rooshvforum.network is a fully functional forum: you can search, register, post new threads etc...
Old accounts are inaccessible: register a new one, or recover it when possible. x


The Star Wars thread
#51

The Star Wars thread

Accurate satire of the modern feminist SJW star wars with sexless, pussy pedestalizing, beta males (with no game) they have been trying to shove down our throats since the late 1990s.

Star Wars - Non Sexual Matters - courtesy of Robot Chicken




Reply
#52

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-02-2015 06:20 AM)Hannibal Wrote:  

...

It still beats the hell out of (LGBT)Z Nation.

Z Nation is hilarious, in a good way. And I don't really remember any gay characters - unless you count the two zombie strippers Murphy mind controlled into making out (which spun a little out of control when they started chewing on each other's faces).

Anyway, back on topic - new Star Wars trailer. Looks like any other moderately entertaining sci-fi movie.




Reply
#53

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 01:20 PM)MikeS Wrote:  

Z Nation is hilarious, in a good way. And I don't really remember any gay characters - unless you count the two zombie strippers Murphy mind controlled into making out (which spun a little out of control

Z Nation is my guilty pleasure: it's exactly the kind of good-natured B-Movie trash I enjoyed as a teenager. The action sequences are surprisingly well-designed and shaky-cam free. (Plus, it had an episode with a Feminist Utopian Commune, with exactly the result you'd expect).

Also:




Reply
#54

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 01:57 PM)AnonymousBosch Wrote:  

... (Plus, it had an episode with a Feminist Utopian Commune, with exactly the result you'd expect)...

Zombear!
Reply
#55

The Star Wars thread

I watched the trailer and went 'hmm...nice battles but, seems like a Battlefront game. Also, seems that someone is missing.' It took me four nanoseconds to realize it was Luke. He's nowhere to be found. Then I see the 'final poster' of the film, one in which said actor is also missing, replaced by some mysterious figure in a cloak and mask. Gee, wonder who it could be? /facepalm

The real downside though isn't that the film is directed by that liberal weenie J.J. or even that it frowns on whitey leading the charge against the Empire. It's that cock-starved female with the lightsaber and the manly attitude, any male Jedi of which could make mincemeat of in ten seconds flat. Shades of Mad Max: Fury Road?

Pass.
Reply
#56

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 03:01 PM)Soothesayer Wrote:  

I watched the trailer and went 'hmm...nice battles but, seems like a Battlefront game. Also, seems that someone is missing.' It took me four nanoseconds to realize it was Luke. He's nowhere to be found. Then I see the 'final poster' of the film, one in which said actor is also missing, replaced by some mysterious figure in a cloak and mask. Gee, wonder who it could be? /facepalm

The real downside though isn't that the film is directed by that liberal weenie J.J. or even that it frowns on whitey leading the charge against the Empire. It's that cock-starved female with the lightsaber and the manly attitude, any male Jedi of which could make mincemeat of in ten seconds flat. Shades of Mad Max: Fury Road?

Pass.

I'm with you, I was just on the phone with someone and I was saying that I expect the battle scenes to be good but the story to be very 'safe' and watered down. Like everyone is going to get a participation ribbon or something silly as to not offend.

Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
Reply
#57

The Star Wars thread

Given my experiences with the Hobbit movies, which performed the same massacre of beloved source material and hamfisted insertion of gay/grrrrrlpower propaganda, I don't think I'm going to bother even torrenting this, let alone going to the cinema to see it.

"Imagine" by HCE | Hitler reacts to Battle of Montreal | An alternative use for squid that has never crossed your mind before
Reply
#58

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 03:01 PM)Soothesayer Wrote:  

I watched the trailer and went 'hmm...nice battles but, seems like a Battlefront game. Also, seems that someone is missing.' It took me four nanoseconds to realize it was Luke. He's nowhere to be found. Then I see the 'final poster' of the film, one in which said actor is also missing, replaced by some mysterious figure in a cloak and mask. Gee, wonder who it could be? /facepalm

Isn't Luke the one reaching for R2 at 1:40?

It reminded me Harry Potter. When Han says that the old stories of the Dark Side and Jedi are real, it reminds me of Hagrid saying, "You're a wizzzzaaaard, Harry."

And, like Harry (and Luke and Anakin), these people are plucked out of obscurity to have superpowers.

A. The empire was defeated a mere 30 years ago and fighting has continued for this whole time. How could people not know about Jedi or the Force?

