. Then were colonized by a slew of who's who in the ancient world.
Ok, so you have these Hindi nationalists, who for years tried to argue that Sanskrit spread westwards, but no one believes this anymore, DNA disproves it.
You have these proud, newly independent Indians, who then as their first move as independent people... flee their nation, to their former colonizers.
You can see how that does a number on your mind. You did everything you could to become independent of your colonizers and now you flee to the exact people you kicked out.
At least black South Africans and other independent nations, don't clamor to migrate to the UK, they are proud of their new independence, townships and violence and all.
Quote:Quote:
(1526) Mughal invasion led by Babur - a Timurid prince, against the Delhi Sultanate under Ibrahim Lodi. The Mughals too adopted Indian culture and added their own contribution to it, taking Indo-Islamic culture to its climax. Babur may have been from Central Asia, but his descendants were born and bred in India. In fact, the Later Mughals undisputedly considered themselves as Indian. So, the use of the term ‘foreign’ with Mughals other than Babur or maybe Humayun, is factually wrong.
Quote: (10-07-2018 11:20 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:
That guy has a good take on it. He is a Westerner about to marry an Indian girl and he knows Hindi very well - also he lives in India because he likes the culture despite the many shortcomings.
I also like the video cuts of the local Indian guys saying: "They have a great culture in India. Women have no place in the culture" - heh.
Seriously - despite all the shortcomings I expect India to become the world's most powerful nation in a few centuries, because they are the beginnings of massive k-selection. AT the current level however the average IQ is in the low 80s while most immigrants to the West are above 100.
Now in the country like Poland they got 8000 Indians - many low-class ones coming in and one Uber bike driver tried to rape a girl on one of his bike trips. After that event I think that I noticed a decrease of Indian Uber drivers. Low intelligence coupled with bad attitude towards women and backwardness - that does not make you fit for the Western world. They would not even have fit the West 300 years ago let alone now.
They will get there one day, but first world systems for example require an avg. IQ of 97 to work - which explains why despite the constant government campaigns of creating at least latrines, the field shitting continues. Every European settler created an outhouse as one of the first things - and that was centuries ago. This kind of awareness is not difficult for some, but obviously currently are beneath them.
India will remain a diverse country of big gaps of ethnicities who are closer to European in terms of look and behavior and those who are closer other tribes. It will likely remain like that for quite some time. But as I mentioned - India will become the world's superpower - just not in the next 100 years - closer to 300+.
Meanwhile you get funny memes - take it with a grain of salt and humor.
The WRT as some call it are mainly concerned with the preservation of Western civilization which is about to be exterminated. It's an utterly alien concept - India's best days are yet to come and the culture is under no threat of extinction for now.
Partly because as the guy above said - women have no say in the culture - hehe - and I approve that message at least.
Quote: (10-07-2018 02:37 PM)DarkTriad Wrote:
Quote:Quote:
(1526) Mughal invasion led by Babur - a Timurid prince, against the Delhi Sultanate under Ibrahim Lodi. The Mughals too adopted Indian culture and added their own contribution to it, taking Indo-Islamic culture to its climax. Babur may have been from Central Asia, but his descendants were born and bred in India. In fact, the Later Mughals undisputedly considered themselves as Indian. So, the use of the term ‘foreign’ with Mughals other than Babur or maybe Humayun, is factually wrong.
So non white people can invade a country, and once they have generations born there it's "factually wrong" to call the foreigners, but white people in Africa will always be foreigners?
Quote: (10-07-2018 04:14 PM)UUU Wrote:
Quote: (10-07-2018 02:37 PM)DarkTriad Wrote:
Quote:Quote:
(1526) Mughal invasion led by Babur - a Timurid prince, against the Delhi Sultanate under Ibrahim Lodi. The Mughals too adopted Indian culture and added their own contribution to it, taking Indo-Islamic culture to its climax. Babur may have been from Central Asia, but his descendants were born and bred in India. In fact, the Later Mughals undisputedly considered themselves as Indian. So, the use of the term ‘foreign’ with Mughals other than Babur or maybe Humayun, is factually wrong.
So non white people can invade a country, and once they have generations born there it's "factually wrong" to call the foreigners, but white people in Africa will always be foreigners?
No, they aren't. White South Africans absolutely are Africans. They've lived there for hundreds of years.
By the same token, a white kid who was born in India and lived there his entire life would be dramatically more Indian than I am.
Quote: (10-05-2018 10:11 AM)Pride male Wrote:
^The Indian girl hunger for white dick is real.
Quote: (10-07-2018 05:45 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:
< Actually the women in the West are more brainwashed by leftist equality viewpoints - as Lenny put it in the beginning of the thread. They don't know until they are stuck in a 10$/night hotel room and are fighting to not get gang-raped.
Western Women in the past never had this illusion - now the devil according to feminism is White Hetero-men. The reality of course hits them like a ton of bricks very quickly, but then it's a bit late.
And no - it's not a hierarchy. I feel for every Indian girl that gets enslaved and raped by her Muslim master - who has usually taken away her passport and treats her like shit. But at least those women are semi-clueless and take the risk because it works for some and they are desperate/poor. Their excuses for going to the gulf states is more understandable to me and her ignorance excusable.
We don't just report on that too much, because this is a Western forum and deals with the people connected to it.
Quote: (10-07-2018 09:23 PM)Cobra Wrote:
Quote: (10-07-2018 09:07 PM)Sgt Donger Wrote:
Quote: (10-07-2018 08:22 PM)Cobra Wrote:
it's 100% a shithole.
your words
50 posts! Wow.
You learned how to cut n paste. Sadly I can't remove Sgt so we can just call you Donger for your sheer lameness.
Enjoy your stay.