B. The lens flare is strong with this one.

Maybe it's impossible to capture the original magic and maybe the second 3 weren't all Lucas' fault. Will see in theater if only for Lucas to have some redemption.
Reply
#59

The Star Wars thread

The only reason I will even consider seeing this is for the character of Han Solo. A true role model for both being your own boss, becoming financially independent, and knowing how to make a "princess" submit to a "scoundrel". He just had a cocksure, don't give a fuck, pay me my money, mercenary attitude. Everytime he passed one of her shit tests, the princess just kept coming back for more abuse and gina tingles.

I just hope that Harrison Ford read the script very closely this time to make sure his character stayed the smartass alpha he was in the original trilogy. When I saw Indiana Jones 4 with the ending of him marrying that dried up old grandmother I felt a great disturbance in the force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

If I see a nice guy, oneitis plagued, pussy worshipping, beta Han Solo I'll know that even Harrison has been indoctrinated by the feminist narrative and all hope is lost.

This is the Han Solo we want:

Escalating and closing






Best answer to a girl saying I love you



Reply
#60

The Star Wars thread

The only thing I like about films of this scope is the CGI improvements. It pushes graphical hardware tech forward and gets the future geniuses interested.
Reply
#61

The Star Wars thread

Saw the trailer. This movie is probably going to suck:
-Black Jedi/Stormtrooper, just because we need diversity. (and i thought stormtroopers were clones of boba fett's father, jango fett)
-Female empowered character, just because grrrrl power. Which also appears to have the force.
Goodpoints:
-No Jar jar binks

Trailers nowadays suck so much. They all have this pseudo dramatic music. It's like they all bought the same format
Avengers, Bond, Star wars... wtf?

I will see the movie, surely will be entertaining, but I am "afraid".
Reply
#62

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 05:43 PM)Wreckingball Wrote:  

-No Jar jar binks

I thought that would be a good thing?
Reply
#63

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 05:43 PM)Wreckingball Wrote:  

Saw the trailer. This movie is probably going to suck:
-Black Jedi/Stormtrooper, just because we need diversity. (and i thought stormtroopers were clones of boba fett's father, jango fett)
-Female empowered character, just because grrrrl power. Which also appears to have the force.
Goodpoints:
-No Jar jar binks

Trailers nowadays suck so much. They all have this pseudo dramatic music. It's like they all bought the same format
Avengers, Bond, Star wars... wtf?

I will see the movie, surely will be entertaining, but I am "afraid".

Your right on the assessment this will suck. I refuse to give someone money for the hatchet job they will do.

First, the original Star Wars had a good character in Lando, not because he was black, but because the actor was right for that role.

I saw the first preview with the stormtrooper guy they have here, and could tell he was going to be a whiny bitch just from the heavy panting and sweating he was doing while on the desert planet.

Not saying that the actor himself is a pansy, but sure plays one from the previews and promotional material.
Reply
#64

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 06:05 PM)eljeffster Wrote:  

I saw the first preview with the stormtrooper guy they have here, and could tell he was going to be a whiny bitch just from the heavy panting and sweating he was doing while on the desert planet.

Not saying that the actor himself is a pansy, but sure plays one from the previews and promotional material

While I have no idea why they're making a stormtrooper the focus of anything (weren't stormtroopers clones?), they could have at least given it a little depth and comedy with Don Cheadle or the guy who played Omar from the Wire.

I know they're going with a young guy because they want a lot of mileage out of this actor. From what little I've seen he doesn't look like he has much on screen charisma.

It's kind of interesting that most of the time, black actors tend to be paired up with latinas - no doubt the black stormtrooper in this new star wars movie is going to have a lily-white love interest. I know that cuckservative has been making the rounds for a long time but I'm pretty convinced that a lot of people in hollywood (liberal or whatever) are cuckolds too.

They're trying to drum up controversy with this one but I really doubt that the "white genocide" tweets on twitter are genuine - it was just two guys who wrote two tweets - probably studio heads pretending that there's a big white power anti-StarWars "movement" going on to make their SWPL/SJW fanbase even more rabid about watching the (probably shitty) reboot of this franchise.

I'm not a huge fan of Star Wars by any measure but this one probably won't even be worth torrenting.
Reply
#65

The Star Wars thread

The stormtroopers in movies 4-6 were not clones, clones were phased out. This was part of the story before the newest movie was even made, so there is no reason to be upset with a black actor for a stormtrooper.
Reply
#66

The Star Wars thread

Just tweeted this:

[Image: attachment.jpg28524]   

Tuthmosis Twitter | IRT Twitter
Reply
#67

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 11:42 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

Just tweeted this:

attachment.php?aid=28524

[Image: potd.gif]

[Image: laugh4.gif]
Reply
#68

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 01:20 PM)MikeS Wrote:  

Anyway, back on topic - new Star Wars trailer. Looks like any other moderately entertaining sci-fi movie.




Actually that trailer looks like shit.

"...so I gave her an STD, and she STILL wanted to bang me."

TEAM NO APPS

TEAM PINK
Reply
#69

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 06:05 PM)eljeffster Wrote:  

First, the original Star Wars had a good character in Lando, not because he was black, but because the actor was right for that role.

As someone who was there at the time, 'Star Wars' was heavily-criticised for lacking any visible actors of colour. Given that Lucas was a boomer, and the voice casting of James Earl Jones, I suspect it wasn't a racist choice, but the fact the film was shot in England).

Lando was designed to be exactly what he is: a shield against criticism. PC was beginning in Hollywood in the early 80's as the Boomers took power, and even at 9, I knew what tokenism was - mainly because I read Mad Magazine religiously.

That being said, when I was a kid, I could only afford three Star Wars figures in the couple of years between when I was into it and then felt too old for it: Han in his Hoth Snow Gear, Chewbacca and Lando. They were the three coolest characters.

As for complaining about the 'strong female character': it's on the Star Wars box. Leia is pure second-wave feminism, as is Marion in Spielberg and Lucas's 'Raiders of the Lost Ark'.
Reply
#70

The Star Wars thread

I don't mind the 'strong female character' so long as it's noted (by us, the media, whoever) that these women have nothing in common with modern feminists.

The 'strong female character', i.e. Charlize Theron in Mad Max, is extremely fit, resourceful and loyal. Remember the scene where she invites Max to come with them? Her delivery, to me at least, clearly indicated that she knew she needed a man around. Likewise, the girl in this Star Wars trailer seems to be a resourceful, fit young woman who was born with nothing and provides a counterbalance to the male characters.

Modern feminists are fat, lazy, entitled and selfish. Most were products of upper-middle class comfort and know nothing of true adversity. Whereas women in these films are in peak condition, the modern feminist couldn't walk a block without running out of breath and blaming it on the patriarchy.

So if the feminists want to try to associate themselves with these characters, I say they should go for it. It would be truly hilarious.
Reply
#71

The Star Wars thread

There is another Star Wars 7 thread - maybe we can merge it into ONE (pun intended):

thread-42812...pid1134077


It will probably be a total Social Justice Crap Fest - now that Disney leads.

What we know:

+ racism will enter the Star Wars world (no one acknowledged even race in the franchise with millions of species)
+ women will be able to tinker with tech, be infatuated with science
+ female storm troopers, pilots will enter the action - of course besting all men in the process
+ bad guys will be all white males as usual
+ Empire looks like Nazi SS
+ green propaganda and climate change shit-fest will make it's appearance in the Star Wars universe
+ when female lead gets reunited with parents Han Solo and Leia, at least one of their parents has to die - that's a Disney staple - kill the parents is standard Disney propaganda

More to come .....
Reply
#72

The Star Wars thread

Quote: (10-20-2015 05:51 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

Quote: (10-20-2015 05:43 PM)Wreckingball Wrote:  

-No Jar jar binks

I thought that would be a good thing?

Read the line above [Image: wink.gif] it says "Goodpoints:"
Reply
#73

The Star Wars thread

Why is Han Solo wearing the same clothes he wore 35 years ago?
Reply
#74

The Star Wars thread

The movie's kind of funny in that it unintentionally promotes the view that white cat ladies are the top of the diversity hierarchy and will be the savior of all the minorities. It's something a lot of minority leftist activists hate but grudgingly accept.

I won't be seeing this movie in theaters. In addition to all the PC shit it just looks uninteresting. Plus they already leaked everything that happens in it and yes, it's really bad. I think people are going to be mad they wasted their money on this.

It's not Mad Max in that it's "feminist" but features a white guy who has to do everything and keep them from unintentionally killing themselves because they're incompetent weak women.

This movie totally buys its own bullshit hook, line and sinker. Story sucks, characters suck, stupid shit happens and sacred cows that shouldn't be fucked with are slaughtered.

Need I remind you all that this is made by Disney, which is basically just a propaganda arm of the SJW movement at this point? It's pretty much what you'd expect.

"Men willingly believe what they wish." - Julius Caesar, De Bello Gallico, Book III, Ch. 18
Reply
#75

The Star Wars thread

You shouldn't be surprised. Hollywood is in the business of making money. Strong female leads appeals to current society HENCE it makes money.

I've studied and been involved in film for a while. If you can be subversive with it - A solid red pill film would annihilate the box office.

Put it this way:

If you try to game a girl and be blatant about what you're doing - She will shut you down faster than Usain Bolt.

If you game a girl correctly she will tell her friends about this guy she met. She'll use the words 'spark' 'connection' 'chemistry'.

IMO film is the same. If you can pull it off the audience will be clueless. It will appeal to their biology. They won't know why. They'll just like it.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)